Book contents
- Human–Wildlife Interactions
- Conservation Biology
- Human–Wildlife Interactions
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Map
- 1 Human–Wildlife Conflicts and the Need to Include Coexistence
- 2 A Multilevel, Systems View of Values Can Inform a Move towards Human–Wildlife Coexistence
- 3 Broadening the Aperture on Coexistence with Wildlife through the Lenses of Identity, Risk and Morals
- 4 Understanding Emotions As Opportunities for and Barriers to Coexistence with Wildlife
- 5 Tolerance for Wildlife
- 6 A Framework for Assessing and Quantifying Human–Wildlife Interactions in Urban Areas
- 7 Predators in Human Landscapes
- 8 Corridor of Conflict
- 9 A Collaborative Approach for Coexistence with Wildlife in Rural Regions of Japan
- 10 Towards Tolerance and Coexistence
- 11 Elephants and Bees
- 12 The Twin Challenges of Preventing Real and Perceived Threats to Human Interests
- 13 Conflict and Coexistence with Invasive Wildlife
- 14 Institutions for Achieving Human–Wildlife Coexistence
- 15 Worldviews and Coexistence with Coyotes
- 16 Conservation Marketing As a Tool to Promote Human–Wildlife Coexistence
- 17 Leaping Forward
- 18 Towards Human–Wildlife Coexistence through the Integration of Human and Natural Systems
- 19 Planning for Coexistence in a Complex Human-Dominated World
- 20 Human–Wildlife Interactions
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
20 - Human–Wildlife Interactions
Multifaceted Approaches for Turning Conflict into Coexistence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 April 2019
Book contents
- Human–Wildlife Interactions
- Conservation Biology
- Human–Wildlife Interactions
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Map
- 1 Human–Wildlife Conflicts and the Need to Include Coexistence
- 2 A Multilevel, Systems View of Values Can Inform a Move towards Human–Wildlife Coexistence
- 3 Broadening the Aperture on Coexistence with Wildlife through the Lenses of Identity, Risk and Morals
- 4 Understanding Emotions As Opportunities for and Barriers to Coexistence with Wildlife
- 5 Tolerance for Wildlife
- 6 A Framework for Assessing and Quantifying Human–Wildlife Interactions in Urban Areas
- 7 Predators in Human Landscapes
- 8 Corridor of Conflict
- 9 A Collaborative Approach for Coexistence with Wildlife in Rural Regions of Japan
- 10 Towards Tolerance and Coexistence
- 11 Elephants and Bees
- 12 The Twin Challenges of Preventing Real and Perceived Threats to Human Interests
- 13 Conflict and Coexistence with Invasive Wildlife
- 14 Institutions for Achieving Human–Wildlife Coexistence
- 15 Worldviews and Coexistence with Coyotes
- 16 Conservation Marketing As a Tool to Promote Human–Wildlife Coexistence
- 17 Leaping Forward
- 18 Towards Human–Wildlife Coexistence through the Integration of Human and Natural Systems
- 19 Planning for Coexistence in a Complex Human-Dominated World
- 20 Human–Wildlife Interactions
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
Following the example of Woodroffe et al. (2005), we close the book by offering our conclusions and hopes for a future that entails coexisting with wildlife. Human–wildlife interactions – and clashes of opinions between stakeholders about how to deal with the encounters – will grow as the boundaries between human and wildlife space become more blurred. Through the innovative conceptual and applied contributions in this book, we aim to catalyse a paradigm shift from human–wildlife conflict discourses to human–wildlife interactions and coexistence dialogues. Exploring when and why people start to accept wildlife in their proximity is key to this endeavour, and represents a pathway by which we may begin to shift toward mechanisms that enhance the willingness to coexist with wild species.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human–Wildlife InteractionsTurning Conflict into Coexistence, pp. 439 - 452Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
20.6 References
Alexander, S. M. & Quinn, M. S. (2012). Portrayal of interactions between humans and coyotes (Canis latrans): Content analysis of Canadian print media (1998–2010). Cities and the Environment (CATE), 4(1), art. 9.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. P., Stanton, L. & Benson-Amram, S. (2018). The cognition of ‘nuisance’ species. Animal Behaviour, DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.05.005.Google Scholar
Behr, D. M., Ozgul, A. & Cozzi, G. (2017). Combining human acceptance and habitat suitability in a unified socio-ecological suitability model: A case study of the wolf in Switzerland. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54, 1919–29.Google Scholar
Bennett, N. J., Roth, R., Klain, S. C., Chan, K., Christie, P., Clark, D. A., Cullman, G., Curran, D., Durbin, T. J. & Epstein, G. (2017). Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation, 205, 93–108.Google Scholar
Blackwell, B. F., DeVault, T. L., Fernandez-Juricic, E., Gese, E. M., Gilbert-Norton, L. & Breck, S. W. (2017). No single solution: Application of behavioural principles in mitigating human–wildlife conflict. Animal Behaviour, 120, 245–54.Google Scholar
