Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:06:15.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Don Ringe
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Joseph F. Eska
Affiliation:
Virginia College of Technology
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Historical Linguistics
Toward a Twenty-First Century Reintegration
, pp. 291 - 308
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Douglas Q. 1999. A dictionary of Tocharian B. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith. 1987. Tzotzil clause structure. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandris, Alexis. 1999. “The Greek census of Anatolia and Thrace (1910–1912): a contribution to Ottoman historical demography.” In Gondicas and Issawi (eds.), pp. 45–76.
Allen, Cynthia. 2008. Genitives in early English: typology and evidence. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Shanley, and Crago, Martha. 1989. “Acquisition of noun incorporation in Inuktitut.” Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 28: 49–56.Google Scholar
Allen, W. Sidney. 1953. Phonetics in ancient India. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, W. Sidney 1978. Vox latina. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, W. Sidney 1987. Vox graeca. 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen. 1982. “Where's morphology?Linguistic Inquiry 13: 571–612.Google Scholar
Appel, René, and Muysken, Pieter. 1987. Language contact and bilingualism. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark 1994. Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Babbitt, E. H. 1896. “The English of the lower classes in New York City and vicinity.” Dialect Notes 1: 457–64.Google Scholar
Bagemihl, Bruce. 1991. “Syllable structure in Bella Coola.” Linguistic Inquiry 22: 589–646.Google Scholar
Bagemihl, Bruce 1998. “Maximality in Bella Coola (Nuxalk).” In Ewa Czaykowska-Higgins and M. Dale Kincade (eds.), Salish languages and linguistics: theoretical and descriptive perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 71–98.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1985. “The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation.” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–416.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark 1988a. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark 1988b. “Theta theory and the syntax of applicatives in Chichewa.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 353–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranowski, Maciej. 2006. “Phonological variation and change in the dialect of Charleston, SC.” Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Bauer, Brigitte. 2010. “Forerunners of Romance -mente adverbs in Latin prose and poetry.” In Dickey, Eleanor and Chahoud, Anna (eds.), Colloquial and literary Latin. Cambridge University Press, pp. 339–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, Jeffrey R. 1982. “Avian vocal mimicry: its function and evolution.” In Kroodsma, Miller, and Ouellet (eds.), vol. II, pp. 51–83.
Becker, Peter H. 1982. “The coding of species-specific characteristics in bird sounds.” In Kroodsma, Miller, and Ouellet (eds.), vol. I, pp. 213–52.
Bellugi, Ursula. 1988. “The acquisition of a spatial language.” In Frank S. Kessel (ed.), The development of language and language researchers: essays in honor of Roger Brown. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 153–85.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A. W., and Smithers, G. V.. 1968. Early Middle English verse and prose. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentley, Mayrene, and Kulemeka, Andrew. 2001. Chichewa. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Bertoncini, Josiane, and Mehler, Jacques. 1981. “Syllables as units in infant speech perception.” Infant Behavior and Development 4: 247–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besch, Werner. 1967. Sprachlandschaften und Sprachausgleich im 15. Jahrhundert. Munich: Francke.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Tej K., and Ritchie, William C. 1999. “The bilingual child: some issues and perspectives.” In Ritchie and Bhatia (eds.), pp. 569–643.
Bickerton, Derek. 1977. “Pidginization and creolization: language acquisition and language universals.” In Albert Valdman (ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 49–69.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek 1981. Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek 1995. “Creoles and the bankruptcy of current acquisition theory.” In Wekker (ed.), pp. 33–43.
Biggs, Bruce. 1978. “The history of Polynesian phonology.” In Stephen Wurm and Carrington, Lois (eds.), Second International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics: Proceedings, Fascicle 2. Canberra: Australian National University, pp. 691–716.Google Scholar
Björkman, Erik. 1900–2. Scandinavian loan-words in Middle English. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 1995. “The syllable in phonological theory.” In Goldsmith, John A. (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 206–44.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette 2003. “The independent nature of phonotactic constraints.” In Féry, Caroline and van de Vijver, Ruben (eds.), The syllable in optimality theory. Cambridge University Press, pp. 375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette 2004. Evolutionary phonology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette, and Garrett, Andrew. 1998. “The origins of consonant–vowel metathesis.” Language 74: 508–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette, and Garrett, Andrew 2004. “The evolution of metathesis.” In Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert, and Steriade, Donca (eds.), Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1925. “Notes on the Fox language.” International Journal of American Linguistics 3: 219–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1946. “Algonquian.” In Osgood, Cornelius (ed.), Linguistic structures of Native America. New York: Viking Fund, pp. 85–129.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1962. The Menominee language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1975. Menomini lexicon. Milwaukee: Milwaukee Public Museum.Google Scholar
Blumstein, Sheila E., and Stevens, Kenneth N. 1979. “Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66: 1001–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bobalijk, Jonathon D., and Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1998. “Two heads aren't always better than one.” Syntax 1: 37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 1982. “Les constructions relatives en français vernaculaire et en français standard: étude d'un paramètre.” In Lefebvre, Claire (ed.), La syntaxe comparée du français standard et populaire: approches formelle et fonctionelle, vol. I. Québec: Office de la Langue Française, pp. 103–33.Google Scholar
Brandl, Alois, and Zippel, O. 1949. Middle English literature. 2nd edn. New York: Chelsea.Google Scholar
Braune, Wilhelm, and Reiffenstein, Ingo. 2004. Althochdeutsche Grammatik. Vol. I, 15th edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breatnach, Liam. 1977. “The suffixed pronouns in Early Irish.” Celtica 12: 75–107.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Mchombo, Sam A. 1987. “Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chicheŵa.” Language 63: 741–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine, and Goldstein, Louis. 1991. “Gestural structures: distinctiveness, phonological processes, and historical change.” In Mattingly, Ignatius G and Studdert-Kennedy, Michael (eds.), Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 313–38.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine, and Goldstein, Louis 1992. “Articulatory phonology: an overview.” Phonetica 49: 155–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunner, Karl. 1948. Abriß der mittelenglischen Grammatik. 2nd edn. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Brunner, Karl 1965. Altenglische Grammatik. 3rd edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, Carl. 1928. A grammar of Oscan and Umbrian. 2nd edn. Boston: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl 1933. Comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene. 2000. “On the naturalness of unnatural rules.” Proceedings from the Second Workshop on American Indigenous Languages, UCSB working papers in linguistics 9: 16–29.Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene 2009. “Phonetics and phonology in Gallo-Romance palatalisation.” Transactions of the Philological Society 107: 31–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, Eugene, and Seidl, Amanda. 2005. “On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules.” Language Learning and Development 1: 289–316.Google Scholar
Bynon, Theodora. 1977. Historical linguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaghan, Catherine. 1979. “An ‘Indo-European’ type paradigm in Proto Eastern Miwok.” In Klar, Kathryn et al. (eds.), American Indian and Indoeuropean studies: papers in honor of Madison S. Beeler. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 31–41.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Catherine 1986. “A comment on ‘Protolinguistics’.” International Journal of American Linguistics 52: 186–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callary, Robert E. 1975. “Phonological change and the development of an urban dialect in Illinois.” Language in Society 4: 155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 1962. Old English grammar. Revised edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1988. Review of Greenberg 1987. Language 64: 591–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, and Harris, Alice C. 2002. “Syntactic reconstruction and demythologizing ‘Myths and the prehistories of grammars.’Journal of Linguistics 38: 599–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, and Poser, William. 2008. Language classification: history and method. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, John B., Davies, Peter, and Richman, Barry. 1971. The American Heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Carstairs, Andrew. 1987. Allomorphy in inflection. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre. 1925. “Les verbes grecs en *-θω.” In Mélanges linguistiques offerts à M. J. Vendryes. Paris: Champion, pp. 93–108.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre 1927. L’histoire du parfait grec. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. “Remarks on nominalization.” In Jacobs, Roderick and Rosenbaum, Peter (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Co., pp. 184–221.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Christmann, Ernst. 1964. “Kleine Beiträge zur deutschen Wortkunde.” Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 31: 187–98.Google Scholar
Clark, Cecily. 1958. The Peterborough Chronicle 1070–1154. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clogg, Richard. 1999. “A millet within a millet: the Karamanlides.” In Gondicas and Issawi (eds.), pp. 115–42.
Coetsem, Frans van. 1988. Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Eung-Do. 1994. “Against moraic licensing in Bella Coola.” Linguistic Inquiry 25: 309–26.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J., and Newson, Mark. 1996. Chomsky's Universal Grammar: an introduction. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 1991. Gender. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowgill, Warren. 1965. “The Old English present indicative ending -e.” In Safarewicz, Jan (ed.), Symbolae linguisticae in honorem Georgii Kuryłowicz. Wrocław: Polska Akademia Nauk, pp. 44–50.Google Scholar
Cowgill, Warren 1975. “The origin of the Insular Celtic conjunct and absolute verbal inflexions.” In Rix, Helmut (ed.), Flexion und Wortbildung. Wiesbaden: Reichert, pp. 40–70.Google Scholar
Cowgill, Warren 1986. “Einleitung.” In Cowgill and Mayrhofer, pp. 9–71.
Cowgill, Warren 1987. “The distribution of infixed and suffixed pronouns in Old Irish.” Cambridge Medieval Celtic Studies 13: 1–5.Google Scholar
Cowgill, Warren, and Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1986. Indogermanische Grammatik, vol. I. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Crisma, Paola, and Longobardi, Giuseppe (eds.). 2009. Historical syntax and linguistic theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Anne, Mehler, Jacques, Norris, Dennis, and Segul, Juan. 1989. “Limits on bilingualism.” Nature 340: 229–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2001. “Learning a morphological system without a default: the Polish genitive.” Journal of Child Language 28: 545–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dailey-O’Cain, Jennifer. 1997. “Canadian raising in a midwestern U.S. city.” Language Variation and Change 9: 107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniloff, Raymond, Schuckers, Gordon, and Feth, Lawrence. 1980. The physiology of speech and hearing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. M. 1910. “Modern Greek in Asia Minor.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 30: 109–32, 267–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. M. 1916. Modern Greek in Asia Minor. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1888. Altindische Syntax. Halle: Verlag der Waisen Hauses.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold 1893–1900. Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
De Simone, Carlo. 1980. “L’aspetto linguistico.” In Stibbe, Conrad, Colonna, Giovanni, de Simone, Carlo, and Versnel, H. S., Lapis Satricanus. The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij, pp. 71–94.Google Scholar
Devine, Andrew. 1970. The Latin thematic genitive singular. Stanford University Committee on Linguistics.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit. 2008. “Language ecology and linguistic diversity on the African continent.” Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 840–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorian, Nancy. 1981. Language death: the life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan. 1999. “Child phonology, learnability, and phonological theory.” In Ritchie and Bhatia (eds.), pp. 299–346.
Drosdowski, Günther (ed.). 1984. Duden Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 4th edn. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1991. “Social polarization and the choice of linguistic variants.” In Eckert (ed.), pp. 213–32.
Eckert, Penelope (ed.). 1991. New ways of analyzing sound change. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eijk, Jan van. 1997. The Lillooet language. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Ekwall, Eilert. 1930. “How long did the Scandinavian language survive in England?” In Bøgholm, N., Brusendorff, Aage, and Bodelsen, C. A. (eds.), A grammatical miscellany offered to Otto Jespersen on his seventieth birthday. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard, pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
Ekwall, Eilert 1936. “The Scandinavian settlement.” In Darby, H. C. (ed.), An historical geography of England before A. D. 1800. Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–64.Google Scholar
Ellegård, Alvar. 1953. The auxiliary do: the establishment and regulation of its use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Embick, David. 1997. “Voice and the interfaces of syntax.” Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Embick, David 2008. “Variation and morphosyntactic theory: competition fractionated.” Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David, and Halle, Morris. 2003. “Latin inflections.” Paper presented at Nijmegen, Nov. 21, 2003.
