Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T00:02:58.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Underinvestment in training?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Randolph Sloof
Affiliation:
Department of Economics University of Amsterdam; Associate Professor Economics of Organization and Personnel
Joep Sonnemans
Affiliation:
Professor of Behavioural Economics University of Amsterdam
Hessel Oosterbeek
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics of Education University of Amsterdam
Joop Hartog
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Henriëtte Maassen van den Brink
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

When a newly hired employee enters a firm there are typically many skills he has to acquire before becoming fully productive. A blue-collar worker, for example, needs to get acquainted with the machines and tools with which he is going to work, while white-collar workers usually have to become familiar with, for example, the particular software package in place. Many of these skills are highly firm-specific, i.e. they are of much lower value in other firms. Investing in firm-specific skills is therefore a risky enterprise for the worker. Although the employer may promise to reward the worker for skills acquisition, for instance through a promotion or a wage increase, after the investment has been made she has an incentive to renege on this promise in order to save on labour costs. Reneging is possible for the firm, because the worker cannot collect the return to his newly obtained skills elsewhere (and because the labour contract is incomplete: see below). Of course, workers will anticipate this opportunistic behaviour by the firm and are unlikely to invest in the first place. Likewise, the firm has not much of an incentive to make the investment. Once the worker has obtained the skills, he will bargain for a wage increase or a promotion. The firm is in a weak bargaining position, because the specific skills required ensure that the worker cannot immediately be replaced by another one.

Type
Chapter
Information
Human Capital
Advances in Theory and Evidence
, pp. 113 - 133
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J. and McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10: 122–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, T. F. (1999). Why Wages Don't Fall during a Recession. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bohnet, I., Frey, B. S. and Huck, S. (2001). More order with less law: on contract enforcement, trust and crowding. American Political Science Review, 95: 131–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory. Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ellingsen, T. and Johannesson, M. (2004a). Is there a hold-up problem? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106: 475–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellingsen, T. and Johannesson, M.(2004b). Promises, threats and fairness. Economic Journal, 114: 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. and List, J. A. (2004). The hidden costs and returns of incentives – trust and trustworthiness among CEOs. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2: 743–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. (2000). Fairness, incentives, and contractual choices. European Economic Review, 44: 1057–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., Gächter, S. and Kirchsteiger, G. (1997). Reciprocity as a contract enforcement device: experimental evidence. Econometrica, 65: 833–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., A. Klein and K. Schmidt (2004). Fairness, contracts and incentives. CEPR Discussion Paper 4464.
Gantner, A., Güth, W. and Königstein, M. (2001). Equitable choices in bargaining games with advance production. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 46: 209–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, S. (1993). Incomplete contracting. A laboratory experimental analysis. Economic Inquiry, 31: 274–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, S.(1994). Is relational exchange possible in the absence of reputations and repeated contract? Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 10: 360–89.Google Scholar
Königstein, M. (2000). Equity, Efficiency and Evolutionary Stability in Bargaining Games with Joint Production. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuven, E., Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R. and Klaveren, C. (2005). Worker reciprocity and employer investment in training. Economica, 72: 137–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcomson, J. M. (1997). Contracts, holdup, and labor markets. Journal of Economic Literature, 35: 1916–57.Google Scholar
Malcomson, J. M.(1999). Individual employment contracts, in, Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D. (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. IIIB. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 2292–2372.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, Organization and Management. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R. and Sonnemans, J. (2001). Who should invest in specific training? forthcoming in Journal of Population Economics.Google Scholar
Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R. and Sonnemans, J.(2006). Promotion rules and skill acquisition: an experimental study. Economica, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Oosterbeek, H., Sonnemans, J. and Velzen, S. (2003). The need for marriage contracts: an experimental study. Journal of Population Economics, 16: 431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloof, R. (2003). Price setting power versus private information: an experimental evaluation of their impact on holdup. SCHOLAR Working Paper Series WP 42/04, Amsterdam.
Sloof, R., Oosterbeek, H. and Sonnemans, J. (2002). Does making investments unobservable boost investment incentives? Amsterdam. Forthcoming in Journal of Economics and Management Strategy.Google Scholar
Sloof, R., Leuven, E., Oosterbeek, H. and Sonnemans, J. (2003). An experimental comparison of reliance levels under alternative breach remedies. RAND Journal of Economics, 34: 205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloof, R., Sonnemans, J. and Oosterbeek, H. (2004). Specific investments, holdup, and the outside option principle: an experimental study. European Economic Review, 48: 1399–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloof, R., Oosterbeek, H., Riedl, A. and Sonnemans, J. (2006). Breach remedies, reliance and renegotiation. International Review of Law and Economics, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnemans, J., Oosterbeek, H. and Sloof, R. (2001). On the relation between asset ownership and specific investments. Economic Journal, 111: 791–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×