BibliographyChapter one: IntroductionAlford, W, To steal a book is an elegant offence: intellectual property law in Chinese civilisation, Stanford University Press, 1995.
Allison, J and Lemley, M, ‘Empirical evidence on the validity of litigated patents’ (1998) AIPLA Quarterly Journal 26, 185.
Aoki, K, ‘Authors, inventors and trademark owners: Private intellectual property and the public domain’ (1993–4) 18:1Columbia-VLA Journal of Law and the Arts 1; and Part II in 18:3–4.
Arrow, K, ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Innovation’, in Nelson, R (ed), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press, 1962.
Arup, C, Innovation, policy and law, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (Australian Bureau of Statistics), 1370.0, Measures of Australia's Progress, 2004.
Australian Law Reform Commission (Australian Law Reform Commission), Report No 74, Designs, 1995.
Bain, J, Barriers to New Competition, Harvard UP, 1956, Chapter IV.
Bankman, J and Gilson, RJ, ‘Why start-ups?’ (1999) Stanford LR, 51, 189.
Bar-Gill O and G Parchomovsky, ‘Intellectual Property Law and the Boundaries of the Firm’ (2005) U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper 05-10; NYU, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 04-06 (April 2005).
Berliner, J, The Innovation Decision in Soviet Industry, MIT Press, 1976.
Boisot, MH, Knowledge assets: Securing competitive advantage in the Information Economy, Oxford University Press, 1998.
Bureau of Industry Economics, The Economics of Intellectual Property, BIE Other Publication, June 1995.
Burk, D, ‘Intellectual property and the firm’ (2004) The University of Chicago Law Review, 71, 3.
Caine, E and Christie, A, ‘A quantitive analysis of Australian intellectual property law and policy-making since federation’ (2005) 16 AIPJ 4, 185.
Castells, M, The rise of the Network Society, Blackwell, 1996.
Chamberlin, E, Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Harvard University Press, 1959.
Conceicao, P et al (eds), Science, technology and innovation policy: opportunities and challenges for the knowledge economy, Quorum Books, 2000.
Coombe, RJ, ‘Objects of property and subjects of politics: intellectual property laws and democratic dialogue’ (1991) Texas LR 69, 1853.
Corones, S, ‘Reconciling Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Law: the Magill TV guide case’ (1992) 20 Australian Bus LR265.
Coulter, M, Property in ideas, Thomas Jefferson University Press, 1991.
David, P, ‘The evolution of intellectual property institutions’ MERIT Research Memorandum 93-009 (1993).
Denicola, R, ‘Freedom to Copy’ (1999) 108 Yale LJ1661.
Drahos, P, ‘The regulation of public goods’ (2004) Journal of International Economic Law, 7, 2, 321.
Drahos, P —A Philosophy of Intellectual Property, Dartmouth, 1996.
Drahos, P —‘Intellectual Property Law and Basic Science: Extinguishing Prometheus?’ in Arup, C (ed), Science Law and Society (1992) 10 Law in Context Special Issue 56.
Duysters, G, The Dynamics of Technical Innovation, Edward Elgar, 1996.
Edvinsson, L and Malone, M, Intellectual Capital, HarperBusiness, 1999.
Fitzgerald, B and Fitzgerald, A, Intellectual property in principle, LBC, 2004.
Flueckiger, G, Control, information and technological change, Kluwer, 1995.
Gans, J, Hsu, DH and Stern, S, ‘When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction?’ (2002) Rand Journal of Economics, 33, 4, 571.
Geller, PA, ‘Dissolving intellectual property’ [2006] EIPR 139.
Granstrand, O (ed), Economics, Law and Intellectual Property, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
Green, J and Scotchmer, S, ‘On the division of profits in sequential innovation’ (1995) 26 Rand J Econ 20.
Hall, P, Innovation, Economics and Evolution: Theoretical Perspectives on Changing Technology in Economic Systems, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994.
Hall, P and Lea, G, ‘Standards and Intellectual Property Rights: An Economic and Legal Perspective’ (2004) Information Economics and Policy 16(1) 67.
Holmstrom, B and Milgrom, P, ‘The firm as an incentive system’ (1994) The American Economic Review, 84, 4, 972.
Hope, J, Open Source Biotechnology project, RSSS, ANU, available at: http://rsss.anu.edu.au/∼janeth/home.html
Horibe, F, Managing knowledge workers: new skills and attitudes to unlock the intellectual capital in your organization, Wiley, 1999.
Imparato, N (ed), Capital for our time: the economic, legal and management challenges of intellectual capital, Hoover Institution Press, 1999.
Industrial Property Advisory Committee (Industrial Property Advisory Committee), Patents, Innovation and Competition in Australia (August 1984).
Intellectual Property & Competition Review Committee (IPCRC), Review of Intellectual Property Legislation under the competition Principles Agreement (Final Report, 30 September 2000).
Kelly, RJ, ‘Private Data and Public Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights in Science’ (1989) 13 Legal Studies Forum365.
Kingston, W, ‘Reducing the cost of resolving intellectual property disputes’ (1995) European Journal of Law and Economics 2, 85.
Kingston, WKingston, W ‘Intellectual property needs help from accounting’ [2002] EIPR, 11, 508.
Klein, A, The strategic management of intellectual capital, Butterworth Heinemann, 1999.
Laddie, Hon Mr Justice , ‘Copyright: Over-strength, Over-regulated, Over-rated?’ [1996] 5 EIPR253.
Lamberton, D, Science, technology and the Australian economy, Tudor Press, 1970.
Lange, D, ‘Recognizing the Public Domain’ (1981) 44 Law & Contemporary Problems 4, 147.
Lasch, C, The true and only heaven: progress and its critics, WW Norton, 1991.
Leijonhufvud, A, ‘Information costs and the division of labour’ (1989) International Social Science Journal 120, 165–76.
Lemley, M and McGowan, D, ‘Legal implications of Network Economic Effects’ (1998) California Law Review 86, 481.
Lemley, M, ‘Ex ante versus ex post justifications for intellectual property’ (2004) The University of Chicago Law Review, 71, 129.
Levin, R et al, ‘Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development’ (1987) 3 Brookings Papers on Econ. Activity783.
Link, A and Scherer, F (eds), Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield, Springer, 2006.
Litman, J, ‘The Public Domain’ (1990) 39 Emory LJ965.
Long, P, ‘Invention, authorship, intellectual property, and the origin of patents: notes toward a conceptual history’ (1991) Technology & Culture, 846–84.
Mansfield, E, ‘Academic Research and Industrial Innovation’ (1991) 20 Research Policyl.
Mansfield, E —The Economics of Technological Change, Norton & Co, 1968.
McGinnis, P, Intellectual Property Commercialisation: A Business Manager's Companion, Butterworths, 2003.
McKeough, J, Stewart, A and Griffith, P, Intellectual Property in Australia, Butterworths, 2004.
Melzer, A, Weinberger, J and Zinman, M. (eds), History and the idea of progress, Cornell University Press, 1995.
Merges, R, ‘Intellectual Property Rights and the New Institutional Economics’ (2000) 53 V and L Rev 1957.
Merges, RP, ‘Property rights theory and the commons: the case of scientific research’ (1996) 13 Soc Phil & Policy145–67.
Metcalfe, S, Evolutionary Foundations of Technology Policy, Edward Elgar, 2000.
Mokyr, J, The lever of riches, Oxford University Press, 1990.
Neef, D, ‘Rethinking Economics in the Knowledge-based Economy’, in The Economic Impact of Knowledge, Butterworth Heinemann, 1998.
Neef, D—A little knowledge is a dangerous thing: understanding our global knowledge economy, Butterworth Heinemann, 1998.
Neef, D—The knowledge economy, Butterworth Heinemann, 1998.
Nelson, R, Understanding Technical Change as an Evolutionary Process, North Holland, 1987.
Nelson, R and Winter, S, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, 1982.
Nonaka, I and Takeuchi, H, The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, 1995.
Pavitt, K, Technology, Management and Systems of Innovation, Edward Elgar, 1999.
Petrusson, U, Intellectual Property and Entrepreneurship, CIP Gothenburg, 2004.
Porter, R, The enlightenment, 2nd edn, Paragon, 2001.
Prager, FD, ‘A History of Intellectual Property Law from 1545 to 1787’ (1944) 26 JPTO712.
Rassokhin, VP, ‘Centralisation and Freedom of Creativity in Science and Technology’ (1988) 27 Soviet Law and Government55.
Reichman, J, ‘Of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation’ (2000) 53 Vanderbilt Law Review174.
Rescher, N, Unpopular essays on technological progress, University of Pittsburgh Press, 1980.
Reynolds, R and Stoianoff, N, Intellectual Property: Text and Essential Cases, The Federation Press, 2005.
Ricketson, S, ‘The Future of Australian Intellectual Property Law Reform and Administration’ (1990) 1 AIPJ3.
Ricketson, S—The law of intellectual property, LBC, 1984.
Roos, J, Roos, G, Edvinsson, L and Dragonetti, N, Intellectual capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape, NYUP, 1998.
Rose, M, Authors and owners, Harvard UP, 1993.
Rushing, F and Ganz, C Brown (eds), Intellectual Property Rights in Science, Technology, and Economic Performance: International Comparisons, Westview Press, 1990.
Sackville, R, ‘Monopoly vs Freedom of Ideas: the expansion of intellectual property’ (2005) 16 AIPJ65.
Sahal, D, Patterns of Technological Innovation, Addison Wesley, 1981.
Schumpeter, JA, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper, 1975 [orig. pub. 1942]) (at pp. 82–85: ‘gale of creative destruction’).
Shavell, S and Ypersele, T, ‘Reward versus intellectual property rights’ (2001) The Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 525.
Sherman, B and Bently, L, The making of modern intellectual property law, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Shulman, B, Owning the future, Houghton Mifflin, 1999.
Staff of Senate Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights, 85th Congress, ‘An economic review of the patent system: study No 15 (Comm Print 1958; Fritz Machlup concluded that it would be irresponsible to create a patent system if the US did not have one, but also irresponsible to abolish the one they had).
Standing Committee on Science and Innovation, Inquiry into Business Commitment to Research and Development in Australia, Riding the Innovation Wave: The Case for Increasing Business Investment in R&D (23 June 2003).
Steindl J, ‘Technical progress and evolution’, in: Sahal, D (ed), Research, development and technological innovation, Lexington, 1980.
Sullivan, PH, Profiting from Intellectual Capital: Extracting value from innovation, John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
Suthersanen, U and Dutfield, G, ‘The Innovation Dilemma: Intellectual Property and the Historical Legacy of Cumulative Creativity’ [2004] 8 Intellectual Property Quarterly379–421.
Todd, E, The causes of progress, Basil Blackwell, 1987.
Caenegem W, , Butterworths Tutorial Series, Intellectual Property, 2nd edn, 2005.
Van, Caenegem W—‘Intellectual property law and the idea of progress’ (2003) IPQ 3, 237.
Van, Caenegem W—‘Intellectual property and intellectual capital’ (2002) Intellectual Property Forum4810.
Van, Caenegem W—‘The public domain: scientia nullius?’ (2002) 24 EIPR324.
Van, Caenegem W—‘Inventions in Russia: From public good to private property’ (1993) 4 AIPJ232.
Whitley, R, ‘Competition and pluralism in the public sciences: the impact of institutional frameworks on the organization of academic science’ (2003) Research Policy, 32, 6, 1015.
Whitt, , ‘Indigenous peoples, intellectual property and the new imperial Science’ (1998) Oklahoma City University Law Review 211.
Chapter two: Trade secretsAncori, B, Bureth, A and Cohendet, P, ‘The economics of knowledge: the debate about codification and tacit knowledge’ (2000) Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 2, 255.
Blackler, F, ‘Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation’ (1995) Organization Studies, 16, 6, 1021.
Butler, D, ‘A Tort of invasion of privacy in Australia?’ (2005) Melbourne Law Review 11.
Casselman R and D Samson, ‘Moving beyond tacit and explicit: four dimensions of knowledge’, IPRIA Working Paper, June 2004.
Cohendet, P and Steinmueller, W, ‘The codification of knowledge: a conceptual and empirical exploration’ (2002) Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 2, 195.
Cooper, DP, ‘Innovation and reciprocal externalities: information transmission via job mobility’ (2001) Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 45, 4, 403.
Cowan, R, David, P and Foray, D, ‘The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness’ (2000) Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 2, 211.
Darby M, Q Liu and L Zucker, ‘Stakes and stars: the effect of intellectual human capital on the level and variability of high-tech firms’ market value', NBER Working Paper Series No 7201 (1999).
Dean, R, The Law of Trade Secrets and Personal Secrets, 2nd edn, Law Book Company, Sydney, 2002.
Di, Gregorio D and Shane, S, ‘Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?’ (2003R) Research Policy, 32, 2, 209.
Freedman CD, ‘The Extension of the Criminal Law to Protecting Confidential Commercial Information: Comments on the Issues and the Cyber-Context’, 14th BILETA Conference: “CYBERSPACE 1999: Crime, Criminal Justice and the Internet”, at p 5 (available at www.bileta.ac.uk).
Friedman, D, Landes, W and Posner, R, ‘Some Economics of Trade Secret Law’ (1991) Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 161–72.
Friedmann D, ‘Restitution for wrongs: the basis of liability’ in Cornish, WR et al (eds), Restitution: Past present and future, Hart, 1998.
Gray, B, ‘Ocular Sciences: a new vision for the doctrine of breach of confidence?’ (1999) Melbourne University Law Review, 23, 1, 241.
Gurry, F, Breach of Confidence, Oxford University Press, 1990.
Johnson, B, Lorenz, E and Lundvall, B-A, ‘Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge’ (2002) Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 2, 245.
Law Commission of England and Wales: ‘Legislating the criminal code: misuse of trade secrets’, Consultation Paper 150, 1997.
Merges, R, ‘The law and economics of employee inventions’ (1999) Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 13, 1.
Monotti, A, ‘Who owns my research and teaching materials: my university or me?’ (1997) Sydney Law Review, 19, 4, 425.
Narayanan, S, ‘The economics of intrapreneurial innovation’ (2005) Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58, 4, 487.
Nelson, R, ‘On the uneven evolution of human know-how’ (2003) Research Policy, 32, 6, 909.
Nightingale, P, ‘If Nelson and Winter are only half right about tacit knowledge, which half? A Searlean critique of “codification”’ (2003) Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 2, 149.
Polanyi, M, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958.
Polanyi, M—‘The logic of tacit inference’ (1966) Philosophy, 41, 1.
Riley, J, ‘Who owns human capital? A critical appraisal of legal techniques for capturing the value of work’ (2005) Australian Journal of Labour Law 18, 1, 1.
Roberts, J, ‘The drive to codify: implications for the knowledge based economy’ (2001) Prometheus, 19, 2, 99.
Caenegem W, , ‘Inter-firm migration of tacit knowledge: law and policy’ (2005) Prometheus 23, 3, 285.
Chapter three: PatentsAdvisory Council on Intellectual Property (Advisory Council on Intellectual Property), Should plant & animal subject matter be excluded from protection by the innovation patent? (November 2004).
Advisory Council on Industrial Property (Advisory Council on Intellectual Property) —Final Report, Patents and Experimental Use (October 2005).
Advisory Council on Industrial Property (Advisory Council on Intellectual Property) —Review of crown use provisions for patents and designs (November 2005).
Australian Law Reform Commission (Australian Law Reform Commission), Report No 99, Genes and Ingenuity: Gene Patenting and Human Health (2004).
Barton, J, ‘Patents and antitrust: a rethinking in light of patent breadth and sequential innovation’ (1997) Antitrust Law Journal 65, 449.
Barton, J—‘Reforming the Patent System’, Science, Vol 287, 17 March 2000, 1993.
Blows, J and Clark, D, ‘Is an innovative step so easy that “any fool could do it”?’, (2006) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, 18, 8, 129.
Brennan, D, ‘Springboards and Ironing Boards: Confidential information as a restraint of trade’ (2005) Journal of Contract Law 71.
Bucknell, et al, Australian Patent Law, Butterworths, 2004.
Bureau of Industry Economics, The Economics of Patents, BIE Occasional Paper, Feb. 1994
Burk, D and Lemley, M, ‘Policy levers in patents law’ (2003) 79 Va L Rev101.
Burk, D and Lemley, M. —‘Is patent law technology specific?’ (2002) Berkeley Tech. Law Journal, 17, 1155.
Christie, A, ‘Some Observations on the Requirement of Inherent Patentability in the Context of Business Methods Patents’ (2000) Intellectual Property Forum 43.
Dreyfuss, R, ‘Are business method patents bad for business?’ (2000) Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal 16(2).
Drummond, D, ‘Are the courts down under properly handling patent disputes?’ (2000) Intellectual Property Forum 42, 10.
Duffy, J, ‘Rethinking the prospect theory of patents’ (2004) The University of Chicago Law Review, 71, 439.
Ellis, T, ‘Distortion of patent economics by litigation costs’, in Hill, et al (eds), CASRIP, Streamlining International Intellectual Property, 1999.
Garde, T, ‘Legal certainty, stare decisis and the doctrine of equivalents’ [2005] EIPR365.
Gee, O, ‘The description-claims relationship – “A fair balance?”. A comparison of the Australian, USA and EPO jurisdictions’ (2006) Intellectual Property Forum 64, 44.
Grady, MF and Alexander, JI, ‘Patent law and rent dissipation’ (1992) 78 Virginia Law Review305.
Grushcow, J, ‘Measuring secrecy: a cost of the patent system revealed’ (2004) The Journal of Legal Studies, 33, 59.
Haines, T, ‘Patenting legal strategies – Does the utility justify the ends?’ (2005) Intellectual Property Forum 62, 24.
Hauhart, R, ‘The origin and development of the British and American patent and copyright laws’ (1983) 5 Whittier L R539.
Heath, , ‘Remuneration of employees’ inventions in Europe and Japan', AIPPI: Bimonthly Journal of the International Association for the Protection of the Industrial Property of Japan, Vol. 27 No. 6, November 2002, pp 398–407.
Heller, M and Eisenberg, R, ‘Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anti-commons in Biomedical Research’ (1998) 280 Science698.
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology, ‘Genetic manipulations: the threat or the glory?’ (1992).
IPAustralia, Issues Paper, Review of the Innovation Patent (September 2005).
IPAustralia, Issues Paper —Review of Patent Grace Period (August 2005).
Janis, M, ‘Patent Abolitionism’ (2002) 17 Berkeley Technology Law Journal899.
Jensen PH and E Webster, ‘Achieving the optimal power of patent rights’, IPRIA Working Paper No 15/04, December 2004.
Kingston, W, ‘Why harmonization is a Trojan horse’ [2004] 26 EIPR10, 447–60.
Kingston, W —‘Innovation needs patent reform’ (2001) Research Policy 30, 3, 403.
Kitch, EW, ‘The nature and function of the patent system’ (1978) J of L & Eco 20, 165.
Lamberton D, Dissenting Statement, ‘Patents, Innovation and Competition in Australia’, Industrial Property Advisory Group, Attorney General's Department, 1984.
Lemley, M, ‘Reconceiving patents in the age of venture capital’ (2000) The Journal of Small and Emerging Business Law137.
Lemley, M —‘The economics of improvement in intellectual property law’ (1997) Texas Law Review 75, 989.
Levin, R et al, ‘Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development’ (1987) 3 Brookings Papers on Economic Activity783.
Lithgow, T, ‘Patent infringement immunity for medical practitioners and related health care entities’ (1997) Jurimetrics Journal251.
Lo, VI, ‘Employee inventions and works for hire in Japan: A comparative study against the US, Chinese and German systems’ (2002) 16 Temp Int'l & Comp LJ279.
Long, P, ‘Invention, authorship, “Intellectual property” and the origin of patents: Notes toward a conceptual history’ (1991) Technology and Culture 32, 846.
Loughlan, P, ‘Of patents and professors: Intellectual Property, Research Workers and Universities’ [1996] 6 EIPR345.
Macdonald, S, ‘When Means Become Ends: Considering the Impact of Patent Strategy on Innovation’ (2004) Information Economics and Policy, 16, 1, 135.
Machlup F, ‘Patents’ in Sills, D (ed), The international encyclopaedia of the social sciences II, Macmillan, 1968, pp 468–71.
Macleod, C, Inventing the industrial revolution: the English patent system 1660–1800, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press 1988.
Mandeville, Lamberton, Bishop , The economic effects of the Australian Patent System, 1982.
Mandich, G, ‘Venetian Patents (1450–1550)’ (1948) JPTOS 30, 166.
Mansfield, E, Schwartz, M and Wagner, S, ‘Imitation costs and patents: an empirical study’ (1981) The Economics Journal 91, 907–18.
Martin, DL, ‘Reducing anticipated rewards from innovation through patent: or less is more’ (1992) 78 Virginia Law Review351.
McBratney, A, ‘Does the fair basing “problem child” escape Lockwood?’ (2005) 16 AIPJ4, 210.
McBratney, A—‘The Problem Child in Australian Patent Law: “Fair” Basing’ (2001) 12 AIPJ 4, 211.
Merges, R, ‘As many as six impossible patents before breakfast: property rights for business concepts and patent system reform’ (1999) Berkeley Technology Law Journal 14, 577.
Merges, R—‘The law and economics of employee inventions’ (1999) Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 13, 1.
Merges, R—‘Rent control in the patent district: observations on the Grady-Alexander thesis’, 78 (1992) Virginia Law Review359.
Merges R and R Nelson, ‘Market structure and technical advance: the role of patent scope decisions’, in Jorde, T and Teece, D (eds), Antitrust, innovation and competitiveness, Oxford University Press, 1992.
Merges, R and Nelson, R—‘On the complex economics of patents scope’ (1990) Columbia Law Review 90, 839.
Mills, O, Biotechnological inventions: Moral Restraints and Patent Law, Ashgate, 2005.
Monotti, A and Ricketson, S, Universities and Intellectual Property, Ownership and Exploitation, Oxford University Press, 2003.
Mossinghoff, G, ‘Remedies under patents on medical and surgical procedures’ (1996) 78 JPTOS789.
Parchomsky, G and Polk, R Wagner, ‘Patent portfolios’ (2005) University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154, 1, 1.
Pendleton, M, ‘Construe Widely and Face Invalidity – Construe Narrowly and Miss Infringements: The Dilemma of Interpreting Patent Specifications’, Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, Volume 11, Number 3 (September 2004).
Scotchmer, S, ‘Standing on the shoulders of giants: cumulative research and the patent law’ (1991) Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, 29.
Caenegem W, , ‘The technicality requirement, patents scope and patentable subject matter in Australia’ (2002) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 13, 309.
Overwalle G, , The legal protection of biotechnological inventions in Europe, Leuven Law Series, Vol 10, Leuven University Press, 1997.
Walterscheid, E, ‘The early evolution of the United States Patent Law: Antecedents’ (Part I) (1994) JPTOS697; (Part II) (1994) JPTOS849.
Weatherall, K and Jensen, P, ‘An empirical investigation into patent enforcements in Australian courts’ (2005) Federal Law Review 33, 2, 239.
Chapter four: Copyright and designsAustralian Law Reform Commission (Australian Law Reform Commission), Report No 74, Designs (1995).
Bently, L, ‘Visuality and Textuality in Nineteenth Century Intellectual Property Law: The Utility Designs Act 1843’ (1997) Intellectual Property Forum, Issue 29.
Brown, D and Cameron, E, ‘Designing the interface’, (2005) International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 19, 1, 65–81.
Bureau of Industry Economics, The Economics of Intellectual Property Rights for Design, BIE Occasional Paper, June 1995.
Commission of the European Communities, Green Paper on the Legal Protection of Industrial Designs, III/F/5131191-EN (1991).
Franzosi, M and Sanctis, G, ‘Moral Rights and New Technology: Are Copyright and Patents Converging?’ [1995] 2 EIPR63.
Fraser, G and Hall, K, ‘Copyright protection for works of artistic craftsmanship’ (1999) Law Institute Journal 73, 9, 47–9.
Golder, T, ‘Australian Designs Law – A Commentary on the Lahore Committee Report and the Need for Legislative Reform’ (1993) Intellectual Property Forum Journal 19.
Gotzen, F (ed), ‘The green paper on the legal protection of industrial design’, CIRLeuven (1992).
Hansmann, H and Santilli, M, ‘Authors and artists’ moral rights: A comparative legal and economic analysis (1997) 26 J Legal Stud95.
Haungs, MJ, ‘Copyright of Factual Compilations: Public Policy and the First Amendment’ (1990) 23 Colum J L & Soc Problems347.
Izquierdo, Peris JJ, ‘Registered Community Design: First two-year Balance from an Insider's Perspective’ (2006) 28 EIPR3, 146.
Ladas, and Parry, , ‘Intellectual Property Law, the European Design Regulation in Context’, Chapter 5, The position in Europe, available at www.ladas.com/Patents/PatentPractice/EUDesignRegulation/EUDesi05.html
Laddie, Prescott and Vitoria, , The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs, 2nd edn 1995.
McGowan G, Paper concerning the new Designs Act, available at: www.vicbar.com.au/pdf/CLESeminar_30062004GMc.pdf
Posner, RA and Landes, WM, ‘An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law’ (1989) 18 Journal of Legal Studies325.
Ricketson, S, The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 1886–1986, Kluwer, 1987.
Rothnie, W, ‘The vexed problem of Copyright/Designs overlap’ (2005) Intellectual Property Forum 60, 33.
Rushton, M, ‘An Economic Approach to Copyright in Works of Artistic Craftsmanship’ [2001] Intellectual Property Quarterly 3, 255.
Chapter five: Sui generis and trade mark registrationAbbot, J, ‘Reverse engineering of software: Copyright and interoperability’ (2003) Journal of law and information science 14, 7.
Advisory Council on Intellectual Property (Advisory Council on Intellectual Property), Review of enforcement of Plant Breeder's Rights (Current; 2006).
Australian Committee on Industrial Property (Advisory Council on Intellectual Property) —Patents & Experimental Use, Options Paper (Dec 2004); Final Report (Oct 2005).
Australian Committee on Industrial Property (Advisory Council on Intellectual Property) —Should plant & animal subject matter be excluded from protection by the innovation patent? (Nov 2004).
Alexandra, A, Lee, J and Vanclay, F, ‘Innovation, exclusion and commodification of plant types: a social and philosophical investigation of Plant Variety Rights in Australia’ (2004), Rural Society 14, 1, 46.
Australian Centre for Intellectual Property in Agriculture (ACIPA), ‘Understanding Plant Breeder's Right's’, available at www.acipa.edu.au/frame_pbr.html
Australian Law Reform Commission (Australian Law Reform Commission), Report No 99, Genes and Ingenuity: Gene Patenting & Human Health (2004).
Bently, L and Burrell, R, ‘The requirement of trade mark use’ (2002) AIPJ, 18, 1.
Burchfield, KJ, ‘The Constitutional Intellectual Property Power: Progress of the Useful Arts and the Legal Protection of Semiconductor Technology’ (1988) 28 Santa Clara LR473.
Christie, A, ‘Final Report of the Copyright Law Review Committee on Protection of Computer Software – An Overview of Recommendations and Issues In relation to Copyright in computer programs’ (1996) Intellectual Property Forum 27.
Christie, A—Integrated Circuits and their Contents: International Protection, LBC Information Services, 1995.
Copyright Law Review Committee, Final Report on Computer Software Protection (1995).
Davis, J, ‘To Protect or Serve? European trade mark law and the decline of the public interest’ [2003] EIPR180.
Davis, M, ‘Death of a Salesman's Doctrine: A critical look at trademark use’ (1985) 19 Georgia LR233.
Economides, N, ‘The Economics of Trademarks’ (1988) 78 Trademark Reporter523.
Eisenberg, R, ‘Proprietary Rights and the Norms of Science in Biotechnology and Research’ (1988) 97 Yale LJ 2 177.
Expert Panel on Breeding, ‘Clarification of plant breeding issues under the Plant Breeder's Rights Act 1994’, Report, December 2002.
Folie, A, ‘Trade-offs in trade mark protection: an economic analysis’ (2004) AIPJ 15, 2, 87.
Forsyth, M, ‘Biotechnology, Patents and Public Policy: A Proposal for Reform in Australia’ (2000) 11 AIPJ 202.
Helth, TS, ‘Beer with lime? A trade mark assembled by the bartenderAIPJ (2005) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, 18, 6, 93.
Honey, R and Sinden, P, ‘The Interface between Trademark, Designs and Passing Off under Australian Law: The Philips Case’ (2000) Murdoch e-law Journal Vol 7 No 4.
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology, ‘Genetic Manipulation: the Threat or the Glory’, Canberra (1992).
Hughes, S, ‘Protection of Shape Marks in Australia: Extending the permanent monopoly’ (2002) 49 Intellectual Property Forum28.
Janis, M, ‘Sustainable Agriculture, Patent Rights, and Plant Innovation’ (2001) 9 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies91.
Jones, N, ‘Biotechnology patents: a change of heart’ [1994] 1 EIPR37.
Kang, PH and Snyder, K, ‘A practitioner's approach to strategic enforcement and analysis of business method patents in the post-State Street era’ (2000) IDEA – The Journal of Law and Technology 40, 267.
Landes, WM and Posner, R, ‘Trademark law: an economic perspective’ (1987) 30 J of Law & Eco265.
Lawson, C, ‘Patents and plant breeder's rights over plant genetic resources for food and agriculture’ (2004) Federal Law Review 32, 107.
Lawson, C—‘Patenting Genes and Gene Sequences and Competition: Patenting at the Expense of Competition’ (2002) 30 Federal Law Review97.
Lemley, M and Cohen, JE, ‘Patent scope and innovation in the software industry’ (2001) 89 California Law Review1.
Lemley, M and McGowan, D, ‘Legal Implications of Network Economic Effects’ (1998) 86 California Law Review479.
Marschak J, ‘The economics of language’, in Lamberton, D (ed), The Economics of Communication and Information, Edward Elgar, 1996.
McCutcheon, J, ‘Monopolised product shapes and factual distinctiveness under s 41(6) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)’ (2004) 15 AIPJ 1, 18.
Moens, A, ‘Streamlining the Software Development Process Through Reuse and Patents’ [2000] EIPR 22(9) 418.
Moens, A—‘The Use of Copyright and Patents for Software Protection’ (1998) 4 Computer & Telecommunications Law Review35.
Nicol, D, ‘On the legality of gene patents’ [2005] MULR25.
Nicol, D and Nielsen, J, ‘The Australian Medical Biotechnology Industry and Access to Intellectual Property: Issues for Patent Law Development’ (2001) 23 Sydney Law Review347.
Nott, R, ‘The proposed directive on biotechnological inventions’ [1994] 5 EIPR191.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, ‘The Ethics of Patenting DNA – A Discussion Paper’ (2002).
Outterson, K, ‘The vanishing public domain: antibiotic resistance, pharmaceutical innovation and intellectual property law’ (2005) University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 1, 67.
Png, I and Reitman, D, ‘Why are some products branded and others not?’ (1995) 38 Journal of Law & Economics207.
Rangnekar, D, ‘Technology paradigms and the Innovation-Appropriation Interface: An examination of the nature and scope of Plant Breeders’ Rights' (1999) 17 Prometheus 2, 125.
Registrar of Plant Breeder's Rights, Clarification of Plant Breeding Issues under the Plant Breeder's Rights Act 1994 (2002).
Rimmer, M, ‘Franklin Barley: patent law and Plant Breeders’ Rights' (2003) Murdoch e-Law Journal 10 4.
Roberts, C, ‘The prospects of success of the National Institute of Health's Human Genome Application’ [1994] 1 EIPR30.
Roberts, T, ‘Broad claims for biotechnological inventions’ [1994] 9 EIPR371.
Schulze, C, ‘Registering colour trade marks in the European Union’ [2003] 25 EIPR 2, 55.
Smith, C, ‘Trade mark protection for product shape – Where does the public interest lie?’ (2005) Intellectual Property Forum 63, 32.
Suthersanen, U, ‘The European Court of Justice in Philips v Remington: Trade Marks and Market Freedom’ [2003] 7 Intellectual Property Quarterly257–83
Turkevich, L, ‘An end to the “Mathematical algorithm” confusion?’ [1995] 2 EIPR91.
Willchon, D, ‘Broad Trade Mark Specifications’ [2002] 24 EIPR228.
