Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T22:05:43.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

33 - International climate policy: approaches to policies and measures, and international coordination and cooperation

from Part IV - Policy design and decisionmaking under uncertainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Brian S. Fisher
Affiliation:
ABARE, Edmund Barton Building, Macquarie Street, Barton ACT 2600 GOP Box 1563, Canberra, ACT 2600 Australia
A. L. Matysek
Affiliation:
ABARE, Edmund Barton Building, Macquarie Street, Barton ACT 2600 GOP Box 1563, Canberra, ACT 2600 Australia
M. A. Ford
Affiliation:
ABARE, Edmund Barton Building, Macquarie Street, Barton Act 2600 GOP Box 1563, Canberra, ACT 2600 Australia
K. Woffendend
Affiliation:
ABARE, Edmund Barton Building, Macquarie Street, Barton ACT 2600 GOP Box 1563, Canberra, ACT 2600 Australia
Michael E. Schlesinger
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Haroon S. Kheshgi
Affiliation:
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering
Joel Smith
Affiliation:
Stratus Consulting Ltd, Boulder
Francisco C. de la Chesnaye
Affiliation:
US Environmental Protection Agency
John M. Reilly
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tom Wilson
Affiliation:
Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto
Charles Kolstad
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Since the industrial revolution, anthropogenic activities such as the burning of fossil fuels, and agricultural and industrial production, have led to growing emissions of greenhouse gases. It is projected that a sustained increase in the demand for energy, particularly in developing countries, and the continued reliance on fossil fuels as an energy source, will cause anthropogenic emissions to rise substantially into the future. The continued growth in emissions is expected to significantly increase atmospheric concentrations of green-house gases beyond current levels. Evidence now suggests that these human-induced increases in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations have the potential to alter the Earth's climate dramatically, leading to possible environmental and economic damage (Schneider and Sarukhan, 2001).

Human-induced climate change is a global phenomenon that is expected to have impacts in all regions of the world, although with differing specific effects. As a result, responding to the climate problem poses several challenges. One key challenge is to design policies that balance the cost of any damage from climate change with the cost of actions to reduce that damage. However, the considerable uncertainties surrounding the causes, nature, and impacts of possible climate change magnify this challenge. A second challenge will be for countries to manage adaptation, which could involve major investments and managing economic and social change. Of course, significant adaptation will occur as a result of economic agents responding to changes in both their physical and economic environments.

Type
Chapter
Information
Human-Induced Climate Change
An Interdisciplinary Assessment
, pp. 403 - 413
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, Q. K., Anisimov, O., Arnell, N. et al. (2001). ‘Summary for Policymakers’. In Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J. and White, K. S.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Aunan, K.Fang, J.Vennemo, H.Oye, K. and Seip, H. M. (2004). Co-benefits of climate policy: lessons learned from a study in Shanxi, China. Energy Policy 32, 567–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. (2002). Towards a Better Climate Treaty. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Nota di Lavoro 54.2002.CrossRef
Bodansky, D. (2001). Bonn voyage: Kyoto's uncertain revival. The National Interest, Fall.
Buchner, B. and Carraro, C. (2004). Economic and Environmental Effectiveness of a Technology-based Climate Protocol. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Nota di Lavoro 61.2004.CrossRef
Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs (2004). Background Note: China, www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/18902.htm (accessed 15 September 2004).
Davidson, O., Halsnaes, K., Huq, S.et al. (2003). The development and climate nexus: the case of sub-Saharan Africa. Climate Policy 3S1 S97–S113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2003). International Energy Outlook 2003. Washington: EIA.Google Scholar
Fisher, B. S., Barrett, S., Bohm, P. et al. (1996). An economic assessment of policy instruments for combating climate change. In Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Bruce, J. P., Lee, H and Haites, E. F.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 397–439.Google Scholar
General Accounting Office (GAO) (2003). Climate Change. Information on Three Air Pollutants' Climate Effects and Emissions Trends. United States General Accounting Office report to Congressional Requesters, House of Representatives www.gao.gov/new.items/d0325.pdf. (accessed 26 August 2004).
Hahn, R. W. and Stavins, R. (1992). Economic incentives for environmental protection: integrating theory and practice. American Economic Review 82, 464–468.Google Scholar
Hogan, L., Fairhead, L., Gurney, A. and Pritchard, R. (2005). Energy Security in APEC: Assessing the Costs of Energy Supply Disruptions and the Impacts of Alternative Energy Security Strategies. ABARE Research Report 05.2. Canberra: ABARE.Google Scholar
Hourcade, J. C., Shukla, P. Kverndokk, S. et al. (2001). Global, regional, and national costs and ancillary benefits of mitigation. In Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R. and Pan, J.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Huq, S., Reid, H. and Kok, M. (2003). Development and Climate. Bridging the Gap between National Development Policies and Dealing with Climate Change. Results of Phase 1. Bilthoven: The Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (IEA) (1999). World Energy Outlook: Looking at Energy Subsidies. Getting the Prices Right. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
IEA (2000). Energy Technology and Climate Change: A Call to Action. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
IEA (2002). World Energy Outlook 2002. Paris: IEA/OECD.Google Scholar
Jakeman, G., Hester, S., Woffenden, K. and Fisher, B. (2002). Kyoto Protocol. The first commitment and beyond. In Australian Commodities March 2002, Forecasts and Issues, 9(1), ed. Wright, A.. Canberra: ABARE.
Karki, S. K., Mann, M. D. and Salehfar, H. (2005). Energy and environment in the ASEAN: challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy 33, 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millhone, J. (1999). Residential, commercial, and institutional buildings sector. In Methodological and Technological Issues in Technology Transfer. Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Metz, B., Davidson, D., Martens, J., Rooijen, S. and Wie McGrory, L.. United Nations Environment Programme/World Meteorological Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moomaw, W. R. and Moreira, J. R. (2001). Technological and economic potential of greenhouse gas emissions reduction. In Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R. and Pan, J.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ogonowski, M., Schmidt, J. and Williams, E. (2004). Advancing Climate Change Technologies through Shared Intellectual Property Rights. Working paper prepared for the Dialogue on Future International Actions to Address Global Climate Change, Stockholm, 16–19 May.
Reilly, J. M., Jacoby, H. D. and Prinn, R. G. (2003). Multi-Gas Contributors to Global Climate Change: Climate Impacts and Mitigation Costs of Non-CO2 Gases. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar
Schneider, S. and Sarukhan, J. (2001). Overview of impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability to climate change. In Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J. and White, K. S.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tietenberg, T. H. (1985). Emissions Trading: An Exercise in Reforming Pollution Policy. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
United Nations Economics Commission for Europe (UNECE) (2004). Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution, www.unece.org/env/lrtap/lrtap_h1.htm. (accessed 20 August 2004).
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2003). Technology Transfer: The Seven C's for the Successful Transfer and Uptake of Environmentally Sound Technologies. Osaka: International Environmental Technology Centre.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (1999). Convention on Climate Change. Bonn: UNEP Information Unit for Conventions.
Wang, C. and Prinn, R. (1997). Interactions among Emissions, Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Change. MIT Report No. 25.
White House Council on Environmental Policy (2004). US Climate Change Policy. www.state.gov/g/oes/rls/fs/2004/36425.htm (accessed 20 August 2004).
Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, R. and Edmonds, J. A. (1996). Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Nature 379, 240–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrell, E. and Levine, M. (1999). Industry. In Methodological and Technological Issues in Technology Transfer. Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Metz, B., Davidson, D., Martens, J., Rooijen, S. and Wie McGrory, L. Edited by United Nations Environment Programme/World Meteorological Organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×