Carlstrom, K, Eriksson, A, Stege, R, Rannevik, G. Relationship between serum testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin in adult men with intact or absent gonadal function. Int J Androl 1990;13:67–73.Google Scholar

Patel, DP, Brant, WO, Myers, JB, et al. Sperm concentration is poorly associated with hypoandrogenism in infertile men. Urology 2015;85:1062–7.Google Scholar

Sussman, EM, Chudnovsky, A, Niederberger, CS. Hormonal evaluation of the infertile male: has it evolved? Urol Clin North Am 2008;35:147–55, vii.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ross, LS, Kandel, GL, Prinz, LM, Auletta, F. Clomiphene treatment of the idiopathic hypofertile male: high-dose, alternate-day therapy. Fertil Steril 1980;33:618–23.Google Scholar

Kathrins, M, Niederberger, C. Diagnosis and treatment of infertility-related male hormonal dysfunction. Nat Rev Urol 2016;13:309–23.Google Scholar

Kim, ED, McCullough, A, Kaminetsky, J. Oral enclomiphene citrate raises testosterone and preserves sperm counts in obese hypogonadal men, unlike topical testosterone: restoration instead of replacement. BJU Int 2016;117:677–85.Google Scholar

Goldstein, SR, Siddhanti, S, Ciaccia, AV, Plouffe, L Jr. A pharmacological review of selective oestrogen receptor modulators. Hum Reprod Update 2000;6:212–24.Google Scholar

Hussein, A, Ozgok, Y, Ross, L, Rao, P, Niederberger, C. Optimization of spermatogenesis-regulating hormones in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia and its impact on sperm retrieval: a multicentre study. BJU Int 2013;111:E110–14.Google Scholar

Helo, S, Mahon, J, Ellen, J, et al. Serum levels of enclomiphene and zuclomiphene in men with hypogonadism on long-term clomiphene citrate treatment. BJU Int 2017;119:171–6.Google Scholar

Krzastek, SC, Sharma, D, Abdullah, N, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of clomiphene citrate for the treatment of hypogonadism. J Urol 2019;202:1029–35.Google Scholar

Guay, AT, Bansal, S, Heatley, GJ. Effect of raising endogenous testosterone levels in impotent men with secondary hypogonadism: double blind placebo-controlled trial with clomiphene citrate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:3546–52.Google ScholarPubMed

Shabsigh, A, Kang, Y, Shabsign, R, et al. Clomiphene citrate effects on testosterone/estrogen ratio in male hypogonadism. J Sex Med 2005;2:716–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Da Ros, CT, Averbeck, MA. Twenty-five milligrams of clomiphene citrate presents positive effect on treatment of male testosterone deficiency – a prospective study. Int Braz J Urol 2012;38:512–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mazzola, CR, Katz, DJ, Loghmanieh, N, Nelson, CJ, Mulhall, JP. Predicting biochemical response to clomiphene citrate in men with hypogonadism. J Sex Med 2014;11:2302–7.Google Scholar

Roth, LW, Ryan, AR, Meacham, RB. Clomiphene citrate in the management of male infertility. Semin Reprod Med 2013;31:245–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Patel, DP, Brant, WO, Myers, JB, et al. The safety and efficacy of clomiphene citrate in hypoandrogenic and subfertile men. Int J Impot Res 2015;27:221–4.Google Scholar

Hussein, A, Ozgok, Y, Ross, L, Niederberger, C. Clomiphene administration for cases of nonobstructive azoospermia: a multicenter study. J Androl 2005;26:787–91; discussion 92–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reifsnyder, JE, Ramasamy, R, Husseini, J, Schlegel, PN. Role of optimizing testosterone before microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 2012;188:532–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chehab, M, Madala, A, Trussell, JC. On-label and off-label drugs used in the treatment of male infertility. Fertil Steril 2015;103:595–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pavlovich, CP, King, P, Goldstein, M, Schlegel, PN. Evidence of a treatable endocrinopathy in infertile men. J Urol 2001;165:837–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Helo, S, Ellen, J, Mechlin, C, et al. A randomized prospective double-blind comparison trial of clomiphene citrate and anastrozole in raising testosterone in hypogonadal infertile men. J Sex Med 2015;12:1761–9.Google Scholar

Shoshany, O, Abhyankar, N, Mufarreh, N, Daniel, G, Niederberger, C. Outcomes of anastrozole in oligozoospermic hypoandrogenic subfertile men. Fertil Steril 2017;107:589–94.Google Scholar

Saylam, B, Efesoy, O, Cayan, S. The effect of aromatase inhibitor letrozole on body mass index, serum hormones, and sperm parameters in infertile men. Fertil Steril 2011;95:809–11.Google Scholar

Cavallini, G, Biagiotti, G, Bolzon, E. Multivariate analysis to predict letrozole efficacy in improving sperm count of non-obstructive azoospermic and cryptozoospermic patients: a pilot study. Asian J Androl 2013;15:806–11.Google Scholar

Gregoriou, O, Bakas, P, Grigoriadis, C, Creatsa, M, Hassiakos, D, Creatsas, G. Changes in hormonal profile and seminal parameters with use of aromatase inhibitors in management of infertile men with low testosterone to estradiol ratios. Fertil Steril 2012;98:48–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alder, NJ, Keihani, S, Stoddard, GJ, Myers, JB, Hotaling, JM. Combination therapy with clomiphene citrate and anastrozole is a safe and effective alternative for hypoandrogenic subfertile men. BJU Int 2018;122:688–94.Google Scholar

Shiraishi, K, Ohmi, C, Shimabukuro, T, Matsuyama, H. Human chorionic gonadotrophin treatment prior to microdissection testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 2012;27:331–9.Google Scholar

Kobori, Y, Suzuki, K, Iwahata, T, et al. Induction of spermatogenesis by rhFSH for azoospermia due to spermatogenic dysfunction with maturation arrest: five case series. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2015;61:168–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Santi, D, De Vicentis, S, Aifano, P, et al. Use of follicle-stimulating hormone for the male partner of idiopathic infertile couples in Italy: results from a multicentre, observational, clinical practice survey. Andrology 2020;8:637–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mao, JF, Liu, ZX, Nie, M, et al. Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone therapy is associated with earlier spermatogenesis compared to combined gonadotropin therapy in patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Asian J Androl 2017;19:680–5.Google Scholar

Buchter, D, Behre, HM, Kliesch, S, Nieschlag, E. Pulsatile GnRH or human chorionic gonadotropin/human menopausal gonadotropin as effective treatment for men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: a review of 42 cases. Eur J Endocrinol 1998;139:298–303.Google Scholar

Bouloux, PM, Nieschlag, E, Burger, HG, et al. Induction of spermatogenesis by recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (puregon) in hypogonadotropic azoospermic men who failed to respond to human chorionic gonadotropin alone. J Androl 2003;24:604–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vicari, E, Mongioi, A, Calogero, AE, et al. Therapy with human chorionic gonadotrophin alone induces spermatogenesis in men with isolated hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism – long-term follow-up. Int J Androl 1992;15:320–9.Google Scholar

Warne, DW, Decosterd, G, Okada, H, Yano, Y, Koide, N, Howles, CM. A combined analysis of data to identify predictive factors for spermatogenesis in men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism treated with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin. Fertil Steril 2009;92:594–604.Google Scholar

Rastrelli, G, Corona, G, Mannucci, E, Maggi, M. Factors affecting spermatogenesis upon gonadotropin-replacement therapy: a meta-analytic study. Andrology 2014;2:794–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Finkel, DM, Phillips, JL, Snyder, PJ. Stimulation of spermatogenesis by gonadotropins in men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. N Engl J Med 1985;313:651–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ramasamy, R, Stahl, PJ, Schlegel, PN. Medical therapy for spermatogenic failure. Asian J Androl 2012;14:57–60.Google Scholar

Liu, PY, Baker, HW, Jayadev, V, Zacharin, M, Conway, AJ, Handelsman, DJ. Induction of spermatogenesis and fertility during gonadotropin treatment of gonadotropin-deficient infertile men: predictors of fertility outcome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:801–8.Google Scholar

Webster, J, Piscitelli, G, Polli, A, Ferrari, CI, Ismail, I, Scanlon, MF. A comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea. Cabergoline Comparative Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994;331:904–9.Google Scholar

