Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:33:48.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Modern immigration detention and the rise of the permanent bureaucratic enterprise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Daniel Wilsher
Affiliation:
City University, London and Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the First Tier Tribunal, UK
Get access

Summary

Introduction: the aliens power and the new politics of enforcement

This chapter explores the political and legal evolution of detention since World War Two, particularly over the last thirty years. As we saw, the ‘aliens power’ had been firmly established in legal doctrine as a, now separate, descendant of the war power. Although extended alien detention had generally been reserved for wars or national security situations, this power had the potential to foster more permanent restrictions. Courts had not found a clear jurisprudential or political reason to apply basic constitutional safeguards to unwanted aliens, non-parties to the social contract. Detention had been glossed over as a ‘necessary’ part of deportation or as ‘temporary confinement’. Detainees were deemed ‘not to have entered’, despite being incarcerated. The legal foundations were thus firmly in place for employment of mass detention should the political conditions arise.

The immediate decades after World War Two were ones of economic recovery during which migration was often openly encouraged. Barring national security scares, there was no sense of crisis around borders. This had changed decisively by the 1970s when a new and diffuse climate of fear over migration emerged. Those simply entering or arriving without permission, whether seeking asylum or economic opportunity, became seen as a ‘security’ threat. The period since has witnessed the full flowering of the illiberal potential of the aliens power, with a massive expansion of detention facilities in peacetime. Justification was sought in a range of bureaucratic instrumental goals; as a deterrent to irregular migration outside of permitted channels, to secure removal or maintain the ‘integrity’ of immigration laws and as a form of public or national security precaution. However, the increased hostility toward migration in public debate also meant that expanded detention had politically symbolic dimensions. It marked out more clearly the liberal state's capacity for extraordinary measures against ‘outsiders’ to protect ‘insiders’. The permanent emergency had arrived.

Type
Chapter
Information
Immigration Detention
Law, History, Politics
, pp. 57 - 118
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

US Department of Homeland SecurityOffice of Immigration Statistics, Immigration Enforcement Actions: 2008Washington, DCOffice of Immigration Statistics 2009 3Google Scholar
Tichenor, D.Dividing Lines: the Politics of Immigration Control in AmericaPrinceton University Press 2002Google Scholar
Hart, H.M.The Power of Congress to Limit the Jurisdiction of Federal Courts: An Exercise in Dialectic 1953 66 Harv. L. Rev1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuck, P.The Transformation of Immigration Law 1984 84 Colum. L. Rev20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudin, L.B.The Settler Within Our Gates 1951 26 N.Y.U. L. Rev.266Google Scholar
Dow, M.American Gulag: Inside U.S. Immigration PrisonsBerkeley: University of California Press 2004 6Google Scholar
Daniels, R.Guarding the Golden Door: American Immigration Policy since 1882New YorkHill and Wang 2004 205Google Scholar
NoteThe Indefinite Detention of Excluded Aliens: Statutory and Constitutional Justifications and Limitations 1983 82 Mich. L. Rev61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuck, P.H.Williams, J.Removing Criminal Aliens: The Pitfalls of Federalism 1988 22 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol367Google Scholar
Tichenor, D.Dividing Lines: the Politics of Immigration Control in AmericaPrinceton University Press 2002 284Google Scholar
Zolberg, A.A Nation By Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning of AmericaCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 2006 385Google Scholar
Taylor, M.Judicial Deference to Congressional Folly: The Story of Martin, D.A.Schuck, P.H.Immigration StoriesFoundation Press 2005 5Google Scholar
Aleinikoff, T.A.Detaining Plenary Power: The Meaning and Impact of 2002 16 Geo. Immig. L.J365Google Scholar
Bay, GuantanamoCuban American Bar Association, Inc v. Christopher 43 1995
Spiro, P.J.Explaining the End of Plenary Power 2002 16 Geo. Immig. L.J339Google Scholar
Cole, D.Enemy Aliens: Double Standards and Constitutional Freedoms in the War on TerrorismNew YorkNew Press 2003 224Google Scholar
Kerwin, D.Lin, S.Y.Immigration Detention: Can ICE Meet its Legal Imperatives and Case Management Responsibilities?Washington, DCMigration Policy Institute 2009 19Google Scholar
Schriro, D.Immigration Detention Overview and RecommendationsWashington, DCHomeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement 2009Google Scholar
Office of Inspector GeneralICE's Compliance with Detention Limits for Aliens with a Final Order of Removal from the United StatesWashington, DCDepartment of Homeland Security 2007Google Scholar
Kalhan, A.Rethinking Immigration Detention 2010 110 Colum. L. Rev42Google Scholar
Hansen, R.Citizenship and Immigration in Post-war BritainOxford University Press 2000Google Scholar
Weber, L.Landman, T.Deciding to Detain: the Organizational Context for Decisions to Detain Asylum Seekers at UK PortsUniversity of Essex 2002Google Scholar
Phillips, J.Spinks, H.Boat Arrivals in Australia since 1976Parliament of Australia 26 2010Google Scholar
Millbank, A.The Detention of Boat PeopleParliament of Australia 27 2001Google Scholar
Betts, K.Boat People and Public Opinion in Australia 2001 9 People and Place4Google Scholar
Montfort, P.La Contentieux de la Retention Administrative des Etrangers en Instance d'eloignmentParisL’Harmattan 2003Google Scholar
Bernadot, M.Camps d'etrangersParisTerra 2008Google Scholar
Bernadot, M.Des Camps en France (1944–1963) 58 Plein Droit 2003Google Scholar
Bernadot, M.Etre interne au Larzac: la politique d'assignation a residence: la guerre d’Algerie, 1958–1962 2005 Politix 1 39Google Scholar
Weisberg, R.Vichy Law and the Holocaust in FranceAmsterdamHarwood Academic Publishers 1996Google Scholar
Richard, C.Fischer, N.A Legal Disgrace? The Retention of Deported Migrants in Contemporary France 2010 47 Social Science Information581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J.French Constitutional LawOxfordClarendon Press 1992 1Google Scholar
Inda, J.Targetting Immigrants: Government, Technology, and EthicsOxford University Press 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eff, C.The Detention Centre Maze 2006 37 VacarmeGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×