Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T07:36:38.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

29 - Mobilizing hard-to-survey populations to participate fully in censuses and surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

Timothy P. Olson
Affiliation:
US Census Bureau
Arturo Vargas
Affiliation:
National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Educational Fund
Jerome D. Williams
Affiliation:
Rutgers Business School
Roger Tourangeau
Affiliation:
Westat Research Organisation, Maryland
Brad Edwards
Affiliation:
Westat Research Organisation, Maryland
Timothy P. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Kirk M. Wolter
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Nancy Bates
Affiliation:
US Census Bureau
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Conducting an accurate census or survey requires active public participation. Without complete participation from all population segments, particularly among those who are hard to count, results will be skewed and not reflect the resident population’s reality. “Hard-to-count” populations are those who are less likely to participate than others in a national census or survey. Hard-to-count populations often include immigrants, those who speak a language other than the nation’s dominant language, renters, people or households living in poverty, and people who feel marginalized or abused by the prevailing society or government (see Chapter 1 in this volume). This chapter discusses how an active public engagement campaign through grass-roots community organizations can ignite participation among those least likely to participate.

Why a grass-roots campaign is critical

According to Rice and Atkin (2013), public communication campaigns are defined as purposive attempts to inform or influence behaviors of large audiences within a given time period using an organized set of communication activities and featuring an array of mediated messages in multiple channels to produce noncommercial benefits to individuals and society. In assessing the impact of public communication campaigns, they note that most experts conclude that such campaigns tend to have a modest rather than strong impact, notably on the health behaviors. There can be a multitude of factors that contribute to the limited impact of these campaigns. For example, Rice and Atkin suggest meager dissemination budgets, unsophisticated application of theory and models, poorly conceived strategic approaches, and promoting complex or difficult behaviors are among the key contributors. They also note that the difficult task of targeting resistant audience segments can be a significant factor. When considering the challenges of reaching hard-to-count population segments in the context of a census public communication campaign, this latter point certainly is a critical consideration, and for this reason alone, it makes sense to have a strong focus on grass-roots efforts.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkin, C. K. (2001). Theory and principles of media health campaigns. In Rice, R. E., & Atkin, C. K. (eds.), Public Communication Campaigns (3rd edn.) (pp. 49–68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertron, P., Barnard, N. D., & Mills, M. (1991). Racial bias in federal nutrition policy, part I: The public health implications of variations in lactase persistence. Journal of the National Medical Association, 91(3), 151–57.Google Scholar
Crews, K. (2011). Philanthropic Support for 2010 Census. Washington, DC: Funders Census Initiative. Retrieved from .Google Scholar
Han, S., & Shavitt, S. (1994). Persuasion and culture: advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(4), 326–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M., & Taeuber, C. (1964). A preliminary evaluation of the 1960 Censuses of population and housing. Demography, 1(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia. (2011). INEGI’s 2010 Census communications campaign. 13th International Regional Directors Conference, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
Kramer, K., Schwarte, L., Lafleur, M., & Williams, J. D. (2013). Targeting marketing of junk food to ethnic minority youth: fighting back with legal advocacy community empowerment. In Williams, J. D., Pasch, K. E., & Collins, C. (eds.), Advances in Communication Research to Reduce Childhood Obesity (pp. 389–405). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morello, C. (2010, April 10). Census volunteers will pile on the pressure Saturday. Washington Post. Retrieved from the Washington Post: .
National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Educational Fund. (2003). Community Empowerment Project – Voter Engagement Focus Groups Supporting Voces del Pueblo Program. Los Angeles, CA: author.Google Scholar
New York Times. (2009, September 11). Census Drops ACORN From 2010 Effort. Retrieved from .
Our Families Count. (2010). Census 2010 – Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Visibility. Retrieved from .
Paisley, W. (2001). Public communication campaigns: the American experience. In Rice, R. E., & Atkin, C. K. (eds.), Public Communication Campaigns (pp. 3–21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2010). Public Trust in Government: 1958–2010. Retrieved from .
Rice, R. E., & Atkin, C. K. (2013). Theory and principles of public communication campaigns. In Rice, R. E., & Atkin, C. E. (eds.), Public Communication Campaigns (4th edn.) (pp. 3–19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, H. B., & Ortman, J. M. (2011). Language Projections: 2010–2020. Paper presented at the Federal Forecasters Conference. Washington, DC. Retrieved from .
State of California. (2001). Counting All Californians: An Analysis of Outreach Effectiveness, ed. Contreras-Sweet, S. Maria. Retrieved from California Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency: .
US Census Bureau. (1966). 1960 Censuses of Population and Housing – Procedural History. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. (1998). Census 2000 Partnership and Marketing Program Master Plan. Retrieved from .
U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). 2000 Census Review of Partnership Program Highlights for Best Practices for Future Operations. Retrieved from .
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). Census 2000 Mail Return Rates. Retrieved from .
U.S. Census Bureau. (2012a). 2010 Census Mail Response/Return Rates Assessment Report. Retrieved from .
U.S. Census Bureau. (2012b). 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Results. Retrieved from .
U.S. Census Bureau. (2012c). Voting and Registration. Retrieved from .
U.S. Census Bureau. (2012d). The Foreign Born Population in the United States: 2010. Retrieved from .
Williams, J. D., & Henderson, G. R. (2012). Discrimination and injustice in the marketplace: they come in all sizes, shapes, and colors. In Mick, D., Pettigrew, S., Pechmann, C., & Ozanne, J. (eds.), Transformative Consumer Research for Personal and Collective Well Being: Reviews and Frontiers (pp. 171–89). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Williams, J. D., & Kumanyika, S. K. (2002). Is social marketing an effective tool to reduce health disparities?Social Marketing Quarterly, 8(4), 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. D., & Qualls, W. J. (1989). Middle-class black consumers and intensity of ethnic identification. Psychology and Marketing, 6(4), 263–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J., & Tharp, M. (2002). African Americans: ethnic roots, cultural diversity. In Tharp, M. (ed.), Marketing and Consumer Identity in Multicultural America (pp. 165–211). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×