John Wyclif's quite conventional assertion that images “may be made both well and ill” apparently did not articulate a strong enough case against visual media for many of his fifteenth-century followers. Indeed, it is often noted that one of the most consistent features of Lollard texts is the critique and rejection of devotional images. Yet while many Lollard writers equated image veneration with idolatry and advocated the replacement of visual libri laicorum with textual ones, as this chapter will show, other Lollard writers represented the ­visual in more measured terms and used vernacular texts to help readers learn to distinguish between “false” and “true” images and, more broadly, between misleading representations and edifying ones. A set of ­moderate Lollard sermons, for example, draws out these distinctions by means of imaginative antitheses. In the Christmas sermon, the preacher asks his listeners to imagine the Nativity scene by posing a series of questions: