Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:42:01.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Law and Politics of U.S. Participation in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Michael Ashley Stein
Affiliation:
Cambridge University, New York
Janet E. Lord
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh in Scotland
Shareen Hertel
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Kathryn Libal
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

On July 30, 2009, the United States signed the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), reversing the Bush Administration's general disengagement with the convention. America historically has considered itself the global leader in disability civil rights law and policy, and largely deserves this reputation. Signature by the United States signals an intention to ratify the treaty, and President Barack Obama's Administration is submitting its convention ratification package to the U.S. Senate in short order. Notably, the CRPD (2007) is the first human rights treaty to be signed by the United States since the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) in 1995.

The worldwide momentum in favor of CRPD ratification poses both a challenge and an opportunity for the United States as a recognized disability rights leader. Ratification would signal an American return to active participation in the UN human rights system, supporting other efforts made by the Obama Administration in that direction, such as joining the UN Human Rights Council. It also would help reinstate the global leadership of the United States in disability law and policy after its relative disengagement from the globally supported CRPD treaty negotiations by the Bush Administration. Yet the prospects for such reinstatement must be set against the political landscape of American nonparticipation in human rights treaties and the challenges of a ratification effort for an American disability community rooted in a tradition of domestic civil rights advocacy and largely disconnected from the global human rights movement.

Type
Chapter
Information
Human Rights in the United States
Beyond Exceptionalism
, pp. 199 - 216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Americans with Disabilities Act. 2000. 42 U.S.C. §12101.
Anderson, Carol. 2003. Eyes Off the Prize: The United Nations and the African American Struggle for Human Rights, 1944–1955. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arbour, Louise. 2006. “Statement on the Ad Hoc Committee's adoption of the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” December 5. http://www.ohchr.org/English/issues/disability/docs/statementhcdec06.doc.
,Architectural Barriers Act. 1968. 42 U.S.C. §§ 4151–4156.
Bagenstos, Samuel R. 2009. The Law and Contradictions of the Disability Movement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, Jen, and Flower, Jonathan. 2001. “Towards a Level Playing Field: A Call to Make Development Programs More Inclusive.” In Discussion Paper 11, All Things Being Equal: Perspectives on Disability and Development, 7–12. Milton Keynes, UK: World Vision. http://www.worldvision.org.uk/upload/pdf/Disability_paper.pdf.Google Scholar
Boyd, Ralph F. 2003. Statement. Second Session of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, June 16–27. New York: United Nations. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/contrib-us.htm.
Bruch, Elizabeth M. 2006. “Whose Law Is It Anyway? The Cultural Legitimacy of International Human Rights in the United States.” Tennessee Law Review 73(4): 669–710.Google Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas. 1995. International Human Rights in a Nutshell. 2nd Edition. Eagan, MN: West Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Burgdorf, Jr., Robert, L. 1991. “The Americans with Disabilities Act: Analysis and Implications of a Second-Generation Civil Rights Statute.” Harvard Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law Review 26(2): 413–522.Google Scholar
Burkhauser, Richard V. 1997. “Post ADA: Are People with Disabilities Expected to Work?” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 549: 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Congressional Record S10789. Vol. 135. 1989.
,Congressional Record S9689. Vol. 136. 1990.
,Congressional Record S8121. Vol. 155. 2009.
,Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. Adopted December 18, 1979 (entered into force Sept. 3, 1981). G.A. Res. 34/180. UN Doc. A/34/46 (1981).
,Convention on the Rights of the Child. Adopted November 20, 1989 (entered into force September 20, 1990). G.A. Res. 44/25, UN Doc. A/44/49 (1989).
,Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Adopted January 24, 2007 (entered into force May 3, 2008). G.A. Res. 61/106. UN Doc A/RES/61/106 (2007).
,Declaration on the Rights of Mentally Retarded Persons. Adopted December 20, 1971 (entered into force September 24, 1973). G.A. res. 2856 (XXVI), 26 UN GAOR Supp. (No. 29) at 93, UN Doc. A/8429 (1971).
Despouy, Leandro. 1993. Human Rights and Disabled Persons: Study Series 6. Geneva and New York: Centre for Human Rights.Google Scholar
Dole, Bob. 1994. “Are We Keeping America's Promises to People with Disabilities?” Iowa Law Review 79(4): 925–34.Google Scholar
Elwan, Ann. 1999. “Poverty and Disability: A Survey of the Literature.” Social Discussion Paper Series. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Erickson, W., and Lee, C.. 2008. 2007 Disability Status Report. Cornell University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Demographics and Statistics. http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/edi/disabilitystatistics/.Google Scholar
Foot, Rosemary. 2008. “Exceptionalism Again: The Bush Administration, the ‘Global War on Terror,’ and Human Rights.” Law and History Review 26(3): 707–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fries, Kenny. 1997. “Introduction.” In Staring Back: The Disability Experience from the Inside Out, edited by Kenny Fries, 6–7. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
,General Accounting Office. 2009. Voters with Disabilities: More Polling Places Had No Potential Impediments than in 2000, but Challenges Remain. Washington, D.C.: GAO. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09685.pdf.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 2001. A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: Random House Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Hahn, Harlan. 1987. “Advertising the Acceptably Employable Image: Disability and Capitalism.” Policy Study Journal 15(3): 551–70.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. 2002. “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?” Yale Law Journal 111(8): 1935–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. 2008. “Treaties End: The Past, Present, and Future of International Lawmaking in the United States.” Yale Law Journal 117(7): 1236–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, Louis. 1995. “U.S. Ratification of Human Rights Conventions: The Ghost of Senator Bricker.” American Journal of International Law 89(2): 341–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. 2006. 20 U.S.C. § 1400, 1415.
,International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Adopted December 16, 1966 (entered into force March 23, 1976). G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), U. N. GAOR, Supp. No. 16 at 52, UN Doc. A/6316 (1966).
,International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). Adopted December 16, 1966 (entered into force January 3, 1976). G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI), UN GAOR, Supp. No. 16, UN Doc. A/6316 (1966).
Lawson, Anna. 2008. Disability and Equality Law in Britain: The Role of Reasonable Adjustment. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Lewis, C., and Sygall, S., eds. 1997. Loud, Proud, and Passionate: Including Women with Disabilities in International Development Programmes. Rome: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Lord, Janet E., Stein, Michael A., and Waterstone, Michael. 2008. “Disability Inclusive Development and Natural Disasters.” In Law and Recovery from Disaster: Hurricane Katrina, edited by Robin Paul Malloy,71–82. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Matson, Floyd W. 2005. Blind Justice: Jacobus tenBroek and the Vision of Equality: 242. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O., and Somin, Ilya. 2007. “Should International Law Be Our Law?” Stanford Law Review 59(5): 1175–1247.Google Scholar
Mertus, Julie A. 2008. Bait and Switch: Human Rights and US Foreign Policy. 2nd Edition. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Nash, Kate. 2009. The Cultural Politics of Human Rights: Comparing the US and UK. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Cinneide, Colm. 2009. “Extracting Protection for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities from Human Rights Framework – Established Limits and New Possibilities.” In The UN Convention on the Rights of Person with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives, edited by Oddny Mjoll Arnardottir and Gerard Quinn, 163–98. Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
,Ogilvy, Graham, and Belhas v. Ya'alon. 2009. “The Case for a Jus Cogens Exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.” Journal of International Business and Law 8(1): 169–95.Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael. 1983. Social Work with Disabled People. New York: The Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, Anita. 2004. “Live and Let Live: Healthcare Is a Fundamental Human Right.” Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal 3(2): 481–503.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Change? 2nd Edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Seventh Session of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on Protection and Promotion on the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities. 2003. List of Participants. UN Doc A/AC.265/2006/INF/1: 12 (January 12).
Silvers, Anita. 1998. “Formal Justice.” In Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy, edited by Anita Silvers, David Wassermand, and Mary Mahowald, 13-146. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Stein, Michael Ashley. 2000. “Empirical Implications of Title I.” Iowa Law Review 85(5): 1671–90.Google Scholar
Stein, Michael Ashley. 2004. “Same Struggle, Different Difference: ADA Accommodations as Antidiscrimination.” Pennsylvania Law Review 153(2): 579–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Michael Ashley. 2007. “Disability Human Rights.” California Law Review 95(1): 75–121.Google Scholar
Stein, Michael Ashley, and Lord, Janet E.. 2008a. “Jacobus tenBroek, Participatory Justice, and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” Texas Journal on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights 13(2): 167–85.Google Scholar
Stein, Michael Ashley, and Lord, Janet E.. 2008b. “United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Process, Substance, and Prospects.” In The International Human Rights Law in a Global Context, edited by Felipe Gomez Isa, 495–514. Bilbao, Spain: University of Duesto Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Michael Ashley, and Stein, Penelope J.S.. 2007. “Beyond Disability Civil Rights.” Hastings Law Journal 58(6): 1203–40.Google Scholar
Stein, Michael Ashley, and Waterstone, Michael E.. 2008. Finding the Gaps: A Comparative Analysis of Disability Laws in the United States to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. National Council on Disability (May 12). http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/2008/pdf/ncd_crpd_analysis.pdf.Google Scholar
Tananbaum, Duane. 1988. The Bricker Amendment Controversy: A Test of Eisenhower's Political Leadership. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
,UN Enable. 2009. “Second Session of the Conference of States Parties List of Side-Events.” http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/COP/CSP2-SideEvents1Aug09-Website.doc.
,UN Human Rights Committee. 2005. “Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 40 of the Covenant: United States of America.” U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/USA/3 (November 28). http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/898586b1dc7b4043c1256a450044f331/01e6a2b492ba27e5c12570fc003f558b$/FILE/G0545268.pdf.
,United Nations Population Fund. 2005. The Promise of Equality: Gender Equity, Reproductive Health and the Millennium Development Goals. UN Sales No. E.05.III.H.1: 3. http://www.unfpa.org/upload/lib_pub_file/493_filename_en_swp05.pdf.
,UN Secretary General. 1992. “Social Development: Questions Relating to the World Social Situation and to Youth, Aging, Disabled Persons and the Family, Implementation of the World Programme of Action Concerning Disabled Persons and the United Nations Decade of Disabled Persons.” U.N. Doc. A/CONF.47/415 (September 11, 1992).
,Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. G.A. Res. 217A (III): art. 5. UN GAOR, 3d Sess. U.N. Doc. A/810 (December 12, 1948).
,World Conference on Human Rights. 1993. “Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action.” UN Doc. A/CONF. 157/23: para. 5 (July 12).
Zatz, Noah D. 2006. “From Welfare to What?” Hastings Law Journal 57(6): 1131–88.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×