Bond, J. & Mkutu, K. (2018). Exploring the hidden costs of human–wildlife conflict in Northern Kenya. African Studies Review, 61(1), 33–54.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, F., Cushman, S. A. & Elliot, N. B. (2017). Identification of human–carnivore conflict hotspots to prioritize mitigation efforts. Ecology & Evolution, 7(24), 10630–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crown, C. A. & Doubleday, K. F. (2017). Man-eaters in the media: Representation of human–leopard interactions in India across local, national, and international media. Conservation & Society, 15(3), 304–12.Google Scholar
Dayer, A. A., Williams, A., Cosbar, E. & Racey, M. (2017). Blaming threatened species: Media portrayal of human–wildlife conflict. Oryx, 1–8.Google Scholar
Dore, K. M., Rile, E. P. & Fuentes, A. (2017). Ethnoprimatology: A Practical Guide to Research at the Human–Nonhuman Primate Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, B. (2016). Human–wildlife conflicts and the need to include tolerance and coexistence: An introductory comment. Society & Natural Resources, 29(6), 738–43.Google Scholar
Fraser-Celin, V.-L., Hovorka, A. J. & Silver, J. J. (2018). Human conflict over wildlife: Exploring social constructions of African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) in Botswana. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, DOI: 10.1080/10871209.2018.1443528.Google Scholar
Fuentes, A., Riley, E. P. & Dore, K. M. (2017). Ethnoprimatology matters: Integration, innovation, and intellectual generosity. In Dore, K. M., Riley, E. P. & Fuentes, A., eds., Ethnoprimatology: A Practical Guide to Research at the Human–Primate Interface. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, D. C., Manfredo, M. J. & Lipscomb, J. (1996). Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1(2), 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaynor, K. M., Hojnowski, C. E., Carter, N. H. & Brashares, J. S. (2018). The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science, 360(6394), 1232–5.Google Scholar
Green, S. J., Armstrong, J., Bogan, M., Darling, E., Kross, S., Rochman, C. M., Smyth, A. & Veríssimo, D. (2015). Conservation needs diverse values, approaches, and practitioners. Conservation Letters, 8, 385–7.Google Scholar
Greggor, A. L., Berger-Tal, O., Blumstein, D. T., Angeloni, L., Bessa-Gomes, C., Blackwell, B. F., St Clair, C. C., Crooks, K., de Silva, S., Fernández-Juricic, E., Goldenberg, S. Z., Mesnick, S. L., Owen, M., Price, C. M., Saltz, D., Schell, C. J., Suarez, A. V., Swaisgood, R. R., Winchell, C. S. & Sutherland, W. J. (2016). Research priorities from animal behaviour for maximising conservation progress. Trends Ecology & Evolution, 31, 953–64.Google Scholar
Hill, C. (2017). Introduction. Complex problems: Using a biosocial approach to understanding human–wildlife interactions. In Hill, C. M., Webber, A. D. & Priston, N. E. C., eds., Understanding Conflicts about Wildlife: A Biosocial Approach. Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Hill, C. M., Webber, A. D. & Priston, N. E. C. (2017). Understanding Conflicts about Wildlife: A Biosocial Approach. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4, 390–405.Google Scholar
Hrubes, D., Ajzen, I. & Daigle, J. (2001). Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 23(3), 165–78.Google Scholar
Law, E. A., Bennett, N. J., Ives, C. D., Friedman, R., Davis, K. J., Archibald, C. & Wilson, K. A. (2018). Equity trade‐offs in conservation decision making. Conservation Biology, 32(2), 294–303.Google Scholar
Loring, P. A. (2016). Toward a theory of coexistence in shared social-ecological systems: The case of Cook inlet salmon fisheries. Human Ecology, 44(2), 153–65.Google Scholar
Madden, F. (2004). Can traditions of tolerance help minimize conflict? An exploration of cultural factors supporting human–wildlife coexistence. Policy Matters, 13, 234–41.Google Scholar
Parathian, H. E., McLennan, M. R., Hill, C. M., Frazão-Moreira, A. & Hockings, K. J. (2018). Breaking through disciplinary barriers: Human–wildlife interactions and multispecies ethnography. International Journal of Primatology, DOI:10.1007/s10764-018-0027-9.Google Scholar
Pooley, S., Barua, M., Beinart, W., Dickman, A., Holmes, G., Lorimer, J., Loveridge, A., Macdonald, D., Marvin, G. & Redpath, S. (2017). An interdisciplinary review of current and future approaches to improving human–predator relations. Conservation Biology, 31, 513–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Setchell, J. M., Fairet, E., Shutt, K., Waters, S. & Bell, S. (2017). Biosocial conservation: Integrating biological and ethnographic methods to study human–primate interactions. International Journal of Primatology, 38(2), 401–26.Google Scholar
Vucetich, J. A., Burnhamb, D., Macdonald, E. A., Bruskotter, J. T., Marchini, S., Zimmermann, A. & Macdonald, D. W. (2018). Just conservation: What is it and should we pursue it? Biological Conservation, 221, 23–33.Google Scholar
Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S. & Rabinowitz, A. (2005). People and Wildlife, Conflict or Coexistence? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar