Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: June 2012

10 - Tax Law


The purpose of the earned income tax credit (EITC) is to eliminate tax-related incentives to remain on welfare. It operates by reimbursing low-income workers for income and Social Security tax withholdings that are not withheld from welfare payments. One persistent problem associated with the EITC is the large number of tax returns with EITC-related errors – referred to as the “error rate.” The inappropriate payments that flowed from the public treasury as a result of these errors are estimated at more than $10 billion for 2006 alone.

President Bill Clinton and the Republican Congress battled in the mid-1990s over the EITC's future. Republican President Gerald Ford signed the EITC into law in 1975 in part to reduce “the welfare rolls,” but it was the Republican Congress that wished to abolish the EITC and President Clinton who wanted to save it. The choice to reform or abolish the EITC depended on why the error rate occurred and how readily the problem could be redressed.

The first theory to explain the error rate is that, because of the EITC’s complexity, it is easy to make a mistake in calculating the credit. For instance, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) informational booklet explaining the EITC is more than fifty pages long and includes several worksheets. The solution for the problem of complexity would be to simplify the EITC to reduce error rates. The second theory to explain the error rate is that it is the result of taxpayer fraud. Under this theory, taxpayers want something for nothing, so they cheat and claim an EITC amount that they know they are ineligible to receive. The solution to a problem based on fraud would be to increase audits of low-income taxpayers to crack down on the fraud.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Federico, Christopher M.When Do Welfare Attitudes Become Racialized? The Paradoxical Effects of Education 48 2004
Peffley, MarkRacial Stereotypes and Whites’ Political Views of Blacks in the Context of Welfare and Crime 41 1997
Brown, Dorothy A.Shades of the American Dream 87 2010
Brown, Dorothy A.Race, Class, and Gender Essentialism in Tax Literature: The Joint Return 54 1997
Book, LeslieSymposium: Closing the Tax Gap: Refund Anticipation Loans and the Tax Gap 20 2009
Brown, Dorothy A.Race and Class Matters 107 2007
Brown, Dorothy A.The Tax Treatment of Children: Separate But Unequal 54 2005
Zelenak, LawrenceTax or Welfare? The Administration of the Earned Income Tax Credit 52 2005
Lindsey, Vada WatersEncouraging Savings Under the Earned Income Tax Credit 44 2010
Roberts, Dorothy ERacism and Patriarchy in the Meaning of Motherhood 1 1993
Chen, JimOf Agriculture's First Disobedience and its Fruit 48 1995
Stevenson, Richard W. 1997
Lee, John W.Transaction Costs Relating to Acquisition or Enhancement of Intangible Property: A Populist, Political, but Practical Perspective 22 2002
Greenstein, RobertThe New Procedures for the Earned Income Tax Credit 99 2003
Alpert, Bruce 2003
Firestone, David 2003
Casteel, Chris 2003
Rosenbaum, David E. 2004
Firestone, David 2003
Greenstein, RobertThe New Procedures for the Earned Income Tax Credit 99 2003
Liebman, Jeffrey B. 2001
Harmelink, Philip J.The Challenge of the EITC 100 2003
Holt, Stephen D.Keeping It in Context: Earned Income Tax Credit Compliance and Treatment of the Working Poor 6 2007