Book contents
- High-Risk Pregnancy: Management Options
- High-Risk Pregnancy: Management Options
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Prepregnancy Problems
- Section 2 Early Prenatal Problems
- Section 3 Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems
- Section 4 Problems Associated with Infection
- Chapter 24 Hepatitis Virus Infections in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 23rd July 2019)
- Chapter 25 Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 23rd July 2019)
- Chapter 26 Rubella, Measles, Mumps, Varicella, and Parvovirus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Chapter 27 Cytomegalovirus, Herpes Simplex Virus, Adenovirus, Coxsackievirus, and Human Papillomavirus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Chapter 28 Parasitic Infections in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 15th June 2018)
- Chapter 29 Other Infectious Conditions in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Section 5 Late Pregnancy – Maternal Problems
- Section 6 Late Prenatal – Obstetric Problems
- Chapter 52 Abdominal Pain in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 15th October 2018)
- Chapter 53 Nonmalignant Gynecology in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 15th October 2018)
- Chapter 54 Bleeding in Late Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 14th December 2020)
- Chapter 55 Multiple Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 14th December 2020)
- Chapter 56 Threatened and Actual Preterm Labor (Content last reviewed: 14th December 2020)
- Chapter 57 Prelabor Rupture of the Membranes (Content last reviewed: 20th February 2020)
- Chapter 58 Breech Presentation, Unstable Lie, Malpresentation, and Malpositions (Content last reviewed: 14th December 2020)
- Chapter 59 Prolonged Pregnancy
- Chapter 60 Induction of Labor and Termination of the Previable Pregnancy
- Chapter 61 Dysfunctional Labor (Content last reviewed: 20th February 2020)
- Chapter 62 Shoulder Dystocia
- Chapter 63 Fetal Compromise in Labor (Content last reviewed: 15th December 2018)
- Chapter 64 Neuraxial Analgesia and Anesthesia in Obstetrics
- Chapter 65 Perineal Repair and Pelvic Floor Injury (Content last reviewed: 20th February 2020)
- Chapter 66 Assisted Vaginal Delivery (Content last reviewed: 15th December 2018)
- Chapter 67 Delivery After Previous Cesarean Section (Content last reviewed: 20th February 2020)
- Chapter 68 Cesarean Section (Content last reviewed: 20th February 2020)
- Section 7 Postnatal Problems
- Section 8 Normal Values
- Index
- References
Chapter 67 - Delivery After Previous Cesarean Section (Content last reviewed: 20th February 2020)
from Section 6 - Late Prenatal – Obstetric Problems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 November 2017
Book contents
- High-Risk Pregnancy: Management Options
- High-Risk Pregnancy: Management Options
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Prepregnancy Problems
- Section 2 Early Prenatal Problems
- Section 3 Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems
- Section 4 Problems Associated with Infection
- Chapter 24 Hepatitis Virus Infections in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 23rd July 2019)
- Chapter 25 Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 23rd July 2019)
- Chapter 26 Rubella, Measles, Mumps, Varicella, and Parvovirus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Chapter 27 Cytomegalovirus, Herpes Simplex Virus, Adenovirus, Coxsackievirus, and Human Papillomavirus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Chapter 28 Parasitic Infections in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 15th June 2018)
- Chapter 29 Other Infectious Conditions in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Section 5 Late Pregnancy – Maternal Problems
- Section 6 Late Prenatal – Obstetric Problems
- Chapter 52 Abdominal Pain in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 15th October 2018)
- Chapter 53 Nonmalignant Gynecology in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 15th October 2018)
- Chapter 54 Bleeding in Late Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 14th December 2020)
- Chapter 55 Multiple Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 14th December 2020)
- Chapter 56 Threatened and Actual Preterm Labor (Content last reviewed: 14th December 2020)
- Chapter 57 Prelabor Rupture of the Membranes (Content last reviewed: 20th February 2020)
- Chapter 58 Breech Presentation, Unstable Lie, Malpresentation, and Malpositions (Content last reviewed: 14th December 2020)
- Chapter 59 Prolonged Pregnancy
- Chapter 60 Induction of Labor and Termination of the Previable Pregnancy
- Chapter 61 Dysfunctional Labor (Content last reviewed: 20th February 2020)
- Chapter 62 Shoulder Dystocia
- Chapter 63 Fetal Compromise in Labor (Content last reviewed: 15th December 2018)
- Chapter 64 Neuraxial Analgesia and Anesthesia in Obstetrics
- Chapter 65 Perineal Repair and Pelvic Floor Injury (Content last reviewed: 20th February 2020)
- Chapter 66 Assisted Vaginal Delivery (Content last reviewed: 15th December 2018)
- Chapter 67 Delivery After Previous Cesarean Section (Content last reviewed: 20th February 2020)
- Chapter 68 Cesarean Section (Content last reviewed: 20th February 2020)
- Section 7 Postnatal Problems
- Section 8 Normal Values
- Index
- References
Summary
Delivery by cesarean section (CS) is the most common surgical operation performed in the world. Cesarean rates vary across countries, ranging from over 50% in South American countries such as Chile, Argentina, and Brazil to over 32% in the United States and 25% of all deliveries in the United Kingdom.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- High-Risk PregnancyManagement Options, pp. 1889 - 1900Publisher: Cambridge University PressFirst published in: 2017
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Births: method of delivery. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/delivery.htm (accessed March 2017)Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Caesarean Section. NICE Clinical Guideline CG132. London: NICE, 2011. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG132 (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Troendle, J, Reddy, UM, et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 326.e1–10.Google Scholar
Hamilton, BE, Martin, JA, Ventura, SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2012; 61: 1–18.Google Scholar
Dodd, JM, Crowther, CA, Grivell, RM, Deussen, AR. Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (12): CD004906.Google Scholar
Crowther, CA, Dodd, JM, Hiller, JE, Haslam, RR, Robinson, JS; Birth After Caesarean Study Group. Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial. PLoS Med 2012; 9 (3): e1001192.Google Scholar
Law, LW, Pang, MW, Chung, TK, et al. Randomised trial of assigned mode of delivery after a previous cesarean section: impact on maternal psychological dynamics. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 1106–13.Google Scholar
Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 184: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: e217–33. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002398.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after Previous Caesarean Birth. Green-top Guideline No. 45. London: RCOG, 2015. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_45.pdf (accessed January 2018).Google Scholar
Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Guidelines for Vaginal Birth after Previous Caesarean Birth. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines No. 155. Ottawa: SOGC, 2005(reaffirmed March 2018). https://sogc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/155E-CPG-February2005.pdf (accessed January 2019).Google Scholar
Rossi, AC, D’Addario, V. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 224–31.Google Scholar
Landon, MB, Hauth, JC, Leveno, KJ, et al.; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2581–9.Google Scholar
Smith, GC, Pell, JP, Cameron, AD, Dobbie, R. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. JAMA 2002; 287: 2684–90.Google Scholar
Tan, PC, Subramaniam, RN, Omar, SZ. Labour and perinatal outcome in women at term with one previous lower-segment Caesarean: a review of 1000 consecutive cases. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 47: 31–6.Google Scholar
Signore, C, Hemachandra, A, Klebanoff, M. Neonatal mortality and morbidity after elective cesarean delivery versus routine expectant management: a decision analysis. Semin Perinatol 2006; 30: 288–95.Google Scholar
Hook, B, Kiwi, R, Amini, SB, Fanaroff, A, Hack, M. Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat cesarean section and trial of labor. Pediatrics 1997; 100: 348–53.Google Scholar
Landon, MB, Spong, CY, Thom, E, et al.; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 12–20.Google Scholar
Macones, GA, Peipert, J, Nelson, DB, et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1656–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hibbard, JU, Ismail, MA, Wang, Y, et al. Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 1365–71.Google Scholar
Grobman, WA, Lai, Y, Landon, MB, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 806–12.Google Scholar
Costantine, MM, Fox, K, Byers, BD, et al. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 1029–33.Google Scholar
Chaillet, N, Bujold, E, Dubé, E, Grobman, WA. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013; 35: 119–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoorel, EN, Melman, S, van Kuijk, SM, et al. Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate. BJOG 2014; 121: 840–7.Google Scholar
Ofir, K, Sheiner, E, Levy, A, Katz, M, Mazor, M. Uterine rupture: risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 1042–6.Google Scholar
Macones, GA, Cahill, A, Pare, E, et al. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1223–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tahseen, S, Griffiths, M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG 2010; 117: 5–19.Google Scholar
Landon, MB, Spong, CY, Thom, E, et al.; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 12–20.Google Scholar
Ritchie, EH. Pregnancy after rupture of the pregnant uterus: a report of 36 pregnancies and a study of cases reported since 1932. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1971; 78: 642–8.Google Scholar
Reyes-Ceja, L, Cabrera, R, Insfran, E, Herrera-Lasso, F. Pregnancy following previous uterine rupture: study of 19 patients. Obstet Gynecol 1969; 34: 387–9.Google Scholar
Halperin, ME, Moore, DC, Hannah, WJ. Classical versus low-segment transverse incision for preterm caesarean section: maternal complications and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 990–6.Google Scholar
Stotland, NE, Lipschitz, LS, Caughey, AB. Delivery strategies for women with a previous classic cesarean delivery: a decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 1203–8.Google Scholar
Shipp, TD, Zelop, CM, Repke, JT, et al. Intrapartum uterine rupture and dehiscence in patients with prior lower uterine segment vertical and transverse incisions. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 735–40.Google Scholar
Silver, RM, Landon, MB, Rouse, DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1226–32.Google Scholar
Burgos, J, Cobos, P, Rodríguez, L, et al. Is external cephalic version at term contraindicated in previous caesarean section? A prospective comparative cohort study. BJOG 2014; 121: 230–5.Google Scholar
Coleman, TL, Randall, H, Graves, W, Lindsay, M. Vaginal birth after cesarean among women with gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 1104–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peaceman, AM, Gersnoviez, R, Landon, MB, et al.; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1127–31.Google Scholar
Stamilio, DM, DeFranco, E, Paré, E, et al. Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1075–82.Google Scholar
Bujold, E, Mehta, SH, Bujold, C, Gauthier, RJ. Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 1199–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esposito, MA, Menihan, CA, Malee, MP. Association of interpregnancy interval with uterine scar failure in labor: a case–control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 1180–3.Google Scholar
Ophir, E, Odeh, M, Hirsch, Y, Bornstein, J. Uterine rupture during trial of labor: controversy of induction’s methods. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2012; 67: 734–45.Google Scholar
Ridgeway, JJ, Weyrich, DL, Benedetti, TJ. Fetal heart rate changes associated with uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 506–12.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Caughey, AB, Cahill, AG, Guise, JM, Rouse, DJ. Obstetric care consensus: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 179–93.Google Scholar