Samplaski, MK, Loai, Y, Wong, K, Lo, KC, Grober, ED, Jarvi, KA. Testosterone use in the male infertility population: prescribing patterns and effects on semen and hormonal parameters. Fertil Steril 2014;101:64–9.Google Scholar

Turek, PJ, Williams, RH, Gilbaugh, JH, 3rd, Lipshultz, LI. The reversibility of anabolic steroid-induced azoospermia. J Urol 1995;153:1628–30.Google Scholar

Anderson, RA, Wu, FC. Comparison between testosterone enanthate-induced azoospermia and oligozoospermia in a male contraceptive study. II. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once weekly administration of testosterone enanthate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81:896–901.Google Scholar

[No authors listed]. Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia in normal men. World Health Organization Task Force on methods for the regulation of male fertility. Lancet 1990;336:955–9.Google Scholar

Wenker, EP, Dupree, JM, Langille, GM, et al. The use of HCG-based combination therapy for recovery of spermatogenesis after testosterone use. J Sex Med 2015;12:1334–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ko, EY, Siddiqi, K, Brannigan, RE, Sabanegh, ES Jr. Empirical medical therapy for idiopathic male infertility: a survey of the American Urological Association. J Urol 2012;187:973–8.Google Scholar

Chua, ME, Escusa, KG, Luna, S, Tapia, LC, Dofitas, B, Morales, M. Revisiting oestrogen antagonists (clomiphene or tamoxifen) as medical empiric therapy for idiopathic male infertility: a meta-analysis. Andrology 2013;1:749–57.Google Scholar

Willets, AE, Corbo, JM, Brown, JN. Clomiphene for the treatment of male infertility. Reprod Sci 2013;20:739–44.Google Scholar

Vandekerckhove, P, Lilford, R, Vail, A, Hughes, E. Clomiphene or tamoxifen for idiopathic oligo/asthenospermia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD000151.Google Scholar

Shuling, L, Sie Kuei, ML, Saffari, SE, et al. Do men with normal testosterone-oestradiol ratios benefit from letrozole for the treatment of male infertility? Reprod Biomed Online 2019;38:39–45.Google Scholar

Caroppo, E, Niederberger, C, Vizziello, GM, D’Amato, G. Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone as a pretreatment for idiopathic oligoasthenoteratozoospermic patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 2003;80:1398–403.Google Scholar

Foresta, C, Bettella, A, Garolla, A, Ambrosini, G, Ferlin, A. Treatment of male idiopathic infertility with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical study. Fertil Steril 2005;84:654–61.Google Scholar

Attia, AM, Abou-Setta, AM, Al-Inany, HG. Gonadotrophins for idiopathic male factor subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;8:CD005071.Google Scholar

Showell, MG, Mackenzie-Proctor, R, Brown, J, Yazdani, A, Stankiewicz, MT, Hart, RJ. Antioxidants for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;12:CD007411.Google Scholar

Intasqui, P, Antoniassi, MP, Camargo, M, et al. Differences in the seminal plasma proteome are associated with oxidative stress levels in men with normal semen parameters. Fertil Steril 2015;104:292–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aitken, RJ, Clarkson, JS. Cellular basis of defective sperm function and its association with the genesis of reactive oxygen species by human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1987;81:459–69.Google Scholar

Zini, A, de Lamirande, E, Gagnon, C. Reactive oxygen species in semen of infertile patients: levels of superoxide dismutase- and catalase-like activities in seminal plasma and spermatozoa. Int J Androl 1993;16:183–8.Google Scholar

Aslam, MA, Groothuis, TG, Smits, MA, Woelders, H. Effect of corticosterone and hen body mass on primary sex ratio in laying hen (Gallus gallus), using unincubated eggs. Biol Reprod 2014;90:76.Google Scholar

Omar, MI, Pal, RP, Kelly, BD, et al. Benefits of empiric nutritional and medical therapy for semen parameters and pregnancy and live birth rates in couples with idiopathic infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2019;75:615–25.Google Scholar

Samplaski, MK, Clemesha, CG. Discrepancies between the internet and academic literature regarding vitamin use for male infertility. Transl Androl Urol 2018;7:S193–7.Google Scholar

Anderson, D, Schmid, TE, Baumgartner, A, Cemeli-Carratala, E, Brinkworth, MH, Wood, JM. Oestrogenic compounds and oxidative stress (in human sperm and lymphocytes in the Comet assay). Mutat Res 2003;544:173–8.Google Scholar

Mendiola, J, Torres-Cantero, AM, Vioque, J, et al. A low intake of antioxidant nutrients is associated with poor semen quality in patients attending fertility clinics. Fertil Steril 2010;93:1128–33.Google Scholar

Eskenazi, B, Kidd, SA, Marks, AR, Sloter, E, Block, G, Wyrobek, AJ. Antioxidant intake is associated with semen quality in healthy men. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1006–12.Google Scholar

Dawson, EB, Harris, WA, Teter, MC, Powell, LC. Effect of ascorbic acid supplementation on the sperm quality of smokers. Fertil Steril 1992;58:1034–9.Google Scholar

Dawson, EB, Harris, WA, Rankin, WE, Charpentier, LA, McGanity, WJ. Effect of ascorbic acid on male fertility. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1987;498:312–23.Google Scholar

Rolf, C, Cooper, TG, Yeung, CH, Nieschlag, E. Antioxidant treatment of patients with asthenozoospermia or moderate oligoasthenozoospermia with high-dose vitamin C and vitamin E: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1028–33.Google Scholar

Zareba, P, Colaci, DS, Afeiche, M, et al. Semen quality in relation to antioxidant intake in a healthy male population. Fertil Steril 2013;100:1572–9.Google Scholar

Schmid, TE, Eskenazi, B, Marchetti, F, et al. Micronutrients intake is associated with improved sperm DNA quality in older men. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1130–7 e1.Google Scholar

Akmal, M, Qadri, JQ, Al-Waili, NS, Thangal, S, Haq, A, Saloom, KY. Improvement in human semen quality after oral supplementation of vitamin C. J Med Food 2006;9:440–2.Google Scholar

Lafuente, R, Gonzalez-Comadran, M, Sola, I, et al. Coenzyme Q10 and male infertility: a meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013;30:1147–56.Google Scholar

Nadjarzadeh, A, Shidfar, F, Amirjannati, N, et al. Effect of Coenzyme Q10 supplementation on antioxidant enzymes activity and oxidative stress of seminal plasma: a double-blind randomised clinical trial. Andrologia 2014;46:177–83.Google Scholar

Safarinejad, MR, Safarinejad, S, Shafiei, N, Safarinejad, S. Effects of the reduced form of coenzyme Q10 (ubiquinol) on semen parameters in men with idiopathic infertility: a double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized study. J Urol 2012;188:526–31.Google Scholar

Balercia, G, Buldreghini, E, Vignini, A, et al. Coenzyme Q10 treatment in infertile men with idiopathic asthenozoospermia: a placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1785–92.Google Scholar

Blomberg, JM. Vitamin D and male reproduction. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2014;10:175–86.Google Scholar

Kwiecinski, GG, Petrie, GI, DeLuca, HF. Vitamin D is necessary for reproductive functions of the male rat. J Nutr 1989;119:741–4.Google Scholar

Uhland, AM, Kwiecinski, GG, DeLuca, HF. Normalization of serum calcium restores fertility in vitamin D-deficient male rats. J Nutr 1992;122:1338–44.Google Scholar

Blomberg Jensen, M, Bjerrum, PJ, Jessen, TE, et al. Vitamin D is positively associated with sperm motility and increases intracellular calcium in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1307–17.Google Scholar

Yang, B, Sun, H, Wan, Y, et al. Associations between testosterone, bone mineral density, vitamin D and semen quality in fertile and infertile Chinese men. Int J Androl 2012;35:783–92.Google Scholar

Blomberg Jensen, M, Lawaetz, JG, Petersen, JH, Juul, A, Jorgensen, N. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on semen quality, reproductive hormones, and live birth rate: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018;103:870–81.Google Scholar

Xu, B, Chia, SE, Tsakok, M, Ong, CN. Trace elements in blood and seminal plasma and their relationship to sperm quality. Reprod Toxicol 1993;7:613–18.Google Scholar

Chia, SE, Ong, CN, Chua, LH, Ho, LM, Tay, SK. Comparison of zinc concentrations in blood and seminal plasma and the various sperm parameters between fertile and infertile men. J Androl 2000;21:53–7.Google Scholar

Mankad, M, Sathawara, NG, Doshi, H, Saiyed, HN, Kumar, S. Seminal plasma zinc concentration and alpha-glucosidase activity with respect to semen quality. Biol Trace Elem Res 2006;110:97–106.Google Scholar

Zhao, RP, Xiong, CL. [Zinc content analysis in serum, seminal plasma and spermatozoa of asthenozoospermic and oligoasthenozoospermic patients]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2005;11:680–2.Google Scholar

Wong, WY, Flik, G, Groenen, PM, et al. The impact of calcium, magnesium, zinc, and copper in blood and seminal plasma on semen parameters in men. Reprod Toxicol 2001;15:131–6.Google Scholar

Bakalczuk, S, Robak-Cholubek, D, Jakiel, G, Krasucki, W. [Level of zinc and magnesium in semen taken from male partners of married infertile couples]. Ginekol Pol 1994;65:67–70.Google Scholar

Steiner, AZ, Hansen, KR, Barnhardt, KT. The effect of antioxidants on male factor infertility: the Males, Antioxidants, and Infertility (MOXI) randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril 2020;113:552–560.Google Scholar

Carpino, A, Siciliano, L, Petroni, MF, De Stefano, C, Aquila, S, Ando, S. Low seminal zinc bound to high molecular weight proteins in asthenozoospermic patients: evidence of increased sperm zinc content in oligoasthenozoospermic patients. Hum Reprod 1998;13:111–14.Google Scholar

Fuse, H, Kazama, T, Ohta, S, Fujiuchi, Y. Relationship between zinc concentrations in seminal plasma and various sperm parameters. Int Urol Nephrol 1999;31:401–8.Google Scholar

Colagar, AH, Marzony, ET, Chaichi, MJ. Zinc levels in seminal plasma are associated with sperm quality in fertile and infertile men. Nutr Res 2009;29:82–8.Google Scholar

Schisterman, EF, Sjaarda, LA, Clemons, T, et al. Effect of folic acid and zinc supplementation in men on semen quality and live birth among couples undergoing inferility treatment: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020;323:35–48.Google Scholar

Forges, T, Monnier-Barbarino, P, Alberto, JM, Gueant-Rodriguez, RM, Daval, JL, Gueant, JL. Impact of folate and homocysteine metabolism on human reproductive health. Hum Reprod Update 2007;13:225–38.Google Scholar

Wong, WY, Merkus, HM, Thomas, CM, Menkveld, R, Zielhuis, GA, Steegers-Theunissen, RP. Effects of folic acid and zinc sulfate on male factor subfertility: a double-bind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2002;77:491–8.Google Scholar

Agarwal, A, Said, TM. Carnitines and male infertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2004;8:376–84.Google Scholar

Vicari, E, Calogero, AE. Effects of treatment with carnitines in infertile patients with prostato-vesiculo-epididymitis. Hum Reprod 2001;16:2338–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lenzi, A, Lombardo, F, Gandini, L, Dondero, F. [Metabolism and action of L-carnitine: its possible role in sperm tail function]. Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl 1992;64:187–96.Google Scholar

Schoenfeld, C, Amelar, RD, Dubin, L. Stimulation of ejaculated human spermatozoa by caffeine. A preliminary report. Fertil Steril 1973;24:772–5.Google Scholar

Dimitriadis, F, Giannakis, D, Pardalidis, N, et al. Effects of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors on sperm parameters and fertilizing capacity. Asian J Androl 2008;10:115–33.Google Scholar

Dimitriadis, F, Tsambalas, S, Tsounapi, P, et al. Effects of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors on Leydig cell secretory function in oligoasthenospermic infertile men: a randomized trial. BJU Int 2010;106:1181–5.Google Scholar

Lacham-Kaplan, O, Trounson, A. The effects of the sperm motility activators 2-deoxyadenosine and pentoxifylline used for sperm micro-injection on mouse and human embryo development. Hum Reprod 1993;8:945–52.Google Scholar

Curtis, KM, Savitz, DA, Arbuckle, TE. Effects of cigarette smoking, caffeine consumption, and alcohol intake on fecundability. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:32–41.Google Scholar

Vine, MF, Setzer, RW Jr, Everson, RB, Wyrobek, AJ. Human sperm morphometry and smoking, caffeine, and alcohol consumption. Reprod Toxicol 1997;11:179–84.Google Scholar

Klonoff-Cohen, H, Bleha, J, Lam-Kruglick, P. A prospective study of the effects of female and male caffeine consumption on the reproductive endpoints of IVF and gamete intra-Fallopian transfer. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1746–54.Google Scholar

Minelli, A, Bellezza, I. Methylxanthines and reproduction. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2011:349–72.Google Scholar

Beaven, CM, Hopkins, WG, Hansen, KT, Wood, MR, Cronin, JB, Lowe, TE. Dose effect of caffeine on testosterone and cortisol responses to resistance exercise. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2008;18:131–41.Google Scholar

Karmon, AE, Toth, TL, Chiu, YH, et al. Male caffeine and alcohol intake in relation to semen parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes among fertility patients. Andrology 2017;5:354–61.Google Scholar

Jensen, TK, Swan, SH, Skakkebaek, NE, Rasmussen, S, Jorgensen, N. Caffeine intake and semen quality in a population of 2,554 young Danish men. Am J Epidemiol 2010;171:883–91.Google Scholar

Schmid, TE, Eskenazi, B, Baumgartner, A, et al. The effects of male age on sperm DNA damage in healthy non-smokers. Hum Reprod 2007;22:180–7.Google Scholar

Salas-Huetos, A, Bullo, M, Salas-Salvado, J. Dietary patterns, foods and nutrients in male fertility parameters and fecundability: a systematic review of observational studies. Hum Reprod Update 2017;23:371–89.Google Scholar

Omori, K, Kotera, J. Overview of PDEs and their regulation. Circ Res 2007;100:309–27.Google Scholar

Scott, L, Smith, S. Human sperm motility-enhancing agents have detrimental effects on mouse oocytes and embryos. Fertil Steril 1995;63:166–75.Google Scholar

Aversa, A, Mazzilli, F, Rossi, T, Delfino, M, Isidori, AM, Fabbri, A. Effects of sildenafil (Viagra) administration on seminal parameters and post-ejaculatory refractory time in normal males. Hum Reprod 2000;15:131–4.Google Scholar

Purvis, K, Muirhead, GJ, Harness, JA. The effects of sildenafil on human sperm function in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002;53 Suppl 1:53S–60S.Google Scholar

Hellstrom, WJ, Gittelman, M, Jarow, J, et al. An evaluation of semen characteristics in men 45 years of age or older after daily dosing with tadalafil 20mg: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 9-month study. Eur Urol 2008;53:1058–65.Google Scholar

Jarvi, K, Dula, E, Drehobl, M, Pryor, J, Shapiro, J, Seger, M. Daily vardenafil for 6 months has no detrimental effects on semen characteristics or reproductive hormones in men with normal baseline levels. J Urol 2008;179:1060–5.Google Scholar

Rago, R, Salacone, P, Caponecchia, L, Marcucci, I, Fiori, C, Sebastianelli, A. Effect of vardenafil on semen parameters in infertile men: a pilot study evaluating short-term treatment. J Endocrinol Invest 2012;35:897–900.Google Scholar

Pourian, MR, Kvist, U, Bjorndahl, L, Oliw, EH. Rapid and slow hydroxylators of seminal E prostaglandins among men in barren unions. Andrologia 1995;27:71–9.Google Scholar

Bartke, A, Kupfer, D, Dalterio, S. Prostaglandins inhibit testosterone secretion by mouse testes in vitro. Steroids 1976;28:81–8.Google Scholar

Abbatiello, ER, Kaminsky, M, Weisbroth, S. The effect of prostaglandins and prostaglandin inhibitors on spermatogenesis. Int J Fertil 1975;20:177–82.Google Scholar

Cohen, MS, Colin, MJ, Golimbu, M, Hotchkiss, RS. The effects of prostaglandins on sperm motility. Fertil Steril 1977;28:78–85.Google Scholar

