Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T00:48:03.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 4 - Determinants and implications of new liberal health policies: the case of India, China and Lebanon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Jean-Pierre Unger
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Pierre De Paepe
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Kasturi Sen
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Werner Soors
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Get access

Summary

Introduction to Section 4

The three chapters in this section examine factors behind reforms of the health sector, most notably the financing of health services which, despite being undertaken over varying periods of time and in varied forms, retained the underlying common thread of rapid privatization and commercialization of health services. The approach to this section is an interdisciplinary one with historical, social, cultural and economic determinants of health reforms featuring in one or more of the chapters. In all three case studies the introduction of privatization whether of primary, secondary or tertiary care, has excluded large elements of the population from access to health care. In addition associated with this is a high risk of indebtedness and health related poverty, a phenomenon that is becoming increasingly widespread. All three countries also share regional variations in the experience of inequities with the urban employed having better access than the majority of the rural poor. Lebanon has the added burden of several decades of chronic conflict that has repeatedly affected its health infrastructure, in contrast to the rest of the Mashreq countries (generally speaking, the region of Arabic-speaking countries to the east of Egypt and north of the Arabian Peninsula) referred to in the chapter. In India the experience of financing will be varied by state, but the key-unifying factor is an almost complete absence of an evidence-base for donors and governments, from which policy decisions were made over the past two decades.

Type
Chapter
Information
International Health and Aid Policies
The Need for Alternatives
, pp. 107 - 108
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×