Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T04:28:22.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Tracy Dennison
Tracy Dennison
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Institutional Framework of Russian Serfdom , pp. 234 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

GAYaO, f. 100, op. 8, d. 647 (1816)
GAYaO, f. 100, op. 8, d. 2656 (1858)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1941 (1850)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2553 (1834)
GAYaO, f. 230, op. 11, d. 1588 (1786–1826)
GAYaO, f. 230, op. 11, d. 1608 (1850–61)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1143 (1832/8)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2320 (1858)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 59 (1737)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 480 (1785)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 555 (1796/1800)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 677 (1808)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 714 (1816)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 848 (1822)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 867 (1821–2)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 934 (1825)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 991 (1827)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1016 (1828)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1305 (1764)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1318 (1800)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1584 (1842)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1615 (1843)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1684 (1845)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1766 (1847)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1942 (1850)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1943 (1850)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2212 (no date)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2312 (1857)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 902 (1824)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 911 (1824)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 938 (1825)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1713 (1846)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2266 (1857)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 131 (1746)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 262 (1760)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 271 (1762)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 272 (1762)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 776 (1820)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 957 (1825)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 958 (1825)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1158 (1832)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1246 (1834)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2390 (1859–60)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 141 (1750)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 174 (1754)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 275 (1763)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 323 (1775)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 496 (1786)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 525 (1787)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 565 (1791)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 652 (1804)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1325 (1837)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1590 (1843)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1635 (1844)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1789 (1847)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2317 (1858)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2518 (1791)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2556 (1833)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 229 (1759)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 303 (1770)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 357 (1777)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 460 (1783)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 612 (1793)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 977 (1826)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1108 (1831)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1155 (1832)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1336 (1837)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1523 (1840)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 189 (‘Communal account books, 1754’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 294 (‘Parish account books, 1764’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 530 (‘Communal account books, 1787’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 608 (‘Parish account books, 1793’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 921 (‘Communal account books, 1824’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 944 (‘Communal account books, 1825’)
GAYaO, f. 230, op. 1 (‘Records of the Yaroslavl’ consistorial court and other ecclesiastical institutions')
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 103 (‘On the distribution of flax, 1744–46’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 575 (‘Monies collected from stallholders, 1792’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 588 (‘Petition regarding credit, 1792’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 620 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1787’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 628 (‘Petition regarding inheritance dispute, 1795’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 629 (‘Petition regarding credit, 1795’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 661 (‘Punishments meted out to serfs, 1807’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 668 (‘Petition against Slasnikov, 1807’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 706 (‘Petition regarding credit, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 729 (‘Petition regarding credit, 1819’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 739 (‘Monies collected from stallholders, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 745 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 766 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 768 (‘Petition regarding dispute, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 770 (‘Petition regarding dispute, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 733 (‘On the election of estate officials, 1821’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 843 (‘Petition regarding credit dispute, 1822’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 844 (‘Petition for poor relief, 1822’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 850 (‘Petition for poor relief, 1849’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 864 (‘On the letting of the market square, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 886 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1824’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 898 (‘Punishments meted out to serfs, 1823’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 912 (‘Petition regarding household dispute, 1824’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 914 (‘Petition from village of Malakhovo residents against Sal'nikov, 1825’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 930 (‘Petition regarding land repartition, 1825’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 941 (‘Petition against the serf Sal'nikov, 1825’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed.khr. 993 (‘Petition regarding inheritance dispute, 1828’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 994 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1828’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1022 (‘On the election of estate officials, 1850’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1030 (‘Petition against poor relief, 1830’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1070 (‘Instructions from Rostov district, 1831’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1119 (‘Report on estate manufactories’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1124 (‘Petitions regarding marriage, 1832’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1133 (‘Petition regarding credit, 1832’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1140 (‘Petition regarding maintenance of parish church, 1832’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1178 (‘Petition regarding credit dispute, 1833’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1181 (‘Petitions regarding marriage, 1833’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1227 (‘Petition regarding credit dispute, 1835’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1256 (‘Petition against bailiff Tizengauzen, 1835’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1283 (‘List of trading peasants and guilds, 1836’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1325 (‘Punishments meted out to serfs, 1825’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1336 (‘Petition regarding land purchase, 1837’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1345 (‘Report on serfs’ buildings, 1837')
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1385 (‘Petition from merchant Sheshunov, 1838’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1391 (‘List of trading peasants and guilds, 1838’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1434 (‘Petition regarding labourer purchase, 1839’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1435 (‘Petition regarding labourer purchase, 1839’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1438 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1839’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1492 (‘Petition regarding land purchase, 1840’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1563 (‘Petition regarding land purchase, 1840’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1568 (‘Report on grain harvests, 1842–54’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1598 (‘On serfs’ houses, 1843')
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1614 (‘On the exile of serfs in arrears, 1843’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1643 (‘Petition regarding trade dispute, 1844’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1646 (‘Petition for household division, 1844’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1745 (‘Petition regarding officeholding, 1847’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1764 (‘Petition regarding credit, 1847’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1774 (‘Contributions to the estate granary, 1847’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2058 (‘Petition regarding land repartition, 1853’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2232 (‘On serfs in arrears, 1855–60’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2241 (‘Record of sums belonging to serfs’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2280 (‘Petition regarding savings, 1857’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2518 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1791’)
GAYaO, f. 100, op. 8, d. 647 (1816)
GAYaO, f. 100, op. 8, d. 2656 (1858)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1941 (1850)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2553 (1834)
GAYaO, f. 230, op. 11, d. 1588 (1786–1826)
GAYaO, f. 230, op. 11, d. 1608 (1850–61)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1143 (1832/8)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2320 (1858)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 59 (1737)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 480 (1785)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 555 (1796/1800)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 677 (1808)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 714 (1816)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 848 (1822)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 867 (1821–2)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 934 (1825)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 991 (1827)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1016 (1828)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1305 (1764)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1318 (1800)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1584 (1842)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1615 (1843)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1684 (1845)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1766 (1847)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1942 (1850)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1943 (1850)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2212 (no date)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2312 (1857)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 902 (1824)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 911 (1824)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 938 (1825)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1713 (1846)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2266 (1857)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 131 (1746)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 262 (1760)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 271 (1762)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 272 (1762)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 776 (1820)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 957 (1825)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 958 (1825)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1158 (1832)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1246 (1834)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2390 (1859–60)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 141 (1750)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 174 (1754)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 275 (1763)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 323 (1775)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 496 (1786)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 525 (1787)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 565 (1791)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 652 (1804)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1325 (1837)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1590 (1843)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1635 (1844)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1789 (1847)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2317 (1858)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2518 (1791)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2556 (1833)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 229 (1759)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 303 (1770)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 357 (1777)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 460 (1783)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 612 (1793)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 977 (1826)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1108 (1831)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1155 (1832)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1336 (1837)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1523 (1840)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 189 (‘Communal account books, 1754’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 294 (‘Parish account books, 1764’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 530 (‘Communal account books, 1787’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 608 (‘Parish account books, 1793’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 921 (‘Communal account books, 1824’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 944 (‘Communal account books, 1825’)
GAYaO, f. 230, op. 1 (‘Records of the Yaroslavl’ consistorial court and other ecclesiastical institutions')
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 103 (‘On the distribution of flax, 1744–46’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 575 (‘Monies collected from stallholders, 1792’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 588 (‘Petition regarding credit, 1792’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 620 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1787’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 628 (‘Petition regarding inheritance dispute, 1795’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 629 (‘Petition regarding credit, 1795’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 661 (‘Punishments meted out to serfs, 1807’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 668 (‘Petition against Slasnikov, 1807’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 706 (‘Petition regarding credit, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 729 (‘Petition regarding credit, 1819’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 739 (‘Monies collected from stallholders, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 745 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 766 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 768 (‘Petition regarding dispute, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 770 (‘Petition regarding dispute, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 733 (‘On the election of estate officials, 1821’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 843 (‘Petition regarding credit dispute, 1822’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 844 (‘Petition for poor relief, 1822’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 850 (‘Petition for poor relief, 1849’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 864 (‘On the letting of the market square, 1820’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 886 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1824’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 898 (‘Punishments meted out to serfs, 1823’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 912 (‘Petition regarding household dispute, 1824’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 914 (‘Petition from village of Malakhovo residents against Sal'nikov, 1825’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 930 (‘Petition regarding land repartition, 1825’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 941 (‘Petition against the serf Sal'nikov, 1825’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed.khr. 993 (‘Petition regarding inheritance dispute, 1828’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 994 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1828’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1022 (‘On the election of estate officials, 1850’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1030 (‘Petition against poor relief, 1830’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1070 (‘Instructions from Rostov district, 1831’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1119 (‘Report on estate manufactories’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1124 (‘Petitions regarding marriage, 1832’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1133 (‘Petition regarding credit, 1832’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1140 (‘Petition regarding maintenance of parish church, 1832’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1178 (‘Petition regarding credit dispute, 1833’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1181 (‘Petitions regarding marriage, 1833’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1227 (‘Petition regarding credit dispute, 1835’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1256 (‘Petition against bailiff Tizengauzen, 1835’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1283 (‘List of trading peasants and guilds, 1836’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1325 (‘Punishments meted out to serfs, 1825’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1336 (‘Petition regarding land purchase, 1837’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1345 (‘Report on serfs’ buildings, 1837')
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1385 (‘Petition from merchant Sheshunov, 1838’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1391 (‘List of trading peasants and guilds, 1838’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1434 (‘Petition regarding labourer purchase, 1839’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1435 (‘Petition regarding labourer purchase, 1839’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1438 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1839’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1492 (‘Petition regarding land purchase, 1840’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1563 (‘Petition regarding land purchase, 1840’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1568 (‘Report on grain harvests, 1842–54’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1598 (‘On serfs’ houses, 1843')
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1614 (‘On the exile of serfs in arrears, 1843’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1643 (‘Petition regarding trade dispute, 1844’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1646 (‘Petition for household division, 1844’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1745 (‘Petition regarding officeholding, 1847’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1764 (‘Petition regarding credit, 1847’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 1774 (‘Contributions to the estate granary, 1847’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2058 (‘Petition regarding land repartition, 1853’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2232 (‘On serfs in arrears, 1855–60’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2241 (‘Record of sums belonging to serfs’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2280 (‘Petition regarding savings, 1857’)
RGADA, f. 1287, op. 3, ed. khr. 2518 (‘Petition regarding property dispute, 1791’)
Acemoglu, D., ‘Constitutions, politics, and economics’, Journal of Economic Literature 43 (2005), pp. 1025–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. A., ‘The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation’, American Economic Review 91 (2001), pp. 1369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aleksandrov, V. A., Sel'skaia obshchina v Rossii, XVII–nachalo XIX vv. (Moscow, 1976).Google Scholar
Aleksandrov, V. A. ‘Typology of the Russian peasant family in the feudal period’, Soviet Studies in History (1982), pp. 26–62.Google Scholar
Aleksandrov, V. A.Obychnoe pravo krepostnoi derevni Rossii, XVIII–nachalo XIX v. (Moscow, 1984).Google Scholar
Andorka, R., and Faragó, T., ‘Pre-industrial household structure in Hungary’, in Wall, R., Robin, J., and Laslett, P. (eds.), Family forms in historic Europe (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artynov, A. A., Vospominaniia krest'ianina sela Ugodich, Iaroslavskaoi gubernii Rostovskago uezda (ed. Titov, A. A.) (Moscow, 1883).Google Scholar
Avdeev, A., Blum, A., and Troitskaia, I., ‘Peasant marriage in nineteenth-century Russia’, Population 59 (2004), pp. 721–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avdeev, A., Blum, A. and Troitskaia, I. ‘Serfdom and state power in imperial Russia’, European History Quarterly 33 (2003), pp. 29–64.Google Scholar
Bartlett, R., ‘Introduction’, in Bartlett, R. (ed.), Land commune and peasant community in Russia: communal forms in imperial and early Soviet society (London and New York, 1990), pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, R. (ed.), Land commune and peasant community in Russia: communal forms in imperial and early Soviet society (London and New York, 1990).CrossRef
Behrisch, L., ‘Social discipline in early modern Russia, seventeenth to nineteenth centuries’, in Schilling, H. and Behrisch, L. (eds.), Institutionen, Instrumenten, und Akteure sozialer Kontrolle und Disziplinierung im frühneuzeitlichen Europa (Frankfurt, 1999), pp. 325–57.Google Scholar
Belliustin, I. S., The description of the clergy in rural Russia: the memoir of a nineteenth-century parish priest (translated Freeze, G.) (Ithaca, 1985).Google Scholar
Berlin, I., Russian thinkers (London and New York, 1978).Google Scholar
Birner, R., and Wittmer, H., ‘Converting social capital into political capital: how do local communities gain political influence?’, paper presented at the Eighth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property (2000).
Blanchard, I., Russia's ‘age of silver’: precious-metal production and economic growth in the eighteenth century (London and New York, 1989).Google Scholar
Blanes Jiménez, J., ‘Cocaine, informality, and the urban economy in La Paz, Bolivia’, in Portes, A., et al. (eds.), The informal economy (Baltimore, 1989), pp. 135–49.Google Scholar
Blickle, P., Kommunalismus: Skizzen einer gesellschaftlichen Organisationsform, 2 vols. (Munich, 2000).Google Scholar
Blum, J., Lord and peasant in Russia from the ninth to the nineteenth century (Princeton, 1961).Google Scholar
Bobke, W., ‘August von Haxthausen: eine Studie zur Ideengeschichte der politischen Romantik’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation (Munich, 1954).
Bohac, R., ‘Family, property, and socioeconomic mobility: Russian peasants on Manuilovskoe estate, 1810–1861’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation (University of Illinois at Champaign–Urbana, 1982).
Bohac, R. ‘The “mir” and the military draft’, Slavic Review 47 (1988), pp. 652–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohac, R. ‘Agricultural structure and the origins of migration in central Russia 1810–1850’, in Grantham, G. and Leonard, C. S. (eds.), Agrarian organization in the century of industrialization: Europe, Russia and North America, Research in Economic History Supplement 5 Part B (Greenwich, CT, and London, 1989), pp. 369–88.Google Scholar
Bohac, R. ‘Widows and the Russian serf community’, in Clements, B. E., Engel, B. A., and Worobec, C. D. (eds.), Russia's women: accommodation, resistance, transformation (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1991), pp. 95–112.Google Scholar
Bourgholtzer, F., Aleksandr Chayanov and Russian Berlin (London and New York, 1999).Google Scholar
Bretell, C. B., Men who migrate, women who wait: population and history in a Portuguese parish (Princeton, 1986).Google Scholar
Briggs, C. D., ‘Manor court procedures, debt litigation levels, and rural credit provision in England c. 1290–1380’, Law and History Review 24 (2006), pp. 519–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, C. D.Credit and village society in fourteenth-century England (Oxford, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. C., and Guinnane, T., ‘Regions and time in the European fertility transition: problems in the Princeton Project's statistical methodology’, Economic History Review 60 (2007), pp. 574–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbank, J., Russian peasants go to court: legal culture in the countryside 1905–1917 (Bloomington, 2004).Google Scholar
Burds, J., Peasant dreams and market politics: labour migration and the Russian village 1861–1905 (Pittsburgh, 1998).Google Scholar
Bush, M. L. (ed.), Slavery and serfdom: studies in legal bondage (London and New York, 1996).
Bushnell, J., ‘Did serf owners control serf marriage?’, Slavic Review 52 (1993), pp. 419–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carus, A. W., and Ogilvie, S., ‘Turning qualitative into quantitative evidence: a well-used method made explicit’, Economic History Review 62 (2009), pp. 893–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayanov, A. V., The theory of peasant economy, ed. Thorner, D., Kerblay, B., and Smith, R. E. F. (Homewood, IL, 1966).Google Scholar
Chernukha, V. G., ‘Pasport v Rossiiskoi imperii: nabliudeniia nad zakonodatel'stvom’, Istoricheskie zapiski 122 (2001), pp. 91–131.Google Scholar
Clements, B. E., Engel, B. A., and Worobec, C. D. (eds.), Russia's women: accommodation, resistance, transformation (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1991).
Coleman, J. S., Foundations of social theory (Cambridge, MA, 1990).Google Scholar
Confino, M., Domaines et seigneurs en Russie vers la fin du XVIIIe siècle: études de structures agraires et de mentalités économiques (Paris, 1963).Google Scholar
Confino, M.Systèmes agraires et progrès agricole: l'assolement triennal en Russie aux XVIIIe–XIXe siècles (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Crisp, O., Studies in the Russian economy before 1914 (London and Basingstoke, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, O. ‘Peasant land tenure and civil rights implications before 1906’, in Crisp, O. and Edmondson, L. (eds.), Civil rights in imperial Russia (Oxford, 1989), pp. 33–64.Google Scholar
Crook, D., ‘Freedom, villeinage and legal process: the dispute between the abbot of Burton and his tenants of Mickleover, 1280’, Nottingham Medieval Studies 44 (2000), pp. 123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custine, A., Letters from Russia (repr. New York, 2002).Google Scholar
Czap, P., ‘The perennial multiple-family household, Mishino, Russia 1782–1858’, Journal of Family History (Spring 1982), pp. 5–26.Google Scholar
Czap, P. ‘“A large family: the peasant's greatest wealth”: serf households in Mishino, Russia, 1814–1858’, in Wall, R., Robin, J., and Laslett, P. (eds.), Family forms in historic Europe (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 105–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P., An inquiry into well-being and destitution (Oxford, 1993).Google Scholar
Dennison, T. K., ‘Serfdom and household structure in central Russia: Voshchazhnikovo 1816–1858’, Continuity and Change 18 (3) (2003), pp. 395–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennison, T. K., and Carus, A. W., ‘The invention of the Russian rural commune: Haxthausen and the evidence’, Historical Journal 46, 3 (2003), pp. 561–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennison, T. K., and Ogilvie, S., ‘Serfdom and social capital in Bohemia and Russia’, Economic History Review 60 (3) (2007), pp. 513–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drobak, J., and Nye, J., The frontiers of the new institutional economics (San Diego and London, 1997).Google Scholar
Druzhinin, N. M., Voprosy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi istorii i istochnikovedeniia perioda feodalizma v Rossii (Moscow, 1961).Google Scholar
Dyer, C., ‘Memories of freedom: attitudes toward serfdom in England, 1200–1350’, in Bush, M. L. (ed.), Serfdom and slavery: studies in legal bondage (Harlow, 1996), pp. 277–95.Google Scholar
Easterley, W., The elusive quest for growth: economists' adventures and misadventures in the tropics (Cambridge, MA, 2002).Google Scholar
Eggertsson, T., Economic behavior and institutions (Cambridge, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekonomakis, E. G., From peasant to Petersburger (New York and London, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, G. R., ‘Happy families’, New York Review of Books (14 June 1984), pp. 39–41.Google Scholar
Elton, G. R.Return to essentials: some reflections on the present state of historical study (Cambridge, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emigh, R. J., ‘Labor use and landlord control: sharecropping and household structure in fifteenth-century Tuscany’, Journal of Historical Sociology 11 (1) (1998), pp. 37–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmons, T., The Russian landed gentry and the peasant Emancipation of 1861 (Cambridge, 1968).Google Scholar
Engel, B. A., Between the fields and the city; women, work, and family in Russia, 1861–1914 (Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
Engerman, D., Modernization from the other shore: American intellectuals and the romance of Russian development (Cambridge, MA, 2003).Google Scholar
Farnsworth, B., and Viola, L. (eds.), Russian peasant women (Oxford, 1992).
Fauve-Chamoux, A., ‘The importance of women in an urban environment: the example of the Rheims household at the beginning of the industrial revolution’, in Wall, R., Robin, J., and Laslett, P. (eds.), Family forms in historic Europe (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 475–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedor, T. S., Patterns of urban growth in the Russian empire during the nineteenth century (Chicago, 1975).Google Scholar
Field, D., The end of serfdom: nobility and bureaucracy in Russia, 1855–1861 (Cambridge, MA, 1976).Google Scholar
Figes, O., Natasha's dance: a cultural history of Russia (New York, 2002).Google Scholar
Frances, C. M., ‘Networks of the life course: a case study of Cheshire, 1570–1700’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis (Cambridge, 2000).
Frank, J., Dostoevsky: the seeds of revolt, 1821–1849 (Princeton, 1976).Google Scholar
Frank, S., Crime, cultural conflict, and justice in rural Russia, 1856–1914 (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1999).Google Scholar
Freeze, G. L., The Russian Levites: parish clergy in the eighteenth century (Cambridge, MA, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeze, G. L.The parish clergy in nineteenth-century Russia: crisis, reform, counter-reform (Princeton, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, C., ‘Razdel: the peasant family divided’, in Farnsworth, B. and Viola, L. (eds.), Russian peasant women (Oxford, 1992), pp. 73–88.Google Scholar
Fyodorov, V. A., ‘Vozniknovenie torgovogo ogorodnichestva v rostovskom uezde Iaroslavskoi gubernii (konets XVIII–pervaia polovina XIX veka)’, Vestnik moskovskogo universiteta 6 (1962), pp. 49–68.Google Scholar
Fyodorov, V. A. ‘Naemnyi trud v zemledelii nakanune krest'ianskoi reform 1861 g. (po materialam tsentral'no-promyshlennykh gubernii)’, Vestnik moskovskogo universiteta 3 (1968), pp. 85–96.Google Scholar
Fyodorov, V. A. ‘Zemlevladenie krepostnykh krest'ian v Rossii (po materialam tsentral'no-promyshlennykh gubernii)’, Vestnik moskovskogo universiteta 1 (1969), pp. 47–67.Google Scholar
Fyodorov, V. A.Pomeshchich'i krest'iane tsentral'no-promyshlennogo raiona Rossii kontsa XVIII–pervoi poloviny XIX v. (Moscow, 1974).Google Scholar
Fyodorov, V. A. ‘Torgovoe zemledelie krest'ian Moskovskoi gubernii v pervoi polovine XIX v.’, Vestnik moskovskogo universiteta 8 (2003), pp. 93–105.Google Scholar
Gatrell, P., The tsarist economy 1850–1917 (London and New York, 1986).Google Scholar
Gaudin, C., Ruling peasants: village and state in late imperial Russia (DeKalb, IL, 2007).Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, A., Economic backwardness in historical perspective (Cambridge, MA, 1962).Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, A.Continuity in history and other essays (Cambridge, MA, 1968).Google Scholar
Gestwa, K., Proto-Industrialisierung in Russland: Wirtschaft, Herrschaft und Kultur in Ivanovo und Pavlovo, 1741–1932 (Göttingen, 1999).Google Scholar
Gill, A., Rural credit markets: financial sector reforms and the informal lenders (New Delhi, 2000).Google Scholar
Glickman, R., Russian factory women: workplace and society, 1880–1914 (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1984).Google Scholar
Goehrke, C., Die Theorien über Entstehung und Entwicklung des ‘Mir’ (Wiesbaden, 1964).Google Scholar
Gorshkov, B. B., ‘Serfs on the move: peasant seasonal migration in pre-reform Russia, 1800–61’, Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 1 (2000), pp. 627–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorskaia, N. A., Monastyrskie krest'iane tsentral'noi Rossii v XVII veke (Moscow, 1977).Google Scholar
Gorskaia, N. A.Russkaia feodal'naia derevnia v istoriografii XX veka (Moscow, 2006).Google Scholar
Gottlieb, B., ‘The meaning of clandestine marriage’, in Wheaton, R. and Hareven, T. (eds.), Family and sexuality in French history (Philadelphia, 1980), pp. 49–83.Google Scholar
Grossman, G., ‘Informal personal incomes and outlays of the Soviet Union population’, in Portes, A., Castells, M., and Benton, L. (eds.), The informal economy (Baltimore, 1989), pp. 150–70.Google Scholar
Guinnane, T., The vanishing Irish: households, migration, and the rural economy in Ireland, 1850–1914 (Princeton, 1997).Google Scholar
Hagen, W., Ordinary Prussians: Brandenburg Junkers and villagers, 1500–1840 (Cambridge, 2002).Google Scholar
Hall, R. E., and Jones, C. I., ‘Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (1999), pp. 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, J., ‘Age at marriage and proportions marrying’, Population Studies 7 (1953), pp. 111–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, J. ‘Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system’, Population and Development Review 8 (1982), pp. 449–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamburg, G. M., ‘Peasant emancipation and Russian social thought: the case of Boris N. Chicherin’, Slavic Review 50 (1991), pp. 890–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, J. M., A social history of the Russian empire 1650–1825 (London and New York, 1998).Google Scholar
Hatcher, J., ‘English serfdom and villeinage: towards a reassessment’, Past and Present 90 (1981), pp. 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haxthausen, A. F., Studien über die innern Züstande, das Volksleben und insbesondere die ländlichen Einrichtungen Rußlands, 3 vols. (Hannover, 1847–52).Google Scholar
Hellie, R., Enserfment and military change (Chicago, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellie, R.The Muscovite Law Code (Ulozhenie) of 1649 (Irvine, CA, 1988).Google Scholar
Hellie, R.The economy and material culture of Russia, 1600–1725 (Chicago, 1999).Google Scholar
Herzen, A., ‘O sel'skoi obshchine v Rossii’, in Sochineniia v deviati tomakh (Moscow, 1956), pp. 508–13.Google Scholar
Herzen, A. ‘The Russian people and socialism: an open letter to Jules Michelet’, reprinted in From the other shore & The Russian people and socialism (repr. Oxford, 1979).Google Scholar
Hoch, S. L., Serfdom and social control in Russia: Petrovskoe, a village in Tambov (Chicago, 1986).Google Scholar
Hoch, S. L. ‘On good numbers and bad: Malthus, population trends and peasant standard of living in late imperial Russia’, Slavic Review 53 (1994), pp. 41–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoch, S. L. ‘The serf economy and the social order in Russia’, in Bush, M. L. (ed.), Serfdom and slavery: studies in legal bondage (London and New York, 1996), pp. 311–22.Google Scholar
Hoch, S. L. ‘Famine, disease, and mortality patterns in the parish of Borshevka, Russia, 1830–1912’, Population Studies 52 (1998), pp. 357–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, P. T., Church and community in the diocese of Lyon 1500–1789 (Yale, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, P. T.Growth in a traditional society: the French countryside 1450–1815 (Princeton, 1996).Google Scholar
Hoffman, P. T., Postel-Vinay, G., and Rosenthal, J.-L., ‘Information and economic history: how the credit market in old regime Paris forces us to rethink the transition to capitalism’, American Historical Review 104(1) (1999), pp. 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holderness, B. A., ‘Widows in pre-industrial society: an essay upon their economic functions’, in Smith, R. M. (ed.), Land, kinship and lifecycle (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 435–42.Google Scholar
Ignatovich, I. I., Pomeshchich'i krest'iane nakanune osvobozhdeniia (Moscow, 1925).Google Scholar
Indova, E. I., Krepostnoe khoziaistvo v nachale XIX veka po materialam votchinnogo arkhiva Vorontsevakh (Moscow, 1955).Google Scholar
Johnson, R. E., Peasant and proletarian (New Brunswick, NJ, 1979).Google Scholar
Kabuzan, V. M., Narodonaselenie Rossii v XVIII–pervoi polovine XIX v. (Moscow, 1963).Google Scholar
Kahan, A., The plow, the hammer, and the knout: an economic history of eighteenth-century Russia (Chicago and London, 1985).Google Scholar
Kahan, A.Russian economic history: the nineteenth century (Chicago and London, 1989).Google Scholar
Kanitschev, V., Kontchakov, R., Mizis, Iu., and Morozova, E., ‘The development of family structure in Tambov region, 1800–1917’, in Kooij, P. and Paping, R. (eds.), Where the twain meet again: new results of the Dutch-Russian project on regional development 1750–1917 (Groningen, 2004), pp. 239–62.Google Scholar
Kanzaka, J., ‘Villein rents in thirteenth-century England: an analysis of the Hundred Rolls of 1279–1280’, Economic History Review 56 (2002), pp. 593–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapustina, G. D., ‘Zapisnye knigi Moskovskoi krepostnoi kontory kak istoricheskii istochnik pervaia chetvert’ XVIII v', in Problemy istochnikovedeniia, vol. VII, (Moscow, 1959), pp. 216–73.Google Scholar
Kashin, V. N., Krepostnye krest'iane-zemlevladel'tsy (Moscow, 1935).Google Scholar
Kertzer, D. P., and Barbagli, M. (eds.), The history of the European family, 3 vols. (New Haven, 2001–3).
Kertzer, D. P., and Hogan, D. I., Family, political economy, and demographic change: the transformation of life in Casalecchio, Italy, 1861–1921 (Madison, WI, 1989).Google Scholar
Keussler, J., Zur Geschichte und Kritik des bäuerlichen Gemeindebesitzes in Rußland, 3 vols. (Riga, Moscow, and Odessa, 1876–87).Google Scholar
Khristoforov, I. A., ‘Aristokraticheskaia’ oppozitsiia velikam reformam konets 1850–serediny 1870–kh gg. (Moscow, 2002).Google Scholar
Kingston-Mann, E., Lenin and the problem of Marxist peasant revolution (Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar
Kingston-Mann, E., and Mixter, T. (eds.), Peasant economy, culture, and politics of European Russia, 1800–1921 (Princeton, 1991).CrossRef
Knack, S., and Keefer, P., ‘Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures’, Economics and Politics 7 (1995), pp. 207–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, J., and Sened, I., Explaining social institutions (Ann Arbor, 1995).Google Scholar
Koenigsberger, H. G., ‘The crisis of the seventeenth century: a farewell?’, in idem, Politics and virtuosi: essays in early modern history (London, 1986), pp. 149–68.Google Scholar
Kolle, H., Social change in nineteenth-century Russia: family development in a proto-industrial community (Bergen, 2006).Google Scholar
Kollman, N. S., Kinship and politics: the making of the Muscovite political system, 1345–1547 (Stanford, 1987).Google Scholar
Koval'chenko, I. D., Russkoe krepostnoe krest'ianstvo v pervoi polovine XIX veka (Moscow, 1967).Google Scholar
Koval'chenko, I. D., and Milov, L. V., ‘Ob intensivnosti obrochnoi ekspluatatsii krest'ian tsentral'noi Rossii v kontse XVIII – pervoi polovine XIX v.’, Istoriia SSSR 4 (1966), pp. 55–80.Google Scholar
Kussmaul, A., Servants in husbandry in early modern England (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanzetta de Pardo, M., Murillo Castano, G., and Triana Soto, A., ‘The articulation of formal and informal sectors in the economy of Bogotá, Colombia’, in Portes, A., Castells, M., and Benton, L. (eds.), The informal economy (Baltimore, 1989), pp. 95–110.Google Scholar
Porta, R., Lopez-de Silanes, F., Schleifer, A., and Vishny, R., ‘The quality of government’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (1999), pp. 222–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laslett, P., ‘The face to face society’, in Laslett, P. (ed.), Philosophy, politics, and society, First Series (Oxford, 1956), pp. 157–84.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. ‘Introduction: the history of the family’, in Laslett, P. with Wall, R. (eds.), Household and family in past time (Cambridge, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laslett, P.Family life and illicit love in earlier generations (Cambridge, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laslett, P. ‘The European family and early industrialization’, in Baechler, J., Hall, J., and Mann, M. (eds.), Europe and the rise of capitalism (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
Laslett, P., with Wall, R. (eds.), Household and family in past time (Cambridge, 1972).CrossRef
Ledeneva, A. V., Russia's economy of favours: blat, networking and informal exchange (Cambridge, 1998).Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I., The development of capitalism in Russia (repr. Moscow, 1964).Google Scholar
Leonard, C. S., ‘Landords and the “mir”’, in Bartlett, R. (ed.), Land commune and peasant community in Russia: communal forms in imperial and early Soviet society (London and New York, 1990), pp. 121–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy Ladurie, E., The peasants of Languedoc (Champaign, IL, 1977).Google Scholar
Lindenmeyr, A., Poverty is not a vice: charity, society, and the state in imperial Russia (Princeton, 1996).Google Scholar
Little, I. M. D., Economic development: theory, policy, and international relations (New York, 1982).Google Scholar
Macfarlane, A., Reconstructing historical communities (Cambridge, 1977).Google Scholar
Macfarlane, A.The origins of English individualism: the family, property, and social transition (Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar
Madariaga, I., Politics and culture in eighteenth-century Russia (London, 1998), pp. 124–49.Google Scholar