Barkay, J, Harpaz-Kerpel, S, Ben-Ezra, S, Gordon, S, Zuckerman, H. The prostaglandin inhibitor effect of antiinflammatory drugs in the therapy of male infertility. Fertil Steril 1984;42:406–11.Google Scholar

Kristensen, DM, Desdoits-Lethimonier, C, Mackey, AL, et al. Ibuprofen alters human testicular physiology to produce a state of compensated hypogonadism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115:E715–24.Google Scholar

Stutz, G, Martini, AC, Ruiz, RD, Fiol De Cuneo, M, Munoz, L, Lacuara, JL. Functional activity of mouse sperm was not affected by low doses of aspirin-like drugs. Arch Androl 2000;44:117–28.Google Scholar

Kavoussi, PK, Gilkey, MS, Hunn, C, et al. Ibuprofen does not have an adverse impact on semen parameters. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018;35:2201–4.Google Scholar

Aggour, A, Mostafa, H, Maged, W. Endoscopic management of ejaculatory duct obstruction. Int Urol Nephrol 1998;30:481–5.Google Scholar

Modgil, V, Rai, S, Ralph, DJ, Muneer, A. An update on the diagnosis and management of ejaculatory duct obstruction. Nat Rev Urol 2016;13:13–20.Google Scholar

Chen, R, Wang, L, Sheng, X, et al. Transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy for recurrent hemospermia: experience from 419 cases. Asian J Androl 2018;20:438–41.Google Scholar

Pryor, JP, Hendry, WF. Ejaculatory duct obstruction in subfertile males: analysis of 87 patients. Fertil Steril 1991;56:725–30.Google Scholar

Tu, XA, Zhuang, JT, Zhao, L, et al. Transurethral bipolar plasma kinetic resection of ejaculatory duct for treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Xray Sci Technol 2013;21:293–302.Google Scholar

Turek, PJ, Magana, JO, Lipshultz, LI. Semen parameters before and after transurethral surgery for ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol 1996;155:1291–3.Google Scholar

Li, YF, Liang, PH, Sun, ZY, et al. Imaging diagnosis, transurethral endoscopic observation, and management of 43 cases of persistent and refractory hematospermia. J Androl 2012;33:906–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jarow, JP. Transrectal ultrasonography of infertile men. Fertil Steril 1993;60:1035–9.Google Scholar

Avellino, GJ, Lipshultz, LI, Sigman, M, Hwang, K. Transurethral resection of the ejaculatory ducts: etiology of obstruction and surgical treatment options. Fertil Steril 2019;111:427–43.Google Scholar

Jurewicz, M, Gilbert, BR. Imaging and angiography in male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 2016;105:1432–42.Google Scholar

Nguyen, HT, Etzell, J, Turek, PJ. Normal human ejaculatory duct anatomy: a study of cadaveric and surgical specimens. J Urol 1996;155:1639–42.Google Scholar

McMahon, S. An anatomical study by injection technique of the ejaculatory ducts and their relations. J Anat 1938;72(Pt 4):556–74.Google Scholar

McCarthy, JF, Bitter, JS, Klemperer, P. Anatomical and histological study of the verumontanum with especial reference to the ejaculatory ducts. J Urol 1927;17:1–16.Google Scholar

Kim, ED, Onel, E, Honig, SC, Lipshultz, LI. The prevalence of cystic abnormalities of the prostate involving the ejaculatory ducts as detected by transrectal ultrasound. Int Urol Nephrol 1997;29:647–52.Google Scholar

Kirkali, Z, Yigitbasi, O, Diren, B, Hekimoglu, B, Ersoy, H. Cysts of the prostate, seminal vesicles and diverticulum of the ejaculatory ducts. Eur Urol 1991;20:77–80.Google Scholar

Shebel, HM, Farg, HM, Kolokythas, O, El-Diasty, T. Cysts of the lower male genitourinary tract: embryologic and anatomic considerations and differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2013;33:1125–43.Google Scholar

Worischeck, JH, Parra, RO. Transrectal ultrasound in the evaluation of men with low volume azoospermia. J Urol 1993;149(5 Pt 2):1341–4.Google Scholar

Van Poppel, H, Vereecken, R, De Geeter, P, Verduyn, H. Hemospermia owing to utricular cyst: embryological summary and surgical review. J Urol 1983;129:608–9.Google Scholar

Meschede, D, Dworniczak, B, Behre, HM, et al. CFTR gene mutations in men with bilateral ejaculatory-duct obstruction and anomalies of the seminal vesicles. Am J Hum Genet 1997;61:1200–2.Google Scholar

Jarvi, K, Zielenski, J, Wilschanski, M, et al. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and obstructive azoospermia. Lancet 1995;345:1578.Google Scholar

Littrup, PJ, Lee, F, McLeary, RD, Wu, D, Lee, A, Kumasaka, GH. Transrectal US of the seminal vesicles and ejaculatory ducts: clinical correlation. Radiology 1988;168:625–8.Google Scholar

Meacham, RB, Hellerstein, DK, Lipshultz, LI. Evaluation and treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction in the infertile male. Fertil Steril 1993;59:393–7.Google Scholar

Weintraub, CM. Transurethral drainage of the seminal tract for obstruction, infection and infertility. Br J Urol 1980;52:220–5.Google Scholar

Fisch, H, Lambert, SM, Goluboff, ET. Management of ejaculatory duct obstruction: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. World J Urol 2006;24:604–10.Google Scholar

Weintraub, MP, de Mouy, E, Hellstrom, WJG. Newer modalities in the diagnosis and treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol 1993;150:1150–4.Google Scholar

Jarow, JP, Espeland, MA, Lipshultz, LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol 1989;142:62–5.Google Scholar

Kochakarn, W, Leenanupunth, C, Muangman, V, Ratana-Olarn, K, Viseshsindh, V. Ejaculatory duct obstruction in the infertile male: experience of 7 cases at Ramathibodi Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2001;84:1148–52.Google Scholar

Paick, J, Kim, SH, Kim, SW. Ejaculatory duct obstruction in infertile men. BJU Int 2000;85:720–4.Google Scholar

Hellerstein, DK, Meacham, RB, Lipshultz, LI. Transrectal ultrasound and partial ejaculatory duct obstruction in male infertility. Urology 1992;39:449–52.Google Scholar

Nagler, HM, Rotman, M, Zoltan, E, Fisch, H. The natural history of partial ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol 2002;167:253–4.Google Scholar

Schroeder-Printzen, I, Ludwig, M, Köhn, F, Weidner, W. Surgical therapy in infertile men with ejaculatory duct obstruction: technique and outcome of a standardized surgical approach. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1364–8.Google Scholar

Jarow, JP. Seminal vesicle aspiration in the management of patients with ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol 1994;152:899–901Google Scholar

Jarow, JP. Seminal vesicle aspiration of fertile men. J Urol 1996;156:1005–7.Google Scholar

Purohit, RS, Wu, DS, Shinohara, K, Turek, PJ. A prospective comparison of 3 diagnostic methods to evaluate ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol 2004;171:232–5; discussion 235–6.Google Scholar

Engin, G, Kadioğlu, A, Orhan, I, Akdöl, S, Rozanes, I. Transrectal US and endorectal MR imaging in partial and complete obstruction of the seminal duct system. A comparative study. Acta Radiol 2000;41:288–95.Google Scholar

Farley, S, Barnes, R. Stenosis of ejaculatory ducts treated by endoscopic resection. J Urol 1973;109:664–6.Google Scholar

Porch, PP. Aspermia owing to obstruction of distal ejaculatory duct and treatment by transurethral resection. J Urol 1978;119:141–2.Google Scholar

Cornel, EB, Dohle, GR, Meuleman, EJ. Transurethral deroofing of midline prostatic cyst for subfertile men. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2297–300.Google Scholar

Dik, P, Lock, TM, Schrier, BP, Zeijlemaker, BY, Boon, TA. Transurethral marsupialization of a medial prostatic cyst in patients with prostatitis-like symptoms. J Urol 1996;155:1301–4.Google Scholar

Netto, NR, Esteves, SC, Neves, PA. Transurethral resection of partially obstructed ejaculatory ducts: seminal parameters and pregnancy outcomes according to the etiology of obstruction. J Urol 1998;159:2048–53.Google Scholar

Goluboff, ET, Kaplan, SA, Fisch, H. Seminal vesicle urinary reflux as a complication of transurethral resection of ejaculatory ducts. J Urol 1995;153:1234–5.Google Scholar

Vazquez-Levin, MH, Dressler, KP, Nagler, HM. Urine contamination of seminal fluid after transurethral resection of the ejaculatory ducts. J Urol 1994;152(6 Part 1):2049–52.Google Scholar

Vicente, J, del Portillo, L, Ma Pomerol, M. Endoscopic surgery in distal obstruction of the ejaculatory ducts. Eur Urol 1983;9:338–40.Google Scholar

Carson, CC. Transurethral resection for ejaculatory duct stenosis and oligospermia. Fertil Steril 1984;41:482–4.Google Scholar

Kadioǧlu, A, Cayan, S, Tefekli, A, Orhan, I, Engin, G, Turek, PJ. Does response to treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction in infertile men vary with pathology? Fertil Steril 2001;76:138–42.Google Scholar

Ozgök, Y, Tan, MO, Kilciler, M, Tahmaz, L, Kibar, Y. Diagnosis and treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction in male infertility. Eur Urol 2001;39:24–9.Google Scholar

Fuse, H, Mizuno, I, Iwasaki, M, Akashi, T. Transurethral treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction in infertile men. Arch Androl 2003;49:429–31.Google Scholar

Tu, XA, Zhao, LY, Zhao, L, et al. Efficacy of transurethral resection of ejaculatory duct for treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction: report of 60 cases. [Article in Chinese] Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 2011;43:559–61.Google Scholar

El-Assmy, A, El-Tholoth, H, Abouelkheir, RT, Abou-El-Ghar, ME. Transurethral resection of ejaculatory duct in infertile men: outcome and predictors of success. Int Urol Nephrol 2012;44:1623–30.Google Scholar

Tu, XA, Zhuang, JT, Zhao, L, et al. Transurethral bipolar plasma kinetic resection of ejaculatory duct for treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Xray Sci Technol 2013;21:293–302.Google Scholar

Goldwasser, BZ, Weinerth, JL, Carson 3rd, CC. Ejaculatory duct obstruction: the case for aggressive diagnosis and treatment. J Urol 1985;134:964–6.Google Scholar

Wang, H, Ye, H, Xu, C, et al. Transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy using a 6F vesiculoscope for ejaculatory duct obstruction: initial experience. J Androl 2012;33:637–43.Google Scholar

Tang, SX, Zhou, HL, Ding, YL. Effectiveness of transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy in the treatment of persistent hematospermia, and oligoasthenozoospermia and azoospermia from ejaculatory duct obstruction. [Article in Chinese] Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2016;96:2872–5.Google Scholar

Lawler, LP, Cosin, O, Jarow, JP, Kim, HS. Transrectal US-guided seminal vesiculography and ejaculatory duct recanalization and balloon dilation for treatment of chronic pelvic pain. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006;17:169–73.Google Scholar

Jarow, JP, Zagoria, RJ. Antegrade ejaculatory duct recanalization and dilation. Urology 1995;46:743–6.Google Scholar

Lee, JY, Diaz, RR, Choi, YD, Cho, KS. Hybrid method of transurethral resection of ejaculatory ducts using holmium:yttriumaluminium garnet laser on complete ejaculatory duct obstruction. Yonsei Med J 2013;54:1062–5.Google Scholar

Halpern, EJ, Hirsch, IH. Sonographically guided transurethral laser incision of a müllerian duct cyst for treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction. Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:777–8.Google Scholar

Barone, MA, Hutchinson, PL, Johnson, CH, Hsia, J, Wheeler, J. Vasectomy in the United States, 2002. J Urol 2006;176:232–6; discussion 236.Google Scholar

Sharma, V, Le, BV, Sheth, KR, et al. Vasectomy demographics and postvasectomy desire for future children: results from a contemporary national survey. Fertil Steril 2013;99:1880–5.Google Scholar

Potts, JM, Pasqualotto, FF, Nelson, D, Thomas, AJ, Agarwal, A. Patient characteristics associated with vasectomy reversal. J Urol 1999;161:1835–9.Google Scholar

Martin, E, Carnett, JB, Levi, JV, Pennington, ME. The surgical treatment of sterility due to obstruction at the epididymis; together with a study of the morphology of human spermatozoa. Univ Pa Med Bull 1902;15:2–15.Google Scholar

O’Conor, VJ. Anastomosis of the vas deferens after purposeful division for sterility. J Urol 1948;59:229–33.Google Scholar

Derrick, FC, Yarbrough, W, D’Agostino, J. Vasovasostomy: results of questionnaire of members of the American Urological Association. J Urol 1973;110:556–7.Google Scholar

Silber, SJ. Microsurgery in clinical urology. Urology 1975;6:150–3.Google Scholar

Pavlovich, CP, Schlegel, PN. Fertility options after vasectomy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Fertil Steril 1997;67:133–41.Google Scholar

Belker, AM, Thomas, AJ, Fuchs, EF, Konnak, JW, Sharlip, ID. Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol 1991;145:505–11.Google Scholar

Chawla, A, O’Brien, J, Lisi, M, Zini, A, Jarvi, K. Should all urologists performing vasectomy reversals be able to perform vasoepididymostomies if required? J Urol 2004;172:1048–50.Google Scholar

Fenig, DM, Kattan, MW, Mills, JN, Gisbert, M, Yu, C, Lipshultz, LI. Nomogram to preoperatively predict the probability of requiring epididymovasostomy during vasectomy reversal. J Urol 2012;187:215–18.Google Scholar

Parekattil, SJ, Kuang, W, Agarwal, A, Thomas, AJ. Model to predict if a vasoepididymostomy will be required for vasectomy reversal. J Urol 2005;173:1681–4.Google Scholar

Boyle, KE, Thomas, AJ, Marmar, JL, Hirshberg, S, Belker, AM, Jarow, JP. Sperm harvesting and cryopreservation during vasectomy reversal is not cost effective. Fertil Steril 2006;85:961–4.Google Scholar

Fischer, MA, Grantmyre, JE. Comparison of modified one- and two-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy. BJU Int 2000;85:1085–8.Google Scholar

Jee, SH, Hong, YK. One-layer vasovasostomy: microsurgical versus loupe-assisted. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2308–11.Google Scholar

Chan, PT. The evolution and refinement of vasoepididymostomy techniques. Asian J Androl 2013;15:49–55.Google Scholar

Parekattil, SJ, Gudeloglu, A, Brahmbhatt, J, Wharton, J, Priola, KB. Robotic assisted versus pure microsurgical vasectomy reversal: technique and prospective database control trial. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012;28:435–44.Google Scholar

Kavoussi, P. Validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal. Asian J Androl 2015;17:245–7.Google Scholar

Marshall, MT, Doudt, AD, Berger, JH, Auge, BK, Christman, MS, Choe, CH. Robot-assisted vasovasostomy using a single layer anastomosis. J Robot Surg 2017;11:299–303.Google Scholar

Anger, JT, Goldstein, M. Intravasal “toothpaste” in men with obstructive azoospermia is derived from vasal epithelium, not sperm. J Urol 2004;172:634–6.Google Scholar

Silber, SJ. Microscopic vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril 1977;28:1191–202.Google Scholar

Owen, E, Kapila, H. Vasectomy reversal. Review of 475 microsurgical vasovasostomies. Med J Aust 1984;140:398–400.Google Scholar

Lee, HY. A 20-year experience with vasovasostomy. J Urol 1986;136:413–15.Google Scholar

Silber, SJ. Pregnancy after vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal: a study of factors affecting long-term return of fertility in 282 patients followed for 10 years. Hum Reprod 1989;4:318–22.Google Scholar

Kabalin, JN, Kessler, R. Macroscopic vasovasostomy re-examined. Urology 1991;38:135–8.Google Scholar

Fox, M. Vasectomy reversal – microsurgery for best results. Br J Urol 1994;73:449–53.Google Scholar

Scovell, JM, Mata, DA, Ramasamy, R, Herrel, LA, Hsiao, W, Lipshultz, LI. Association between the presence of sperm in the vasal fluid during vasectomy reversal and postoperative patency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology 2015;85:809–13.Google Scholar

Patel, SR, Sigman, M. Comparison of outcomes of vasovasostomy performed in the convoluted and straight vas deferens. J Urol 2008;179:256–9.Google Scholar

