Book contents
- How to Be a Pyrrhonist
- How to Be a Pyrrhonist
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Part I How the Pyrrhonists Present Themselves
- Part II Pyrrhonists at Work
- Part III Life as a Pyrrhonist
- Part IV Intersections of Pyrrhonism with Contemporary Thought
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2019
Book contents
- How to Be a Pyrrhonist
- How to Be a Pyrrhonist
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Part I How the Pyrrhonists Present Themselves
- Part II Pyrrhonists at Work
- Part III Life as a Pyrrhonist
- Part IV Intersections of Pyrrhonism with Contemporary Thought
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- How to Be a PyrrhonistThe Practice and Significance of Pyrrhonian Skepticism, pp. 244 - 254Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Ackeren, Marcel van. 2013. “Dei Selbstbetrachtungen Marc Aurels. Ein stoischer Selbstdialog,” in Erler, Michael and Hessler, Jan Erik, eds., Argument und Literarischer Form in antiker Philosophie, Akten des 3. Kongresses der Gesellschaft für antike Philosophie 2010 (Berlin: De Gruyter), 371–87.Google Scholar
Allen, James. 1993. “Pyrrhonism and Medical Empiricism: Sextus Empiricus on Evidence and Inference,” in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.37.1 (Berlin: De Gruyter), 646–90.Google Scholar
Allen, James. 2010. “Pyrrhonism and Medicine,” in Bett, Richard, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 232–48.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia. 1986. “Doing without Objective Values: Ancient and Modern Strategies,” in Schofield, Malcolm and Striker, Gisela, eds., The Norms of Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 3–29; revised version in Stephen Everson, ed., Companions to Ancient Thought 4: Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 193–220.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia. 2011. “Ancient Scepticism and Ancient Religion,” in Morison, Benjamin and Ierodiakonou, Katerina, eds., Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia, and Barnes, Jonathan. 1985. The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia, and Barnes, Jonathan (ed./trans.). 1994. Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Scepticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). (Revised edition 2000.)Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1973. The Central Questions of Philosophy (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson).Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 1990. The Toils of Scepticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 1992. “Diogenes Laertius IX 61–116: The Philosophy of Pyrrhonism,” in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.36.6 (Berlin: De Gruyter), 4241–301.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 1997. “The Beliefs of a Pyrrhonist,” reprinted in Burnyeat and Frede 1997, 58–91. (Originally published in 1982.)Google Scholar
Beckwith, Christopher. 2015. Greek Buddha: Pyrrho’s Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatar, David. 2006. Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, Richard. 1990. “Carneades’ Distinction between Assent and Approval,” The Monist 73, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, Richard. 1993. “Scepticism and Everyday Attitudes in Ancient and Modern Philosophy,” Metaphilosophy 24, 363–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, Richard (ed./trans.). 1997. Sextus Empiricus, Against the Ethicists, translated with an introduction and commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2000a. Pyrrho, His Antecedents, and His Legacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2000b. “Nietzsche on the Skeptics and Nietzsche as Skeptic,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 82, 62–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2002. Review of Brittain 2001, Bryn Mawr Classical Review, online: http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2002/2002-07-08.html.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2003. “Rationality and Happiness in the Greek Skeptical Traditions,” in Yu, Jiyuan and Gracia, Jorge, eds., Rationality and Happiness: From the Ancients to the Early Medievals (Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press), 109–34.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard (ed./trans.). 2005. Sextus Empiricus, Against the Logicians (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2006. “Socrates and Skepticism,” in Ahbel-Rappe, S. and Kamtekar, R., eds., A Companion to Socrates (Malden, MA: Blackwell), 298–311.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2008. “Nietzsche, the Greeks and Happiness (with Special Reference to Aristotle and Epicurus),” Philosophical Topics 33, no. 2, 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2009. “Sextus Empiricus,” in Trakakis, Nick and Oppy, Graham, eds., History of Western Philosophy and Religion, vol. 1: Ancient Philosophy and Religion (Durham, UK: Acumen Publishing), 173–85.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2010. “Scepticism in Ethics,” in Bett, Richard, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 181–94.