Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:37:04.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Multiple Embeddedness and Socialization in Europe: The Case of Council Officials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2009

Jan Beyers
Affiliation:
Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science, Leiden University
Jeffrey T. Checkel
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Get access

Summary

Socialization is an important theme in much research about European integration. Since Haas' seminal study, crucial questions have been to what extent, under which conditions, and through which processes political elites and the broader public within the member states shift their allegiance toward the European Union (EU). This connection between European integration and change among domestic actors and institutions is also characteristic of contemporary “Europeanization” studies, and the socialization theme has recently regained attention within the ranks of empirically oriented constructivists. The basic idea behind socialization is as follows: the organization of social interactions (that is, institutional conditions and informal/formal rules that structure social life) and/or the logic of these interactions (that is, instrumental bargaining, role playing, or suasion) affect which behavioral practices, norms about appropriateness, and preferences about outcomes are internalized by individual actors. More importantly, these practices, norms, and preferences are not only internalized by individual actors, but, because they are shared by many, also characterize and shape the identity of larger social aggregates (that is, a bureaucratic agency, a political party, a country, and so on). Socialization thus refers to both individuals (that is, when and how they socialize) and groups (that is, the social aggregate's features and how interactions among individuals shape these aggregates).

Because regional integration in Europe can be considered as a process that transforms the organization of the European political space, it is no surprise that early and contemporary scholars consider “socialization” a key feature of regional integration.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beyers, Jan, and Dierickx, Guido. 1998. The Working Groups of the Council of the European Union: Supranational or Intergovernmental Negotiations?Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (3):289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, Jan, and Trondal, Jarle. 2004. How Nation-States ‘Hit’ Europe. Ambiguity and Representation in the European Union. West European Politics 27 (5):919–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, Simon J. 1994. The Governance of the European Union: A New Institutionalist Approach. Journal of Public Policy 13 (4):351–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursens, Peter. 2002. Why Denmark and Belgium Have Different Implementation Records: On Transposition Laggards and Leaders in the EU. Scandinavian Political Studies 25 (2):173–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David R. 1995. Transnational Relations and the Development of European and Monetary Union. In Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions, edited by Thomas Risse-Kappen, 37–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey. 1999. Social Construction and Integration. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4):545–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey. 2004. Social Constructivism in Global and European Politics: A Review Essay. Review of International Studies 30 (2):229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, Thomas. 2002. The Role of Supranational Actors in EU Treaty Reform. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (l):33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, Maria Green, , James Caporaso and Risse, Thomas. 2001. Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Crombez, Christophe. 1996. Legislative Procedures in the European Community. British Journal of Political Science 26 (2):199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dierickx, Guido, and Beyers, Jan. 1999. Belgian Civil Servants in the European Union. A Tale of Two Cultures?West European Politics 22 (3):198–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egeberg, Morten. 1999. Transcending Intergovemmentalism? Identity and Role Perceptions of National Officials in EU Decision-Making. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (3):456–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egeberg, Morten. 2004. An Organizational Approach to European Integration: Outline of a Complementary Perspective. European Journal of Political Research 43 (2):199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgstrom, Ole, Bjurulf, Bo, Johansson, Jonas, and Sannerstedt, Anders. 2001. Coalitions in European Union Negotiations. Scandinavian Political Studies 24 (2):111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Tsebelis, George. 1996. An Institutional Critique of Intergovemmentalism. International Organization 50 (2):269–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, Klaus. 2000. European Integration and National Executives: A Cause in Search of an Effect?West European Politics 23 (4):210–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economical Forces 1950–1957. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (l): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmsen, Robert. 1999. The Europeanization of National Administrations: A Comparative Study of France and the Netherlands. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 12 (1): 81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona, and Wallace, Helen. 1997. The Council of Ministers. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1966. Ostinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe. Daedalus 95: 862–915.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1982. Reflections on the Nation-State in Western Europe Today. Journal of Common Market Studies 21 (l-2): 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, G. C. 1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet. 1999. Supranational Activists or Intergovernmental Agents?: Explaining the Orientations of Senior Commission Officials Toward European Integration. Comparative Political Studies 32 (4): 435–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2001. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2001. Treating International Institutions as Social Environments. International Studies Quarterly 45 (4):487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1969. Institutionalization in the United Nations General Assembly. International Organization 23 (4):859–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Henry H. 1973. Changing Attitudes Through International Participation: European Parliamentarians and Integration. International Organization 27 (l):45–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerremans, Bart. 1996. Do Institutions Make a Difference? Non-Institutionalism, Neo-Institutionalism, and the Logic of Common Decision-Making in the European Union. Governance 9 (2):217–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerremans, Bart, and Beyers, Jan. 2001. The Belgian Permanent Representation to the European Union: Mail Box, Messenger, or Representative? In The National Co-ordination of EU Policy, edited by Hussein Kassim, Anand Menond, B. Guy Peters, and Vincent Wright, 1991–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Jae-On and Charles, W Mueller. 1978. Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 1998. Is the ‘Hard Bargaining’ Image of the Council Misleading? The Committee of Permanent Representatives and the Local Elections Directive. Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (4):479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 2003. Institutional Environments and Everyday EU Decision Making: Rationalist or Constructivist?Comparative Political Studies 36 (l/2):97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Leon N. 1963. The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Leon N. 1998 [1963]. Political Integration: Definitions and Hypotheses. In The European Union: Readings on the Theory and Practice of European Integration, edited by Brent Nelsen and Alexander Stubb, 145–56. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2004. The Europeanization Dimension. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (2):337–48.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. Forthcoming. The Logic of Appropriateness. In Handbook of Public Policy, edited by Goodin, Robert, Moran, Michael, and Rein, Martin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa, and Simmons, Beth A.. 1998. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52 (4):729–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, Mikko, and Lane, Jan-Erik. 2001. Why Unanimity in the Council? A Roll Call Analysis of Council Voting. European Union Politics 2 (l):31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayntz, Renate 1999. Organizations, Agents and Representatives. In Organizing Political Institutions: Essays for Johan P. Olsen, edited by Egeberg, Morten and Laegreid, Per, 81–91. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovern-mentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (4):473–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1999. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power From Messina to Maastricht. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Peck, Richard. 1979. Socialization of Permanent Representatives in the United Nations: Some Evidence. International Organization 33 (3):365–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. 1998. Constructivism, Social Psychology and Elite Attitude Change: Lessons from an Exhausted Research Program. Paper Presented at the 11th International Conference of Europeanists, February, Baltimore.
Pollack, Mark A. 2003. The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheinman, Lawrence, and Feld, Werner. 1972. The European Economic Community and National Civil Servants of the Member States. International Organization 26 (l):121–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, Donald D. 1969. The Comparative Study of Elite Socialization. Comparative Political Studies 1 (4):471–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, Donald D. 1986. A Theory of Political Socialization: Institutional Support and Deradicalization in Britain. British Journal of Political Science 16 (3):341–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, Donald D. 1991. Roles, Rules, and Rationality in the New Institutionalism. American Political Science Review 85 (4):1239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Keith A. 1973. The European Economic Community and National Civil Servants of the Member States—A Comment. International Organization 27 (4):563–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, Jacqueline M. 1997. The European Union ‘A View from the Top’: Top Decision Makers and the European Union. Prepared for EOS Gallup Europe's European Omnibus Survey. Brussels: EOS Gallup Europe. Available at (http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/top/top_en.htm). Accessed 21 June 2005.
Steunenberg, Bernard. 2000. Seeing What You Want to See: the Limits of Current Modelling on the European Union. European Union Politics 1 (3):368–73.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Sandholtz, Wayne. 1997. European Integration and Supranational Governance. Journal of European Public Policy 4 (3):297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Perspective. Reading, Mass.: Benjamin-Cummings.Google Scholar
Tacq, Jacques. 1997. Multivariate Analysis Techniques in Social Science Research: From Problem to Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Trondal, Jarle. 2001. Is There Any Social Constructivist-Institutionalist Divide? Unpacking Social Mechanisms Affecting Representational Roles among EU Decision-Makers. Journal of European Public Policy 8 (l):l–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vink, Maarten. 2003. What Is Europeanisation? And Other Questions on a New Research Agenda. European Political Science 3 (l):63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessels, Wolfgang. 1991. The EC Council: The Community's Decisionmaking Center. In The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change, edited by Hoffmann, Stanley and Keohane, Robert O., 133–54. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
Westlake, Martin. 1995. The Council of the European Union. London: Catermill.Google Scholar
Wolf, Peter. 1973. International Organization and Attitude Change: A Re-Examination of the Functionalist Approach. International Organization 27 (3): 347–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×