Book contents
- International Courts and Domestic Politics
- Studies on International Courts and Tribunals
- International Courts and Domestic Politics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 ‘Missing in Action? The Rare Voice of International Courts in Domestic Politics’
- Part I
- Part II
- 8 Ideology and International Human Rights Commitments in Post-Communist Regimes: The Cases of the Czech Republic and Slovakia
- 9 Escalation and Interaction: International Courts and Domestic Politics in the Law of State Immunity
- 10 National Parliaments: Obstacles or Aid to the Impact of International Human Rights Bodies?
- 11 The European Court of Human Rights and Swiss Politics: How Does the Swiss Judge Fit In?
- 12 The Use of International Jurisprudence by Israel’s Supreme Court
- 13 Laggards or Pioneers? When Scandinavian Avant-garde Judges Do Not Cite International Case Law: A Methodological Framework
- Index
- References
8 - Ideology and International Human Rights Commitments in Post-Communist Regimes: The Cases of the Czech Republic and Slovakia
from Part II
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 June 2018
Edited by
Book contents
- International Courts and Domestic Politics
- Studies on International Courts and Tribunals
- International Courts and Domestic Politics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 ‘Missing in Action? The Rare Voice of International Courts in Domestic Politics’
- Part I
- Part II
- 8 Ideology and International Human Rights Commitments in Post-Communist Regimes: The Cases of the Czech Republic and Slovakia
- 9 Escalation and Interaction: International Courts and Domestic Politics in the Law of State Immunity
- 10 National Parliaments: Obstacles or Aid to the Impact of International Human Rights Bodies?
- 11 The European Court of Human Rights and Swiss Politics: How Does the Swiss Judge Fit In?
- 12 The Use of International Jurisprudence by Israel’s Supreme Court
- 13 Laggards or Pioneers? When Scandinavian Avant-garde Judges Do Not Cite International Case Law: A Methodological Framework
- Index
- References
Summary
What motivates States to commit to international human rights treaties remains an unanswered question in political science. Many tentative explanations for the observed variation in ratification patterns have been proposed; some are based on intrinsic characteristics of the treaties (the substance of the protected rights and the control mechanism); others are tied to external factors (having originated either from pressure of the international community or in the domestic political system). Yet the empirical evidence supporting the proposed hypotheses remains unsatisfactory. We aim to contribute to this discussion by providing a new systematic examination of the commitment practices in two post-communist countries: the Czech Republic and Slovakia. While both countries have experienced similar international development, propelled by the same international incentives and constraints, their internal political experience differs significantly. This case selection allows us to focus on how domestic political factors and treaty characteristics interact to determine commitment behaviour. Building upon an analysis of government’s manifestos and commitment processes in 192 treaties dealing with human rights, we examine whether Czech and Slovak governments claiming to protect certain human rights are more likely to act accordingly and aim to adopt related international human rights commitments.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- International Courts and Domestic Politics , pp. 181 - 205Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Aust, A. (2013). Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 3rd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, W. M. (2005). Sovereignty Relinquished? Explaining Commitment to the International Human Rights Covenants, 1966–1999. American Sociological Review, 70, 472–95.Google Scholar
Drzemczewski, A. (1983). European Human Rights Convention in Domestic Law. A Comparative Study, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Goodman, R. (2000). Human Rights Treaties, Invalid Reservations, and State Consent. American Journal of International Law, 96, 531–60.Google Scholar
Guzman, A. T. (2008). How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory, New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, E. M. & Tsutsui, K. (2005). Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1373–411.Google Scholar
Hathaway, O. (2007). Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, 588–621.Google Scholar
Hathaway, O. (2008). International Delegation and State Sovereignty. Law and Contemporary Problems, 71, 115–49.Google Scholar
Hawkins, D. (2004). Explaining Costly International Institutions. Persuasion and Enforceable Human Rights Norms. International Studies Quarterly, 48, 779–804.Google Scholar
Heyns, C. & Viljoen, F. (2001). The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level. Human Rights Quarterly, 23, 483–535.Google Scholar
Keller, H. & Stone Sweet, A. (2008). A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1999). Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landman, T. (2005). Protecting Human Rights: A Comparative Study, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, J. J. & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe, Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. et al. (1997). World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 144–81.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. (2000). The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization, 51, 228–9.Google Scholar
Powell, E. J. & Staton, J. K. (2009). Domestic Judicial Institutions and Human Rights Treaty Violation. International Studies Quarterly, 53, 150–1.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1992). The Games of Transition. In Mainwaring, S., O’Donnell, G. & Valenzuela, J. S., eds., Issues in Democratic Consolidation. The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 105–153.Google Scholar
Sadurski, W. (2009). Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments. Human Rights Law Review, 9, 397–453.Google Scholar
Simmons, B. A. (2000). International Law and State Behaviour: Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs. American Political Science Review, 9, 819–35.Google Scholar
Šipulová, K., Janovský, J. & Smekal, H. (2015). Veto players and human rights commitments, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Smekal, H. & Šipulová, K. (2014). DH v Czech Republic Six Years Later: On the Power of an International Human Rights Court to Push through Systemic Change. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 3, 288–322.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. (2009). On the Constitutionalisation of the Convention: The European Court of Human Rights as a Constitutional Court, digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/71.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C. (2008). Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Týč, V., Janků, L. & Šipulová, K. (2014). Reservations to Human Rights Treaties: A Case Study on the Practice of Czechoslovakia and Its Successor States. International Community Law Review, 3, 371–98.Google Scholar
Von Beyme, K. (1985). Political Parties in Western Democracies, New York: St. Martin’s Press..Google Scholar
Von Stein, J. (2005). Do Treaties Constrain or Screen? Selection Bias and Treaty Compliance. American Political Science Review, 99, 611–22.Google Scholar
Wotipka, C. M. & Tsutsui, K. (2008). Global Human Rights and State Sovereignty: State Ratification of International Human Rights Treaties, 1965–2001. Sociological Forum, 23, 724–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar