Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:05:01.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Cultural diversity and the arts: Contemporary challenges for copyright law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Tzen Wong
Affiliation:
Public Interest Intellectual Property Advisors
Graham Dutfield
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

The whole of human development is derivative. We stand on the shoulders of the scientists, artists and craftsmen who preceded us. We borrow and develop what they have done; not necessarily as parasites but simply as the next generation. (Laddie 1996, p. 259)

Human development is a cultural process. As a biological species, humans are defined in terms of our cultural participation. (Rogoff 2003, p. 3)

Introduction

This chapter examines the relationship between copyright protection and the encouragement of creative expression by individuals and communities. It begins by exploring concepts of culture and cultural diversity as promoted by international organizations including the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). It poses the question as to whether copyright law, in its current formulations, adequately promotes a diversity of cultural expressions by persons and peoples of all backgrounds. It evaluates the conventional rhetoric that copyright incentivizes the arts by protecting the material and moral interests of creators. It does this by exploring trends in copyright protection and ownership, including corporate ownership, highlighting some notable differences in the experiences of creators in different sectors, world regions and local contexts. Does the copyright lacuna in some sectors and contexts suggest that other incentives and motivations might be at work in spurring creative activity? The example of contemporary art is discussed as a case study, to illustrate the ambiguities faced by creators in some sectors in relation to copyright protection for their works, along with their potential infringement of copyright over other works.

Since many creators are both copyright owners and active users of other persons’ protected works, a simple dichotomy cannot be drawn between rights owners and end users. Indeed, the line between ‘producer’ and ‘consumer’ of cultural works is increasingly blurred, with digital technology and the Internet making it ever easier for users to ‘cut and paste’ and ‘remix’ existing works. What challenges do such phenomena pose for copyright law? The second part of the chapter looks at ‘public access’ to cultural works under existing copyright frameworks. It investigates whether access is provided on terms that ultimately enhance the capabilities of individuals or communities for free, creative expression.

Type
Chapter
Information
Intellectual Property and Human Development
Current Trends and Future Scenarios
, pp. 279 - 328
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, F. 2006 http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/iteipc20064_en.pdf
Adeney, E. 2006 The Moral Rights of Authors and Performers: An International and Comparative AnalysisOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
Adorno, T.W.Horkheimer, M. 1944 Enlightenment as Mass DeceptionDialectic of EnlightenmentVersoLondonGoogle Scholar
Adorno, T.W. 1997 Theory and History of Literature 88 University of Minnesota PressMinneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
Afori, O.F. 2004 Human Rights and Copyright: The Introduction of Natural Law Considerations into American Copyright LawFordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 14 497http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/200flspub6402.pdfGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. 2008
Band, J.227http://www.jmripl.com/Publications/Vol9/Issue2/Band.pdf 2010
Barthes, R 1967 http://www.ubu.com/aspen/aspen5and6/threeEssays.html#barthes
Benjamin, W. 1938 The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical ReproductionIlluminationsEnglish translation by H. Zohn (1999), PimlicoLondonGoogle Scholar
Benkler, Y. 2006 The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and FreedomYale University PressNew Haven and Londonhttp://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bently, L. 1994 Copyright and the Death of the Author in Literature and LawBook Review, Modern Law Review 57 973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkman Center for Internet & Society & Garner 2005 Copyright and Digital Media in a Post-Napster World: 2005 UpdateHarvard Law SchoolCambridge, MAhttp://cyber.law.harvard.edu/media/wpsupplement2005Google Scholar
Bettig, R. 1996 Copyrighting Culture: The Political Economy of Intellectual PropertyWestview PressBoulder, COGoogle Scholar
Beutz Land, M 2008 Intellectual Property Rights and the Right to Participate in Cultural LifeWhite Paper Series 08/09 2 http://www.nyls.edu/user_files/1/3/4/30/58/Beutz_Cultural_Rights.pdfGoogle Scholar
Beutz Land, M 2009 Protecting Rights OnlineYale Journal of International Law 34 1http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1295448Google Scholar
Boateng, B. 2005 ‘Square Pegs in Round Holes? Cultural Production, Intellectual Property Frameworks, and Discourses of PowerGhosh, R.A.CODE: Collaborative Ownership and the Digital Economy61Massachusetts Institute of Technology PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Bowrey, K. 2006 Alternative Intellectual Property? : Indigenous Protocols, Copyleft and New Juridifications of Customary PracticeMacquarie Law Journal 6 65Google Scholar
Brennan, D. J.Christie, A.F. 2000 Spoken Words and Copyright Subsistence in Anglo-American LawIntellectual Property Quarterly 4 309Google Scholar
Bullard, A. 2005 Reinvindicando a los Piratas. ¿Es La Propiedad Intelectual un Robo?Latin American and Caribbean Law and Economics Association (ALACDE) Annual Papershttp://repositories.cdlib.org/bple/alacde/7Google Scholar
Caribbean Regional Negotiating Machinery (CARICOM) 2006
Carpenter, M.M. 2004 Intellectual Property Law and Indigenous Peoples: Adapting Copyright Law to the Needs of a Global CommunityYale Human Rights and Development Law Journal 7 51Google Scholar
Caves, R.E. 2000 Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and CommerceHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Chander, A.Sunder, M. 2007 Everyone's a Superhero: A Cultural Theory of “Mary SueCalifornia Law Review 95 597Google Scholar
Chowdhury, A.R. 2008 The Future of Copyright in IndiaJournal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 3 102http://jiplp.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/3/2/102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, J. 2007 Creative Commons – The Next Generation: Creative Commons License Use Five Years OnSCRIPT-ed – A Journal of Law, Technology and Society 4 http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/script-ed/vol4–1/coates.aspGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J.E. 2006 Copyright, Commodification and Culture: Locating the Public DomainGuibault, L.Hugenholtz, P.B.The Future of the Public Domain121Kluwer Law Internationalhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=663652Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (EC Commission) 2008 Green Paper on Copyright in the Knowledge Economyhttp://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0466:FIN:EN:PDFGoogle Scholar
Commission on Intellectual Property Rights (CIPR) 2002 Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development PolicyCIPR, Londonhttp://www.iprcommission.org/papers/pdfs/final_report/CIPRfullfinal.pdfGoogle Scholar
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) 2005 http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/7cec89369c43a6dfc1256a2a0027ba2a/03902145edbbe797c125711500584ea8/$FILE/G0640060.pdf
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) 2009 http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cescr/comments.htm
Cornish, W.R. 1999 Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied RightsSweet and MaxwellLondonGoogle Scholar
Cornish, W.R. 2002 ‘The Author as Risk-SharerColumbia Journal of Law and the Arts 26 1Google Scholar
Cornish, W.R.Llewelyn, D. 2003 Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied RightsSweet and MaxwellLondonGoogle Scholar
Crace, J. 2008 Harry Potter: The Last BattleThe Guardianhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/mar/11/harrypotter.lawGoogle Scholar
Darnton, R. 2009 Google and the Future of BooksThe New York Review of Books 56 http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22281Google Scholar
Desurmont, T. 2006 Considerations on the Relationship between the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions and the Protection of Authors’ Rightse-Copy Bulletin Doctrine and Opinionshttp://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/files/32555/11655864341desurmont_en.pdf/desurmont_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. 1934 Art as ExperiencePerigee TradeNew YorkGoogle Scholar
Dietz, A. 2006 GermanyGeller, P.E.International Copyright Law and Practice 2 GER-55, LexisNexisNewark, NJGoogle Scholar
Donders, Y. 2007 The Legal Framework of the Right to Take Part in Cultural LifeDonders, Y.Volodin, V.Human Rights in Education, Science and Culture: Legal Developments and ChallengesUNESCO and Ashgate PublishingParisGoogle Scholar
Donders, Y.Volodin, V. 2007 Human Rights in Education, Science and Culture: Legal Developments and ChallengesUNESCO and Ashgate PublishingParis
Drahos, P. 1999 Intellectual Property and Human RightsIntellectual Property Law Quarterly 1999 349Google Scholar
Drahos, P.Braithwaite, J. 2002 Information Feudalism – Who Owns the Knowledge Economy?Earthscan Publications Ltd.LondonGoogle Scholar
Dufrenne, M. 1979 Main Trends in Aesthetics and the Sciences of ArtHolmes & Meier Publishers, Inc.New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Dutfield, G.Suthersanen, U. 2007 Innovation and developmentSuthersanen, U.Dutfield, G.Chow, K.B.Innovation Without Patents: Harnessing the Creative Spirit in a Diverse World3Edgar Elgar PressCheltenham, UKGoogle Scholar
Ficsor, M. 2002 ‘How Much of What? The “Three-Step Test” and Its Application in Two Recent WTO Dispute Settlement CasesRevue Internationale du Droit D’Auteur 192 110Google Scholar
Fisher, W. 1988 Reconstructing the Fair Use DoctrineHarvard Law Review 101 1659Google Scholar
Fisher, W. 2001 Theories of Intellectual PropertyNew Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of PropertyCambridge University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, B.F. 2008 Copyright 2010: The Future of CopyrightEuropean Intellectual Property Review 30 43Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, B.F.Coates, J.M.Lewis, S.M. 2007 Open Content Licensing: Cultivating the Creative CommonsSydney University Presshttp://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00006677/Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, B.O’Brien, D. 2007 Digital Sampling and Culture Jamming in a Remix World: What Does the Law Allow?Fitzgerald, B.F.Coates, J.M.Lewis, S.M.Open Content Licensing: Cultivating the Creative Commons156Sydney University PressSydneyGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1979 What Is an Author?The Foucault ReaderHarari, J.V.Cornell UniversityIthaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Geller, P.E. 2008 Beyond the Copyright Crisis: Principles for ChangeJournal of the Copyright Society of the USA 55 2http://ssrn.com/abstract=1114372Google Scholar
Gervais, D.J. 2005 Towards a New Core International Copyright Norm: The Reverse Three-Step TestMarquette Intellectual Property Law Review 9 1Google Scholar
Ghosh, R.ASoete, L. 2006 http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/wppdf/2006/wp2006–029.pdf
Ginsburg, J.C. 2001 ‘Toward Supranational Copyright Law? The WTO Panel Decision and the “Three-Step Test” for CopyrightRevue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur 187 2http://ssrn.com/abstract=253867Google Scholar
Goldstein, P. 2004 Paternalism and Autonomy in Copyright ContractsVaver, D.Bently, L.Intellectual Property in the New Millennium: Essays in Honour of William R. CornishCambridge University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
Gollin, M. 2008 Driving Innovation: Intellectual Property Strategies for a Dynamic WorldCambridge University PressNew YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, G. 2005 http://wsispapers.choike.org//papers/eng/gustavo_wto_wsis_unesco.pdf
Gowers, A. 2006 http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/pbr06_gowers_report_755.pdf
Guibault, L. 2002 Copyright Limitations and Contracts. An Analysis of the Contractual Overridability of Limitations on CopyrightInformation Law Series 9Google Scholar
Guibault, L.Hugenholtz, P.B. 2003 The Nature and Scope of Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright and Neighbouring Rights with regard to General Interest Missions for the Transmission of Knowledge: Prospects for their Adaptation to the Digital EnvironmentCopyright BulletinUNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
Halbert, D.J. 1996 Intellectual Property Law, Technology and Our Probable FutureTechnological Forecasting and Social Change 52 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbert, D.J. 2001 Intellectual Property in the Year 2025Journal of Futures Studies 6 25Google Scholar
Heins, M.Beckles, T. 2005 Will Fair Use Survive? Free Expression in the Age of Copyright ControlNew Yorkhttp://www.fepproject.org/policyreports/WillFairUseSurvive.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hilty, R.Kur, A.Klass, N.Geiger, C.Peukert, A.Drexl, J.Katzenberger, P. 2008 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1288620
Hinze, G. 2007 http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2007/06/latest-u-s-free-trade-agreement-contains-new-twist
Hirsch, E.D. 1967 In Defense of the AuthorValidity in Interpretation1Yale University PressNew Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
Hodin, J.P. 1951 Contemporary Art: Its Definition and ClassificationCollege Art Journal 10 337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howkins, J. 2001 The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from IdeasPenguinLondonGoogle Scholar
Hugenholtz, P.B.Okediji, R.L. 2008 Conceiving an International Instrument on Exceptions and Limitations to Copyrighthttp://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/hugenholtz/finalreport2008.pdf
Intellectual Property Office (IPO) 2009 Taking Forward the Gowers Review of Intellectual Property: Second Stage Consultations on Copyright ExceptionsIPO, UKhttp://www.ipo.gov.uk/consult-gowers2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. 2007 Creative Commons and the Creative Industries: Perspectives from the Creative IndustriesFitzgerald, B.F.Coates, J.M.Lewis, S.M.Open Content Licensing: Cultivating the Creative CommonsSydney University PressSydneyGoogle Scholar
Keaney, E. 2006 From Access to Participation: Cultural Policy and Civil RenewalInstitute for Public Policy ResearchLondonGoogle Scholar
Koelman, K.J. 2006 Fixing the Three-Step TestEuropean Intellectual Property Review 28 407Google Scholar
Laddie, H. 1996 Copyright: Over-Strength, Over-Regulated, Over-Rated?European Intellectual Property Review 18 253Google Scholar
Landes, W.M. 1999 The Arts and Humanities in Public Life: Copyright Protection and Appropriation ArtUniversity of Chicago Law Schoolhttp://culturalpolicy.uchicago.edu/conf1999/landes.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lange, D. 1981 Recognizing the Public DomainLaw & Contemporary Problems 44 147http://www.law.duke.edu/pd/papers/lange_background.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, D. 2003 Reimagining the Public DomainLaw & Contemporary Problems 66 463http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/lcp/downloads/LCP66DWinterSpring2003P463.pGoogle Scholar
Lessig, L. 2004 Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control CreativityPenguin PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
Lessig, L. 2007 ‘The Vision for the Creative Commons: What Are We and Where Are We Headed? Free CultureFitzgerald, B.F.Coates, J.M.Lewis, S.M.Open Content Licensing: Cultivating the Creative CommonSydney University Press36http://eprints.qut.edu.au/6677/1/6677.pdfGoogle Scholar
Liang, L. 2004 A Guide to Open Content Licencehttp://pzwart.wdka.hro.nl/mdr/pubsfolder/opencontentpdfGoogle Scholar
Litman, J. 1990 The Public DomainEmory Law Journal 39 965Google Scholar
Long, P. 2001 Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the RenaissanceJohns Hopkins University PressBaltimoreGoogle Scholar
Lufkin, M. 2005 Why Harvard Had to Sign 45 Contracts to Install a Work by Pierre HuygheThe Art NewspaperGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, D.Malm, K.Ronström, O. 2003 Music, Media, Multiculture: Changing Musicscapeshttp://www.visarkiv.se/mmmindex.htm
McCutcheon, J. 2008
Merges, R.P.Menell, P.S.Lemley, M.A. 2003 Intellectual Property in the New Technological AgeAspen PublishersNew YorkGoogle Scholar
Mizukami, P.N.Lemos, R. 2008 From Free Software to Free Culture: The Emergence of Open BusinessShaver, L.Access to Knowledge in Brazil: New Research on Intellectual Property, Innovation and DevelopmentInformation Society Project, Yale Law SchoolNew Haven, CThttp://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/ISP/A2KBrazil_bkmk.pdfGoogle Scholar
Morgan, O. 2002 International Protection of Performers’ RightsHart PublishingOxfordGoogle Scholar
Munoz Tellez, VWaitara, C. 2007 A Development Analysis of the Proposed WIPO Treaty on the Protection of Broadcasting and Cablecasting OrganizationsResearch Paper No. 9http://www.southcentre.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=66Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. 2000 Women and Human Development: The Capabilities ApproachCambridge University PressCambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oguamanam, C. 2008 Local Knowledge as Trapped Knowledge: Intellectual Property, Culture, Power and PoliticsThe Journal of World Intellectual Property 11 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opderbeck, D.W. 2008 Deconstructing Jefferson's Candle: Towards a Critical Realist Approach to Cultural Environmentalism and Information PolicySeton Hall Public Law Research Paper No. 1091024http://ssrn.com/abstract=1091024Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2007 Participative Web and User-Created Contenthttp://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/14/38393115.pdf
Ovett, D. 2006 Intellectual Property and Human Rights: Is the Distinction Clear Now?: An Assessment of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’ General Comment No. 17 (2005)3D Policy Brief 3http://www.3dthree.org/pdf_3D/3D_GC17_IPHR.pdfGoogle Scholar
Penna, F.J.Thormann, M.Finger, J.M. 2004 The Africa Music ProjectFinger, J.M.Schuler, P.Poor People's Knowledge: Promoting Intellectual Property in Developing CountriesOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Pitrout, J. 2006 An Authors’ Rights-based Copyright Law: The Fairness and Morality of French and American Law ComparedCardozo Arts and Entertainment 24 549Google Scholar
Prott, L.V. 1998 Understanding One Another on Cultural RightsNiec, H.Cultural Rights and Wrongs: A Collection of Essays in Commemoration of the 50th Anniversary of the University Declaration of Human RightsInstitute of Art & LawGoogle Scholar
Prott, L.V. 1998 Cultural Rights as Peoples’ Rights in International LawCrawford, J.The Rights of Peoples93Clarendon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, K.Sprigman, C. 2006 The Piracy Paradox: Innovation and Intellectual Property in Fashion DesignVirginia Law Review 92 1687http://ssrn.com/abstract=878401Google Scholar
Reese, R.A. 2008 Transformativeness and the Derivative Work RightColumbia Journal of Law & the Arts 31 467Google Scholar
Rens, A.Prabhala, A.Kawooya, D. 2006 Intellectual Property, Education and Access to Knowledge in Southern AfricaICTSD Regional Research Paper Southern and Eastern Africahttp://www.iprsonline.org/unctadictsd/docs/06%2005%2031%20tralac%20amended-pdf.pdfGoogle Scholar
Roberts, G. 2009 Rowling Powerless to Block “Potter Guide”The Independent 3 http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/rowling-powerless-to-block-potter-guide-1222855.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rochlitz, R. 1996 The Disenchantment of Art: The Philosophy of Walter BenjaminGuildford PressNew York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Rogers, B. 2006 ForewordKeaney, E.From Access to Participation: Cultural Policy and Civil RenewalInstitute for Public Policy ResearchLondonGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, B. 2003 The Cultural Nature of Human DevelopmentOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
Rose, M. 1993 Authors and Owners: The Invention of CopyrightHarvard University PressLondon and Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. 2006 Enriching Discourse on Public DomainsDuke Law Journal 55 783http://ssrn.com/abstract=925052Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.Google Book Search and the Future of Books in CyberspaceMinnesota Law Reviewhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1535067 2010Google Scholar
Sen, A.K. 1985 Commodities and CapabilitiesElsevier Science PublishersOxfordGoogle Scholar
Sherman, B.Bently, L. 1995 Performers’ Rights: Options for Reform – Consultants Report for the Interdepartmental CommitteeDepartment of Communications and the ArtsCanberraGoogle Scholar
Stavenhagen, R. 1998 Cultural Rights: A Social Science PerspectiveNiec, H.Cultural Rights and WrongsUNESCOGoogle Scholar
Stokes, S. 2003 Art and CopyrightHart PublishingOxfordGoogle Scholar
Strathern, 2005 Imagined Collectivities and Multiple AuthorshipGhosh, R.A.CODE: Collaborative Ownership and the Digital EconomyMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Sun, H.C. 2007 Overcoming the Achilles Heel of Copyright LawNorthwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 5 265http://ssrn.com/abstract=1021027Google Scholar
Sunder, M. 2008 Intellectual Property and Development as FreedomNetanel, N.W.The Development Agenda: Global Intellectual Property and Developing CountriesOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
Suthersanen, U. 2007 Copyright Law: A Stakeholder's PalimpsestMacmillan, F.New Directions in Copyright Law 5Google Scholar
Suthersanen, U. 2008 A2K and the WIPO Development Agenda: Time to List the “Public Domain”UNCTAD-ICTSD Projects on IPRs and Sustainable Development 1Google Scholar
Takeyama, L. 1994 The Welfare Implications of Unauthorized Reproduction of Intellectual Property in the Presence of Demand Network ExternalitiesJournal of Industrial Economics 42 155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towse, R. 2007 ‘The Singer or the Song? Developments in Performers’ Rights from the Perspective of a Cultural EconomistReview of Law and Economics 3 http://www.bepress.com/rle/vol3/iss3/art6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, R. 2008 User-Generated Discontent: Transformation in PracticeColumbia Journal of Law & the Arts 31 497http://ssrn.com/abstract=1146461Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) 2008 Creative Economy Report – The Challenge of Assessing the Creative Economy: Towards Informed Policy-Makinghttp://www.unctad.org/en/docs/ditc20082cer_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) 2004 UNDP Human Development Report 2004: Cultural Liberty in Today's Diverse WorldUNDPNew YorkGoogle Scholar
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) 2004 UNESCO and the Issue of Cultural Diversity: Review and Strategy 1946–2004http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/files/12900/10958784163DivCultBilanStrategies-ENG-sept04.pdf/DivCult-BilanStrategies-ENG-sept04.pdfGoogle Scholar
United States Copyright Office 2006 http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/orphan-report-full.pdf
Vander Ark, S 2009 The Lexicon: An Unauthorized Guide to Harry Potter Fiction and Related MaterialsRDR BooksMuskegon, MIGoogle Scholar
Vogel, J. 1998 Schricker, G.
Wade, A. 2003 http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/story/0,3605,949979,00.html
Wallis, R.Malm, K. 1984 Big Sounds from Small Peoples: The Music Industry in Small CountriesPendragon PressNew York and LondonGoogle Scholar
Walravens, N. 2005 L’oeuvre d’Art en Droit d’Auteur, Forme et Originalité des Oeuvres d’Art ContemporainesEconomicaGoogle Scholar
Watt, R. 2004 The Past and the Future of the Economics of CopyrightReview of Economic Research on Copyright Issues 1 151http://ssrn.com/abstract=1143022Google Scholar
Weatherall, K.G. 2006 “Pretend-y Rights”’: On the Insanely Complicated New Regime for Performers’ Rights in Australia, and How Australian Performers Got GyppedNew Directions in Copyright Law 3 171Edward Elgar Presshttp://ssrn.com/abstract=809905Google Scholar
Wood, J. 2008 How Fiction WorksFarrar, Straus and GirouxNew YorkGoogle Scholar
Woodmansee, M. 1984 The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the ‘Author’Eighteenth Century Studies 17 425http://www.compilerpress.atfreeweb.com/Anno%20Woodmansee%20Genius%20&%20Copyright.htmCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodmansee, M. 1993 The Author, Art and the Market: Rereading the History of AestheticsColumbia University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 2004 WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and UseWIPO Publication No. 489(E), WIPOGenevaGoogle Scholar
WIPO 2005
WIPO Standing Committee on Copyrights and Related Rights 2008 Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Libraries and ArchivesGenevahttp://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_17/sccr_17_2.pdfGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×