Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:55:58.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - A requisite journey: from business ethics to economic philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2011

Heiko Spitzeck
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Michael Pirson
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Wolfgang Amann
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Shiban Khan
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Ernst von Kimakowitz
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

To put humans first in business and to implement humanistic values in management are noble endeavors. In order to make room for more humane business practices, however, a new kind of business ethics is requisite: one that does not subordinate its principles to the narrow confines of short-term profit maximization. Since discussion in business ethics is often influenced and framed by the theoretical foundations of academic economics, the demand for a new business ethics translates into the need for a critique of the economic paradigms underlying traditional business ethics. In that vein, a departure from certain reductionistic economic theories, namely from basic assumptions of neoclassical economics, becomes crucial. Instead of construing human agency within a matrix of self-centered utility calculations, the real human being needs to be reintroduced into economic theory, and we must recognize the eminent role of human freedom. In pursuit of a humanistic business ethics, an economic philosophy based upon the notion of human freedom must be advanced.

The ethical challenges of globalization

With astounding speed, the global exchange of products and services is transforming the natural and cultural face of the earth. Biological systems vanish, customary rules of behavior fade, legal frameworks dissolve, languages die out, and many traditional religions are on the wane. In their stead, driven by an exponential increase in information exchange, novel forms of interaction are taking hold; various new ways of life are quickly spreading, from their origins in the remotest localities on earth and even from cyberspace, all around the globe.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergmann, Barbara. 1989. “Why Do Most Economists Know So Little about The Economy?” in Samuel Bowles, Richard Edwards and William G. Shepherd (eds.), Unconventional Wisdom: Essays on Economics in Honor of John Kenneth Galbraith. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 29–37.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1987. “The Economics of Pride and Shame,” Atlantic Economic Journal 15(1): 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E 1969. “Economics as a Moral Science,” American Economic Review 59(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Edward H. 1948. “An Experimental Imperfect Market,” Journal of Political Economy 56: 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, David and Klamer, Arjo 1987. “The Making of an Economist,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1(2): 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Ruseel, DeJong, Doughlas, and Ross, Thomas. 1996. “Cooperation without Reputation: Experimental Evidence from Prisoner's Dilemma Games,” Games and Economic Behaviour, 12:187–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornia, Giovanni Andrea. 2004. Inequality Growth and Poverty in an Era of Liberalization and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, Partha. 2005. “What Do Economists Analyze and Why: Value or Facts?Economics and Philosophy 21:221–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dierksmeier, Claus. 2003. “Über den gegenwärtigen Stand der Wirtschaftsphilosophie,” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 3: 551–61.Google Scholar
Dierksmeier, Claus. 2001. “Was heißt und zu welchem Ende studiert man Wirtschaftsphilosophie?” in Arbeit und Lebenssinn. Wirtschaftsphilosophische Untersuchungen, Kritisches Jahrbuch der Philosophie. Würzburg: Königshausen-Neumann, pp. 9–18.Google Scholar
Dierksmeier, Claus 2007. “Qualitative versus quantitative Freiheit,” Rechtsphilosophische Hefte XII: 107–19.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics,” in Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel. 1994. “Why Look under the Hood?” in Hausman, Daniel (ed.), The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–21.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel 1998. Causal Asymmetries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbroner, Robert L. and Milberg, William S. 1995. The Crisis of Vision in Modern Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoover, Kevin. 2001. Causality in Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1931, “Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren,” in Essays in Persuasion. London: Norton, pp. 358–73.Google Scholar
Kirman, Alan. 1989. “The Intrinsic Limits of Modern Economic Theory: The Emperor Has No Clothes,” The Economic Journal 99(395):126–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. 1890. Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald. 1994. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menninger, Karl. 1969. Number Words and Number Symbols, a Cultural History of Numbers, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mongin, Philippe. 2006. “A Concept of Progress for Normative Economics,” Economics and Philosophy 22:19–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niehans, Jurg. 1980. A History of Economic Theory: Classic Contributions 1720–1980. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 2003. “For Ethics and Economics without the Dichotomies,” Review of Political Economy 153:395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Lionell. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Roth, Alvin. 1998. “Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: A Methodological Overview,” The Economic Journal 98: 974–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya 2002. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, Brian. 1996. Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, Robert. 1997. “How did Economics Get That Way, and What Way Did It Get?Daedalus 134(4): 39–58.Google Scholar
Summers, Lawrence. 1991. “The Scientific Illusion in Empirical Economics,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 93(2): 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppe, Frederick. 1989. The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Peter. 2008. Integrative Economic Ethics. Foundations of a Civilized Market Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinten, Gerald. 2002. “The Corporate Governance Lessons of Enron,” International Journal of Business in Society 2(4): 4–9.Google Scholar
Vitell, Scott J., Nwachukwu, Saviour L., and Barnes, James H. 1993. “The Effects of Culture on Ethical Decision-making: An Application of Hofstede's Typology,” Journal of Business Ethics 12(10): 753–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mises, Ludwig. 1960. Epistemological Problems of Economics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Waligorski, Conrad. 1990. The Political Theory of Conservative Economists. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Webley, Simon and More, Elise. 2003. Does Business Ethics Pay? Ethics and Financial Performance. London: Institute of Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 2000. “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead,” Journal of Economic Literature 38(3): 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×