Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:03:25.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Hydrogen-infrastructure build-up in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2010

Michael Ball
Affiliation:
Shell, The Netherlands
Martin Wietschel
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe, Germany
Get access

Summary

If a mass-market roll-out of hydrogen vehicles in the European Union takes place in the next 10 to 15 years, as promoted by the European Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology Platform (HFP), then infrastructure strategies will be crucial. At the core of any infrastructure analysis is the question of how the infrastructure should be developed over time and how the needs of both consumers and suppliers can be met. At the same time, such an analysis must also take into account the characteristics of different national energy systems (such as the availability of primary energy sources or competition for end uses), as well as national energy policies. What this infrastructure build-up could look like and what it might cost is shown in a case study for Germany as well as at the European level. On this basis, more general infrastructure strategies are derived with respect to roll-out strategies, production mix and distribution options, and their impacts on supply costs and CO2 emissions. The chapter finishes with an outlook on global hydrogen scenarios.

The need for a hydrogen-infrastructure analysis

The potential benefits of a hydrogen economy are recognised to differing degrees by national governments and supranational institutions, although the pathways and timeframes to achieve such a transition remain highly contended. The development of hydrogen-powered fuel-cell vehicles that are economically and technologically competitive with conventional vehicles is a crucial prerequisite for the successful introduction of hydrogen as an automotive fuel.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Hydrogen Economy
Opportunities and Challenges
, pp. 385 - 453
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almansoori, A. (2006). Design and operation of a future hydrogen supply chain. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 84 (A6), 423–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. (1972). Models for determining least-cost investments in electricity supply. Bell Journal of Economics, 3 (1), 267–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, M. (2006). Integration einer Wasserstoffwirtschaft in ein nationales Energiesystem am Beispiel Deutschlands. Dissertation, VDI Fortschritt-Berichte Reihe 16, No. 177. Düsseldorf: VDI Verlag.Google Scholar
Ball, M., Wietschel, M. and Rentz, O. (2006). Integration of a hydrogen economy into the German energy system: an optimising modelling approach. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (10–11), 1355–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramanis, M. C. (1983). Electricity Generation Expansion Planning in the Eighties: Requirements and Available Analysis Tools, Energy Models and Studies. North-Holland Publishing Company, pp. 541–562.Google Scholar
,CASCADE MINTS (2005a). Summary and Objectives. National Technical University of Athens (NTUA). www.e3mlab.ntua.gr/cascade.html.
,CASCADE MINTS (2005b). Case study comparisons and development of energy models for integrated technology systems. National Technical University of Athens (NTUA). www.e3mlab.ntua.gr/cascade.html.
Cremer, C. (2005). Integrating Regional Aspects in Modeling of Electricity Generation – the Example of CO2 Capture and Storage. Dissertation No. 16119. ETH Zurich.
,DWV (Deutscher Wasserstoff- und Brennstoffzellen-Verband (German Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Association)) (2005). H2-Roadmap. Berlin: DWV. www.dwv-info.de.
Enzensberger, N. (2003). Entwicklung und Anwendung eines Strom- und Zertifikatmarktmodells für den Europäischen Energiesektor. Dissertation, VDI Fortschritt-Berichte Reihe 16, No. 159. Düsseldorf: VDI Verlag.Google Scholar
Fischedick, M., Esken, A., Luhmann, H. J., Schüwer, D. and Supersberger, N. (2007). CO2 Capture and Geological Storage as a Climate Policy Option. Technologies, Concepts, Perspectives. Wuppertal Spezial 35e. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.Google Scholar
Forsberg, P. and Karlström, M. (2006). On optimal investment strategies for a hydrogen filling station. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (5), 647–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,FORUM (Forum für Energiemodelle und Energiewirtschaftliche Systemanalysen) (1999). Energiemodelle zum Klimaschutz in Deutschland: Strukturelle und gesamtwirtschaftliche Auswirkungen aus nationaler Perspektive. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
Gately, (1970). Investment Planning for the Electric Power Industry: An Integer Programming Approach. Research Report 7035. Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
Gielen, D. and Taylor, M. (2007). Modelling industrial energy use: the IEA's energy technology perspectives. Energy Economics, 29 (4), 889–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Monroy, L. and Cordoba, A. (2002). Financial costs and environment impact optimisation of the energy supply systems. International Journal of Energy Research, 26 (1), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, D. L. (1998). Survey evidence on the importance of fuel availability to the alternative fuels and vehicles. Energy Studies Review, 8 (3), 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, D. L. (2005). HyTrans Model Development. FY 2005 Progress Report. DOE Hydrogen Program. Knoxville: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, National Transportation Research Center. www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/progress05/iii_3_greene.pdf.Google Scholar
