Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T13:45:56.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Penal comparisons: puzzling relations

from PART 2 - Comparative penal policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2011

Michael Cavadino
Affiliation:
Lancashire Law School
James Dignan
Affiliation:
None
Adam Crawford
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

In retrospect, it seems surprising that it had attracted so little attention before. It is hardly news – it was hardly news when Durkheim considered the matter at the end of the nineteenth century – that punishment and ideas about punishment vary between different societies, and that these variations can be related to larger social and political differences. Several theorists had postulated or investigated a possible connection (some kind of inverse relationship) between a society's welfare provision and the severity of its punishments (see for example Greenberg1999; Downes and Hansen 2006; Beckett and Western 2001). Certainly, some had spotted a link between the advance of neoliberalism in the United States and the spectacular rise in US punishment levels from the early 1970s onwards (e.g. Downes 2001). And some had made use or mention of Esping-Andersen's (1990) typology of modern capitalist welfare states in the penal context (Kilcommins et al. 2004: Chapter 7; Beckett and Western 2001). But we flatter ourselves that our 2006 work Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach (Cavadino and Dignan 2006) demonstrated just how illuminating was the Esping-Andersen schema when applied to comparative penology.

To recapitulate briefly: Esping-Andersen delineated three types of contemporary capitalist political economy: the free-market neoliberal polity (exemplified archetypally by the United States of America); the more communitarian conservative corporatism (exemplified by Germany) and the social democratic corporatism found in the Nordic countries (the prime example being Sweden). To these we added what we call the oriental corporatism of Japan.

Type
Chapter
Information
International and Comparative Criminal Justice and Urban Governance
Convergence and Divergence in Global, National and Local Settings
, pp. 193 - 213
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beckett, K. (1997) Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, K. and Western, B. (2001) ‘Governing social marginality: welfare, incarceration, and the transformation of state policy’, Punishment and Society, 3, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, P. (2007) Securing the Future: Proposals for the Efficient and Sustainable Use of Custody in England and Wales, London: Ministry of Justice, www.justice.gov.uk/publications/securing-the-future.htm.Google Scholar
Cavadino, M. (2005) ‘Review of Tonry, “Thinking about crime”’, Crime, Media, Culture, 1, 124–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavadino, M. and Dignan, J. (2006) Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cavadino, M. and Dignan, J. (2007) The Penal System: An Introduction, 4th edn, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cavadino, M., Crow, I. and Dignan, J. (1999) Criminal Justice 2000, Winchester: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
Dijk, J., Kesteren, J. and Smit, P. (2007) Criminal Victimisation in International Perspective: Key Findings from the 2004–2005 ICVS and EU ICS, Den Haag: WODC.Google Scholar
Downes, D. (2001) ‘The Macho penal economy: mass incarceration in the United States: a European perspective’, Punishment and Society, 3, 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, D. and Hansen, K. (2006) ‘Welfare and punishment in comparative context’ in Armstrong, S. and McAra, L. (eds.), Perspectives on Punishment: The Contours of Control, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–54.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, D. (1999) ‘Punishment, division of labor, and social solidarity’ in Laufer, W. S. and Adler, F. (eds.), The Criminology of Criminal Law, Advances in Criminological Theory, vol. 8, New Brunswick: Transaction Books, pp. 283–361.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (2003) ‘An introduction to the varieties of capitalism’ in Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–68.Google Scholar
Hirsch, A., Bottoms, A. E., Burney, E. and Wikström, P.-O. (1999) Criminal Deterrence and Sentence Severity: An Analysis of Recent Research, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Kilcommins, S., O'Donnell, I., O'Sullivan, E. and Vaughan, B. (2004) Crime, Punishment and the Search for Order in Ireland, Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
Lacey, N. (2008) The Prisoners' Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (1977) Selected Writings, ed. McLellan, D., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, S., Kershaw, C. and Walker, A. (2007) Crime in England and Wales 2006/07, 4th edn, Home Office Statistical Bulletin 11/07, London: Home Office, www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pubsstatistical.html.Google Scholar
Ormerod, P. (1997) ‘Stopping crime spreading’, New Economy, 4, 83–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, C., Windzio, M. and Kleimann, M. (2005) ‘Media use and its impacts on crime perception, sentencing attitudes and crime policy’, European Journal of Criminology, 2, 259–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiner, R. (2007) ‘Political economy, crime, and criminal justice’ in Maguire, M., Morgan, R. and Reiner, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 341–80.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, J. J. (1999) ‘Knowledge, domination and criminal punishment revisited: incorporating state socialism’, Punishment and Society, 1, 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, M. (2004) Thinking about Crime: Sense and Sensibility in American Penal Culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walmsley, R. (2008) World Prison Population List, 8th edn, London: International Centre for Prison Studies, King's College London, www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/law/research/icps/downloads/wppl-8th_41.pdf.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. (2005) The Impact of Inequality: How to Make Sick Societies Healthier, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. (1975) Thinking About Crime, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Young, J. (2003) ‘Winning the fight against crime? New Labour, populism and lost opportunities’ in Matthews, R. and Young, J. (eds.), The New Politics of Crime and PunishmentCullompton: Willan, pp. 33–47.Google Scholar
Young, W. and Brown, M. (1993) ‘Cross-national comparisons of imprisonment’ in Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 17, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×