Embick, David, and Noyer, Rolf. 2007. “Distributed morphology and the syntax–morphology interface.” In Ramchand, Gillian and Reiss, Charles (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces. Oxford University Press, pp. 289–324.Google Scholar
Embleton, Sheila. 1986. Statistics in historical linguistics. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Enderlin, Fritz. 1913. Die Mundart von Kesswil im Oberthurgau. Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar
Engel, Ralph, and Mary Allhiser de, Engel. 1987. Diccionario zoque de Francisco León. Mexico: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Ernout, Thomas, and Meillet, Antoine. 1939. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. 4th edn. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Eska, Joseph. 2003. “The distribution of the Old Irish personal object affixes and forward reconstruction.” In Jones-Bley, Karlene, Huld, Martin E., Volpe, Angela Della, and Dexter, Miriam Robbins (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference (Los Angeles, November 8–9, 2002). Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man, pp. 25–36.Google Scholar
Eska, Joseph 2009–10. “Where have all the object pronouns gone? The growth of object agreement in earlier Celtic.” Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 57: 25–47.Google Scholar
Fantini, Alvino E. 1985. Language acquisition of a bilingual child: a sociolinguistic perspective (to age ten). San Diego: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
Ferraresi, Gisella, and Goldbach, Maria (eds.). 2008. Principles of syntactic reconstruction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filppula, Markku. 1999. The grammar of Irish English: language in Hibernian style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Richard. 1997. The barbarian conversion. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael, and Olsen, Lise Lennert. 1992. “The acquisition of West Greenlandic.” In Slobin (ed.), pp. 111–219.
Fortson, Benjamin W. IV. 2009. Indo-European language and culture: an introduction. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Franck, Johannes. 1910. Mittelniederländische Grammatik. 2nd edn. Leipzig: Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1970. Proto-Indo-European trees. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Paul 1975. Proto-Indo-European syntax: the order of meaningful elements. Butte, MT: Journal of Indo-European Studies.Google Scholar
Fromm, Hans, and Sadeniemi, Matti. 1956. Finnisches Elementarbuch. Vol. I: Grammatik. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Gallée, Johan Hendrik. 1993. Altsächsische Grammatik. Halle: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, Lila. 1990. “The structural sources of verb meanings.” Language Acquisition 1: 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1974. “An outline of the historical phonology of Arapaho and Atsina.” International Journal of American Linguistics 40: 102–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Ives 1975. “Algonquian, Wiyot, and Yurok: proving a distant genetic relationship.” In Kinkade, M. Dale, Hale, Kenneth, and Werner, Oswald (eds.), Linguistics and anthropology in honor of C. F. Voegelin. Lisse: Peter de Ridder, pp. 249–62.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives 1988. “Stylistic dialects in Fox linguistic change.” In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Historical dialectology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 193–209.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives 1994a. Leonard Bloomfield's Fox lexicon. Critical edition. Winnipeg: Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics. (= Memoir 12.)Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives 1994b. “The west-to-east cline in Algonquian dialectology.” In Cowan, William (ed.), Actes du Vingt-Cinquième Congrès des Algonquinistes. Ottawa: Carleton University, pp. 187–211.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives 2007. “Phonetically unmotivated sound change.” In Nussbaum, Alan (ed.), Verba Docenti: Studies…presented to Jay H. Jasanoff. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press, pp. 115–30.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. 1990. Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gondicas, Dimitri, and Issawi, Charles (eds.). 1999. Ottoman Greeks in the age of nationalism. Princeton: Darwin Press.Google Scholar
Goossens, Jan. 1977. “De tweede nederlandse auslautverscherping.” Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 93: 3–23.Google Scholar
Gordon, Eric Valentine. 1957. Introduction to Old Norse. 2nd edn., revised by A. R. Taylor. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grant, Michael. 1990. The fall of the Roman empire. Revised edn. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. The languages of Africa. IJAL Supplement 29(1), Part 2.
Greenberg, Joseph 1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph 2000. Indo-European and its closest relatives: the Eurasiatic language family. Vol. I: Grammar. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gress-Wright, Jonathan. 2010. “Opacity and transparency in phonological change.” Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Griffith, Aaron. 2011. “Old Irish pronouns: agreement affixes vs. clitic arguments.” In Carnie, Andrew (ed.), Formal approaches to Celtic linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press, pp. 65–93.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jakob, and Grimm, Wilhelm. 1860. Deutsches Wörterbuch. Berlin: Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J., and Wilson, Robert. 1971. “Convergence and creolization: a case from the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian border in India.” In Hymes, Dell (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge University Press, pp. 151–67.Google Scholar
Habick, Timothy. 1991. “Burnouts versus rednecks: effects of group membership on the phonemic system.” In Eckert (ed.), pp. 185–212.
Hackstein, Olav. 1995. Untersuchungen zu den sigmatischen Präsensstammbildungen des Tocharischen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Haeri, Niloofar. 1997. The sociolinguistic market of Cairo: gender, class, and education. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1991. “From V/2 to subject clitics: evidence from Northern Italian.” In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. Vol. II: Focus on types of grammatical markers. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Lauri. 1961. The structure and development of the Finnish language. Tr. by John Atkinson. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1973. “Deep-surface canonical disparities in relation to analysis and change: an Australian example.” In Sebeok, Thomas, Hoenigswald, Henry, and Longacre, Robert (eds.), Current trends in linguistics. Vol. 11: Diachronic, areal, and typological linguistics. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 401–58.Google Scholar
Hale, Mark. 1998. “Diachronic syntax.” Syntax 1: 1–18.Google Scholar
Hale, Mark 2007. Historical linguistics: theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, Nancy. 2006. “Cross-linguistic patterns of vowel intrusion.” Phonology 23: 387–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1962. “Phonology in generative grammar.” Word 18: 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris 1973. “Prolegomena to a theory of word formation.” Linguistic Inquiry 4: 3–16.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris 1997. “Distributed morphology: impoverishment and fission.” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: 425–49.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. 1984. “Notes on the Early Irish suffixed pronouns.” Études celtiques 21: 139–40.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi, and Noyer, Rolf. 1999. “State-of-the-article: Distributed Morphology.” Glot International 4/4: 3–9.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 2008. “Reconstruction in syntax: reconstruction of patterns.” In Ferraresi and Goldbach (eds.), pp. 73–95.
Harris, Alice C., and Campell, Lyle. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, et al. (eds.). 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Available online at .)Google Scholar
Helten, W. L. van. 1890. Altostfriesische Grammatik. Leeuwarden: Meijer.Google Scholar
Herold, Ruth. 1990. “Mechanisms of merger: the implementation and distribution of the low back merger in eastern Pennsylvania.” Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hinds, John. 1986. Japanese. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics. 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles. 1981. “The phonological history of Menominee.” Anthropological Linguistics 23: 51–87.Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry. 1960. Language change and linguistic reconstruction. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Karl, and Forssman, Bernhard. 2004. Avestische Laut- und Flexionslehre. 2nd edn. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.Google Scholar
Hohepa, Patrick. 1967. A profile generative grammar of Maori. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Honti, László. 1975. System der paradigmatischen Suffixmorpheme des wogulischen Dialektes an der Tawda. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honti, László 1988. “Die ob-ugrischen Sprachen I: Die wogulische Sprache.” In Sinor, Denis (ed.), The Uralic languages. Leiden: Brill, pp. 147–71.
Householder, Fred, Kazazis, Kostas, and Koutsoudas, Andreas. 1964. Reference grammar of literary Dhimotiki. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, Kenneth, & Obler, Loraine K (eds.). 1989. Bilingualism across the lifespan. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imedadze, Natela, and Tuite, Kevin. 1992. “The acquisition of Georgian.” In Slobin (ed.), pp. 39–109.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. “Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon.” Language 51: 639–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Neil G. 2005. Yiddish: a linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janse, Mark. 2009. “Greek–Turkish language contact in Asia Minor.” Études helléniques / Hellenic Studies (Montréal) 17: 37–54.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay. 1976. “Gr. ἄμφω, lat. ambō et le mot indo-européen pour ‘l'un et l'autre’.” Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 71: 123–31.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay 1987. “Some irregular imperatives in Tocharian.” In Watkins, Calvert (ed.), Studies in memory of Warren Cowgill. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 92–112.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay 2009. “*-bhi, *-bhis, *-ōis: following the trail of the PIE instrumental plural.” In Rasmussen, Jens Elmegård and Olander, Thomas (eds.), Internal reconstruction in Indo-European. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum, pp. 137–49.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1909. A Modern English grammar on historical principles. Part I: Sounds and spellings. Revised edn. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto 1914. —. Part II: Syntax. Vol. I. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto 1954. —. Part VI: Morphology. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jacqueline S., and Newport, Elissa L. 1989. “Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language.” Cognitive Psychology 21: 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Keith. 2003. Acoustic and auditory phonetics. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jonasson, Jan. 1972. “Perceptual factors in phonology.” In Rigault, André and Charbonneau, René (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 1127–30.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles (ed.). 1993. Historical linguistics: problems and perspectives. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D., and Janda, Richard D (eds.). 2003. The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jutz, Leo. 1931. Die alemannischen Mundarten. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kálmán, Béla. 1964. Vogul chrestomathy. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Karatsareas, Petros. 2009. “The loss of grammatical gender in Cappadocian Greek.” Transactions of the Philological Society 107: 196–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kari, James. 1976. Navajo verb prefix phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Kari, James, and Potter, Ben (eds.). 2010. The Dene–Yeniseian connection (= Anthro-pological Papers of the University of Alaska, New Series, vol. 5 [1–2].) Department of Anthropology, University of Alaska at Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1991. “Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO.” Linguistic Inquiry 22: 647–86.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 2003. “An historical explanation of some binding theoretic facts in English.” In Moore, John and Polinsky, Maria (eds.), The nature of explanation in linguistic theory. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 153–89.Google Scholar
Keller, Madeleine. 1985. “Latin escit, escunt a-t-il des correspondants?Revue de Philologie 59: 27–44.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudolf. 1961. German dialects. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kessler, Brett. 2001. The significance of word lists. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kessler, Brett, and Lehtonen, Annukka. 2006. “Multilateral comparison and significance testing of the Indo-Uralic question.” In Forster, Peter and Renfrew, Colin (eds.), Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages. Cambridge: McDonald Institute, pp. 33–42.Google Scholar
King, Andrew P., and West, Meredith J. 1977. “Species identification in the North American cowbird: appropriate responses to abnormal song.” Science 195: 1002–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, Robert D. 1967. “Functional load and sound change.” Language 43: 831–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Ruth. 2000. The lexical basis of grammatical borrowing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982a. Explanation in phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1982b. “From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology.” In van der Hulst, Harry and Smith, Norval (eds.), The structure of phonological representations, vol. I. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 131–75.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1982c. “Productivity in phonology.” In Kiparsky 1982a, pp. 165–73.
Kiparsky, Valentin. 1979. Russian historical grammar. Revised edn., translated by J. I. Press. Ann Arbor: Ardis.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H. 1989. “Review of selected models of speech perception.” In Marslen-Wilson, William (ed.), Lexical representation and process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 169–226.Google Scholar
Kleiner, Yuri. 2006. Review of Jacobs 2005. Diachronica 23: 417–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1995. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 23rd edn., revised by Elmar Seebold. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kökeritz, Helge. 1953. Shakespeare's pronunciation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
König, Werner. 2001. dtv-Atlas Deutsche Sprache. 13th edn. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Kranzmayer, Eberhard. 1956. Historische Lautgeographie des gesamtbairischen Dialekt-raumes. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Krause, Wolfgang. 1971. Die Sprache der urnordischen Runeninschriften. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Krauss, Michael. 1969. “On the classification [sic; read classifiers] in the Athapaskan, Eyak, and Tlingit verb.” Supplement to IJAL 35(4): 49–83.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. “Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change.” Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S 1994. “Morphosyntactic variation.” In Beals, Katharine et al. (eds.), Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Parasession on Variation and Linguistic Theory. Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.180–201.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S 1996. “Dialect and style in the speech of upper class Philadelphia.” In Guy, Gregory et al. (eds.), Towards a social science of language. Vol. I: Variation and change in language and society. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S 2001. “Syntactic change.” In Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 699–729.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Taylor, Ann, and Ringe, Don. 2000. “The Middle English verb-second constraint: a case study in language contact and language change.” In Herring, Susan, van Reenen, Pieter, and Schøsler, Lele (eds.), Textual parameters in older languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 353–91.Google Scholar
Kroodsma, Donald E. 1977. “A re-evaluation of song development in the song sparrow.” Animal Behavior 25: 390–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroodsma, Donald E 1982. “Learning and the ontogeny of sound signals in birds.” In Kroodsma, Miller, and Ouellet (eds.), vol. II, pp. 1–23.
Kroodsma, Donald E., Miller, Edward H, and Ouellet, Henri (eds.). 1982. Acoustic communication in birds. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kümmel, Martin Joachim. 2007. Konsonantenwandel. Bausteine zu einer Typologie des Lautwandels und ihre Konsequenzen für vergleichende Rekonstruktion. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1949. “La nature des procès dits ‘analogiques’.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 5: 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laanest, Arvo. 1982. Einführung in die ostseefinnischen Sprachen. Translated by Hans-Hermann Bartens. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. “The social motivation of a sound change.” Word 19: 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1972. “Some principles of linguistic methodology.” Language in Society 1: 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William 1994. Principles of linguistic change. Vol. I: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2001. Priniciples of linguistic change. Vol. II: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2007. “Transmission and diffusion.” Language 83: 344–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, and Boberg, Charles. 2006. Atlas of North American English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Karen, Mark, and Miller, Corey. 1991. “Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast.” Language Variation and Change 3: 33–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Yaeger, Malcah, and Steiner, Richard. 1972. A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1962. Elements of acoustic phonetics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter 1975. A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter, and Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Landau, Barbara, and Gleitman, Lila. 1985. Language and experience: evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lanza, Elizabeth. 2000. “Concluding remarks: language contact – a dilemma for the bilingual child or for the linguist?” In Döpke, Susanne (ed.), Cross-linguistic structures in simultaneous bilingualism. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 227–45.Google Scholar
Laughlin, Robert M. 1975. The great Tzotzil dictionary of San Lorenzo Zinacantán. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Leer, Jeff. 1990. “Tlingit: a portmanteau language family?” In Baldi, Philip (ed.), Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 73–98.Google Scholar
Leer, Jeff 2010. “The palatal series in Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit, with an overview of the basic sound correspondences.” In Kari and Potter (eds.), pp. 168–93.
Lefebvre, Claire. 1984. “Grammaires en contact: définition et perspectives de recherche.” Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 14: 11–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred. 1974. Proto-Indo-European syntax. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric H. 1967. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lennig, Matthew. 1978. “Acoustic measurement of linguistic change: the modern Paris vowel system.” Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Lessen Kloeke, Wus van. 1982. Deutsche Phonologie und Morphologie: Merkmale und Markiertheit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessiak, Primus. 1933. Beiträge zur Geschichte des deutschen Konsonantismus. Brünn: Rohrer.Google Scholar
Liberman, Alvin M., and Mattingly, Ignatius G. 1985. “The motor theory of speech perception revised.” Cognition 21: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lightfoot, David W. 1999. The development of language: acquistion, change, and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001. “Formal syntax, diachronic minimalism, and etymology: the history of French chez.” Linguistic Inquiry 32: 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe 2003. “Methods in parametric linguistics and cognitive history.” Language Variation Yearbook 3: 101–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe, and Guardiano, Cristina. 2009. “Evidence for syntax as a signal of historical relatedness.” Lingua 119: 1679–1706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luick, Karl. 1914–40. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Vol. I. Leipzig: Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
Lust, Barbara. 1999. “Universal grammar: the strong continuity hypothesis in first language acquisition.” In Ritchie and Bhatia (eds.), pp. 111–55.
Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallory, J. P., and Douglas, Q. Adams. 2006. The Oxford introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European world. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil. 1955. “The phonetic basis for syllable division.” Studia linguistica 9: 80–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mańczak, Witold. 1958. “Tendences générales des changements analogiques.” Lingua 7: 298–325, 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James. 1990. “On megalocomparison.” Language 66: 106–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 1998. “Utterance modifiers and universals of grammatical borrowing.” Linguistics 36: 281–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1986. “Lautlehre (segmentale Phonologie des Indogermanischen).” In Cowgill and Mayrhofer 1986, pp. 73–216.
McCarthy, John. 1988. “Feature geometry and dependency: a review.” Phonetica 43: 84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCone, Kim. 1985. “Varia II. 2. OIr. olc, luch- and IE *wkwos, *lúkwos ‘wolf’.”Ériu 36: 171–6.Google Scholar
McMahon, April. 2000. Change, chance, and optimality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meid, Wolfgang. 1967. Germanische Sprachwissenschaft. Vol. III: Wortbildungslehre. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M. 1989. “Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children.” In Hyltenstam and Obler (eds.), pp. 13–40.
Meiser, Gerhard. 1986. Lautgeschichte der umbrischen Sprache. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.Google Scholar
Melchert, H. Craig. 1994. Anatolian historical phonology. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Melchert, H. Craig 1997. “Traces of a PIE aspectual contrast in Anatolian?Incontri Linguistici 20: 83–92.Google Scholar
Melchert, H. Craig, and Oettinger, Norbert. 2009. “Ablativ und Instrumental im Hethitischen und Indogermanischen.” Incontri Linguistici 32: 53–73.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm. 1895. Grammaire des langues romanes. Vol. II: Morphologie. Translated by Auguste and Georges Doutrepont. Paris: Welter.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm 1935. Romanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 3rd edn. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Miller, D. Gary. 1975. “Indo-European: VSO, SOV, SVO or all three?Lingua 37: 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. Gary 2010. Language change and linguistic theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Anne E. 1985. “The acquisition of German.” In Slobin (ed.), pp. 141–254.
Milroy, James, and Harris, John. 1980. “When is a merger not a merger? The MEAT/MATE problem in a present-day English vernacular.” English World Wide 1: 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax. Vol. I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1989. “The acquisition of polysynthesis.” Journal of Child Language 16: 285–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mondon, Jean-François. 2009. “The nature of homophony and its effects on diachrony and synchrony.” Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Moore, Samuel. 1927. “Loss of final n in inflectional syllables of Middle English.” Language 3: 232–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Samuel 1957. Historical outlines of English sounds and inflections. 2nd edn., revised by Albert Marckwardt. Ann Arbor: Wahr.Google Scholar
Moore, Samuel, and Knott, Thomas A. 1955. The elements of Old English. Ann Arbor: Wahr.Google Scholar
Morse-Gagné, Elise E. 2003. “Viking pronouns in England: charting the course of THEY, THEIR, and THEM.” Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Mossé, Fernand. 1952. A handbook of Middle English. Translated by James Walker. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mundinger, Paul C. 1982. “Microgeographic and macrogeographic variation in the acquired vocalizations of birds.” In Kroodsma, Miller, and Ouellet (eds.), vol. II, pp. 147–208.
Munkácsi, Bernát, and Kálmán, Béla. 1986. Wogulisches Wörterbuch. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Murphy, Lawrence. 1968. “Sosva Vogul grammar.” Dissertation, Indiana University.
Nakhleh, Luay, Ringe, Don, and Warnow, Tandy. 2005a. “Perfect phylogenetic networks: a new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages.” Language 81: 382–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakhleh, Luay, Warnow, Tandy, Ringe, Don, and Evans, Steven N. 2005b. “A comparison of phylogenetic reconstruction methods on an Indo-European dataset.” Transactions of the Philological Society 103: 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nater, H. F. 1984. The Bella Coola language. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Glenda. 2008. “Motivating the loss of V-to-C movement in Old Irish.” Paper presented at the Tenth Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference, Cornell University.
Ní Chasaide, Ailbhe. 1989. “Sonorization and spirantization: a single phonetic process?” In Szende, Tamás (ed.), Proceedings of the Speech Research ’89 International Conference. Budapest: Linguistics Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, pp. 108–11.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1990. “Linguistic diversity and the first settlement of the New World.” Language 66: 475–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna 1996. “The comparative method as heuristic.” In Durie, Mark and Ross, Malcolm (eds.), The comparative method reviewed. Oxford University Press, pp. 39–71.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna 2010. “Proving Dene – Yeniseian genealogical relatedness.” In Kari and Potter (eds.), pp. 299–309.
Nichols, Johanna, and Warnow, Tandy. 2008. “Tutorial on computational linguistic phylogeny.” Language and Linguistic Compass 2: 760–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noreen, Adolf. 1923. Altnordische Grammatik. Vol. I: Altisländische und altnorwegische Grammatik. 4th edn. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Noyer, R. Rolf. 1997. Features, positions, and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Alan. 1975. “-ī- in Latin denominative derivation.” In Watkins, Calvert (ed.), Indo-European Studies II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Department of Linguistics, pp. 116–61.Google Scholar
Odlin, Terence. 1997. “Bilingualism and substrate influence: a look at clefts and reflexives.” In Kallen, Jeffrey (ed.), Focus on Ireland. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John. 1981. “The listener as a source of sound change.” In Masek, Carrie, Hendrick, Roberta, and Miller, Mary Frances (eds.), Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 178–203.Google Scholar
Ohala, John 1993. “The phonetics of sound change.” In Jones (ed.), pp. 237–78.
Ohala, John 2003. “Phonetics and historical phonology.” In Joseph and Janda (eds.), pp. 669–86.
Osthoff, Hermann, and Brugmann, Karl. 1878. “Vorwort.” Morphologische Untersuch-ungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen 1: iii–xx.Google Scholar
Oswalt, Robert. 1970. “The detection of remote linguistic relationships.” Computer Studies in the Humanities and Verbal Behavior 3: 117–29.Google Scholar
Oswalt, Robert 1991. “A method for assessing distant linguistic relationships.” In Lamb, Sydney and Mitchell, E. Douglas (eds.), Sprung from some common source. Stanford University Press, pp. 389–404.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1960. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. 6th edn., unaltered from the 5th edn. of 1920. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann, Moser, Hugo, and Schröbler, Ingeborg. 1969. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. 24th edn. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 1991. “The language of the deaf.” The New York Review, March 28, pp. 65–72.
Peters, F. E. 1970. The harvest of Hellenism. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Peters, Martin. 1991. “Ein tocharisches Auslautproblem.” Die Sprache 34: 242–4.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven 1994. The language instinct. New York: William Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 1990. Latin syntax and semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 2003. “Variationist approaches to syntactic change.” In Joseph and Janda (eds.), pp. 509–28.
Pintzuk, Susan, and Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. “The rightward movement of complements and adjuncts in Old English.” Language Variation and Change 1: 115–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 1995. “The diachronic development of subject clitics in North Eastern Italian dialects.” In Battye, Adrian and Roberts, Ian (eds.), Clause structure and language change. Oxford University Press, pp. 295–324.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, and Meechan, Marjory. 1995. “Patterns of language mixture: nominal structure in Wolof-French and Fongbe-French bilingual discourse.” In Milroy, Lesley and Muysken, Pieter (eds.), One speaker, two languages: cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching. Cambridge University Press, pp. 199–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana, Wheeler, Susan, and Westwood, Anneli. 1989. “Distinguishing language contact phenomena: evidence from Finnish-English bilingualism.” In Hyltenstam and Obler (eds.), pp. 132–54.
Poser, William J. 1992. “The Salinan and Yurumanguí data in Language in the Americas.” International Journal of American Linguistics 58: 202–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F., and Pintzuk, Susan. 2000. “Bilingual code-switching and the open/closed class distinction.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 6(3): 237–57.Google Scholar
Quin, E. G. 1975. Old-Irish workbook. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy.Google Scholar
Ramsey, S. Robert. 1987. The languages of China. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, Julian D. 2000. Viking age England. Revised edn. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Ridouane, Rachid. 2008. “Syllables without vowels: phonetic and phonological evidence from Tashlhiyt Berber.” Phonology 25: 321–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Don. 1995. “Nominative–accusative syncretism and syntactic case.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 45–81.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don 1996a. “The mathematics of ‘Amerind’.” Diachronica 13: 135–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Don 1996b. On the chronology of sound changes in Tocharian. Vol. I. New Haven: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don 1999. “How hard is it to match CVC roots?Transactions of the Philological Society 97: 213–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Don 2002. Review of Greenberg 2000. Journal of Linguistics 38: 415–20.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don 2006. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Vol. I of A linguistic history of English. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Don, Warnow, Tandy, and Taylor, Ann. 2002. “Indo-European and computational cladistics.” Transactions of the Philological Society 100: 59–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risch, Ernst. 1974. Wortbildung der homerischen Sprache. 2nd edn. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William C., and Bhatia, Tej K (eds.). 1996. Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William C 1999. Handbook of child language acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rix, Helmut. 1992. “Zur Entstehung des lateinischen Perfektparadigmas.” In Panagl, Oswald and Krisch, Thomas (eds.), Latein und Indogermanisch. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität, pp. 221–40.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The fine structure of the left periphery.” In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar: handbook in generative syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic syntax. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas. 1995. “Comments on Bickerton's paper.” In Wekker (ed.), pp. 45–9.
Ross, Malcolm. 1997. “Social networks and kinds of speech-community event.” In Blench, Roger and Spriggs, Matthew (eds.), Archaeology and language. Vol. I: Theoretical and methodological orientations. London: Routledge, pp. 209–61.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm 1998. “Sequencing and dating linguistic events in Oceania: the linguistics / archaeology interface.” In Blench, Roger and Spriggs, Matthew (eds.), Archaeology and language. Vol. II: Archaeological data and linguistic hypotheses. London: Routledge, pp. 141–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammallahti, Pekka. 1988. “Historical phonology of the Uralic languages.” In Sinor, Denis (ed.), The Uralic languages. Leiden: Brill, pp. 478–554.Google Scholar
Sands, Bonny. 2009a. “Africa's linguistic diversity.” Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 559–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, Bonny 2009b. “Teaching and learning guide for: Africa's linguistic diversity.” Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 1357–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2002. “Linguistic outcomes of language contact.” In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter, and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 638–68.Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice. 1993. “The rate of phrase structure change in the history of Yiddish.” Language Variation and Change 5: 257–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Jacquelyn. 1996. “Maturation and the issue of universal grammar in second language acquisition.” In Ritchie and Bhatia (eds.), pp. 159–93.
Schein, Barry, and Steriade, Donca. 1986. “On geminates.” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 691–744.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 1994. “The Celtic adverbs for ‘against’ and ‘with’ and the early apocope of *-i.” Ériu 45: 151–89.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Stefan. 2004. Die keltischen Primärverben: ein vergleichendes, etymologisches und morphologisches Lexikon. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.Google Scholar
Seebold, Elmar. 1966. “Die ae. schwundstufigen Präsentien (Aoristpräsentien) der ei-Reihe.” Anglia 84: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebold, Elmar 1970. Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen starken Verben. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M., and Petitto, Laura. 1979. “Signing behavior in apes: a critical review.” Cognition 7: 177–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddiqi, Daniel. 2009. Syntax within the word. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebert, Frank. 1967. “The original home of the Proto-Algonquian people.” In Contributions to Anthropology: Linguistics I (Algonquian). Ottawa: National Museum of Canada, pp. 13–47.Google Scholar
Sihler, Andrew. 1995. New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sims-Williams, Patrick. 1984. “The double system of verbal inflexion in Old Irish.” Transactions of the Philological Society 82: 138–201.CrossRef
Singleton, Jenny L., and Newport, Elissa L. 2004. “When learners surpass their models: the acquisition of American Sign Language from inconsistent input.” Cognitive Psychology 49: 370–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slobin, Dan Isaac (ed.). 1985. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. I: The data. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan Isaac(ed.). 1992. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. III. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smyth, Herbert Weir. 1956. Greek grammar. Revised edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sommer, Ferdinand. 1948. Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre. 2nd and 3rd edns. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, Alan. 1973. The sound pattern of Ancient Greek (= Publications of the Philological Society 23). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Speyer, Augustin. 2008. “Topicalization and clash avoidance: on the interaction of prosody and syntax in English with a few spotlights on German.” Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Steinitz, Wolfgang. 1955. Geschichte des wogulischen Vokalismus. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1982. “Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification.” Dissertation, MIT.
Stetson, R. H. 1951. Motor phonetics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Stiles, Patrick. 1985. “The fate of the numeral ‘4’ in Germanic (1).” North-Western European Language Evolution 6: 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockall, Linnaea, and Marantz, Alec. 2006. “A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity.” The Mental Lexicon 1: 85–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streitberg, Wilhelm. 1920. Gotisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, Michael, and Goldstein, Louis. 2003. “Launching language: the gestural origin of discrete infinity.” In Christiansen, Morten and Kirby, Simon (eds.), Language evolution. Oxford University Press, pp. 235–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturtevant, Edgar. 1940. The pronunciation of Greek and Latin. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Surendran, Dinoj, and Niyogi, Partha. 2006. “Quantifying the functional load of phonemic oppositions, distinctive features, and suprasegmentals.” In Nedergaard Thomsen, Ole (ed.), Competing models of linguistic change: evolution and beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann. 1994. “The change from SOV to SVO in Ancient Greek.” Language Variation and Change 6: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann 1996. “A prosodic account of clitic position in Ancient Greek.” In Halpern, Aaron L. and Zwicky, Arnold M. (eds.), Approaching second. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 477–503.Google Scholar
Terrace, Herbert S., Petitto, Laura A, Sanders, R. J, and Bever, Thomas G. 1980. “On the grammatical capacity of apes.” In Nelson, Keith E. (ed.), Children's language, vol. II. New York: Gardner, pp. 371–495.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alan R. 1997. “The Welshness of Welsh English: a survey paper.” In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (ed.), The Celtic Englishes. Heidelberg: Winter, pp. 55–85.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey, and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Þórhallsdóttir, Guðrún. 1993. “The development of intervocalic *j in Proto-Germanic.” Dissertation, Cornell University.
Threatte, Leslie. 1996. The grammar of Attic inscriptions. Vol. II: Morphology. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf. 1946. A grammar of Old Irish. Revised and translated by D. A. Binchy and Osborn Bergin. Dublin: Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Trager, George L. 1930. “The pronunciation of ‘short a’ in American Standard English.” American Speech 5: 396–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trager, George L 1940. “One phonemic entity becomes two: the case of ‘short a’.” American Speech 15: 255–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trask, R. Lawrence. 1997. The history of Basque. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1983. On dialect: social and geographical perspectives. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Vaan, Michiel de. 2008. Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vajda, Edward. 2010. “A Siberian link with Na-Dene languages.” In Kari and Potter (eds.), pp. 33–99.
Veselinović, Elvira. 2003. Suppletion im irischen Verb. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač.Google Scholar
Villar, Francisco. 1997. “The Celtiberian language.” Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 49–50: 898–949.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob. 1920. Vorlesungen über Syntax, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch. Basel: E. Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Walde, Alois, and Hofmann, J. B. 1938. Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 3rd edn. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Wang, William S.-Y., and Lien, Chinfa. 1993. “Bidirectional diffusion in sound change.” In Jones, (ed.), pp. 345–400.
Wanner, Georg. 1941. Die Mundarten des Kantons Schaffhausen. Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar
Wanner, Hans, et al. 1973. Schweizerisches Idiotikon: Wörterbuch der schweizer-deutschen Sprache. Vol. XIII. Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar
Warner, Anthony. 1997. “The structure of parametric change and V-movement in the history of English.” In van Kemenade, Ans and Vincent, Nigel (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge University Press, pp. 380–93.Google Scholar
Warner, Anthony 2006. “Variation and the interpretation of change in periphrastic do.” In van Kemenade, Ans and Los, Bettelou (eds.), The handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 1963. “Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the Old Irish verb.” Celtica 6: 1–49.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert 1976. “Towards Proto-Indo-European syntax.” In Steever, Sanford B., Walker, Carol A., and Mufwene, Salikoko S. (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax. Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 305–26.Google Scholar
Wegener, Heide. 1999. “Die Pluralbilding im Deutschen: ein Versuch im Rahmen der Optimalitätstheorie.” Linguistik online 4(3). (Accessible at .)Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, and Herzog, Marvin. 1968. “A theory of language change.” In Lehmann, Winfred and Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, pp. 97–195.Google Scholar
Wekker, Herman (ed.). 1995. Creole languages and language acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wełna, Jerzy. 1980. “On gender change in linguistic borrowing (Old English).” In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Historical morphology. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 399–420.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth. 1999. “Maturation and growth of grammar.” In Ritchie and Bhatia (eds.), pp. 55–109.
Williams, Edwin. 1981. “On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’.” Linguistic Inquiry 12: 245–74.Google Scholar
Wonderly, William L. 1946. “Phonemic acculturation in Zoque.” International Journal of American linguistics 12: 92–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1907. Historical German grammar. Vol. I. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph 1910. Grammar of the Gothic language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Fei, and Pinker, Steven. 1995. “Weird past tense forms.” Journal of Child Language 22: 531–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Charles. 2002. Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles 2006. The infinite gift. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Zerdin, Jason. 2000. “Studies in the Ancient Greek verbs in -skō.” Dissertation, University of Oxford.
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1984. “Prépositions orphelines et pronoms nuls.” Recherches linguistiques 12: 46–91.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Don Ringe, University of Pennsylvania, Joseph F. Eska, Virginia College of Technology
  • Book: Historical Linguistics
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980183.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Don Ringe, University of Pennsylvania, Joseph F. Eska, Virginia College of Technology
  • Book: Historical Linguistics
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980183.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Don Ringe, University of Pennsylvania, Joseph F. Eska, Virginia College of Technology
  • Book: Historical Linguistics
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980183.015
Available formats
×