Peng, J, Yuan, Y, Zhang, Z, Cui, W, Song, W, Gao, B. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy is an effective treatment for azoospermic patients with epididymal obstruction and prior failure to achieve pregnancy by sperm retrieval with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 2014;29:1–7.Google Scholar

Fuchs, ME, Anderson, RE, Ostrowski, KA, Brant, WO, Fuchs, EF. Pre-operative risk factors associated with need for vasoepididymostomy at the time of vasectomy reversal. Andrology 2016;4:160–2.Google Scholar

Herrel, LA, Goodman, M, Goldstein, M, Hsiao, W. Outcomes of microsurgical vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Urology 2015;85:819–25.Google Scholar

Belker, AM, Thomas, AJ, Fuchs, EF, Konnak, JW, Sharlip, ID. Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol 1991;145:505–11.Google Scholar

Ostrowski, KA, Polackwich, AS, Kent, J, Conlin, MJ, Hedges, JC, Fuchs, EF. Higher outcomes of vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partner as before vasectomy. J Urol 2015;193:245–7.Google Scholar

Chan, PT., Goldstein, M. Superior outcomes of microsurgical vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partners. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1371–4.Google Scholar

Kolettis, PN, Woo, L, Sandlow, JI. Outcomes of vasectomy reversal performed for men with the same female partners. Urology 2003;61:1221–3.Google Scholar

Gerrard, ER, Sandlow, JI, Oster, RA, Burns, JR, Box, LC, Kolettis, PN. Effect of female partner age on pregnancy rates after vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril 2007;87:1340–4.Google Scholar

Dubin, L, Amelar, RD. Magnified surgery for epididymovasostomy. Urology 1984;23:525–8.Google Scholar

Fogdestam, I, Fall, M, Nilsson, S. Microsurgical epididymovasostomy in the treatment of occlusive azoospermia. Fertil Steril 1986;46:925–9.Google Scholar

Silber, SJ. Results of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: role of epididymis in sperm maturation. Hum Reprod 1989;4:298–303.Google Scholar

Dewire, D, Thomas, A. Microsurgical treatment of male infertility. In: Goldstein, M, ed. Surgery of Male Fertility. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1995; pp. 128–34.Google Scholar

Berger, RE. Triangulation end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. J Urol 1998;159:1951–3.Google Scholar

Marmar, JL. Modified vasoepididymostomy with simultaneous double needle placement, tubulotomy and tubular invagination. J Urol 2000;163:483–6.Google Scholar

Chan, PTK, Brandell, RA, Goldstein, M. Prospective analysis of outcomes after microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy. BJU Int 2005;96:598–601.Google Scholar

Zhao, L, Tu, XA, Zhuang, JT, et al. Retrospective analysis of early outcomes after a single-armed suture technique for microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy. Andrology 2015;3:1150–3.Google Scholar

Silverstein, JI, Mellinger, BC. Fibrin glue vasal anastomosis compared to conventional sutured vasovasostomy in the rat. J Urol 1991;145:1288–91.Google Scholar

Shekarriz, BM, Thomas, AJJ, Sabanegh, E, Kononov, A, Levin, HS. Fibrin-glue assisted vasoepididymostomy: a comparison to standard end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy in the rat model. J Urol 1997;158:1602–5.Google Scholar

Busato, WF, Marquetti, AM, Rocha, LC. Comparison of vasovasostomy with conventional microsurgical suture and fibrin adhesive in rats. Int Braz J Urol 2007;33:829–36.Google Scholar

Weiss, JN, Mellinger, BC. Fertility rates with delayed fibrin glue: vasovasostomy in rats. Fertil Steril 1992;57:908–11.Google Scholar

Ho K-L, V, Witte, MN, Bird, ET, Hakim, S. Fibrin glue assisted 3-suture vasovasostomy. J Urol 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1360–3; discussion 1363.Google Scholar

Ball, RA, Steinberg, J, Wilson, LA, Loughlin, KR. Comparison of vasovasostomy techniques in rats utilizing conventional microsurgical suture, carbon dioxide laser, and fibrin tissue adhesives. Urology 1993;41:479–83.Google Scholar

Vankemmel, O, de la Taille, A, Burnouf, T, Rigot, JM, Duchene, F, Mazeman, E. Evaluation of a fibrin sealant free of bovine-derived components in an experimental vas anastomosis study. Urol Int 2000;65:196–9.Google Scholar

Saunders, MM, Baxter, ZC, Abou-Elella, A, Kunselman, AR, Trussell, JC. BioGlue and Dermabond save time, leak less, and are not mechanically inferior to two-layer and modified one-layer vasovasostomy. Fertil Steril 2009;91:560–5.Google Scholar

Mazzilli, R, Defeudis, G, Olana, S, Zamponi, V, Macera, M, Mazzilli, F. The role of ejaculatory dysfunction on male infertility. Clin Ter 2020;171:e523–7.Google Scholar

Shaban, SF, Seager, SW, Lipshultz, LI. Clinical electroejaculation. Med Instrum 1988;22:77–81.Google Scholar

Wein, AJ, Kavoussi, LR, Novick, AC, Partin, AW, Peters, CA (eds). Campbell-Walsh Urology, 10th ed. Saint Louis, MO: Elsevier, 2011.Google Scholar

Sønksen, J, Ohl, DA. Penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation in the treatment of ejaculatory dysfunction. Int J Androl 2002;25:324–32.Google Scholar

Halpern, JA, Das, A, Faw, CA, Brannigan, RE. Oncofertility in adult and pediatric populations: options and barriers. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(Suppl 2):S227–38.Google Scholar

Cito, G, Picone, R, Fucci, R, et al. Reproductive outcomes in infertile men with spinal cord injury (SCI): a retrospective case-control analysis. Urology 2020;141:82–8.Google Scholar

Chong, W, Ibrahim, E, Aballa, TC, Lynne, CM, Brackett, NL. Comparison of three methods of penile vibratory stimulation for semen retrieval in men with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2017;55:921–5.Google Scholar

Brackett, NL, Ead, DN, Aballa, TC, Ferrell, SM, Lynne, CM. Semen retrieval in men with spinal cord injury is improved by interrupting current delivery during electroejaculation. J Urol 2002;167:201–3.Google Scholar

Restelli, AE, Bertolla, RP, Spaine, DM, Miotto, A Jr, Borrelli, M Jr, Cedenho, AP. Quality and functional aspects of sperm retrieved through assisted ejaculation in men with spinal cord injury. Fertil Steril 2009;91:819–25.Google Scholar

da Silva, BFBS, Borrelli, MMD, Fariello, RMBS, et al. Is sperm cryopreservation an option for fertility preservation in patients with spinal cord injury-induced anejaculation? Fertil Steril 2010;94:564–73.Google Scholar

Schatte, EC, Orejuela, FJ, Lipshultz, LI, Kim, ED, Lamb, DJ. Treatment of infertility due to anejaculation in the male with electroejaculation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Urol 2000;163:1717–20.Google Scholar

Brackett, NL, Lynne, CM, Aballa, TC, Ferrell, SM. Sperm motility from the vas deferens of spinal cord injured men is higher than from the ejaculate. J Urol 2000;164:712–15.Google Scholar

Witt, MA, Grantmyre, JE, Lomas, M, Richard, J, Lipshultz, LI. The effect of semen quality of the electrical current and heat generated during rectal probe electroejaculation. J Urol 1992;147:747–9.Google Scholar

Schoor, RA, Elhanbly, S, Niederberger, CS, Ross, LS. The role of testicular biopsy in the modern management of male infertility. J Urol 2002;167:197–200.Google Scholar

Jarvi, K, Lo, K, Fischer, A, et al. CUA Guideline: The workup of azoospermic males. Can Urol Assoc J 2010;4:163–7.Google Scholar

Bernie, AM, Mata, DA, Ramasamy, R, Schlegel, PN. Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2015;104:1099–103.Google Scholar

Schlegel, PN, Su, L-M, Li, PS. Pathophysiologic changes after testicular sperm extraction: patterns and avoidance of testicular injury. In: Hamamah, S, Olivennes, F, Mieusset, R, Frydman, R, eds. Male Sterility and Motility Disorders: Etiologic Factors and Treatment. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1999; pp. 243–52.Google Scholar

Khadra, A.A., Abdulhadi, I., Ghunain, S., Kilani, Z. Efficiency of percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration as a mode of sperm collection for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2003;169:603–605.Google Scholar

Gottschalk-Sabag, S., Glick, T., Bar-On, E., Weiss, D.B. Testicular fine needle aspiration as a diagnostic method. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:1129–1131.Google Scholar

Meng, MV, Cha, I, Ljung, BM, Turek, PJ. Relationship between classic histological pattern and sperm findings on fine needle aspiration map in infertile men. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1973–7.Google Scholar

Ron-El, R, Strassburger, D, Friedler, S, et al. Extended sperm preparation: an alternative to testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1222–6.Google Scholar

Fahmy, I, Mansour, R, Aboulghar, M, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection using surgically retrieved epididymal and testicular spermatozoa in cases of obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. Int J Androl 1997;20:37–44.Google Scholar

Amer, M, Haggar, SE, Moustafa, T, Abd El-Naser, T, Zohdy, W. Testicular sperm extraction: impact of testicular histology on outcome, number of biopsies to be performed and optimal time for repetition. Hum Reprod 1999;14:3030–4.Google Scholar

Schlegel, PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod 1999;14:131–5.Google Scholar

Okada, H, Dobashi, M, Yamazaki, T, et al. Conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 2002;168:1063–7.Google Scholar

Tsujimura, A, Matsumiya, K, Miyagawa, Y, et al. Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative study. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2924–9.Google Scholar

Ramasamy, R, Yagan, N, Schlegel, PN. Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology 2005;65:1190–4.Google Scholar

Ramasamy, R, Schlegel, PN. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: effect of prior biopsy on success of sperm retrieval. J Urol 2007;177:1447–9.Google Scholar

Schlegel, PN, Su, LM. Physiological consequences of testicular sperm extraction. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1688–92.Google Scholar

Amer, M, Ateyah, A, Hany, R, Zohdy, W. Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations. Hum Reprod 2000;15:653–6.Google Scholar

Everaert, K, De Croo, I, Kerckhaert, W, et al. Long term effects of micro-surgical testicular sperm extraction on androgen status in patients with non obstructive azoospermia. BMC Urol 2006;6:9.Google Scholar

Schlegel, PN, Liotta, D, Hariprashad, J, Veeck, LL. Fresh testicular sperm from men with non-obstructive azoospermia works best for ICSI. Urology 2004;64:1069–71.Google Scholar

Ohlander, S, Hotaling, J, Kirshenbaum, E, Niederberger, C, Eisenberg, ML. Impact of fresh versus cryopreserved testicular sperm upon intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancy outcomes in men with azoospermia due to spermatogenic dysfunction: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2014;101:344–9.Google Scholar

Fullerton, G, Hamilton, M, Maheshwari, A. Should non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome men be labelled as infertile in 2009? Hum Reprod 2010;25:588–97.Google Scholar

Dabaja, AA, Schlegel, PN. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: an update. Asian J Androl 2013;15:35–9.Google Scholar

Damani, MN, Master, V, Meng, MV, Burgess, C, Turek, P, Oates, RD. Postchemotherapy ejaculatory azoospermia: fatherhood with sperm from testis tissue with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:930–6.Google Scholar

Hopps, CV, Mielnik, A, Goldstein, M, Palermo, GD, Rosenwaks, Z, Schlegel, PN. Detection of sperm in men with Y chromosome microdeletions of the AZFa, AZFb and AZFc regions. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1660–5.Google Scholar

Oates, RD. Clinical evaluation of the infertile male with respect to genetic etiologies. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2011;57:72–7.Google Scholar

Choi, DY, Gong, IH, Hwang, JH, Oh, JJ, Jong, JY. Detection of Y chromosome microdeletion is valuable in the treatment of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia: sperm retrieval rate and birth rate. Korean J Urol 2013;54:111–16.Google Scholar

Weedin, JW, Bennett, RC, Fenig, DM, Lamb, DJ, Lipshultz, LI. Early versus late maturation arrest: reproductive outcomes of testicular failure. J Urol 2011;186:621–6.Google Scholar

Sheynkin, YR, Ye, Z, Menendez, S, Liotta, D, Veeck, LL, Schlegel, PN. Controlled comparison of percutaneous and microsurgical sperm retrieval in men with obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3086–9.Google Scholar

Lee, R, Li, PS, Goldstein, M, Tanrikut, C, Schattman, G, Schlegel, PN. A decision analysis of treatments for obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 2008;23:2043–9.Google Scholar

Weidel, L, Prins, GS. Cryosurvival of human spermatozoa frozen in eight different buffer systems. J Androl 1987;8:41–7.Google Scholar

Centola, G, Jeyendran, RS. Sperm processing techniques. In: Lipshultz, LI, Howards, SS, Niederberger, CS, eds. Infertility in the Male, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009; pp. 582–92.Google Scholar

Jeyendran, RS, Caroppo, E, Rouen, A, Anderson, A, Puscheck, E. Selecting the most competent sperm for assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 2019;111:851–63.Google Scholar

Schlegel, PN. What are the assisted reproductive technologies for male infertility? In: Robaire, B, Chan, P, eds. Handbook of Andrology, 2nd ed. East Dundee, IL: American Society of Andrology, 2008; pp. 62–6. Available from: www.andrologysociety.com/.Google Scholar

Byrd, W. Processing human semen for insemination comparison of methods. In: Centola, G, Ginsberg, KA, eds. Evaluation and Treatment of the Infertile Male. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996; pp. 89–107.Google Scholar

European Society for Human Reproduction. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories. 2015 . Available from: www.eshre.eu/Guidelines-and-Legal/Guidelines/Revised-guidelines-for-good-practice-in-IVF-laboratories-(2015).aspx.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.Google Scholar

Wald, M, Prins, G. Sperm banking: indications and techniques. In: Lipshultz, LI, Howards, SS, Niederberger, CS, eds. Infertility in the Male, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009; pp. 593–602.Google Scholar

De Los Santos, MJ, Apter, S, Coticchio, G, et al. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015). Hum Reprod 2016;31:685–6.Google Scholar

Niederberger, CS. Male infertility. In: Wein, AJ, Kavoussi, LR, Partin, AW, Peters, CA, eds. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2016; pp. 556–79.Google Scholar

Jefferys, A, Siassakos, D, Wardle, P. The management of retrograde ejaculation: a systematic review and update. Fertil Steril 2012;97:306–12.e6.Google Scholar

Mullin, C, Stelling, J, Schoor, R. Intrauterine insemination from the urologist’s perspective. In: Lipshultz, LI, Howards, SS, Niederberger, CS, eds. Infertility in the Male, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009; pp. 493–9.Google Scholar

Phipps, W. Assisted reproductive technology for male factor infertility. In: Centola, G, Ginsburg, KA, eds. Evaluation and Treatment of the Infertile Male. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996; pp. 130–55.Google Scholar

Morin, SJ, Scott, RT. Knowledge gaps in male infertility: a reproductive endocrinology and infertility perspective. Transl Androl Urol 2018;7(Suppl 3):S283–91.Google Scholar

Pagani, RL, Serafini, PC, Srougi, M. In-vitro fertilization and micromanipulation for male infertility. In: Lipshultz, LI, Howards, SS, Niederberger, CS, eds. Infertility in the Male, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009; pp. 500–15.Google Scholar

Moolenaar, LM, Cissen, M, De Bruin, JP, et al. Cost-effectiveness of assisted conception for male subfertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2015;30:659–66.Google Scholar

Van Voorhis, BJ, Barnett, M, Sparks, AET, Syrop, CH, Rosenthal, G, Dawson, J. Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2001;75:661–8.Google Scholar

Prins, GS, Dolgina, R, Studney, P, Kaplan, B, Ross, L, Niederberger, C. Quality of cryopreserved testicular sperm in patients with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 1999;161:1504–8.Google Scholar

Rothmann, S. What is sperm banking? When and how is it (or should it be) used in humans? Animals? In: Robaire, B, Chan, P, eds. Handbook of Andrology, 2nd ed. East Dundee, IL: American Society of Andrology, 2008; pp. 41–4. Available from: www.andrologysociety.com/.Google Scholar

Gliedt, D, Reed, M. Preparation of gametes for assisted reproductive technologies. In: Andrology and Embryology Review Course Manual. St Louis, MO: American Association of Bioanalysists, 2003; pp. 8.1–8.58.Google Scholar