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2011. “Pyrrhonian Skepticism,” in Bernecker, S. and Pritchard, D., eds., The Routledge Companion to Epistemology (London: Routledge), 403–13.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2012. Sextus Empiricus, Against the Physicists, translated with an introduction and notes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2013a. “Ancient Scepticism,” in Crisp, Roger, ed., Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 112–28.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2013b. “Language, Gods, and Virtue: A Discussion of Robert Mayhew, Prodicus the Sophist: Texts, Translations, and Commentary,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 44, 279–311.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2015a. “Pyrrhonism in Diogenes Laertius,” in Vogt, K., ed., Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Diogenes Laertius, SAPERE Series vol. 25 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2015b. “Pyrrho and the Socratic Schools,” in Zilioli, Ugo, ed., From the Socratics to the Socratic Schools: Classical Ethics, Metaphysics and Epistemology (New York: Taylor & Francis), 149–67.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2015c. “God (M IX.13–194),” in Algra, Keimpe and Ierodiakonou, Katerina, eds., Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 33–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2017. “Skepticism,” in Johnson, W. and Richter, D., eds., The Oxford Handbook to the Second Sophistic (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 551–62.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2018a. “The Cyrenaics,” in Machuca, D. and Reed, B., eds., Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present (London: Bloomsbury Publishing), 14–23.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. 2018b. Sextus Empiricus, Against Those in the Disciplines, translated with an introduction and notes (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. Forthcoming. “Prodicus on the Choice of Heracles, Language, and Religion,” in David Wolfsdorf, ed., Early Greek Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Blomqvist, Jerker. 1974. “Die Skeptika des Sextus Empiricus,” Grazer Beiträge 2, 7–14.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, Mauro. 2011. “A Pyrrhonian Plato? Again on Sextus on Aenesidemus on Plato,” in Machuca, D., ed., New Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism (Leiden: Brill), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, George. 2001. Post-Hellenistic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Brennan, Tad. 1994. “Criterion and Appearance in Sextus Empiricus: The Scope of Sceptical Doubt, the Status of Sceptical Belief,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 39, 151–69. Revised version in Juha Sihvola (ed.), Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition, Acta Philosophica Fennica 66 (Helsinki, 2000), 63–92.Google Scholar
Brennan, Tad, and Lee, Jongsuh. 2014. “A Relative Improvement,” Phronesis 59, 246–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Tad, and Roberts, Cliff. 2018. “Sextus Empiricus,” in Machuca, D. and Reed, B., eds., Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present (London: Bloomsbury Publishing), 125–44.Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles. 2001. Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles. 2005. “Arcesilaus,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (online).Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles (ed./trans.). 2006. Cicero, On Academic Scepticism (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles. 2016. “Cicero’s Sceptical Methods: The Example of the De Finibus,” in Annas, Julia and Betegh, Gabor, eds., Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 12–40.Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles, and Palmer, John. 2001. “The New Academy’s Appeals to the Presocratics,” Phronesis 46, 38–72.Google Scholar
Brochard, Victor. 2002. Les sceptiques grecs (Paris: Librairie générale française). (Originally published in 1887.)Google Scholar
Bullock, Joseph. 2016. “The Challenges of the Modes of Agrippa,” Apeiron 49, 409–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles. 1982. “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed,” Philosophical Review 91, 3–40.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles. 1983. “Can the Skeptic Live His Skepticism?,” in Burnyeat, Myles, ed., The Skeptical Tradition (Berkeley: University of California Press), 117–48. (Originally published in 1980.)Google Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles. 1984. “The Sceptic in His Place and Time,” in Rorty, Richard, Schneewind, J. B. and Skinner, Quentin, eds., Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 225–54.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles, and Frede, Michael (eds.). 1997. The Original Sceptics: A Controversy (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Bury, R. G. (ed./trans.). 1933. Sextus Empiricus, with an English translation, vol. I (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press – Loeb Classical Library).Google Scholar
