Aboh, E. 2015. The Emergence of Hybrid Grammars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aboh, E. 2016. Creole distinctiveness: A dead end. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 31.2: 400–418.Google Scholar

Aboh, E., & DeGraff, M. 2016. A null theory of creole formation based on Universal Grammar. In Roberts, I. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar, 401–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Adger, D. 2006. Combinatorial variability. Journal of Linguistics, 42: 503–530.Google Scholar

Adger, D. 2007. Variability and modularity: A response to Hudson. Journal of Linguistics, 43, 695–700.Google Scholar

Adger, D. 2010. A minimalist theory of feature structure. In Kibort, A., & Corbett, G. (eds.), Features: Perspectives on a Key Notion in Linguistics, 185–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Adger, D., & Smith, J. 2005. Variation and the minimalist program. In Cornips, L., & Corrigan, K. P. (eds.), Syntax and Variation. Reconciling the Biological and the Social, 149–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Adger, D., & Smith, J. 2010. Variation in agreement: A lexical feature-based approach. Lingua, 120.5: 1109–1134.Google Scholar

Adger, D., & Svenonius, P. 2011. Features in minimalist syntax. In Boeckx, C. (ed.), Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, 27–51. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar

Adger, D., & Trousdale, G. 2007. Variation in English syntax: Theoretical implications. English Language and Linguistics, 11.2: 261–278.Google Scholar

Aguilar, L., De-la-Mota, C. & Prieto, P. 2009. Sp_ToBI training materials. http://prosodia.upf.edu/sp_tobi.Google Scholar

Aguirre Beltrán, G. 1946. La población negra en México: Estudio etnohistórico. Mexico City: Ediciones Fuente cultural.Google Scholar

Aguirre, C. 1997. Peru. In Rodríguez, J. (ed.), The Historical Encyclopedia of World Slavery, 501–502. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar

Alarcón, I. 2011. Spanish grammatical gender under complete and incomplete acquisition: Early and late bilinguals’ linguistic behavior within the noun phrase, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14.3: 332–350.Google Scholar

Alemán Bañón, J., & Rothman, J. 2016. The role of morphological markedness in the processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: An event-related potential investigation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31.10: 1273–1298.Google Scholar

Alexiadou, A. 2001. Adjective syntax and noun raising: Word order asymmetries in the DP as the result of adjective distribution. Studia Linguistica, 55.3: 217–248.Google Scholar

Alleyne, M. 1980. Comparative Afro-American: An Historical-Comparative Study of English-Based Afro-American Dialects of the New World. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar

Alvar, M. 1996. Manual de dialectología hispánica. Madrid: Grupo Planeta.Google Scholar

Álvarez, A., & Obediente, E.. 1998. El español caribeño: Antecedentes sociohistóricos y lingüísticos. In Pearl, M., & Schwegler, A. (eds.), América negra: Panorámica actual de los estudios lingüísticos sobre variedades hispanas, portuguesas y criollas, 40–61. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar

Álvarez Nazario, M. 1974. El elemento afronegroide en el español de Puerto Rico. San Juan: Instituto de Cultura Puertorriqueña.Google Scholar

Andersen, R. 1980. Creolization as the acquisition of a second language as a first language. In Valdmann, A., & Highfield, A. (eds.), Theoretical Orientations in Creole Studies, 273–295. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Andersen, R. (ed.) 1983. Pidginization and Creolization as Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Andrien, K. 1995. The Kingdom of Quito, 1690–1830: The State and Regional Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, M. 2008. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, P. 1990. Off target? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 5: 107–119.Google Scholar

Bakker, P., Levisen, C. & Sippola, E. (eds.) 2016. Phylogenetic Approaches to Creole Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bakker, P., Daval-Markussen, A., Parkvall, M. & Plag, I. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 26.1: 5–42.Google Scholar

Baptista, M. 2002. The Syntax of Cape Verdean Creole. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Barbiers, S. 2009. Locus and limits of syntactic microvariation. Lingua, 119.11: 1607–1623.Google Scholar

Barbiers, S., & Cornips, L. 2001. Introduction to syntactic microvariation. In Barbiers, S., Cornips, L. and van der Kleij, S. (eds.), Syntactic Microvariation, 1–11. Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics. www.meertens.knaw.nl/projecten/sand/synmic/.Google Scholar

Barbosa, P., Kato, M. A. & Duarte, M. E. 2005. Null subjects in European and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 4: 11–52.Google Scholar

Barnes, H., & Michnowicz, J. 2013. Peak alignment in semi-spontaneous bilingual Chilipo Spanish. In Carvalho, A., & Beaudrie, S. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, 109–122. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

Barrera-Tobón, C., & Raña-Risso, R. 2016. A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of contact-induced changes in subject placement in the Spanish of New York City bilinguals. In Sessarego, S., & Tejedo-Herrero, F. (eds.), Spanish Language and Sociolinguistic Analysis, 323–342. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Battistella, E. 1990. Markedness: The Evaluative Superstructure of Language. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Baxter, A., Lucchesi, D. & Guimarães, M. 1997. Gender agreement as a “decreolizing” feature of an Afro-Brazilian dialect. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 12:1: 1–57.Google Scholar

Beckman, M., Díaz-Campos, M., McGory, J. & Morgan, T. 2002. Intonation across Spanish, in the Tones and Break Indices framework. Probus 14: 9–36.Google Scholar

Béjar, S. 2008. Conditions on phi-agree. In Harbour, D., Adger, D. & Béjar, S. (eds.), Phi Theory, 130–154. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Belletti, A., Bennati, E. & Sorace, A. 2007. Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25: 657–689.Google Scholar

Bello, A. 1847[1988]. Gramática castellana destinada al uso de americanos. [edited by Trujillo, R.]. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar

Benincà, P. 1989. Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Benincà, P. 1994. La variazione sintattica: Studi di dialettologia romanza. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

Bentley, W. 1887. Dictionary and Grammar of the Kongo Language, as Spoken at San Salvador, the Ancient Capital of the Old Kongo Empire, West Africa. London: Baptist Missionary Society.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. 1993. The syntactic role of word markers in null nominal constructions. Probus, 5: 5–38.Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. 1981. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar

Birdsong, D. 1992. Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68: 706–755.Google Scholar

Black, J., & Motapanyane, V. (eds.) 1996. Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Blasi, D., Michaelis, S. & Haspelmath, M.. 2017. Grammars are robustly transmitted even during the emergence of creole languages. Nature Human Behaviour, 1: 723–729.Google Scholar

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. 2014. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. www.praat.org/.Google Scholar

Bonet, E. 1995. The feature structure of Romance clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 13: 607–617.Google Scholar

Borer, H. 1984. Parametric Syntax. Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Bouisson, E. 1997. Esclavos de la tierra: Los capesinos negros del Chota-Mira, siglos XVII–XX. Procesos, Revista Ecuatoriana de Historia, 11: 45–67.Google Scholar

Bowser, F. 1974. The African Slave in Colonial Peru, 1524–1650. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bridikhina, E. 1995. El tráfico de esclavos negros a La Paz a fines del siglo XVIII. Estudios Bolivianos, 1: 183–191.Google Scholar

Brockington, L. 2006. Blacks, Indians, and Spaniards in the Eastern Andes. Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Brody, M. 2003. Lexico-Logical Form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brown, E., & Rivas, J.. 2011. Subject–verb word-order in Spanish interrogatives: A quantitative analysis of Puerto Rican Spanish. Spanish in Context, 8.1: 23–49.Google Scholar

Browne, R. 2017. Surviving Slavery in the British Caribbean. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Bruhn de Garavito, J., & White, L. 2002. The second language acquisition of Spanish DPs: The status of grammatical features. In Pérez-Leroux, A. T., & Liceras, J. M. (eds.), The Acquisition of Spanish Morphosyntax: The L1/L2 Connection, 153–178. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Bryant, K. 2005. Slavery and the context of ethnogenesis: African, Afro-Creoles, and the realities of bondage in the kingdom of Quito, 1600–1800. PhD Dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Burnard, T., & Garrigus, J. 2018. The Plantation Machine Atlantic Capitalism in French Saint-Domingue and British Jamaica. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Busdiecker, S. 2006. We are Bolivians too: The experience and meaning of blackness in Bolivia. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Bustin, A., Fenton, E. & Muntendam, A. 2017. Controlled elicitation of Afro-Peruvian Spanish intonation of broad focus declaratives. Paper presented at the 11th International Symposium on Bilingualism, University of Limerick, Ireland (June 11–15).Google Scholar

Butera, B., Sessarego, S., Rao, S. & R.. 2019. Afro-Peruvian Spanish declarative intonation: Analysis and implications. In Campos, H., et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2016, 230–247. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Butera, B., Sessarego, S., 2020. Afro-Peruvian Spanish declarative intonation: Analysis and implications. In Morales-Font, A., Ferreira, M., Leow, R. & Sanz, C. (eds.), Hispanic Linguistics: Current Issues and New Directions, 229–248. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Camacho, J. 2008. Syntactic variation: The case of Spanish and Portuguese subjects. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 1.2: 415–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camacho, J. 2013. Null Subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, A. 1997. Subjects and clause structure. In Haegeman, L. (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax, 33–63. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M.. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In van Riemsdijk, H. (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Carstens, V. 2000. Concord in minimalist theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 31.2: 319–355.Google Scholar

Carstens, V. 2001. Multiple agreement and case-deletion: Against Φ-incompleteness. Syntax, 4: 147–163.Google Scholar

Centurión Vallejo, H. 1954. Esclavitud y manumisión de negros en Trujillo. Trujillo: Imprenta de la Universidad de Trujillo.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. 2001. Vernacular universals. In Fontana, J. M., McNally, L., Turell, T. M. & Vallduví, E. (eds.), Proceedings of ICLaVE, the First International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, 52–60. Barcelona: Universitate Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. 2003. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and Its Social Significance. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. 2004. Dynamic typology and vernacular universals. In Kortmann, B. (ed.), Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross Linguistic Perspective, 127–145. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1976. Reflections on Language. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, R, Michaels, D. & Uriagereka, J. (eds.), Step by Step, 89–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1–52, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2006. Language and Mind. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H.. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Joachim, J., von Stechow, A., Sternefeld, W. & Vennemann, T. (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, 506–569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

CHSJ 2012. Casa Hacienda San José. www.havciendasanjose.com.pe.Google Scholar

Cinque, G. 1990. Ergative adjectives and the lexicalist hypothesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8: 1–40.Google Scholar

Cinque, G. 1993. On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, 3.2: 21–40.Google Scholar

Cinque, G. 1994. On the evidence for partial N movement in the Romance DP. In Cinque, G., Koster, J., Pollock, J.-Y., Rizzi, L. & Zanuttini, R. (eds.), Paths towards Universal Grammar, 85–110. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Clementi, H. 1974. La abolición de la esclavitud en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Editorial La Pléyade.Google Scholar

Clements, C. 2009. The Linguistic Legacy of Spanish and Portuguese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Colantoni, L. 2011. Broad-focus declaratives in Argentine Spanish contact and non-contact varieties. In Gabriel, C., & Lleó, C. (eds.), Intonational Phrasing in Romance and Germanic: Cross-Linguistic and Bilingual Studies, 183–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Colantoni, L., & Gurlekian, J.. 2004. Convergence and intonation: Historical evidence from Buenos Aires Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2): 107–119.Google Scholar

Colmenares, G. 1997. Historia Económica y Social de Colombia – II Popayán una Sociedad Esclavista 1680–1800. Cali: TM editores, Universidad del Valle, Banco de la República, Colciencias.Google Scholar

Contreras, H. 1991. On the position of subjects. In Rothstein, S. (ed.), Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing, Syntax and Semantics 25, 63–80. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, G. (2000). Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, G. (2012). Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cornips, L., & Poletto, C. 2005. On standardising syntactic elicitation techniques (part 1). Lingua, 115: 939–957.Google Scholar

Coronel Feijóo, R. 1991. El valle sangriento de los indígenas de la coca y el algodón a la hacienda cañera jesuita, 1580–1700. Quito: ABYA-YALA.Google Scholar

Correa, J. A. 2012. La entonación del palenquero y del keteyano hablado en Palenque (Colombia). In Maglia, G., & Schwegler, A. (eds.), Palenque (Colombia): Oralidad, identidad y resistencia, 31–56. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana/Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar

Cowper, E. 2005. The geometry of interpretable features: Infl in English and Spanish. Language, 81: 10–46.Google Scholar

Crespo, A. 1995. Esclavos negros en Bolivia. La Paz, Bolivia: Librería Editorial Juventud.Google Scholar

Croft, W. 2003. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cuba, M. 2002. El castellano hablado en Chincha. Lima: Talleres Gráficos de Angélica Tapia.Google Scholar

Cushner, N. 1980. Lords of the Land: Sugar, Wine, and the Jesuit Estates of Coastal Peru. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Cushner, N. 1982. Farm and Factory: The Jesuit and the Development of Agrarian Capitalism in Colonial Quito, 1600–1767. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Cuza, A., 2013. Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax proper: Interrogative subject–verb inversion in heritage Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17: 71–96.Google Scholar

Cuza, A., & Pérez-Tattam, R. 2016. Grammatical gender selection and phrasal word order in child heritage Spanish: A feature re-assembly approach. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19.1: 50–68.Google Scholar

Cyrino, S., & Espinal, M. T.. 2019. The syntax of number in Romance. Studia Linguistica, 1–39.Google Scholar

D’Imperio, M., Elordieta, G., Frota, S., Prieto, P. & Vigário, M. 2005. Intonational phrasing in Romance: The role of syntactic and prosodic structure. In Frota, S., Vigário, M. & Freitas, M. J. (eds.), Prosodies, 59–98. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Davis, C. 1971. Tú, ¿qué tú tienes? Hispania, 54: 331–332.Google Scholar

De Janvry, A., Sadoulet, E. & Wolford, W. 1998. The changing role of the state in Latin American land reforms. CUDARE Working Paper No. 852. Berkeley, CA: Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics and Policy.Google Scholar

De Vogelaer, G. 2006. Actuation, diffusion, and universals: Change in the pronominal system of Dutch dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 3: 259–274.Google Scholar

DeCamp, D. 1971. Towards a generative analysis of a post-creole continuum. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and Creolization of Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

DeGraff, M. 2003. Against creole exceptionalism. Language, 79.2: 391–410.Google Scholar

DeGraff, M. 2005. Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of Creolist Exceptionalism. Language in Society, 34: 533–591.Google Scholar

Delicado-Cantero, M., & Sessarego, S. 2011. Variation and syntax in number expression in Afro-Bolivian Spanish. In Ortiz-López, L. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 42–53. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Demonte, V. 2008. Meaning–form correlations and adjective position in Spanish. In Kennedy, C., & McNally, L. (eds.), The Semantics of Adjectives and Adverbs, 71–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Díaz-Campos, M., & Clements, C. 2005. Mainland Spanish colonies and Creole genesis: The Afro-Venezuelan area revisited. In Lotfi, S., & Westmoreland, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, 41–53. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Díaz-Campos, M., & Clements, C. 2008. A Creole origin for Barlovento Spanish? A linguistic and sociohistorical inquiry. Language in Society, 37: 351–383.Google Scholar

Díaz Collazos, A. M., & Vásquez Hurtado, D. 2017. Gender agreement in online versus classroom students of first-semester Spanish. Open Linguistics, 3: 656–672.Google Scholar

Domínguez, L. 2013. Understanding Interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Donaldson, B. 2011. Nativelike right-dislocations in near-native French. Second Language Research, 27: 361–390.Google Scholar

Duarte, M. E. 1995. A perda do princípio “Evite pronome” no português brasileiro. PhD Dissertation, UNICAMP.Google Scholar

Duarte, M. E. 2000. The loss of the ‘Avoid Pronoun’ principle in Brazilian Portuguese. In Kato, M., & Negrão, E. (eds.), Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter, 17–36. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar

Duarte, M. E., & Kato, M. 2002. A diachronic analysis of Brazilian Portuguese WH-questions. Santa Barbara Portuguese Studies, 6: 326–340.Google Scholar

D’Alessandro, R., & van Oostendorp, M. 2017. On the diversity of linguistic data and the integration of the language sciences. Frontiers in Psychology, 8: 1–4.Google Scholar

Eguren, L., Fernández-Soriano, O. & Mendikoetxea, A. (eds.) 2016. Rethinking Parameters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Elordieta, G. 2003. The Spanish intonation of speakers of a Basque pitch-accent dialect. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2: 67–95.Google Scholar

Elordieta, G., Frota, S., Prieto, P. & Vigário, M. 2003. Effects of constituent length and syntactic branching on intonational phrasing in Ibero-Romance. In Solé, M.-J., Recasens, D. & Romero, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 487–490. Barcelona: Futurgraphic.Google Scholar

Epstein, S., Flynn, S. & Martohardjono, G. 1996. Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19: 677–714.Google Scholar

Estebas-Vilaplana, E., & Prieto, P.. 2008. La notación prosódica del español: una revisión del Sp_ToBI. Estudios de Fonética Experimental, 17: 263–283.Google Scholar

Face, T. 2001. Intonational marking of contrastive focus in Madrid Spanish. PhD Dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Face, T. 2003. Intonation in Spanish declaratives: Differences between lab speech and spontaneous speech. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2: 115–131.Google Scholar

Face, T., & Prieto, P. 2007. Rising accents in Castilian Spanish: A revision of Sp_ToBI. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 6.1: 117–146.Google Scholar

Fernández-García, M. 1999. Patterns in gender agreement in the speech of second language learners. In Gutiérrez-Rexach, J., & Martínez-Gill, F. (eds.), Advances in Hispanic Linguistics, 25–39. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar

Fernández Ramírez, S. 1986. Gramática Española. 4. El verbo y la oración. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar

Flores Galindo, A. 1984. Aristocracia y plebe: Lima 1760–1830 (Estructura de clases y sociedad colonial). Lima: Mosca Azul.Google Scholar

Frampton, J., & Gutmann, S. 2000. Agreement is feature sharing. www.math.neu.edu/ling /pdffiles/agrisfs.pdf.Google Scholar

Franceschina, F. 2002. Case and φ-feature agreement in advanced L2 Spanish grammars. In Foster-Cohen, S., Ruthenberg, T. & Poschen, M. (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook, 71–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Franceschina, F. 2005. Fossilized Second Language Grammars. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Z., Polinsky, M. & Scontras, G.. 2014. The differential representation of number and gender in Spanish. Linguistic Review, 32: 703–737.Google Scholar

Gadet, F., & Pagel, S.. 2019. On the notion of ‘natural’ in ecological linguistics. In Ludwig, R., Mühlhäusler, P. & Pagel, S. (eds.), Linguistic Ecology and Language Contact, 43–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Geeslin, K. 2013 (ed). The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

González-Rivera, M. 2018. Sobre el sujeto preverbal en oraciones exclamativas. Paper presented at Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (October).Google Scholar

González-Rivera, M., & Sessarego, S.. 2020. La inversión del sujeto en el español caribeño: el caso de las oraciones exclamativas. Paper presented at Congreso Retorno al Español del Caribe 2020, Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra, Santo Domingo (November 4–7).Google Scholar

Goodall, G. 2004. On the syntax and processing of Wh-questions in Spanish. In Schmeiser, B., Chand, V., Kelleher, A. & Rodriguez, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 237–250. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Granda, G. de. 1968. La tipología criolla de dos hablas del área lingüística hispánica. Thesaurus, 23: 193–205.Google Scholar

Granda, G. de. 1977. Estudios sobre un área dialectal hispanoamericana de población negra: las tierras bajas occidentales de Colombia. Bogotá: Publicaciones del Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar

Granda, G. de. 1978. Estudios lingüísticos afrohispánicos y criollos. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar

Granda, G. de. 1988a. Lingüística e historia: Temas afro-hispánicos. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar

Granda, G. de. 1988b. Sociedad, historia y lengua en el Paraguay. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J. (ed.), Universals of Grammar, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Grimshaw, J., & Samek-Lodovici, V. 1998. Optional subjects and subject universals. In Barbosa, P., Fox, D., Hagstom, P., McGinnis, M. & Pesetsky, D. (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, 192–219. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Guamán Poma de Ayala, F. 1615[2006]. El primer nueva coránica y buen gobierno. Buenos Aires: Siglo Ventiuno.Google Scholar

Guerra Rivera, A., Coopmans, P., & Baauw, S. 2015. On the L2 acquisition of Spanish subject–verb inversion. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173: 37–42.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-Bravo, R. 2005. Structural Markedness and Syntactic Structure. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-Bravo, R. 2007. Prominence scales and unmarked word order in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25: 235–271.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-Bravo, R. 2008. Topicalization and preverbal subjects in Spanish wh-interrogatives. In Bruhn de Garavito, J., & Valenzuela, E. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 225–236.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-Rexach, J., & Sessarego, S. 2014. Morphosyntactic variation in three Afro-Andean dialects: The evolution of gender agreement in DP. Lingua, 151.B: 142–161.Google Scholar

Guy, G. 1981. Linguistic variation in Brazilian Portuguese: Aspects of the phonology, syntax, and language history. PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Guy, G. 2004. Muitas linguas: The linguistic impact of Africans in colonial Brazil. In Curto, J., & Lovejoy, P. (eds.), Enslaving Connections: Changing Cultures of Africa and Brazil During the Era of Slavery, 125–137. New York, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar

Guy, G. 2005. Grammar and usage: A variationist response. Language, 81: 561–563.Google Scholar

Guy, G. 2017. The African diaspora in Latin America. In Cutler, C., Vrzić, Z. & Angermeyer, P. (eds.), Language Contact in Africa and the African Diaspora in the Americas, 49–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Harley, H. 1994. Hug a tree: Deriving the morphosyntactic feature hierarchy. In Carnie, A., & Harley, H. (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21, 289–320. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Harley, H., & Ritter, E. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language, 78: 482–526.Google Scholar

Harris, J. 1991. The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 22.1: 27–62.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics, 42.1: 25–70.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. 2008. Parametric versus functional explanations of syntactic universals. In Biberauer, T., & Holmberg, A. (eds.), The Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hassaurek, F. 1867. 1831–1885: Four Years among Spanish-Americans. New York, NY: Hurd and Houghton.Google Scholar

Hawkins, R. 1998. The inaccessibility of formal features of functional categories in second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Pacific Second Language Research Forum, Tokyo (March).Google Scholar

Helps, A. 1900. The Spanish Conquest in America and Its Relation to the History of Slavery and to the Government of Colonies, 1855–1861, 4 vols. London: John Lane.Google Scholar

Henry, A. 2005. Ideolectal variation and syntax theory. In Cornips, L., & Corrigan, K. (eds.), Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social, 109–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hernández, T. 2013. Racial Subordination in Latin America: The Role of the State, Customary Law, and the New Civil Rights Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Herschensohn, J. 2000. The Second Time Around: Minimalism and L2 Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Holm, J. 1992. Popular Brazilian Portuguese: A semi-creole. In D’Andrade, E., & Kihm, A. (eds.), Actas do colóquio sobre crioulos de base lexical portuguesa, 37–66. Lisbon: Colibri.Google Scholar

Holm, J. A., & Patrick, P. L. (eds.) 2007. Comparative Creole Syntax. Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar

Holmberg, A. 2005. Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry, 36: 533–564.Google Scholar

Hualde, J. I. 2002. Intonation in Spanish and the other Ibero-Romance languages. In Wiltshire, C., & Camps, J. (eds.), Romance Philology and Variation, 101–115. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hualde, J. I., & Schwegler, A. 2008. Intonation in Palenquero. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 23: 1–31.Google Scholar

Huang, Y. 1994. The Syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora: A Study with Special Reference to Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ivanov, I. 2009. Second language acquisition of Bulgarian object clitics: A test case for the interface hypothesis. PhD Dissertation, University of Iowa.Google Scholar

Ivanov, I. 2012. L2 acquisition of Bulgarian clitic-doubling: A test case for the Interface Hypothesis. Second Language Research, 28.3: 345–368.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jaeggli, O. 1986. Arbitrary plural pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 4: 43–76.Google Scholar

Jayaseelan, K. 1999. Empty pronoun in Dravidian. In Jayaseelan, K. (ed.), Parametric Studies in Malayalam Syntax, 14–25. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar

Johnson, J., & Newport, E. N.. 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21: 60–99.Google Scholar

Kany, C. 1945. American–Spanish Syntax. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kato, M., & Negrão, E. (eds.) 2000. Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter. Frankfurt/Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana.Google Scholar

Kato, M., & Ordóñez, F. (eds.) 2016. The Morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kayne, R. 1996. Microparametric syntax: Some introductory remarks. In Black, J., & Motapanyane, V. (eds.), Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation, ix–xxviii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kayne, R. 2000. Parameters and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kayne, R., & Pollock, J.-Y.. 2001. New thoughts on stylistic inversion. In Hulk, A. & Pollock, J.-Y. (eds.), Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, 107–162 Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E.. 1987. An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11: 201–258.Google Scholar

Kerstens, J. 1993. The Syntax of Number, Person and Gender. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

King, R. 2005. Morphosyntactic variation and theory: Subject–verb agreement in Acadian French. In Cornips, L., & Corrigan, K. (eds.), Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social, 199–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. 1973. “Elsewhere” in phonology. In Stephen, A., & Kiparsky, P. (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 93–106. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehait and Winston.Google Scholar

Klee, C. A., & Lynch, A. 2009. El español en contacto con otras lenguas. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Klein, H., & Vinson, B.. 2007. African Slavery in Latin America and the Caribbean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Knaff, C., Rao, R. & Sessarego, S. 2018. Future directions in the field: A look at Afro-Hispanic prosody. Lingua, 202: 76–86.Google Scholar

Kroch, A. 1978. Toward a theory of social dialect variation. Language in Society, 7.1: 17–36.Google Scholar

Kroch, A. 1989. Function and grammar in the history of English: Periphrastic “do.” In Fasold, R., & Schiffrin, D. (eds.), Language Change and Variation, 133–172. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kroch, A. 1994. Morphosyntactic variation. In Beals, K. (ed.), Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 2, 180–201. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Kroch, A. 2000. Syntactic change. In Baltin, M., & Collins, C. (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, 629–739. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Kouwenberg, S., & Patrick, P. (eds.) 2003. Reconsidering the Role of SLA in Pidginization and Creolization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Labov, W. 1969. Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45: 715–762.Google Scholar

Labov, W. 1972a. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W. 1972b. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W. 1974. Language change as a form of communication. In Silverstein, M. (ed.), Human Communication: Theoretical Explorations, 221–256. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar

Labov, W. 1984. Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Baugh, J., & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Language in Use, 84–112. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert 2008. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. 1980. Constraints on interrogative word order in Puerto Rican Spanish. Bilingual Review, 7–8: 113–122.Google Scholar

Lapesa, R. 1981. Historia de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar

Lardiere, D. 2005. On morphological competence. In Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A. & Liljestrand, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference, 178–192. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

Lardiere, D. 2007. Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lardiere, D. 2000. Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Archibald, J. (ed.), Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, 102–129. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Laurence, K. 1974. Is Caribbean Spanish a case of decreolization? Orbis, 23: 484–499.Google Scholar

Lavandera, B. 1988. The study of language in its socio-cultural context. In Newmeyer, F. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey IV. Language: The Socio-cultural Context, 1–13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leal, T., Rothman, J. & Slabakova, R.. 2014. A rare structure at the syntax–discourse interface: Heritage and Spanish-dominant native speakers weigh in. Language Acquisition, 21.4: 411–429.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, C. 1998. Creole Genesis and the Acquisition of Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, C., White, L. & Jourdan, C. (eds.) 2006. L2 Acquisition and Creole Genesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lipski, J. 1977. Preposed subjects in questions: Some considerations. Hispania, 60: 61–67.Google Scholar

Lipski, J. 1993. On the non-creole basis for Afro-Caribbean Spanish. www.personal.psu.edu/jml34/noncreol.pdf.Google Scholar

Lipski, J. 1994. Latin American Spanish. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar

Lipski, J. 2005. A History of Afro-Hispanic Language. Five Centuries, Five Continents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lipski, J. 2006a. Morphosyntactic implications in Afro-Hispanic language: New data on creole pathways. www.personal.psu.edu/jml34/afmorph.pdf.Google Scholar

Lipski, J. 2006b. Afro-Bolivian Spanish and Helvécia Portuguese: Semi-creole parallels. PAPIA: Revista Brasileira de Estudos Crioulos e Similares, 16: 96–116.Google Scholar

Lipski, J. 2007. Castile and the hydra: The diversification of Spanish in Latin America. www.personal.psu.edu/jml34/hydra.pdf.Google Scholar

Lipski, J. 2008. Afro-Bolivian Spanish. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar

Lipski, J. 2009. Afro-Choteño speech: Towards the (re)creation of “Black Spanish”. Negritud, 2: 99–120.Google Scholar

Lockhart, J. 1968. Spanish Peru, 1532–1560: A Social History. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Luna Desola, D. 1978. Algunos aspectos ideológicos de la independencia latinoamericana. Anuario de Estudios Centroamericanos, 4.1: 79–92.Google Scholar

Macera, Pablo. 1966. Instrucciones para el Manejo de las Haciendas Jesuitas del Perú, ss. XVIIXVIII. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.Google Scholar

MacLean y Estenós, R. 1947. Negros en el nuevo mundo. Lima: PTCM.Google Scholar

Martínez-Sanz, C. 2011. Null and overt subjects in a variable system: The case of Dominican Spanish. PhD Dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar

Martohardjono, G., & Gair, J. W.. 1993. Apparent UG inaccessibility in SLA: Misapplied principles or principled misapplications? In Eckman, F. R. (ed.), Conference: Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition and Speech Pathology, 79–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mayén, N. 2007. Afro-Hispanic linguistic remnants in Mexico: The case of the Costa Chica region of Oaxaca. PhD Dissertation, Purdue University.Google Scholar

McCarthy, C. 2008. Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation. Second Language Research, 24.4: 459–486.Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language, 74: 788–818.Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. 2000. The Missing Spanish Creoles. Recovering the Birth of Plantation Contact Languages. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. 2001. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Language Typology, 5: 125–166.Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. 2014. A response to Mufwene. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 29.1: 172–176Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. 2018a. The Creole Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. 2018b. Why neither demographics nor feature pools can explain the missing Spanish plantation creoles. Lingua, 201: 4–12.Google Scholar

Megenney, W. 1993. Elementos criollo-portugueses en el español dominicano. Montalbán, 15: 3–56.Google Scholar

Megenney, W. 1999. Aspectos del lenguaje afronegroide en Venezuela. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar

Mellafe, R. 1984. La introducción de la esclavitud negra en Chile: Tráfico y rutas. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar

Michnowicz, J., & Barnes, H.. 2013. A sociolinguistic analysis of pre-nuclear peak alignment in Yucatan Spanish. In Howe, C., Blackwell, S. & Lubbers Quesada, M. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 221–235. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

Migge, B. 2003. Creole Formation as Language Contact: The Case of the Suriname Creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mintz, S. 1971. The socio-historical background to pidginization and creolization. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, 481–498. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Modesto, M. 2000. Null subject without ‘rich’ agreement. In Kato, M., & Negrão, E. (eds.), Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter, 147–174. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar

Montalbetti, M. 1984. After binding: On the interpretation of pronouns. PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2004. The Acquisition of Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. 2011. Multiple interfaces and incomplete acquisition. In Rothman, J., & Roumyana, R. (eds.), Acquisition at the Linguistic Interfaces [Lingua Special Issue, 121.4], 567–688. New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Montrul, S., Prince, R. & Thomé-Williams, A. 2009. Subject expression in the non- native acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese. In Pires, A., & Rothman, J. (eds.), Minimalist Inquiries into Child and Adult Language Acquisition: Case Studies across Portuguese, 301–325. Berlin: Mouton DeGruyter.Google Scholar

Mufwene, S. 1997. Jargons, pidgins creoles and koines: What are they? In Spears, A., & Winford, D. (eds.), The Structure and Status of Pidgins and Creoles, 35–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mufwene, S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mufwene, S. 2014. The case was never closed: McWhorter misinterprets the ecological approach to the emergence of creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 29.1: 157–171.Google Scholar

Muysken, P. 1997. Media Lengua. In Thomason, S. (ed.), Contact Languages: A Wider Perspective, 365–426. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, P. 1986. Pidgin and Creole Linguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Nebrija, A. 1981[1492]. Gramática de la lengua castellana [edited by Quilis, A.]. Madrid: Editora Nacional.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, F. 2003. Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language, 79.4: 682–707.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, F. 2004. Against a parameter-setting approach to language variation. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 4: 181–234.Google Scholar

Newmeyer, F. 2017. Where, if anywhere, are parameters? A critical historical overview of parametric theory. In Bowern, C., Horn, L. & Zanuttini, R. (eds.), On Looking into Words (and Beyond), 547–569. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar

Nowak, M. 2002. Computational and evolutionary aspects of language. Nature, 417: 611–617.Google Scholar

Nowak, M., Komarova, N. & Niyogi, P. 2001. Evolution of Universal Grammar. Science, 291: 114–118.Google Scholar

Núñez Cedeño, R. 1983. Pérdida de trasposición de sujeto en interrogativas pronominales del español del Caribe. Thesaurus, 38: 35–57.Google Scholar

Olarrea, A. 1997. Pre- and postverbal subject positions in Spanish: A minimalist account. PhD Dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar

O’Rourke, E. 2004. Peak placement in two regional varieties of Peruvian Spanish intonation. In Auger, J., Clements, J. C. & Vance, B. (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics, 321–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

O’Rourke, E. 2005. Intonation and language contact: A case study of two varieties of Peruvian Spanish. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Ordóñez, F., & Olarrea, A.. 2006. Microvariation in Caribbean/Non-Caribbean Spanish interrogatives. Probus, 18: 59–96.Google Scholar

Ordóñez, F., & Treviño, E.. 1999. Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish. Lingua, 107: 38–68.Google Scholar

Ortega-Llebaria, M., & Prieto, P. 2010. Acoustic correlates of stress in Central Catalan and Castilian Spanish. Language and Speech, 54.1: 73–97.Google Scholar

Otheguy, R. 1973. The Spanish Caribbean: A creole perspective. In Bailey, C.-J., & Shuy, R. (eds.), New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, 323–339. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Parrott, J. 2007. Distributed morphological mechanisms of Labovian variation in morphosyntax. PhD Dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar

Parrott, J. 2009. Danish vestigial case and the acquisition of vocabulary in distributed morphology. Biolinguistics, 3: 2–3, 270–304.Google Scholar

Penny, R. 2002. A History of the Spanish Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Peñaherrera de Costales, P., & Costales Samaniego, A. 1959. Coangue o historia cultural y social de los negros del Chota y Salinas. Quito: Llacta.Google Scholar

Perez, D. 2015. Traces of Portuguese in Afro-Yungueño Spanish? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 30.2: 307–343.Google Scholar

Perez, D., Sessarego, S. & Sippola, E. 2017. Afro-Hispanic varieties in comparison: New light from phylogeny. In Bakker, P., Levisen, C. & Sippola, E. (eds.), Phylogenetic Approaches to Creole Languages, 269–292. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Perl, M. 1998. Introduction. In Perl, M., & Schwegler, A. (eds.), América negra: Panorámica actual de los estudios lingüísticos sobre variedades hispanas, portuguesas y criollas, 1–24. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana-Vervuert.Google Scholar

Perl, M., & Schwegler, A. (eds.), 1998. América negra: Panorámica actual de los estudios lingüísticos sobre variedades hispanas, portuguesas y criollas. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana-Vervuert.Google Scholar

Pesetsky, D., & Torrego, E. 2001. T to C movement: Causes and consequences. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 355–426, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Pesetsky, D., & Torrego, E. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Karimi, S., Samiian, V. & Wilkins, W. K. (eds.), Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Philippaki-Warburton, I. 1987. The theory of empty categories and the pro-drop parameter in Modern Greek. Journal of Linguistics, 23: 289–318.Google Scholar

Picallo, C. 1991. Nominals and nominalizations in Catalan. Probus, 3: 279–316.Google Scholar

Picallo, C. 2008. Gender and number in Romance. Lingue e Linguaggio, 1: 47–66.Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. 1998. Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. (ed.) 2000. Cross-Linguistic Aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct. New York, NY: William Morrow.Google Scholar

Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. 2005. The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition, 95: 201–236.Google Scholar

Plag, I. 2008a. Creoles as interlanguages: Inflectional morphology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 23.1: 109–130.Google Scholar

Plag, I. 2008b. Creoles as interlanguages: Syntactic structures. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 23.2: 307–328.Google Scholar

Plag, I. 2009a. Creoles as interlanguages: Phonology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 24.1: 119–138.Google Scholar

Plag, I. 2009b. Creoles as interlanguages: Word-formation. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 24.2: 339–362.Google Scholar

Poletto, C. 2000. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pollard, C., & Sag, I. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Pomino, N. 2012. Partial or complete lack of plural agreement. In Gaglia, S., & Hinzelin, M-O. (eds.), Inflection and Word Formation in Romance Languages, 201–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Pomino, N. 2017. Gender and number. In Dufter, A., & Stark, E. (eds.), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, 691–725. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Poplack, S. 1980.The notion of the plural in Puerto Rican Spanish: Competing contrasts on (s) deletion. In Labov, W. (ed.), Locating Language in Time and Space, 55–67. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Portugal Ortiz, M. 1977. La esclavitud negra en las épocas colonial y nacional de Bolivia. Instituto Boliviano de Cultura, La Paz.Google Scholar

Preminger, O. 2014. Agreement and Its Failures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Prieto, P., & Roseano, P. (eds.), 2010. Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language. Munich: LINCOM.Google Scholar

Quirk, R. 1972. On the extent and origin of questions in the form ¿Qué tú tienes? Hispania, 55: 303–304.Google Scholar

R Core Team 2016. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar

Rao, R. 2009. Deaccenting in spontaneous speech on Barcelona Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 2.1: 31–75.Google Scholar

Rao, R. 2010. Final lengthening and pause duration in three dialects of Spanish. In Ortega-Llebaria, M. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, 69–82. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

Rao, R., & Sessarego, S. 2016. On the intonation of Afro-Bolivian Spanish declaratives: Implications for a theory of Afro-Hispanic creole genesis. Lingua, 174: 45–64.Google Scholar

Rao, R., & Sessarego, S. 2018. The intonation of Chota Valley Spanish: Contact-induced phenomena at the discourse–phonology interface. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 11.1: 163–192.Google Scholar

Reinhart, T. 2006. Interface Strategies: Reference-Set Computation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Restall, M. 2000. Black conquistadors: Armed Africans in early Spanish America. The Americas, 57.2: 171–205.Google Scholar

Řeźač, M. 2004. Elements of cyclic syntax: Agree and Merge. PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Ritter, E. 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Rothstein, S. (ed.), Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing, 37–62. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1996. Residual verb second and the Wh-criterion. In Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads, 63–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, I., & Holmberg, A.. 2010. Introduction: parameters in minimalist theory. In Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I. & Sheehan, M. (eds.), Null Subjects: The Structure of Parametric Variation, 1–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rodríguez Tocarruncho, L. 2010. La marca de plural y otros aspectos morfológicos y sintácticos del español del Pacífico de Colombia. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar

Romero, R., & Sessarego, S. (2018). Hard come, easy go: Linguistic interfaces in Istambul Judeo-Spanish and Afro-Ecuadorian Spanish. In King, J., & Sessarego, S. (eds.), Language Variation and Contact-Induced Change: The Spanish Language across Space and Time, 83–110. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Rosenblat, A. 1954. La población indígena y el mestizaje en America. Buenos Aires: Editorial NOVA.Google Scholar

Rosemeyer, M. 2018. The pragmatics of Spanish postposed wh-interrogatives. Folia Linguistica, 52.2: 283–317.Google Scholar

Rostworowski Tovar de Díez Canseco, M. 1999. Historia de los Incas. Lima: Editorial Bruño.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. 2008. How pragmatically odd! Interface delays and pronominal subject distribution in L2 Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 1: 317–339.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. 2009 Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax–pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 41: 951–973.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R. 2011 (eds.), Acquisition at the Linguistic Interfaces [Lingua Special Issue, 121.4]. New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J. 2011. Proficiency and animacy effects on L2 gender agreement processes during comprehension. Language Learning, 61.1: 80–116.Google Scholar

Saito, M. 2004. Ellipsis and pronominal reference in Japanese clefts. Studies in Modern Grammar, 36: 1–44.Google Scholar

Scherre, M. M. P. 1988. Reanálise da concordância nominal em português. PhD Dissertation, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar

Scherre, M. M. P. 1991. A concordância de número nos predicativos e nos particípios passivos. Organon, 18: 52–70.Google Scholar

Schumann, J. 1978. The Pidginization Process: A Model for Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. 1996. Now for some facts, with a focus on development and an explicit role for L1. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19: 739–740.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. 1998. The second language instinct. Lingua, 106, 133–160.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R.. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.Google Scholar

Schwegler, A. 1991a. La doble negación dominicana y la génesis del español caribeño. Lingüística, 3: 31–88.Google Scholar

Schwegler, A. 1991b. El español del Chocó. América Negra, 2: 85–119.Google Scholar

Schwegler, A. 1993. Rasgos (afro-)portugueses en el criollo del Palenque de San Basilio (Colombia). In Alayon, C. D. D. (ed.), Homenaje a José Pérez Vidal, 667–696. La Laguna, Tenerife: Litografía A. Romero S. A.Google Scholar

Schwegler, A. 1996. Chi ma nkongo: Lengua y rito ancestrales en El Palenque de San Basilio (Colombia). 2 vols. Frankfurt/Madrid: Vervuert Verlag.Google Scholar

Schwegler, A. 1999. Monogenesis revisited: The Spanish perspective. In Rickford, J., & Romaine, S. (eds.), Creole Genesis, Attitudes and Discourse, 235–262. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Schwegler, A. 2010. State of the Discipline. Pidgin and creole studies: Their interface with Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 3.2: 431–481.Google Scholar

Schwegler, A. 2014. Portuguese remnants in the Afro-Hispanic diaspora. In Amaral, P., & Carvalho, A. M. (eds.), Portuguese-Spanish Interfaces: Diachrony, Synchrony, and Contact, 403–441. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Seiler, G. 2004. On three types of dialect variation, and their implications for linguistic theory: Evidence from verb clusters in Swiss German dialects. In Kortmann, B. (ed.), Dialectology Meets Typology. Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 367–399. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., Filiaci, F. & Baldo, M. 2009. Bilingual children’s sensitivity to specificity and genericity: Evidence from metalinguistic awareness. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12.2: 239–257.Google Scholar

Serratrice, L., Sorace, A. & Paoli, S. 2004. Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax–pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English–Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7.3: 183–205.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2011a. Introducción al idioma afroboliviano: Una conversación con el awicho Manuel Barra. Cochabamba/La Paz: Plural Editores.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2011b. On the status of Afro-Bolivian Spanish features: Decreolization or vernacular universals? In Michnowicz, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, 125–141. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2012a. Non-creole features in the verb system of Afro-Hispanic languages: New insights from SLA studies. International Journal of Linguistics, 4.1: 146–157.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2012b. Vowel weakening in Yungueño Spanish: Linguistic and social considerations. PAPIA: Revista Brasileira de Estudos Crioulos e Similares. 22.2: 279–294.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2013a. Chota Valley Spanish. Madrid: IberoamericanaGoogle Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2013b. Afro-Hispanic contact varieties as conventionalized advanced second languages. IBERIA, 5, 1: 96-122.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2013c. On the non-creole bases for Afro-Bolivian Spanish. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 28.2: 363–407.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2013d. Enhancing dialogue between quantitative sociolinguistics and minimalist syntax. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 5.2: 79–97.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2014a. The Afro-Bolivian Spanish Determiner Phrase: A Microparametric Account. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Press.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2014b. On Chota Valley Spanish origin: Linguistic and sociohistorical evidence. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 29.1: 86–133.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2014c. Afro-Peruvian Spanish in the context of Spanish creole genesis. Spanish in Context, 11.3: 381–401.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2015. Afro-Peruvian Spanish: Spanish Slavery and the Legacy of Spanish Creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2016a. On the Non-(de)creolization of Chocó Spanish: A linguistic and sociohistorical account. Lingua, 184: 122–133.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2017a. The legal hypothesis of Creole genesis: Presence/absence of legal personality, a new element to the Spanish creole debate. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 32.1: 1–47.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2017b. Extracts from ‘Solving the Spanish Creole puzzle: The legal hypothesis of creole genesis’, in Afro-Peruvian Spanish: Spanish Slavery and the Legacy of Spanish Creoles (Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2015), pp. 120–121, 139–145, 156–157. In Farquharson, J., & Migge, B. (eds.), Pidgins and Creoles. Vol. 1, 172–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2017c. A feature-geometry account for subject–verb agreement phenomena in Yungueño Spanish. In Colomina-Almiñana, J. (ed.), Contemporary Studies on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics of Spanish Variation, 265–282. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2017d. Chocó Spanish and the missing Spanish creole debate: Sociohistorical and linguistic considerations to solve the puzzle. Language Ecology, 1.2: 213–241.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2017e. Chocó Spanish double negation and the genesis of the Afro-Hispanic dialects of the Americas. Diachronica, 34.2: 219–252.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2018a. La schiavitù nera nell’America spagnola. Genova: Marietti Editore.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2018b. Enhancing dialogue in the field: Some remarks on the status of the Spanish creole debate. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 33.1: 197–203.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2018c. On the importance of legal history to Afro-Hispanic linguistics and creole studies. In Sessarego, S. (guest ed.), Current Trends in Afro-Hispanic Linguistics [Lingua Special Issue, 202], 13–23. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2019a. Language Contact and the Making of an Afro-Hispanic Vernacular: Variation and Change in the Colombian Chocó. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2019b. Universal processes in contact-induced syntactic change: Evidence from the Afro-Hispanic varieties. In Darquennes, J., Salmons, J. & Vandenbussche, W. (eds.), Language Contact. An International Handbook, 24–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2019c. Chocó Spanish: An Afro-Hispanic language on the Spanish frontier. In Ortiz-López, L. (ed.), Hispanic Contact Linguistics: Theoretical, Methodological and Empirical Perspectives, 219–252. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S. 2020. Not all grammatical features are robustly transmitted during the emergence of creoles. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 7.130: 1–8.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S., Butera, B. & Rao, R. 2019. Aspectos de la entonación afroperuana. Cuadernos de la Asociación de Lingüística y Filología de América Latina, 11.1: 199–215.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S., & Ferreira, L. 2016. Spanish and Portuguese parallels: Impoverished number agreement as a vernacular feature of two rural dialects. In Sessarego, S., & Tejedo-Herrero, F. (eds.), Spanish Language and Sociolinguistic Analysis, 283–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S., & Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. 2011. A minimalist approach to gender agreement in the Afro-Bolivian DP: Variation and the specification of uninterpretable features. In DeVogelaer, G., & Janse, M. (eds.), The Diachronic of Gender Marking [Special issue of Folia Linguistica, 45.2], 465–488. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S., & Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. 2012. Variation universals and contact induced change: Language evolution across generations and domains. In González-Rivera, M., & Sessarego, S. (eds.), Current Formal Aspects of Spanish Syntax and Semantics, 251–270. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S., & Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. 2017. Revisiting the Null Subject Parameter: New insights from Afro-Peruvian Spanish. Isogloss, 3.1: 43–68.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S., & Rao, R. 2016. On the simplification of a prosodic inventory: The Afro-Bolivian Spanish case. In Cuza, A., Czerwionka, L. & Olson, D. (eds.), Inquiries in Hispanic Linguistics, 171–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sessarego, S., & Rodríguez-Riccelli, A. 2018. Formal issues in Afro-Hispanic morpho-syntax: The Afro-Bolivian Spanish case. In Sessarego, S. (guest ed.), Current Trends in Afro-Hispanic Linguistics [Lingua Special Issue, 202], 58–75. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Seuren, P., & Wekker, H. 1986. Semantic transparency as a factor in Creole genesis. In Muysken, P., & Smith, N. (eds.), Substrata versus Universals in Creole Genesis, 57–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Siegel, J. 2008. Pidgin/Creoles and second language acquisition. In Kouwenberg, S., & Singler, J. V. (eds.), The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies, 189–218. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Silva, G. 2001. Word Order in Brazilian Portuguese. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Simioni, L. 2007. A concordância de número no DP: Propostas minimalistas. Estudos Lingüísticos, 36.1: 117–125.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. 2008. Meaning in the Second Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. 2009. What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language? In Bowles, M., Ionin, T., Montrul, S. & Tremblay, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference, 280–294. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. 2013. What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language: A generative perspective. In García Mayo, M., Gutiérrez Mangado, M. J. & Martínez-Adrián, M. (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, 5–28. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. 2016. Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. 2019. “L” stands for language. The Modern Language Journal, 103: 152–160.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R., & Ivanov, I. 2011. A more careful look at the syntax–discourse interface. Lingua, 121: 637–651.Google Scholar

Sorace, A. 2000. Syntactic optionality in non-native grammars. Second Language Research, 16: 93–102.Google Scholar

Sorace, A. 2003. Near-nativeness. In Doughty, C., & Long, M. (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 130–153. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sorace, A. 2004. Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax–discourse interface. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7: 143–145.Google Scholar

Sorace, A. 2005. Selective optionality in language development. In Cornips, L., & Corrigan, K. (eds.), Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social, 55–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sorace, A. 2011. Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1.1: 1–33.Google Scholar

Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. 2006. Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22.3: 339–368.Google Scholar

Sorace, A., & Keller, F. 2005. Gradience in linguistic data. Lingua, 115: 1497–1524.Google Scholar

Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L. 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13.2: 195–210.Google Scholar

Sorace, A., Serratrice, L., Filiaci, F. & Baldo, M. 2009. Discourse conditions on subject pronoun realization: Testing the linguistic intuitions of bilingual children. Lingua, 119: 460–477.Google Scholar

Stark, E., & Pomino, N. 2009. Adnominal adjectives in Romance. Where morphology seemingly meets semantics. In Espinal, M. T., Leonetti, M. & McNally, L. (eds.), Proceedings of the IV Nereus International Workshop: Definiteness and DP Structure in Romance Languages, 113–135. Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar

Suñer, M. 1983. proarb. Linguistic Inquiry, 14: 188–191.Google Scholar

Suñer, M. 1994. V-movement and the licensing of argumental wh-phrases in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12: 335–372.Google Scholar

Svenonius, P. 2002. Icelandic case and the structure of events. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 5: 197–225.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, S. 2006. Analyzing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, S. 2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, S. 2016. Quantitative analysis in language variation and change. In Sessarego, S., & Tejedo-Herrero, F. (eds.), Spanish Language and Sociolinguistic Analysis, 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Tardieu, J.-P. 2006. El negro en la Real Audiencia de Quito: Siglos XVI–XVIII. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar

Távara, S. 1855. Abolición de la esclavitud. Lima: Imprenta del Comercio.Google Scholar

Thompson, R. 1961. A note on some possible affinities between the creole dialects of the Old World and those of the New. In Le Page, R. B. (ed.), Creole Language Studies 2, 107–113. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Tomioka, S., 2003. The semantics of Japanese null pronouns and its cross-linguistic implications. In Schwabe, K., & Winkler, S. (eds.), The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures, 321–340. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Toribio, A. J. 2000. Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish. Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics, 110.5: 315–341.Google Scholar

Toribio, A. J. 1993a. Lexical subjects in finite and non-finite clauses. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, 11: 149–178.Google Scholar

Toribio, A. J. 1993b. Parametric variation in the licensing of nominals. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Torrego, E. 1984. On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry, 15.1: 102–129.Google Scholar

Torres Saldamando, E. 1900[1967]. Apuntes Históricos sobre las encomiendas en el Perú. Lima: UNMSM.Google Scholar

Tremblay, A. 2005. On the use of grammaticality judgments in linguistic theory: theoretical and methodological perspectives. Second Language Studies, 24: 129–167.Google Scholar

Tsimpli, I., & Sorace, A.. 2006. Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax–semantics and syntax–discourse phenomena. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 653–664. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar

Tsimpli, I., Sorace, A., Heycock, C. & Filiaci, F. 2004. First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8.3: 257–277.Google Scholar

Valenzuela, E., 2006. L2 end state grammars and incomplete acquisition of the Spanish CLLD constructions. In Slabakova, R., Montrul, S. & Prévost, P. (eds.), Inquiries in Linguistic Development: In Honor of Lydia White, 283–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Valkhoff, M. 1966. Studies in Portuguese and Creole. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar

Van Coetsem, F. 1988. Loan Phonology and the Two Transfer Types in Language Contact. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Villa-García, J. 2018. Properties of the extended verb phrase: Agreement, the structure of INFL, and subjects. In Geeslin, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics, 329–350. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Villa-García, J., Snyder, W. & Riqueros-Morante, J. 2010. On the analysis of lexical subjects in Caribbean and Mainland Spanish: Evidence from L1 acquisition. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 34), 2: 433–444.Google Scholar

Villa-García, J., & Suárez-Palma, I. 2016. Early null and overt subjects in the Spanish of simultaneous English–Spanish bilinguals and crosslinguistic influence. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 29.2: 250–395.Google Scholar

Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. P., & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics, 95–188. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Weiss, H. 2001. On two types of natural languages: Some consequences for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 27: 87–103.Google Scholar

Whinnom, K. 1965. Origin of European-based creoles and pidgins. Orbis, 14: 510–527.Google Scholar

White, L. 1992. Subjacency violations and empty categories in L2 acquisition. In Goodluck, H., & Rochement, M. (eds.), Island Constraints, 445–464. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

White, L. 2003a. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

White, L. 2003b. Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6.2: 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, L. 2011. Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua, 121.4: 577–590.Google Scholar

White, L., & Juffs, A.. 1998. Constraints on wh-movement in two different contexts of non-native language acquisition: Competence and processing. In Flynn, S., Martohardjono, G. & O’Neil, W. (eds.), The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition, 111–129. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M. & Leung, Y.-K. 2004. Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25.1: 105–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wills, D. 2006. Against N-raising and NP-raising analyses of Welsh noun phrases. Lingua, 116: 11: 1807–1839.Google Scholar

Wilner, J. 2007. Wortubuku fu Sranan Tongo. Paramaribo: SIL International.Google Scholar

Winford, D. 1997. Property items and predication in Sranan. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 12: 237–302.Google Scholar

Winford, D. 2000. “Intermediate” creoles and degrees of change in creole formation: The case of Bajan. In Neumann-Holzschuh, I., & Schneider, E. W. (eds.), In Degrees of Restructuring in Creole Languages, 215–246. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Winford, D. 2003. An Introduction to Contact Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Winford, D. 2008. Atlantic creole syntax. In Kouwenberg, S., & Singler, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies, 19–47. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Winford, D., & Migge, B. 2008. Surinamese creole: Morphology and syntax. In Schneider, E. W. (ed.), Varieties of English, Vol. 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, 693–731. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yang, C. 2002. Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yang, C. 2004. Universal grammar, statistics, or both? Trends in Cognitive Science, 8.10: 451–456.Google Scholar

Zamora Vicente, A. 1967. Dialectología española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, M. L. 2001. The constraints on preverbal subjects in Romance interrogatives. In Hulk, A., & Pollock, J.-Y. (eds.), Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, 183–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar