Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T18:27:59.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Recognition of cultural membership and implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2009

Alexandra Xanthaki
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The recognition of collectivities and collective rights is one of the most contested issues in international law and politics. For some, group rights are in stark contrast with the traditional approach of liberal rights theory, which views human rights as individual rights. The extensive philosophising on cultural membership is generally perceived by international lawyers as very engaging and relevant to debates on collective rights; yet, sometimes it appears to be ignoring new developments in international law. If international law is defined as the system of rules and principles that govern international relations, its normative directions on the issue cannot be ignored. Indigenous claims provide an excellent example of the importance of cultural membership and its challenges.

The importance of cultural membership

Although indigenous claims include individual rights, in their overwhelming majority they are famously of a collective nature. Indeed, the collective element is prominent in indigenous claims, from self-determination to cultural rights and land resources. Indigenous peoples view the recognition of their collective rights as a token of respect towards their identity and communities as well as the only way for their survival and development. As long ago as 1989 indigenous leaders agreed on the following statement:

[T]he concept of indigenous peoples' collective rights is of paramount importance. It is the establishment of rights of peoples as groups, and not merely the recognition of individual rights, which is one of the most important purposes of this Declaration [on the rights of indigenous peoples]. Without this, the Declaration cannot adequately protect our most basic interests. This must not be compromised. (emphasis added)

Type
Chapter
Information
Indigenous Rights and United Nations Standards
Self-Determination, Culture and Land
, pp. 13 - 46
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×