Mauro, P., ‘Corruption and growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (1995), pp. 681–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medick, H., Weben und Überleben in Laichingen, 1650–1900: Lokalgeschichte als allgemeine Geschichte (Göttingen, 1996).Google Scholar
Melton, H. E., ‘Serfdom and the peasant economy in Russia: 1780–1861’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis (Columbia University, 1984).
Melton, H. E. ‘Proto-industrialization, serf agriculture, and agrarian social structure: two estates in nineteenth-century Russia’, Past and Present 115 (1987), pp. 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melton, H. E. ‘Enlightened seignioralism and its dilemmas in serf Russia, 1750–1830’, Journal of Modern History 62 (1990), pp. 675–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melton, H. E. ‘Household economies and communal conflicts on a Russian serf estate, 1800–1817’, Journal of Social History 26 (1993), pp. 559–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melton, H. E. ‘The Russian peasantries, 1450–1860’, in Scott, T. (ed.), The peasantries of Europe from the fourteenth to the eighteenth centuries (London and New York, 1998).Google Scholar
Melton, H. E. ‘The magnate and her trading peasants: Countess Lieven and the Baki estate, 1800–1820’, Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas 47 (1999), pp. 40–55.Google Scholar
Ménard, C., and Shirley, M., Handbook of new institutional economics (Berlin, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milov, L. V., Issledovanie ob ekonomicheskikh primechaniiakh k general'nomu mezhevaniiu (Moscow, 1965).Google Scholar
Milov, L. V.Velikorusskii pakhar' i osobennosti rossiiskogo istoricheskogo protsessa (Moscow, 1998).Google Scholar
Mironov, B. N., ‘Traditsionnoe demograficheskoe povidenie krest'ian v XIX – nachale XX v.’, in Vishnevskii, A. G. (ed.), Brachnost', rozhdaemost', smertnost' v Rossii i v SSSR (Moscow, 1977), pp. 83–104.Google Scholar
Mironov, B. N.Vnutrennyi rynok Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XVIII–pervoi polovine XIX v. (Leningrad, 1981).Google Scholar
Mironov, B. N.Khlebnye tseny v Rossii za dva stoletiia XVIII–XIX vv. (Leningrad, 1985).Google Scholar
Mironov, B. N. ‘The peasant commune after the reforms of the 1860s’, in Eklof, B. and Frank, S. (eds.), The world of the Russian peasant: post-Emancipation culture and society (Boston, MA, 1990), 7–33.Google Scholar
Mironov, B. N. ‘Local government in Russia in the first half of the nineteenth century: provincial government and estate government’, Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas 42 (1994), pp. 161–201.Google Scholar
Mironov, B. N. ‘Work and rest in the peasant economy of European Russia in the 19th and early 20th centuries’, in Blanchard, I. (ed.), Labour and leisure in historical perspective: thirteenth to the twentieth centuries (Stuttgart, 1994), pp. 55–64.Google Scholar
Mironov, B. N.Sotsial'naia istoriia Rossii perioda imperii XVIII–nachalo XX v., 2 vols. (St Petersburg, 1999).Google Scholar
Mironov, B. N., and Eklof, B., The social history of imperial Russia, 1700–1917, 2 vols. (Boulder, 1999).Google Scholar
Mitterauer, M., and Kagan, A., ‘Russian and central European family structures: a comparative view', Journal of Family History 7 (1982), pp. 103–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitterauer, M., and Sieder, R., Vom Patriarchat zur Partnerschaft: zum Strukturwandel der Familie (Munich, 1991).Google Scholar
Moon, D., ‘Reassessing Russian serfdom’, European History Quarterly 26(4) (1996), pp. 483–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, D.The Russian peasantry, 1600–1930: the world the peasants made (London, 1999).Google Scholar
Moon, D.The abolition of serfdom in Russia (London, 2001).Google Scholar
Moon, D. ‘Peasant migration, the abolition of serfdom, and the internal passport system in Russia, c. 1800–1914’, in Eltis, D. (ed.), Coerced and free migration: global perspectives (Palo Alto, 2002).Google Scholar
Moor, T., and Zinden, J.-L., ‘Girl power: the European marriage pattern and labour markets in the North Sea region in the late medieval and early modern period’, Economic History Review 63 (2010), pp. 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, D., ‘Trading peasants’ and urbanization in eighteenth-century Russia: the Central Industrial Region (New York and London, 1987).Google Scholar
Muldrew, C., The economy of obligation: the culture of credit and social relations in early modern England (New York and Basingstoke, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murav'eva, L. L., Derevenskaia promyshlennost' tsentral'noi Rossii vtoroi poloviny XVII v. (Moscow, 1971).Google Scholar
Newcity, M., ‘Russian legal tradition and the rule of law’, in Sachs, J. and Pistor, K. (eds.), The rule of law and economic reform in Russia (Boulder, 1997), pp. 41–53.Google Scholar
Nosevich, V. L., Traditsionnaia belorusskaia derevnia v evropeiskoi perspektive (Minsk, 2004).Google Scholar
Ogden, P. E., and Winchester, S. W. C., ‘The residential segregation of provincial migrants in Paris in 1911’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 65 (July 1975), pp. 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, S. C., State corporatism and proto-industry: the Württemberg Black Forest 1580–1797 (Cambridge, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, S. C. ‘The state in Germany: a non-Prussian view’, in Brewer, J. and Hellmuth, E. (eds.), Rethinking Leviathan: the eighteenth-century state in Britain and Germany (Oxford, 1999).Google Scholar
Ogilvie, S. C. ‘The European economy in the eighteenth century’, in Blanning, T. C. W. (ed.), The eighteenth century: Europe 1688–1815 (Oxford, 2000), pp. 91–130.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, S. C.A bitter living: women, markets, and social capital in early modern Germany (Oxford, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, S. C. ‘Communities and the second serfdom in early modern Bohemia’, Past and Present 187 (2005), pp. 69–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, S. C. ‘“So that every subject knows how to behave”: social disciplining in early modern Bohemia’, Comparative Studies of Society and History 48(1) (2006), pp. 38–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, S., and Edwards, J., ‘Women and the “second serfdom”: evidence from Bohemia’, Journal of Economic History 60 (2000), pp. 961–94.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, S., Küpker, M., and Maegraith, J., Community characteristics and demographic development: three Wurttemberg communities, 1558–1914, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics (2009).
Owen, T., ‘A standard ruble of account for Russian business history 1769–1914: a note’, Journal of Economic History 49 (1989), pp. 699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page Moch, L., Moving Europeans: migration in western Europe since 1650 (Bloomington, 1992).Google Scholar
Pallot, J., Land reform in Russia, 1906–1917 (Oxford, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallot, J., and Shaw, D. J. B., Landscape and settlement in Romanov Russia 1613–1917 (Oxford, 1990).Google Scholar
Pande, R., and Udry, C., ‘Institutions and development: a view from below’, in Blundell, R., Newey, W. K., and Persson, T. (eds.), Advances in economics and econometrics: theory and applications, Ninth World Congress (Cambridge, 2006), vol. II, pp. 349–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrie, M., The agrarian policy of the Russian Social-Revolutionary Party from its origins through the revolution of 1905–1907 (Cambridge, 1976).Google Scholar
Pipes, R., Property and freedom (New York, 1999).Google Scholar
Plakans, A., and Weatherall, C., ‘Family and economy on an early nineteenth-century Baltic serf estate’, Continuity and Change 7(2) (1992), pp. 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plakans, A. and Weatherall, C. ‘Family and economy on an early nineteenth-century Baltic serf estate’, in Rudolph, R. (ed.), The European peasant family and society (Liverpool, 1995), pp. 165–87.Google Scholar
Polla, M.Vienankarjalainen perhelaitos 1600–1900 (Helsinki, 2001).Google Scholar
Polla, M. ‘Family systems in central Russia in the 1830s and 1890s’, History of the Family 11 (2006), pp. 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, S., The rational peasant: the political economy of rural society in Vietnam (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1979).Google Scholar
Popkins, G., ‘Code versus custom? Norms and tactics in peasant volost’ court appeals 1889–1917', Russian Review 59 (2000), pp. 408–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkins, G. ‘Peasant experiences of the late tsarist state: district congresses of land captains, provincial boards, and the legal appeals process 1891–1917’, Slavonic and East European Review 78 (2000), pp. 90–114.Google Scholar
Popov, N. P., The Russian people speak: democracy at the crossroads (Syracuse, 1995).Google Scholar
Postan, M., Fact and relevance: essays on historical method (Cambridge, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Procaccia, U., Russian culture, property rights, and the market economy (Cambridge, 2007).Google Scholar
Prokof'eva, L. S., Krest'ianskaia obshchina v Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XVIII–pervoi polovine XIX v. (Leningrad, 1981).Google Scholar
Pushkarev, S. G., Krest'ianskaia pozemel'no-peredel'naia obshchina v Rossii (repr. Newtonville, MA, 1976).Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D., Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy (Princeton, 1993).Google Scholar
Ray, D., Development economics (Princeton, 1988).Google Scholar
Rose, R., ‘Getting things done in an antimodern society: social capital networks in Russia’, in Dasgupta, P. and Seregeldin, I. (eds.), Social capital: a multifaceted perspective (Washington, 1999), pp. 147–71.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, J.-L, ‘Rural credit markets and aggregate shocks: the experience of Nuits St. Georges, 1756–1776’, Journal of Economic History 54 (1994), pp. 288–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinshtein, N. A., Sel'skoe khoziaistvo Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XVIII v. (Moscow, 1957).Google Scholar
Rudolph, R. L., ‘Family structure and proto-industrialization in Russia’, Journal of Economic History, 40 (1980), pp. 111–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, M., Institutions in economics: the old and the new institutionalism (Cambridge, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J., The end of poverty: economic possibilities for our time (New York, 2005).Google Scholar
Sadoulet, E., Janvry, A., and Benjamin, C., ‘Household behaviour with imperfect labor markets’, Industrial Relations, 37(1) (1998), pp. 85–108.Google Scholar
Saunders, D., Russia in the age of reaction and reform, 1801–1881 (London, 1992).Google Scholar
Schofield, P., Peasant and community in medieval England 1200–1500 (London, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, T. W., Transforming traditional agriculture (New Haven, 1964).Google Scholar
Scott, J. C., The moral economy of the peasant: rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia (New Haven, 1976).Google Scholar
Semevskii, V. I., Krest'iane v tsartsvovanie imperatritsy Ekateriny II, 2 vols. (St Petersburg, 1881–1901).Google Scholar
Semevskii, V. I.Krest'ianskii vopros v Rossii v XVIII v pervoi polovine XIX veka (St Petersburg, 1888).Google Scholar
Shanin, T., The awkward class: the political sociology of the peasantry in a developing society (Oxford, 1972).Google Scholar
Shanin, T. ‘The nature and logic of the peasant economy’, Journal of Peasant Studies 1 (1973), pp. 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanin, T.Russia as a ‘developing society’, 2 vols. (London and New Haven, 1985–6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanin, T. (ed.), Peasants and peasant societies (Oxford, 1987).
Shchepetov, K. N., Krepostnoe pravo v votchinakh Sheremetevykh (Moscow, 1947).Google Scholar
Shchepetov, K. N.Iz zhizni krepostnykh krest'ian Rossii XVIII–XIX vekov: po materialam Sheremetyevskikh votchin (Moscow, 1963).Google Scholar
Shustrova, I., and Sinitsyna, E., ‘Demographic behaviour in the Iaroslavl’ loamy area: the results of cohort analysis for two typical rural parishes', in Kooij, P. and Paping, R. (eds.), Where the twain meet again: new results of the Dutch-Russian project on regional development 1750–1917 (Groningen, 2004), pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
Sivkov, K. V., Ocherki po istorii krepostnogo khoziaistva i krest'ianskogo dvizheniia v Rossii v pervoi polovine XIX veka (Moscow, 1951).Google Scholar
Slicher van Bath, B. H., The agrarian history of western Europe, A.D. 500–1850 (London, 1963).Google Scholar
Smith, A. K., ‘Eating out in imperial Russia: class, nationality, and dining before the Great Reforms’, Slavic Review 65 (2006), pp. 747–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. K. ‘Authority in a serf village: peasants, managers, and the role of writing in early nineteenth century Russia’, Journal of Social History 43(1) (2009), pp. 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. E. F., The enserfment of the Russian peasantry (Cambridge, 1968).Google Scholar
Smith, R. E. F.Peasant farming in Muscovy (Cambridge, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. E. F., and Christian, D., Bread and salt: a social and economic history of food and drink in Russia (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar
Smith, R. M., ‘Some issues concerning families and their property in rural England 1200–1800’, in Smith, R. M. (ed.), Land, kinship, and lifecycle (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 1–86.Google Scholar
Smith, R. M. ‘Further models of medieval marriage: landlords, serfs and priests in rural England, c. 1290–1370’, in Duhamel-Amado, C. and Lobrichon, G. (eds.), Georges Duby: l'écriture de l'histoire (Brussels, 1996), pp. 161–73.Google Scholar
Smith, R. M. ‘A periodic market and its impact on a manorial community: Botesdale, Suffolk, and the manor of Redgrave, 1280–1300’, in Razi, Z. and Smith, R. (eds.), Medieval society and the manor court (Oxford, 1996), pp. 450–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soto, H., The other path: the invisible revolution in the third world (New York, 1989).Google Scholar
Soto, H.The mystery of capital (London, 2000).Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, G., The peasants of Ottobeuren 1487–1726: a rural society in early modern Europe (Cambridge, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szoltysek, M., ‘Rethinking eastern Europe: household formation patterns in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and European family systems’, Continuity and Change 23 (2008), pp. 389–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzi, V., ‘Corruption: arm's length relationships and markets’, in Fiorentini, G. and Peltzman, S. (eds.), The economics of organised crime (Cambridge, 1995), pp. 161–80.Google Scholar
Tarlovskaia, V. R., ‘Rostovshchicheskie operatsii moskovskikh kuptsov i torgovyhk krest'ian v nachale XVIII v.’, Vestnik moskovskogo universiteta ser. istoriia 3 (1977), pp. 44–55.Google Scholar
Tikhonov, Yu. A., Pomeshchich'i krest'iane v Rossii: feodal'naia renta v XVII–nachale XVIII v. (Moscow, 1974).Google Scholar
Tolstoy, L. N., Anna Karenina, trans. Louise, and Maude, Aylmer (Oxford, 1918; repr. 1980, 1992).Google Scholar
Troinitskii, A., The serf population in Russia according to the 10th national census, ed. Domar, E. (Newtonville MA, 1982).Google Scholar
Troinitskii, N. A. (ed.), Naselenie imperii po perepisi 28-go ianvaria 1897 goda (St Petersburg, 1897).
Vdovina, L. N., Krest'ianskaia obshchina i monastyr v tsentral'noi Rossii v pervoi polovine XVIII v. (Moscow, 1988).Google Scholar
Venturi, F., Roots of revolution: a history of the populist and socialist movements in nineteenth-century Russia (Chicago, 1960).Google Scholar
Vovelle, M., Piété baroque et déchristianisation en Provence au XVIIIe siècle: les attitudes devant la mort d'après les clauses des testaments (Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
Vries, J., The Dutch rural economy in the golden age (New Haven, 1974).Google Scholar
Vries, J.The economy of Europe in an age of crisis 1600–1750 (Cambridge, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, J.The industrious revolution: consumer behaviour and the household economy 1650–present (Cambridge, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, R., ‘The composition of households in a population of 6 men to 10 women: southeast Bruges in 1814’, in Wall, R., Robin, J. and Laslett, P. (eds.), Family forms in historic Europe (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 421–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, R., Harevan, T., and Ehmer, J. (eds.), Family history revisited (Newark and London, 2001).
Wall, R., Robin, J., and Laslett, P. (eds.), Family forms in historic Europe (Cambridge, 1983).CrossRef
Wegge, S., ‘Chain migration and information networks: evidence from nineteenth-century Hesse-Cassel’, Journal of Economic History 58 (4) (1998), pp. 957–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, J., The development of agrarian capitalism: land and labour in Norfolk, 1440–1580 (Oxford, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, E., Peasants (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1966).Google Scholar
,World Bank, World development report 1989: financial systems and development (Oxford, 1989).Google Scholar
Worobec, C., ‘Victims or actors? Russian peasant women and patriarchy’, in Kingston-Mann, E. and Mixter, T. (eds.), Peasant economy, culture, and politics of European Russia, 1800–1921 (Princeton, 1991) pp. 177–206.Google Scholar
Worobec, C.Peasant Russia: family and community in the post-emancipation period (DeKalb, IL, 1995).Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A., and Schofield, R. S., The population history of England 1541–1871: a reconstitution (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Tracy Dennison, California Institute of Technology
  • Book: The Institutional Framework of Russian Serfdom
  • Online publication: 03 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974946.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Tracy Dennison, California Institute of Technology
  • Book: The Institutional Framework of Russian Serfdom
  • Online publication: 03 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974946.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Tracy Dennison, California Institute of Technology
  • Book: The Institutional Framework of Russian Serfdom
  • Online publication: 03 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974946.015
Available formats
×