Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T16:15:55.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Intelligence and Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Richard E. Mayer
Affiliation:
University of New Hampshire, Conant Hall, Durham
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

INTELLIGENCE AND EDUCATION

The fields of intelligence and education are so intimately bound together that it would be impossible to understand intelligence without knowing about its relation to education. Quite literally, intelligence is the child of education, because the field of intelligence testing was born from the need to develop a test that would predict children's school success (Wolf, 1973). The thesis of this chapter is that the field of education has been instrumental in challenging psychologists to develop more authentic theories of individual differences in intellectual ability and that the emerging cognitive theories of intelligence can be instrumental in reforming educational practice. In short, the study of intelligence and education provides an example of the fruitful interaction between the practical demands of educators and the basic research focus of cognitive scientists. The first section of this chapter reviews education's contributions to the study of intelligence, and the second section reviews the study of intelligence's contributions to education.

EDUCATION'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE STUDY OF INTELLIGENCE

The historical connection between intelligence and education is no accident. As mandatory public education became commonplace by the late 1800s, educators were confronted with an overwhelming observation: Students of the same chronological age displayed a range of individual differences in intellectual ability. Like other advances in psychological theory, the study of intelligence has been motivated by the practical problems of education (Mayer, 1992). In this case, the practical pedagogic problem of how to address the needs of individual students touched off a worldwide search for an “instrument to differentiate children and adolescents on the basis on their ability to learn” (Wolf, 1973, p. 139).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×