Hafkamp, W. A. (1984). Economic-Environmental Modelling in a National-Regional System. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Hart, D. (E4tech) (2005). The Economics of a European Hydrogen Automotive Infrastructure. A study for Linde AG. www.hydrogenday.de/International/Web/Hydrogenday2005.nsf/e4tech%20hydrogen%20study.pdf.
,HFP (European Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology Platform) (2007). Implementation Plan, Status 2006. www.hfpeurope.org.
Höllermann, T. (2004). Märkte für Wasserstofffahrzeuge in Europa. Diploma thesis. FhG ISI. Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Hugo, A., Rutter, P., Pistikopoulos, S., Amorelli, A. and Zoia, G. (2005). Hydrogen infrastructure strategic planning using multi-objective optimisation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30 (15), 1523–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HyWays, (2007). Hydrogen Energy in Europe. Integrated Project under the 6th Framework Programme of the European Commission to Develop the European Hydrogen Energy Roadmap. Contract No. 502596, 2004–2007. www.hyways.de.Google Scholar
,H2A (2008). US Department of Energy – Hydrogen Program. www.hydrogen.energy.gov/h2a_analysis.html.
,IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (1995). Computer Tools for Comparative Assessment of Electricity Generation Options and Strategies. DECADES Project Series Publication. Vienna.
,IEA (International Energy Agency) (2005). Prospects for Hydrogen and Fuel Cells. IEA Energy Technology Analysis Series. Paris: OECD/IEA.
,IEA (International Energy Agency) (2006a). World Energy Outlook 2006. Paris: OECD/IEA.
,IEA (International Energy Agency) (2006b). Energy Technology Perspectives 2006. Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. Paris: OECD/IEA.
,JRC (Joint Research Centre, EUCAR, CONCAWE) (2007). Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Powertrains in the European Context; Well-to-Wheels Report, Version 2c. http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/wtw.html.
Joffe, D . Strachan, N. and Balta-Ozkan, N. (2007). Representation of Hydrogen in the UK, US and Netherlands MARKAL Energy Systems Models. UK Sustainable Hydrogen Energy Consortium (UKSHEC), Social Science Working Paper No. 29. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Karlsson, K. and Meibom, P. (2008). Optimal investment paths for future renewable based energy systems – using the optimisation model Balmorel. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33 (7), 1777–1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kienzle, S. (2005). Einbindung einer Wasserstoffinfrastruktur in das Energiesystemmodell Balmorel. Optionen der Bereitstellung von Wasserstoff als Kraftstoff für den deutschen Straßenverkehr. Diploma Thesis. University of Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Krzyzanowski, D., Kypreos, S. and Barreto, L. (2008). Supporting hydrogen based transportation: case studies with global MARKAL model. Computational Management Science, 5 (3), 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiby, P. N., Greene, D. L., Bowman, D. and Tworek, E. (2006). Systems analysis of hydrogen transition with HyTrans. Transportation Research Record (1983), 129–139. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev, B. (1983). Energy Models and Studies. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Lin, D. Z., Ogden, J., Fan, Y. and Sperling, D. (2006). The Hydrogen Infrastructure Transition (HIT) Model and its Application in Optimising a 50-Year Hydrogen Infrastructure for Urban Beijing. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-06–05. Davis: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Márban, G. and Valdés-Solís, T. (2007). Towards the hydrogen economy?International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (12), 1625–1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinot, E., Dienst, C., Weiliang, L. and Qimin, C. (2007). Renewable energy futures: targets, scenarios, and pathways. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 205–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowall, W. and Eames, M. (2006). Forecasts, scenarios, visions, backcasts and roadmaps to the hydrogen economy: A review of the hydrogen futures literature. Energy Policy, 34 (11), 1236–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melaina, M. W. (2003). Initiating hydrogen infrastructures: preliminary analysis of a sufficient number of initial hydrogen stations in the US. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 28 (7), 743–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, M., Gilette, J., Elgowainy, A.et al. (2006). HDSAM: hydrogen delivery scenario analysis model to analyse hydrogen distribution options. Transportation Research Record (1983), 114–120. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.Google Scholar
Nouweland, A., Borm, P., Brouwers, W., Bruinderink, R. and Tijs, S. (1996). A game theoretic approach to problems in telecommunication. Management Science, 42 (2).Google Scholar
Ogden, J. M. (1999). Prospects for building a hydrogen energy infrastructure. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 24, 227–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, J. (2006). High hopes for hydrogen. Scientific American, 295 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, J. M., Yang, C. and Johnson, N. (2005). Technical and Economic Assessment of Transition Strategies Towards Widespread Use of Hydrogen as Energy Carrier. Report to the United States Department of Energy. Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program, for Phase I of NREL. Technical Report No. UCD-ITS-RR-05–13. University of California Davis, Institute of Transportation Studies.Google Scholar
Parks, K., Milbrandt, A. and Davies, K. (2006). Energy Systems Analysis: HyDS Modeling Environment. FY 2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Progress Report, Washington, DC. www.hydrogen.energy.gov/analysis_repository/project.cfm/PID=100.Google Scholar
Prekopa, A. (1995). Stochastic Programming. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Prognos/EWI (2005). Energiereport IV. Die Entwicklung der Energiemärkte bis zum Jahr 2030. Energiewirtschaftliche Referenzprognose. Munich: Oldenbourg Industrieverlag.
,Roads2HyCom (2007). European Hydrogen Infrastructure Atlas and Industrial Excess Hydrogen Analysis, ed. Steinberger-Wilckens, R. and Trümper, S. C. Roads2HyCom. www.roads2hy.com.
Ruth, M. (2007). MacroSystem Model Overview. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, US DOE Hydrogen Program. www.hydrogen.energy.gov/macro_system_model.html.Google Scholar
Schindler, J. (2008). E3database – An Introduction into the Life-Cycle Analysis Tool. Ottobrunn: Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik GmbH. www.e3database.com.Google Scholar
Schwoon, M. (2006). A Tool to Optimise the Initial Distribution of Hydrogen Filling Stations. Working Paper No. 110. Hamburg: Forschungsstelle für Nachhaltige Umweltentwicklung (FNU).
Shell, (2004). Shell Pkw-Szenarien bis 2030. Shell Deutschland Oil. www.shell.de.Google Scholar
Smit, R., Weeda, M. and Groot, A. (2007). Hydrogen infrastructure development in the Netherlands. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (10–11), 1387–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (2001). Cleaner Vehicles in Cities. Guidelines for Local Governments. UTOPIA Project, European Commission, Transport RTD Programme, Contract UR-97-SC-2076.Google Scholar
Song, Y. H. (1999). Modern Optimisation Techniques in Power Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, C. and Sullivan, J. (2004). An agent-based hydrogen vehicle/infrastructure model. Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2004, 2, 1774–1779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiller, C. (2008). H2INVEST – Hydrogen infrastructure venture support tool. www.h2invest.com.
Stiller, C., Seydel, P., Bünger, U. and Wietschel, M. (2007). Assessment of the regional hydrogen demand and infrastructure build-up for 10 European countries. www.hyways.de.Google Scholar
Tolley, G. (2005). Analysis of the Hydrogen Production and Delivery Infrastructure as a Complex Adaptive System. www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review05/anp_4_tolley.pdf; www.dis.anl.gov/projects/hydrogen_transition_modeling.html.Google Scholar
,TREMOVE (2007). A Policy Assessment Model to Study the Effects of Different Transport and Environment Policies on the Transport Sector for all European Countries. Version v2.52. www.tremove.org.
Tseng, P., Lee, J. and Friley, P. (2003). Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities and Challenges. Washington: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, US Department of Energy. Upton, NY: Brookhaven National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Tzimas, E., Castello, P. and Peteves, S. (2007). The evolution of size and cost of a hydrogen delivery infrastructure in Europe in the medium and long term. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (10–11), 1369–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uyterlinde, M. A., Martinus, G. H. and Thuijl, E. (2004). Energy Trends for Europe in a Global Perspective. Baseline Projections by Twelve E3-Models in the CASCADE MINTS Project. ECN Report C–04–094. www.energytransition.info/cascade_mints.Google Scholar
Benthem, A. A., Kramer, G. J. and Ramer, R. (2006). An options approach to investment in a hydrogen infrastructure. Energy Policy, 34 (17), 2949–2963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M. (2008). Overview of GREET model development at Argonne. GREET user workshop, Sacramento (CA), March 18. Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory. www.transportation.anl.gov/modeling_simulation/GREET/index.html.Google Scholar
Welch, C. (2007). HyDIVE (Hydrogen Dynamic Infrastructure and Vehicle Evolution) model analysis. Hydrogen Analysis Workshop, August 9–10. Washington: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/analysis/pdfs/welch_hydive.pdf.Google Scholar
,WETO (2006). World Energy Technology Outlook 2050. WETO H2 Report EUR 22038. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
Wietschel, M. (2000). Produktion und Energie: Planung und Steuerung industrieller Energie- und Stoffströme. Frankfurt a. M.: Habilitation, Technical University Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Yang, C., Nicholas, M. A. and Ogden, J. (2006). Comparison of idealized and real-world city station sitting models for hydrogen distribution. UCD-ITS-RP-06–09, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis. In Proceedings of the National Hydrogen Association (NHA) Annual Conference. Long Beach, California.Google Scholar
Yang, C. and Ogden, J. (2007). Determining the lowest-cost hydrogen delivery mode. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (2), 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×