Castagnoli, Luca. 2018. “Aenesidemus,” in Machuca, D. and Reed, B., eds., Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present (London: Bloomsbury Publishing), 67–80.Google Scholar
Chakravartty, Anjan. 2004. “Stance Relativism: Empiricism versus Metaphysics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35, 173–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravartty, Anjan. 2011. “A Puzzle about Voluntarism about Rational Epistemic Stances,” Synthese 178, 37–48.Google Scholar
Chakravartty, Anjan. 2017. “Scientific Realism,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, online: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/.Google Scholar
Clayman, Dee. 2009. Timon of Phlius: Pyrrhonism into Poetry (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John. 2004. “Arcesilaus: Socratic and Skeptic,” in Cooper, J., Knowledge, Nature, and the Good (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 81–103.Google Scholar
Cooper, John, and Procopé, J. F. (ed./trans.). 1995. Seneca, Moral and Political Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, Fernanda. 1992. “Aenesidemus and the Academy,” Classical Quarterly 42, 176–89.Google Scholar
Dorsey, Dale. 2017. “Adaptive Preferences Are a Red Herring,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3, 465–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Theodor. 1987. “The Origin of the Stoic Theory of Signs in Sextus Empiricus,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 5, 83–126.Google Scholar
Ebert, Theodor. 1991. Dialektiker und frühe Stoiker bei Sextus Empiricus: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung der Aussagenlogik, Hupomnemata 95 (Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Theodor. 2005. “La théorie du signe entre la medicine et la philosophie,” in Kany-Turpin, José, ed., Signe et Prédiction dans l’Antiquité (Saint-Étienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Étienne), 51–63.Google Scholar
Eichorn, Roger. 2014. “How (Not) to Read Sextus Empiricus,” Ancient Philosophy 34, 121–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Matthew. 2004. “Can Epicureans Be Friends?,” Ancient Philosophy 24, 407–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogelin, Robert. 1994. Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, Michael. 1982. “The Method of the So-Called Methodical School of Medicine,” in Barnes, Jonathan, Brunschwig, Jacques, Burnyeat, Myles and Schofield, Malcolm, eds., Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1–23, reprinted in Michael Frede, Essays in Ancient Philosophy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), 261–78.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael. 1985. Galen, Three Treatises on the Nature of Science, trans. Walzer, Richard and Frede, Michael with an introduction by Frede, Michael (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Frede, Michael. 1997. “The Sceptic’s Two Kinds of Assent and the Question of the Possibility of Knowledge,” in Burnyeat, M. and Frede, M., eds., The Original Sceptics: A Controversy (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing), 127–51. (Originally published in 1984.)Google Scholar
Frede, Michael. 2011. “An Anti-Aristotelian Point of Method in Three Rationalist Doctors,” in Morison, Benjamin and Ierodiakonou, Katerina, eds., Episteme, etc.: Essays, in Honour of Jonathan Barnes (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 115–37.Google Scholar
Furley, David. 1993. “Democritus and Epicurus on Sensible Qualities,” in Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M., eds., Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 72–94.Google Scholar
Gettier, Edmund. 1963. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?,” Analysis 23: 121–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Christopher. 2013. Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, Books 1–6, translated with an introduction and commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Giovacchini, Julie. 2008. “Le ‘dogmatisme négatif’ des médecins empiriques: Sextus et Galien à la recherché d’une médecine sceptique,” Cahiers Philosophiques 115, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grgic, Filip. 2006. “Sextus Empiricus on the Goal of Skepticism,” Ancient Philosophy 26, 141–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. 1987. Exercises spirituels et philosophie antique, 2nd edition (Paris: Études Augustiennes).Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. 1995. Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, edited with an introduction by Davidson, Arnold I., translated by Chase, Michael (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing).Google Scholar
