Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T06:25:22.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Current trends in humanism and business

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2011

By
Domènec Melé
Edited by
Heiko Spitzeck ,
Michael Pirson ,
Wolfgang Amann ,
Shiban Khan  and
Ernst von Kimakowitz
Heiko Spitzeck
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Michael Pirson
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Wolfgang Amann
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Shiban Khan
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Ernst von Kimakowitz
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Familiarity with current trends in a field is not only interesting as an aid to understanding our world or as a form of erudition, but also helps to guide speculation about the future. Extrapolating a future based on current trends is often better than prophesying without considering the evidence at hand and the main historical drivers of the present. This is the case for all human activity and, more specifically, for humanism in business.

“Humanism,” wrote Jacques Maritain (1996), “essentially tends to make man more humane and to manifest his original greatness by making him participate in everything in so far as it enriches him in nature and in history. It requires time that man develops virtues which he possesses, his creative strength and his rational life, and that man works to convert the forces of the physical world into tools of his freedom.” These words contain provocative ideas, which lead us to question to what extent business and humanism cross paths. In this respect, some questions arise: Does business respect the sovereign human rights of people? Do business institutions or companies make the people who participate in them more human? Does business give people the possibility to participate in organizations in accordance with their humanity? Does business foster the growth of individuals as human beings? Does business favor aspects of human potential such as creativity, rationality, and character?

Type
Chapter
Information
Humanism in Business , pp. 123 - 140
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, P. S. and Kwon, S. 2002. “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept,” Academy of Management Review 27(1): 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. 1997. “Values-based Management,” Academy of Management Executive 11(4): 25–46.Google Scholar
Argyris, C. 1957. Personality and Organization. The Conflict between System and Individual. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Barnard, C. 1968/1938. The Functions of the Executive. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blanchard, K. and O'Connor, M. 1996. Managing by Values. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Burns, J. G. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cable, D. M. and Judge, T. A. 1994. “Pay Preferences and Job Search Decisions: A Person-Organization Perspective,” Personnel Psychology 47(2): 317–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Swart J. 1973. “The Worth of Humanistic Management. Some Contemporary Examples,” Business Horizons (June): 41–50.Google Scholar
Chatman, J. A. 1989. “Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person-Organization Fit,” Academy of Management Review 14(1): 333–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicerón, . 1950. El sueño de Escisión [Scipio's Dream]. Madrid: Instituto A. Nebrija.Google Scholar
Ciulla, J. 1998. Ethics, the Heart of Leadership. London: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Collins, J. 2001. Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap and Others Don't. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Collins, J. and Porras, J. 1994. Built to Last. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
Follett, M. P. 1940. “Dynamic Administration,” in Metcalf, H. and Urwick, L. (eds.), The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York and London: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Follett, M. P. 1987. Lectures in Business Organization. New York and London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Follett, M. P. 1995. Prophet of Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press Classic.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, R. K. 1977. Servant Leadership. A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. Mahwah, NY: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Grey, W. 1993. “Anthropocentrism and Deep Ecology,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71(4): 463–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. T. 1999. “The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits,” Administrative Science Quarterly 44(1): 82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, P. 2005. “Evolution of Strategic Management: The Need for New Dominant Designs,” International Journal of Management Reviews 7(2): 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzberg, F. 1959. The Motivation to Work. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Herzberg, F. 1976. The Managerial Choice: To Be Efficient and to Be Human. Homewood: Dow Jones-Irwin.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A. and Bretz Jr., R. D. 1992. “Effects of Work Values on Job Choice Decisions,” Journal of Applied Psychology 77(3): 261–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. 1995. “Knowledge, market failure and the multinational enterprise: A reply,” Journal of International Business Studies 26(2): 417–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristof, A. L. 1996. “Person-Organization Fit: An Integrative Review of Its Conceptualizations, Measurement, and Implications,” Personnel Psychology 49(1): 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maritain, J. and Bird, O. A. (eds.). 1996. Integral Humanism. Freedom in the Modern World and a Letter on Independence. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Maslow, A. H. 1954. Motivation and Personality (second edition). New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Mayo, E. 1933. The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mayo, E. 1946. The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCoy, C. 1985. Management by Values: The Ethical Difference on Corporate Policy and Performance. Marchfield: Pitman.Google Scholar
McGregor, D. V. 1960. The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Moran, P. 2005. “Structural vs. Relational Embeddedness: Social Capital and Managerial Performance,” Strategic Management Journal 26(12): 1129–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal S. 1998. “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage,” Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. and Veiga J. F. 1999. “Putting People First for Organizational Success,” Academy of Management Executive 13(2): 37–48.Google Scholar
Preece, G. R. (ed.) 2002. Rethinking Peter Singer: A Christian Critique. Downser Grove: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Reale, G. and Antiseri, D. 1992. Historia del Pensamiento Filosofico y Cientifico III. Del romanticismo hasta hoy. Barcelona: Herder.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. D. and Krugman, P. 1997. “Just What We Need – More Sweat Shops,” The New York Times, Dollars & Sense 213: 4.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1994. Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1999. Practical Ethics (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sison, A. J. G. 2003. The Moral Capital of Leaders. Why Virtue Matters. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, C. R. 1992. Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, C. R. 1994. The New Word of Business. Ethics and Free Enterprise in the Global 1990s. Lanham: Roman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Taylor, F. W. 1911. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Uzzi, B. 1996. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effects,” American Sociological Review 61(4): 674–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×