Ruiz, A, Jeyendran, RS. Sperm processing procedure for intrauterine insemination. In: Yeyendran, RS, ed. Sperm Collection and Processing Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003; pp. 123–40.Google Scholar

Centola, G. Sperm preparation for insemination. In: Patton, PE, Battaglia, DE, eds. Office Andrology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2005; pp. 39–52.Google Scholar

Said, TM, Grunewald, S, Paasch, U, et al. Advantage of combining magnetic cell separation with sperm preparation techniques. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10:740–6.Google Scholar

Malvezzi, H, Sharma, R, Agarwal, A, Abuzenadah, AM, Abu-Elmagd, M. Sperm quality after density gradient centrifugation with three commercially available media: a controlled trial. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12:1–7.Google Scholar

Allamaneni, SSR, Agrawal, A, Rama, S, Ranganathan, P, Sharma, RK. Comparative study on density gradients and swim-up preparation techniques utilizing neat and cryopreserved spermatozoa. Asian J Androl 2005;7:86–92.Google Scholar

Henkel, RR, Schill, WB. Sperm preparation for ART. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2003;1:1–22.Google Scholar

Oshio, S, Kaneko, S, Lizuka, R, Mohri, H. Effects of gradient centrifugation on human sperm. Arch Androl 1987;19:85–93.Google Scholar

Enciso, M, Iglesias, M, Galán, I, Sarasa, J, Gosálvez, A, Gosálvez, J. The ability of sperm selection techniques to remove single- or double-strand DNA damage. Asian J Androl 2011;13:764–8.Google Scholar

Zorn, B, Vidmar, G, Meden-Vrtovec, H. Seminal reactive oxygen species as predictors of fertilization, embryo quality and pregnancy rates after conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Int J Androl 2003;26:279–85.Google Scholar

Takeshima, T, Yumura, Y, Kuroda, S, Kawahara, T, Uemura, H, Iwasaki, A. Effect of density gradient centrifugation on reactive oxygen species in human semen. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2017;63:192–8.Google Scholar

Ahelik, A, Mändar, R, Korrovits, P, et al. Systemic oxidative stress could predict assisted reproductive technique outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015;32:699–704.Google Scholar

Yumura, Y, Iwasaki, A, Saito, K, Ogawa, T, Hirokawa, M. Effect of reactive oxygen species in semen on the pregnancy of infertile couples. Int J Urol 2009;16:202–7.Google Scholar

Boomsma, CM, Heineman, MJ, Cohlen, BJ, Farquhar, C. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4:CD004507.Google Scholar

Jeyendran, RS, Perez-Pelaez, M, Crabo, BG. Concentration of viable spermatozoa for artificial insemination. Fertil Steril 1986;45:132–4Google Scholar

Henkel, RR, Franken, DR, Lombard, CJ, Schill, WB. Selective capacity of glass-wool filtration for the separation of human spermatozoa with condensed chromatin: a possible therapeutic modality for male-factor cases? J Assist Reprod Genet 1994;11:395–400.Google Scholar

Sterzik, K, De Santo, M, Uhlich, S, Gagsteiger, F, Strehler, E. Glass wool filtration leads to a higher percentage of spermatozoa with intact acrosomes: an ultrastructural analysis. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2506–11.Google Scholar

Larson, KL, Brannian, JD, Timm, BK, Jost, LK, Evenson, DP. Density gradient centrifugation and glass wool filtration of semen remove spermatozoa with damaged chromatin structure. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2015–19.Google Scholar

Johnson, DE, Confino, E, Jeyendran, RS. Glass wool column filtration versus mini-Percoll gradient for processing poor quality semen samples. Fertil Steril 1996;66:459–62.Google Scholar

Van Der Ven, HH, Jeyendran, RS, Al-hasani, S, et al. Glass wool column filtration of human semen: relation to swim-up procedure and outcome of IVF. Hum Reprod 1988;3:85–8.Google Scholar

Tanphaichitr, N, Randall, M, Fitzgerald, L, Lee, G, Seibel, M, Taymor, M. An increase in in vitro fertilization ability of low-density human sperm capacitated by multiple-tube swim-up. Fertil Steril 1987;48:821–7.Google Scholar

Andolz, P, Bielsa, M, Genesca, A, Benet, J, Egozcue, J. Improvement of sperm quality in abnormal semen samples using a modified swim-up procedure. Hum Reprod 1987;2:99–101.Google Scholar

Calamera, J, Brugo, S, Quiros, M, Nicholson, R. Computer assisted measurement in normal and pathological human semen, fresh and post swim-up technique. Andrologia 1989;21:340–5.Google Scholar

Yetkinel, S, Kilicdag, EB, Aytac, PC, Haydardedeoglu, B, Simsek, E, Cok, T. Effects of the microfluidic chip technique in sperm selection for intracytoplasmic sperm injection for unexplained infertility: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019;36:403–9.Google Scholar

Bower, L, Serafini, P, Wikland, M, Moyer, D. The use of hyaluronic acid for sperm selection – evaluation of sperm head ultrastructure. Int J Fertil 1989;34:420–4.Google Scholar

Barak, Y, Amit, A, Lessing, J, Paz, G, Homonnai, T, Yogey, L. Improved fertilization rate in an in-vitro fertilization program by egg yolk treated sperm. Fertil Steril 1992;58:197–8.Google Scholar

Holmgren, WJ, Jeyendran, RS, Neff, MR, Perez-Pelaez, M, Zaneveld, LJD. Preincubation of human spermatozoa in test-yolk medium: effect on penetration of zona-free hamster oocytes and correlation with other semen characteristics. J Vitr Fertil Embryo Transf 1989;6:207–12.Google Scholar

Jeyendran, RS, Gunawardana, VK, Barisic, D, Wentz, AC. TEST-yolk media and sperm quality. Hum Reprod Update 1995;1:73–9.Google Scholar

Bielfeld, P, Jeyendran, RS, Holmgren, WJ, Zaneveld, LJD. Effect of egg yolk medium on the acrosome reaction of human spermatozoa. J Androl 1990;11:260–9.Google Scholar

Yang, YS, Rojas, FJ, Stone, SC. Acrosome reaction of human spermatozoa in zona-free hamster egg penetration test. Fertil Steril 1988;50:954–9.Google Scholar

Ericsson, R, Langevin, C, Nishino, M. Isolation of fractions rich in human Y sperm. Nature 1973;246:421.Google Scholar

Janson, J-C. On the history of the development of Sephadex. Chromatographia 1987;23:361–5.Google Scholar

Byrd, W, Drobnis, E, Kutteh, W, Marshburn, P, Carr, B. Intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm: a prospective randomized trial comparing three different sperm preparation techniques. Fertil Steril 1994;62:850–6.Google Scholar

Amer, M, Metawae, B, Hosny, H, Raef, A. Beneficial effect of adding pentoxifylline to processed semen samples on ICSI outcome in infertile males with mild and moderate asthenozoospermia: a randomized controlled prospective crossover study. Int J Reprod Biomed 2013;11:939–44.Google Scholar

Negri, P, Grechi, E, Tomasi, A, Fabbri, E, Capuzzo, A. Effectiveness of pentoxifylline in semen preparation for intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1236–9.Google Scholar

Imoedemhe, DAG, Sigue, AB, Pacpaco, ELA, Olazo, AB. The effect of caffeine on the ability of spermatozoa to fertilize mature human oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:155–60.Google Scholar

Moghadam, KK, Nett, R, Robins, JC, et al. The motility of epididymal or testicular spermatozoa does not directly affect IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcomes. J Androl 2005;26:619–23.Google Scholar

Zhang, W, Li, F, Cao, H, Li, C. Protective effects of l-carnitine on astheno- and normozoospermic human semen samples during cryopreservation. Zygote 2016;24:293–300.Google Scholar

Yang, C, Xu, L, Cui, Y, Wu, B, Liao, Z. Potent humanin analogue (HNG) protects human sperm from freeze-thaw-induced damage. Cryobiology 2019;88:47–53.Google Scholar

Saeednia, S, Shabani Nashtaei, M, Bahadoran, H, Aleyasin, A, Amidi, F. Effect of nerve growth factor on sperm quality in asthenozoospermic men during cryopreservation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016;14:1–8.Google Scholar