Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:42:33.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Racial constructs and martial theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Timothy C. Winegard
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo, Ontario
Get access

Summary

The paternalistic policies regulating indigenous peoples were dependent upon contemporary racial and class theories persistent in European dialogue and culture, imported by settler societies:

Colonial settlers, the offspring of European imperialism, refused to integrate with the indigenous population. Moreover, they kept Europe as their myth of origin and as a signifier of superiority even when formal political ties and/or dependency with European colonial powers had been abandoned. This sense of identification with the ‘mother country’ has not, however, mitigated the unevenness and fragility of settler identities, which were often forged in defence against metropolitan contempt.

In the absence of large noble and gentry populations, the original convict and primarily lower-class British settlers of the ‘white Dominions’ instinctively filled the vacuum. While the colonies afforded both new opportunities and the ability to transcend the regimented tiers of European society, the hierarchies did not vanish. Settlers found in indigenous peoples, Asian labourers and inferior immigrants alternatives to fill the lower rungs of class and racial hierarchies.

The concept of martial races – the belief that certain identifiable peoples or societies had an innate and exceptional capacity for war – was a construct engineered in India and exported across the British and other European empires. Martial race theories were derived from a pragmatic approach to internal state security, as a consequence of the 1857 Indian Mutiny and the subsequent shifting of sepoy ratios in the Indian Army of the British Raj to favour men from the Punjab, Nepal and the Northwest Frontier (Afghanistan).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Killingray, DavidOmissi, DavidGuardians of Empire: The Armed Forces of the Colonial Powers c. 1700–1964Manchester University Press 1999

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×