Hallie, Philip P. (ed.). 1985. Sextus Empiricus, Selections from the Major Writings on Scepticism, Man, and God, revised edition, trans. Etheridge, Sanford G. (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing). (Originally published in 1968.)Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2010. “Aenesidemus and the Rebirth of Pyrrhonism,” in Bett, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 105–19.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1981. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, René (ed./trans.). 1962. Photius, Bibliothèque, vol. III (Paris: Collection Byzantine).Google Scholar
Hetherington, Stephen. 2011. “The Gettier Problem,” in Bernecker, S. and Pritchard, D., eds., The Routledge Companion to Epistemology (London: Routledge), 119–30.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, Leofranc. 1997. “Favorinus: The Man of Paradoxes,” in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M., eds., Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 188–217.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1993. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Steinberg, Eric, 2nd edition (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad, and Gerson, Lloyd. 1997. Hellenistic Philosophy: Introductory Readings, 2nd edition (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Ioppolo, Anna Maria. 2002. “Gli Accademici ‘νεώτεροι᾽ nel secondo secolo D.C.,” Méthexis 15, 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioppolo, Anna Maria. 2009. La testimonianza di Sesto Empirico sull’Accademia scettica (Naples: Bibliopolis).Google Scholar
Janáček, Karel. 1963. “Die Hauptschrift des Sextus Empiricus also Torso erhalten?,” Philologus 107, 271–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janáček, Karel. 1976. “Zur Interpretation des Photius-Abschnittes über Aenesidemos,” Eirene 14, 93–100.Google Scholar
Janáček, Karel. 2000. Sexti Empirici Indices, 3rd edition (Florence: Leo S. Olschki Editore).Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 2009. “Médecine et philosophie: sur la date de Sextus Empiricus et celle de Diogène Laërce à la lumière du corpus galénique,” Revue des études grecques 122, 359–90.Google Scholar
Joyce, R., and Kirchin, S. (eds.). 2010. A World without Values: Essays on John Mackie’s Moral Error Theory (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1981. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Ellington, James W. (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Kraut, Richard. 2006. “Doing without Morality: Reflections on the Meaning of Dein in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30, 159–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasserre, François. 1975. “Un papyrus sceptique méconnu,” in Le monde grec: hommages à Claire Préaux (Brussels: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles), 537–48. Reprinted in François Lasserre, Nouveaux chapitres de literature grecque (1947–1986), Université de Lausanne, Publications de la faculté de lettres XXXI (Geneva: Droz, 1989), 181–96.Google Scholar
Lévy, Carlos. 2010. “The Sceptical Academy: Decline and Afterlife,” in Bett, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. 1978. “Timon of Phlius: Pyrrhonist and Satirist,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, NS24: 68–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. 1988. “Socrates in Hellenistic Philosophy,” Classical Quarterly 38, 150–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machuca, Diego. 2006. “The Pyrrhonist’s ἀταραξία and φιλανθρωπία,” Ancient Philosophy 26, 111–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machuca, Diego. 2011. “Moderate Ethical Realism in Sextus’ against the Ethicists?,” in Machuca, Diego, ed., New Essays in Ancient Pyrrhonism (Leiden: Brill), 143–78.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, Jaap. 1995. “Aenesidemus and the Academics,” in Ayres, L., ed., The Passionate Intellect (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers), 236–48.Google Scholar
Marchand, Stéphane. 2010. “Le sceptique cherche-t-il vraiment la vérité?,” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale No. 1, 125–41.Google Scholar
Mates, Benson. 1996. The Skeptic Way: Sextus Empiricus’ Outlines of Pyrrhonism (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1939. “Proof of an External World,” Proceedings of the British Academy 25, 273–300; reprinted in Thomas Baldwin, ed., G. E. Moore: Selected Writings (London: Routledge, 2013), 147–70.Google Scholar
Morison, Benjamin. 2011. “The Logical Structure of the Sceptic’s Opposition,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40, 265–95.Google Scholar
Morison, Benjamin. 2014. “Sextus Empiricus,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, online at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sextus-empiricus/.Google Scholar
Morrison, Donald. 1990. “The Ancient Sceptic’s Way of Life,” Metaphilosophy 21, 204–22.Google Scholar
Neta, Ram (ed.). 2014. Current Controversies in Epistemology (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1966. Beyond Good and Evil, trans. Kaufmann, Walter (New York: Random House).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1997. Twilight of the Idols, trans. Polt, Richard with introduction by Strong, Tracy (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1994. The Therapy of Desire (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Obdrzalek, Suzanne. 2006. “Living in Doubt: Carneades’ Pithanon Reconsidered,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 31, 243–79.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Tim. 2002. “The Cyrenaics on Pleasure, Happiness, and Future-Concern,” Phronesis 47, 395–416.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Tim. 2011. “The Cyreniacs vs. the Pyrrhonists on Knowledge of Appearances,” in Machuca, D., ed., New Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism (Leiden: Brill), 27–40.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi, and Conway, Eric. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (New York: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Pellegrin, Pierre (ed./trans.). 1997. Sextus Empiricus, Esquisses pyrrhoniennes (Paris: Éditions du Seuil).Google Scholar
Pellegrin, Pierre. 2005. “Scepticisme et sémiologie médicale,” in Kany-Turpin, José, ed., Signe et prédiction dans l’antiquité (Saint-Étienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Étienne), 65–82.Google Scholar
Pérez-Jean, Brigitte. 2005. Dogmatisme et scepticisme: L’héraclitisme d’Énésidème. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires de Septentrion.Google Scholar
Perin, Casey. 2006. “Pyrrhonian Scepticism and the Search for Truth,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30, 337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perin, Casey. 2010a. The Demands of Reason (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perin, Casey. 2010b. “Scepticism and Belief,” in Bett, Richard, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 145–64.Google Scholar
Perin, Casey. 2013. “Making Sense of Arcesilaus,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45, 313–40.Google Scholar
Philippson, Robert. 1881. De Philodemi libro, qui est Peri sêmeiôn kai sêmeiôseôn et Epicureorum doctrina logica (Berlin: Berliner Buchhdruckerie Actien-Gesellschaft).Google Scholar
Polito, Roberto. 2004. The Sceptical Road: Aenesidemus’ Appropriation of Heraclitus (Leiden: Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polito, Roberto. 2014. Aenesidemus of Cnossos: Testimonia, edited with introduction and commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Powers, Nathan. 2010. “The System of the Sceptical Modes in Sextus Empiricus,” Apeiron 43, no. 4, 157–71.Google Scholar
Pritchard, Duncan. 2011. “Wittgensteinian Pyrrhonism,” in Machuca, Diego, ed., Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy (Dordrecht: Springer), 193–202.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis. 2006. “Scientific Realism,” in Borchert, Donald M., ed., The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd edition (Detroit: Macmillan), vol. 8, 688–94.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, Brian. 2002. “Is Pyrrhonism Psychologically Possible?,” Ancient Philosophy 22, 319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Alan (ed.). 1987. John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham, Utilitarianism and Other Essays (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1973. Existentialism and Humanism, trans. Mairet, P. (London: Eyre Methuen).Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 1996. “Voluntarism and the Foundations of Ethics,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 70, no. 2, 25–41. Reprinted in J. B. Schneewind, Essays on the History of Moral Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 405–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm. 2007. “Aenesidemus: Pyrrhonist and ‘Heraclitean,’” in Ioppolo, A.-M. and Sedley, D., eds., Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers: Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 BC (Naples: Bibliopolis), 271–338.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. 1992. “Sextus Empiricus and the Atomist Criteria of Truth,” Elenchos 13, 21–56.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. 1997. “Philosophical Allegiance in the Greco-Roman World,” in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J., eds., Philosophia Togata I: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 97–119. (Originally published in 1989.)Google Scholar
Sedley, David (ed.). 2012. The Philosophy of Antiochus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, David. 2015. “Diogenes Laertius on the Ten Pyrrhonist Modes,” in Vogt, K., ed., Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Diogenes Laertius, SAPERE Series vol. 25 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 171–85.Google Scholar
Sellars, John. 2010. “Marcus Aurelius, the Philosopher,” in Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece and Rome, ed. Gagarin, Michael, 7 vols. (New York: Oxford University Press), vol. 4, 345–6.Google Scholar
Sidelle, Alan. (2006). “Constructivism and Conventionalism,” in Borchert, Donald M., ed., The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd edition (Detroit: Macmillan), vol. 2, 474–6.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (ed.). 2004. Pyrrhonian Skepticism (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. 2006. Moral Skepticisms (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Spinelli, Emidio. 2000. “Sextus Empiricus, the Neighbouring Philosophies and the Sceptical Tradition,” in Sihvola, J., ed., Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition, Acta Philosophica Fennica 66, 35–61.Google Scholar
Spinelli, Emidio. 2005. Questioni scettiche: Letture introduttive al pirronismo antico (Rome: Lithos editrice snc).Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela. 1983. “The Ten Tropes of Aenesidemus,” in Burnyeat, Myles, ed., The Skeptical Tradition (Berkeley: University of California Press), 95–115.Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela. 2001. “Scepticism as a Kind of Philosophy,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 83, 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, Gisela. 2004. “Historical Reflections on Classical Pyrrhonism and Neo-Pyrrhonism,” in Sinnott-Armstrong 2004, 13–24.Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela. 2010. “Academics versus Pyrrhonists, Reconsidered,” in Bett, Richard, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, Barry. 1984. The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svavarsson, Svavar. 2010. “Pyrrho and Early Pyrrhonism,” in Bett, Richard, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlazzo, Rosa. 2017. “Must Adaptive Preferences Be Prudentially Bad for Us?,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3, 412–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorsrud, Harald. 2010. “Arcesilaus and Carneades,” in Bett, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tor, Shaul. 2014. “Sextus and Wittgenstein on the End of Justification,” International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 4, no. 2, 81–108.Google Scholar
Tredennick, Hugh. 1969. Plato, The Last Days of Socrates, translated with an introduction (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Tsouna-McKirahan, Voula. 2002. “Is There an Exception to Greek Eudaimonism?,” in Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P., eds., Le style de le pensée: receuil de texts en hommage à Jacques Brunschwig (Paris: Les Belles Lettres), 464–89.Google Scholar
Tuominen, Miira. 2009. The Ancient Commentators on Plato and Aristotle (Berkeley: University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veenhoven, Ruut. 2018. World Database of Happiness: Archive of Research Findings on Subjective Enjoyment of Life, online: www.worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl.Google Scholar
Viano, Cristina. 2002. “‘Énésidème selon Héraclite’: la substance corporelle du temps,” Revue Philosophique 192, 141–58.Google Scholar
Vogt, Katja Maria. 1998. Skepsis und Lebenspraxis: Das pyrrhonische Leben ohne Meinungen (München: Alber Verlag).Google Scholar
Vogt, Katja Maria. 2010. “Scepticism and Action,” in Bett, Richard, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 165–80.Google Scholar
Vogt, Katja Maria. 2012a. Belief and Truth: A Skeptic Reading of Plato (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, Katja Maria. 2012b. “Appearances and Assent: Sceptical Belief Reconsidered,” Classical Quarterly 62, no. 2, 648–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, Katja Maria. 2015. “Introduction: Skepticism and Metaphysics in Diogenes Laertius,” in Vogt, K., ed., Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Diogenes Laertius, SAPERE Series vol. 25 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 3–14.Google Scholar
Walker, Matthew. Forthcoming. “Aristotle on Wittiness,” in Pierre Destrée and Franco Trivigno, eds., Laughter and Comedy in Ancient Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Warnock, Mary. 2003. Utilitarianism, on Liberty, Essay on Bentham, Together with Selected Writings of Jeremy Bentham and John Austin, edited with an introduction (Malden, MA: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Warren, James. 2002. Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archaeology of Ataraxia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Warren, James. 2015. “Precursors of Pyrrhonism: DL 9.67–73,” in Vogt, K., ed., Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Diogenes Laertius, SAPERE Series vol. 25 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 105–21.Google Scholar
Weiner, Eric. 2008. The Geography of Bliss: One Grump’s Search for the Happiest Places in the World (New York: Hachette Book Group USA).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1981. “Persons, Character and Morality,” in Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1–19. (Originally published in 1976.)Google Scholar
Williams, Michael. 1988. “Scepticism without Theory,” Review of Metaphysics 41, 547–88.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael. 2010. “Descartes’ Transformation of the Sceptical Tradition,” in Bett, Richard, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 288–313.Google Scholar
Woodruff, Paul. 2010. “The Pyrrhonian Modes,” in Bett, Richard, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 208–31.Google Scholar