Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Speer, Susan A.
2002.
What can conversation analysis contribute to feminist methodology? Putting reflexivity into practice.
Discourse & Society,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 6,
p.
783.
Antaki, Charles
2002.
Personalised revision of `failed' questions.
Discourse Studies,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 4,
p.
411.
Speer, Susan A.
2002.
`Natural' and `contrived' data: a sustainable distinction?.
Discourse Studies,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 4,
p.
511.
Antaki, Charles
2002.
“Lovely”: turn-initial high-grade assessments in telephone closings.
Discourse Studies,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 1,
p.
5.
Antaki, Charles
Young, Natasha
and
Finlay, Mick
2002.
Shaping Clients' Answers: Departures from neutrality in care-staff interviews with people with a learning disability.
Disability & Society,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 4,
p.
435.
Arminen, Ilkka
and
Perälä, Riikka
2002.
Multiprofessional team work in 12-step treatment: constructing substance abusers to alcoholics.
Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1_suppl,
p.
18.
Antaki, Charles
2004.
Reading Minds or Dealing with Interactional Implications?.
Theory & Psychology,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 5,
p.
667.
Schober, Michael F.
Conrad, Frederick G.
and
Fricker, Scott S.
2004.
Misunderstanding standardized language in research interviews.
Applied Cognitive Psychology,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 2,
p.
169.
Myers, Greg
2004.
Matters of Opinion.
Locke, Abigail
2004.
Accounting for Success and Failure: A Discursive Psychological Approach to Sport Talk.
Quest,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
302.
McCabe, Rosemarie
and
Priebe, Stefan
2004.
Assessing the stability of schizophrenia patients' explanatory models of illness over time.
Journal of Mental Health,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
163.
Puchta, Claudia
Potter, Jonathan
and
Wolff, Stephan
2004.
Repeat receipts: a device for generating visible data in market research focus groups.
Qualitative Research,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 3,
p.
285.
Schober, Michael F.
and
Bloom, Jonathan E.
2004.
Discourse Cues That Respondents Have Misunderstood Survey Questions.
Discourse Processes,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 3,
p.
287.
Thøgersen, Jacob
2005.
The quest for objectivity in the study of subjectivity.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 1,
p.
217.
Molder, Hedwig te
and
Potter, Jonathan
2005.
Conversation and Cognition.
DiNardo, A. Catherine
Schober, Michael F.
and
Stuart, Jennifer
2005.
Chair and Couch Discourse: A Study of Visual Copresence in Psychoanalysis.
Discourse Processes,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 3,
p.
209.
Myers, Greg
2005.
Applied Linguists and Institutions of Opinion.
Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 4,
p.
527.
Tileaga, Cristian
2005.
Accounting for extreme prejudice and legitimating blame in talk about the Romanies.
Discourse & Society,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 5,
p.
603.
Antaki, Charles
2006.
Producing a ‘cognition’.
Discourse Studies,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
p.
9.
Roulston, Kathryn
2006.
Close encounters of the ‘CA’ kind: a review of literature analysing talk in research interviews.
Qualitative Research,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 4,
p.
515.