Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2017
  • Online publication date: March 2017

31 - Ensuring Competency in Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring

1. Ayres-de-Campos, D, Arteiro, D, Costa-Santos, C, et al. Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters clinicians’ interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocograph. BJOG 2011;118(8):978e84.
2. Nurani, R, Chandraharan, E, Lowe, V, et al. Misidentification of maternal heart rate as fetal on cardiotocography during the second stage of labor: the role of the fetal electrocardiograph. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scan 2012;91(12):1428e32.
3. McDonnell, S, Chandraharan, E. The pathophysiology of CTGs and types of intrapartum hypoxia. Curr Wom Health Rev 2013;9:158e68.
4. Chandraharan, E, Lowe, V, Arulkumaran, S. Pathological decelerations on CTG: time for FPS or FBS? Int J Obstet Gynecol 2012:S309.
5. Chandraharan, E, Arulkumaran, S. Prevention of birth asphyxia: responding appropriately to cardiotocograph (CTG) traces. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007;21(4):609e24.
6.Chandraharan, E, Lowe, V, Ugwumadu, A, Arulkumaran, S. Impact of fetal ECG (STAN) and competency based training on intrapartum interventions and perinatal outcomes at a teaching hospital in London: 5 year analysis. BJOG 2013;120(s1):428429.
7. Pinas, A, Chandraharan, E. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: analysis, classification and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2015;25:S1521-6934.
8. Chandraharan, E, Lowe, V, Penna, L, Ugwumadu, A, Arulkumaran, S. Does ‘process based’ training in fetal monitoring improve knowledge of cardiotocograph (CTG) among midwives and obstetricians? Book of Abstracts. Ninth RCOG International Scientific Meeting, Athens, 2011.