International Law in the Supreme Court to 1860

David L. Sloss; Michael D. Ramsey; William S. Dodge

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511977121.002

1 - International Law in the Supreme Court to 1860

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2011

David L. Sloss ,

Michael D. Ramsey and

William S. Dodge

Edited by

David L. Sloss ,

Michael D. Ramsey and

William S. Dodge

Show author details

David L. Sloss: Affiliation:
Santa Clara University School of Law
Michael D. Ramsey: Affiliation:
University of San Diego School of Law
William S. Dodge: Affiliation:
University of California
David L. Sloss: Affiliation:
Santa Clara University, California
Michael D. Ramsey: Affiliation:
University of San Diego School of Law
William S. Dodge: Affiliation:
University of California, Hastings College of Law

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The United States and the Law of Nations, 1776–1789

The Declaration of Independence in 1776 marked the birth of the United States as a nation and as a subject of the law of nations. As Chief Justice John Jay later wrote, “[T]he United States had, by taking a place among the nations of the earth, become amenable to the laws of nations; and it was their interest as well as their duty to provide, that those laws should be respected and obeyed.” Complying with the law of nations was important for a small, weak country trying to avoid trouble, but the law of nations was also a tool that the United States would use to protect its trade and commercial interests. National honor was at stake as well, an idea the Revolutionary generation took quite seriously. Interest and duty – as Jay put it – compelled the Founders to pay close attention to the law of nations.

Eighteenth-Century Sources of International Obligations

For eighteenth-century Americans, international legal obligations fell broadly into two categories: treaties and the unwritten law of nations. Formal written treaties formed an important part of European international relations at the time, as a way European nations arranged alliances, settled disputes, and established economic relations. American independence itself rested heavily on treaties. Two 1778 treaties with France cemented an alliance that led to French assistance against Britain.

Type: Chapter
Information: International Law in the U.S. Supreme Court , pp. 7 - 52

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977121.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dickinson, Edwin D., Changing Concepts and the Doctrine of Incorporation, 26 Am. J. Int'l L. 239, 259 n.132 (1932)

Gulati, Mitu, Withdrawing from International Custom, 120 Yale L.J. 202, 216-18 (2010)

Dodge, William S., Withdrawing from Customary International Law: Some Lessons from History, 120 Yale L.J. Online 169, 171–75 (2010).

Frederick Marks, Independence on Trial 3–95 (1973)

Journals of the Continental Congress 1774–1789, at 781–874 (Fitzpatrick, John C. ed., 1934) (Foreign Secretary John Jay's report on state treaty violations)

Rowe, G.S. & Knott, Alexander, Power, Justice and Foreign Relations in the Confederation Period: The Marbois-Longchamps Affairs, 1784–1786, 104 Pa. Mag. Hist. & Biog. 275 (1980)

Casto, William, The Federal Courts' Protective Jurisdiction over Torts Committed in Violation of the Law of Nations, 18 Conn. L. Rev. 467, 491–94 (1986).

Journals of the Continental Congress 1774–1789, at 478–79 (Hunt, Gaillard ed., 1928).

Sloss, David, Judicial Foreign Policy: Lessons from the 1790s, 53 St. Louis Univ. L.J. 145, 176–83 (2008)

Sandrock, Otto, Handcuffs Clauses in International Commercial Contracts: Basic Reflections on the Autonomy of the Parties to Choose the Proper Law for Their Contracts, 31 Int'l Law. 1105, 1109 (1997).

Ku, Julian, Treaties as Laws: A Defense of the Last-in-Time Rule for Federal Statutes, 80 Ind. L.J. 319 (2005)

Parry, John T., Congress, the Supremacy Clause, and the Implementation of Treaties, 32 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1209, 1304–16 (2009).

Sloss, David, Non-Self-Executing Treaties: Exposing a Constitutional Fallacy, 36 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1, 19–23 (2002).

Fletcher, William A., The General Common Law and Section 34 of the Judiciary Act of 1789: The Example of Marine Insurance, 97 Harv. L. Rev. 1513, 1517 (1984)

Clark, Bradford, Federal Common Law: A Structural Reinterpretation, 144 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1245 (1996).

Dodge, William S., The Historical Origins of the Alien Tort Statute: A Response to the “Originalists,” 19 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 221, 243–56 (1996).

Huber, Ulrich, De Conflictu Legum Diversarum in Diversis Imperiis, translated in Ernest G. Lorenzen, Selected Articles on the Conflict of Laws 162 (1947).

Bradley, Curtis A., The Alien Tort Statute and Article III, 42 Va. J. Int'l L. 587 (2002)

Dodge, William S., The Constitutionality of the Alien Tort Statute: Some Observations on Text and Context, 42 Va. J. Int'l L. 687 (2002)

Helvidius No. 2 (Aug.–Sept. 1793), 6 The Writings of James Madison 159 (Hunt, Gaillard ed., 1906).

Mark Weston Janis, The American Tradition of International Law: Great Expectations, 1798–1914 (2004)

David J. Bederman, The Spirit of International Law 5–9 (2002)

Dodge, , supra note 220, at 546–49.

Lee, Thomas H., Making Sense of the Eleventh Amendment: International Law and State Sovereignty, 96 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1027 (2002)

Cleveland, Sarah H., Foreign Authority, American Exceptionalism, and the Dred Scott Case, 82 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 393 (2007)

Janis, Mark, Scott, Dredand International Law, 43 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 763 (2005).

Newmyer, Kent, History over Law: The Taney Court, 27 Stan. L. Rev. 1373, 1375 n.28 (1975)

Book contents

1 - International Law in the Supreme Court to 1860

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive