Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:24:32.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Political Parties: Presidential Succession Crises and Internal Party Democra

from Part III - Elections, Parties and Political Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2018

Ian Cooper
Affiliation:
Cambridge University
Nic Cheeseman
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

‘Modern democracy’ – Schattschneider (1942: 1) wrote – ‘is unthinkable save in terms of political parties’. By contesting elections, participating in parliament and taking grievances to court rather than to the streets, parties encourage citizens to regard democratic politics as morally and procedurally legitimate. By representing constituents in the corridors of power, they render public policymaking accountable and expose instances of official malfeasance. By recruiting, training and socialising political actors, they bring fresh talent into the system and ensure that democratic ideals are imbibed at the highest levels of society. And by creating, nurturing and reproducing societal coalitions – with the capacity to secure an electoral majority – they bring together groups with conflicting interests and so facilitate social cohesion. A representative democracy without effective political parties, in other words, is akin to an engine without moving parts.

African parties, however, have a bad reputation. Far from exercising power for the common good, ruling parties are said to intimidate opponents, politicise security forces and erode the boundaries between party, government and state. Far from recruiting fresh talent, they affect an endless circulation of elites, with the discredited autocrats of yesteryear moving from party to party without ever relinquishing power. Far from building broad-based alliances capable of reconciling interests and managing conflict, they seek short-term electoral advantage by fanning the flames of ethnic hatred. And far from establishing acceptable norms of political behaviour, opposition parties attack rivals, denigrate judiciaries and cry foul over electoral defeat even when the popular will has been unambiguously expressed. Little wonder, then, that African parties are often regarded as the ‘weak link in the chain of elements that together make for a democratic state’ (Randall and Svåsand 2002: 31).

Most African parties, of course, have a constitution intended to define objectives, guarantee rights and responsibilities, establish institutions and place limits on the exercise of political power. These rules, however, tend to exist only on paper. Indeed, few African parties have a grassroots membership capable of effecting vertical accountability or influencing policy, in part because internal party organisation is sustained by the personal fortunes of ‘big men’. Fewer still have a professional bureaucracy capable of applying party statute, conducting policy research and creating checks on presidential power.

Type
Chapter
Information
Institutions and Democracy in Africa
How the Rules of the Game Shape Political Developments
, pp. 191 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agência Angola Press. 2014. ‘MPLA Congress Reinforces Unity within Party’, accessed 5 September 2017. www.portalangop.co.ao/angola/en_us/noticias/politica/2014/11/49/Angola-MPLA-Congress-reinforces-unity-within-party,540b12a2-cb83-47ad-b330-6ccc40d51112.html.
Akawa, Martha, and Gawanas, Bience. 2014. The gender politics of the Namibian liberation struggle, Basel: Carl Schlettwein Stiftung.Google Scholar
Basedau, Matthias, Erdmann, Gero and Mehler, Andreas (eds.). 2007. Votes, money and violence: Parties and elections in sub-Saharan Africa, Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.Google Scholar
Bauer, Gretchen. 2001. ‘Namibia in the first decade of independence: How democratic?’, Journal of Southern African Studies 27, 1: 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaards, Matthijs. 2000. ‘Crafting competitive party systems: Electoral laws and the opposition in Africa’, Democratisation 7, 4: 163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaards, Matthijs. 2004. ‘Counting parties and identifying dominant party systems in Africa’, European Journal of Political Research 43, 2: 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Susan. 1995. ‘Diplomacy by other means – SWAPO's liberation war’ in Leys, Colin and Saul, John S. (eds.), Namibia's liberation struggle: The two-edged sword, Oxford: James Currey and Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Chabal, Patrick, and Daloz, Jean-Pascal. 1999. Africa works: The Political instrumentalization of disorder, Oxford: James Currey and Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Cheeseman, Nic. 2010. ‘African elections as vehicles for change’, Journal of Democracy 21, 4: 139–153.Google Scholar
Cliffe, Lionel, Bush, Ray, Lindsay, Jenny, Mokopakgosi, Brian, Pankhurst, Donna, and Tsie, Balefi. 1994. The transition to independence in Namibia, Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Cooper, Ian. 2010. ‘The Namibian elections of 2009’, Electoral Studies 29: 529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Ian. 2015a. ‘Zuma, Malema and the provinces: Factional conflict within the African National Congress’, Transformation 87: 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Ian. 2015b. ‘Dominant party cohesion in comparative perspective: Evidence from South Africa and Namibia’, Democratisation [published online].
Dobell, Lauren. 1998. SWAPO's struggle for Namibia, 1960–1991: War by other means, Basel: Schlettwein.Google Scholar
Du Toit, Pierre. 1999. ‘Bridge or bridgehead? Comparing the party systems of Botswana, Namibia, Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi’ in Giliomee, Hermann and Simkins, Charles (eds.), The Awkward Embrace: One Party Domination and Democracy, Cape Town: Tafelberg.Google Scholar
Elischer, Sebastian. 2012. ‘Measuring and comparing party ideology in nonindustrialized societies: Taking party manifesto research to Africa’, Democratisation 19, 4: 642–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdmann, Gero, and Basedau, Matthias. 2007. Problems of categorising and explaining party systems in Africa, Hamburg: German Institute for Global and Area Studies.Google Scholar
Fomunyoh, Christopher. 2001. ‘Democratisation in fits and starts’, Journal of Democracy 12, 3: 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, K. 2008. Diamonds, dispossession and democracy in Botswana, Oxford: Woodbridge and James Currey.Google Scholar
Gunther, Richard, and Diamond, Larry. 2003. ‘Species of political parties: a New typology’, Party Politics 9, 2: 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyimah-Boadi, Emmanuel. 2007. ‘Political parties, elections and patronage: Random thoughts on neo-patrimonialism and African democratisation’ in Basedau, Matthias, Erdmann, Gero and Mehler, Andreas (eds.), Votes, money and violence: Parties and elections in sub-Saharan Africa, Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.Google Scholar
Hopwood, Graham. 2008. Guide to Namibian politics, Windhoek: Namibian Institute for Democracy.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The third wave: Democratisation in the late twentieth century, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Informanté. 12 November 2009. Education Splashes Tax-Payers’ Money Defending Chinese Scholarships.
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2015. Women in National Parliaments, accessed 5 September 2017. www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm.].
Jackson, Robert H., and Rosberg, Carl Gustav. 1982. Personal rule in Black Africa: Prince, autocrat, prophet, tyrant, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Katjavivi, Peter. 1988. A history of resistance in Namibia, Oxford: UNESCO and James Currey.Google Scholar
Kuenzi, Michelle, and Lambright, Gina. 2005. ‘Party systems and democratic consolidation in Africa's electoral regimes’, Party Politics 11, 4: 423–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBas, Adrienne. 2011. From protest to parties: Party-building and democratisation in Africa, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Tom. 2000. ‘The Namibian elections of 1999’, Democratisation 8, 2: 191–230.Google Scholar
Mac Giollabhuì, Shane. 2014. ‘How things fall apart: Candidate selection and the cohesion of dominant parties in South Africa and Namibia’, Party Politics 19, 4: 577–600.Google Scholar
Manning, Carrie. 2005. ‘Assessing Africa's party systems after the Third Wave’, Party Politics 11, 6: 707–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melber, Henning. 2007. ‘“Swapo is the nation, and the nation is Swapo”: Government and opposition in a dominant party state. The case of Namibia’ in Melber, Henning (ed.), Political opposition in African countries: The cases of Kenya, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe, Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.Google Scholar
Mozaffar, Shaheen, and Scarritt, James R.. 2005. ‘The puzzle of African party systems’, Party Politics 11, 4: 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozambique News Agency. 2014. ‘FRELIMO will unite around Nyussi – Guebuza’, accessed 5 September 2017. http://allafrica.com/stories/201403040081.html.
Nakamura, Robert and Johnson, John. 2003. ‘Rising legislative assertiveness in Uganda and Kenya, 1996 to 2002’, International Political Science Association Congress, accessed 5 September 2017. www.cid.suny.edu/publications1/Nakamura-Johnson%20Rising%20Legislative%20Assertiveness%20in%20Uganda%20and%20Kenya.pdf.
Namibian Sun, 19 November 2012. ‘Hage gets campaign wings’.
Namibian Sun, 27 April 2014. ‘Pohamba unrepentant on gender quota’.
Namibian Sun, 29 August 2013. ‘RDP would remove Nujoma statues—Nyamu’.
Namibian Sun, 29 August 2014. ‘SWAPO old guard saved by the bill’.
Namibian Sun, 11 March 2014. ‘SWAPO rules out 50/50 gender quota reversal’.
New Patriotic Party. ‘Organisational structure’, accessed 5 September 2017. www.newpatrioticparty.org/index.php/who-we-are/wings/npp-abroad.
New Vision, 11 January 2012. ‘NRM retreat to resolve internal rifts’.
Posner, Daniel N., and Young, Daniel J.. 2007. ‘The institutionalization of political power in Africa’, Journal of Democracy 18, 3: 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, Vicky, and Svåsand, Lars. 2002. ‘Political parties and democratic consolidation in Africa’, Democratisation 9, 3: 30–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Republic of Namibia. 2014. Third Constitutional Amendment Bill.
Sartori, Giovanni. 2005. Parties and party systems: A Framework for analysis, Colchester: ECPR.Google Scholar
Saul, John S., and Leys, Colin. 1995. ‘Swapo: The politics of exile’ in Leys, Colin and Saul, John S. (eds.), Namibia's liberation struggle: The two-edged sword, Oxford: James Currey and Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1942. Party government, New York: Rinehart and Company.Google Scholar
Sherbourne, Robin. 2004. ‘After the dust has settled: Continuity or stagnation?’ Institute for Public Policy Research, Windhoek, accessed 5 September 2017. www.ippr.org.na/sites/default/files/IPPR%20Opinion%20No%2016%20Continuity%20or%20Stagnation.pdf.
Soiri, Ilina. 1998. ‘SWAPO wins, apathy rules: The Namibian 1998 local authority elections’ in Cowen, Michael and Laakso, Liisa (eds.), Multi-party elections in Africa, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
SWAPO Party. 2012. ‘“I'm in”, says Ekandjo, “Let the Congress Decide”’, accessed 5 September 2017. www.swapoparty.org/im_in_says_ekandjo.html.
Tanzanian Affairs. ‘Eleven CCM candidates fight for presidency’, 1 March 2005, accessed 2 July 2015. www.tzaffairs.org/2005/05/eleven-ccm-candidates-fight-for-presidency/.
The Guardian. 8 July 2014. ‘Namibia's “Zebra Politics” could make it Stand Out from the Global Herd’.
The Namibian. 30 March 2009. ‘All steamed up about “hibernators”’.
The Namibian. 28 August 2014. ‘Constitutional amendments passed’.
The Namibian. 10 March 2015. ‘Ndeitunga, Namoloh in land row’.
The Namibian. 27 August 2002. President forced to drop women's quota.
The Namibian. 19 May 2014. ‘Salary rise to politicians’.
The Namibian. 30 August 2014. ‘Shock and awe at SWAPO pot elections’.
The Namibian. 28 August 2013. ‘SWAPO's pro-women constitution launched’.
The Namibian. 26 March 1999. ‘Ulenga suspension was never debated’.
The Observer (Kampala). 21 July 2011. ‘Why NRM MPs defied Museveni to elect Amongi’, accessed 2 July 2015. Available at: www.observer.ug/news-headlines/14374-why-nrm-mps-defied-museveni-to-elect-amongi.
The Observer (London). 18 January 2015. ‘Goodluck Jonathan: from poor boy to accidental president’.
Van de Walle, Nicolas. 2003. ‘Presidentialism and clientelism in Africa's emerging party systems’, Journal of Modern African Studies 41, 2: 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Walle, Nicolas, and Butler, Kimberley Smiddy. 1999. ‘Political parties and party systems in Africa's illiberal democracies’, Cambridge Journal of International Affairs 13, 1: 14–28.Google Scholar
Windhoek Observer, 23 June 2013. ‘Ngurare has Learnt his Lesson’,
Windhoek Observer, 1 August 2014. ‘Controversial bill tabled’.
World Bank. 2009. Namibia: Country brief, Washington, D.C.: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×