Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T16:37:57.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Divergent patterns in immigrant earnings across European destinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2009

Alicia Adserà
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Economics; NICHD Post-doc Fellow, Population Research Center University of Chicago
Barry R. Chiswick
Affiliation:
Research Professor and Head, Department of Economics; Director, UIC Center for Economics Education University of Illinois at Chicago
Craig A. Parsons
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Timothy M. Smeeding
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, New York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Western Europe, which used to think of itself as a region of emigration, has experienced substantial net immigration in the last four decades from the lesser-developed countries of Asia, Africa, Latin America, and in the last decade, from the former Eastern bloc countries. As a result, immigration has become an important socioeconomic and public policy issue in all of the developed European economies. Understanding how well immigrants from different origins adapt to diverse labor markets across Europe, and whether labor market outcomes, such as earnings, occupation or unemployment among immigrants differ by country of destination, country of origin and gender is of public policy interest.

The analysis of earnings of the immigrants began with the study of white men in the United States (Chiswick 1978), but was quickly followed by analyses for a range of racial and ethnic groups, countries of origin and for women (Chiswick 1979, 1980; Long 1980). While the literature has spread to nearly all destination countries, most studies deal with immigrants in the English-speaking developed countries of overseas settlement (United States, Canada, and Australia) and tend to concentrate on only one country, thereby making comparisons across destinations very difficult.

This study builds on the existing literature, but takes a different approach. Unlike the standard literature on the adjustment of immigrants that focuses on one destination at a time, and often one origin and one gender at a time, this study emphasizes the comparison across destination countries, as well as across countries of origin and gender.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adserà, Alicia and Chiswick, Barry R. forthcoming “Are There Gender and Country of Origin Differences in Immigrant Labor Market Outcomes across European Destinations?” Journal of Population Economics
Antecol, Heather, Deborah Cobb-Clark and Stephen Trejo 2002 “Human Capital and Earnings of Female Immigrants to Australia, Canada and the United States.” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, Claremont McKenna College
Baker, Michael and Benjamin, Dwayne 1997The Role of the Family in Immigrants’ Labor-Market Activity.American Economic Review 87(4) (September): 705–27.Google Scholar
Biswal, Urvashi D . 1999Testing the Family ‘Common Preference’ Model for Immigrant and Non-Immigrant Women's Labour Supply.Canadian Public Policy 25(s1) (November): 95–114. http://economics.ca/cgi/jab?journal=cpp&view=v25s1/CPPv25s1p095.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Paul, Cooke, Thomas J., Halfacree, Keith and Smith, Darren 2001A Cross-National Comparison of the Impact of Family Migration on Women's Employment Status.Demography 38(2) (May): 201–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiswick, Barry R. 1978The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-Born Men.Journal of Political Economy 86(5) (October): 897–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiswick, Barry R. 1979 “The Economic Progress of Immigrants: Some Apparently Universal Patterns,” in Contemporary Economic Problems, 1979, John, William, Fellner (ed.). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 357–99Google Scholar
Chiswick, Barry R. 1980 “An Analysis of the Economic Progress and Impact of Immigrants.” PB80–200454. Prepared for the Employment and Training Administration, US Department of Labor. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, August
Chiswick, Barry R. 1986Human Capital and the Labor Market Adjustment of Immigrants: Testing Alternative Hypotheses.Research in Human Capital and Development 4: 1–26.Google Scholar
Chiswick, Barry R. and Miller, Paul W. 1994Language Choice among Immigrants in a Multi-lingual Destination.Journal of Population Economics 7(2): 119–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. and Connolly, Marie D. 2001A Family Affair: The Labor Market Experiences of Immigrant Spouses.Social Science Quarterly 82(4) (December): 796–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. and Crossley, T. F. 2006Gender, Comparative Advantage and Labour Market Activity in Immigrant Families.Journal of Labor Economics.Google Scholar
Duleep, Harriet Orcutt and Sanders, Seth 1993The Decision to Work by Married Immigrant Women.Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46(4) (July): 677–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. D. R. 1984Immigrant Women in Australia: Resources, Family, and Work.International Migration Review 18(4) (Special Issue) (Winter): 1063–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeClere, Felicia B. and McLaughlin, Diane K.. 1997Family Migration and Changes in Women's Earnings: A Decomposition Analysis.Population Research and Policy Review 16(4) (August): 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, James E. 1980The Effect of Americanization on Earnings: Some Evidence for Women.Journal of Political Economy 88(3) (June): 620–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacPherson, David A. and Stewart, James B. 1989The Labor Force Participation and Earnings Profiles of Married Female Immigrants.Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 29(3) (Autumn): 57–72.Google Scholar
Reimers, Cordelia W. 1985Cultural Differences in Labor Force Participation among Married Women.American Economic Review 75(2) (May): 251–55.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×