Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:46:02.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

David Hill
Affiliation:
Director of Ecology RPS Group plc
Matthew Fasham
Affiliation:
Principal Consultant RPS Group plc
Graham Tucker
Affiliation:
Freelance Ecologist
Michael Shewry
Affiliation:
Environmental Statistician
Philip Shaw
Affiliation:
Environmental Audit Specialist
David Hill
Affiliation:
RPS Group plc, UK
Matthew Fasham
Affiliation:
RPS Group plc, UK
Graham Tucker
Affiliation:
Ecological Solutions, UK
Michael Shewry
Affiliation:
Scottish Natural Heritage
Philip Shaw
Affiliation:
Scottish Natural Heritage
Get access

Summary

This generation is living at a time when the world's biodiversity resources have never been so impoverished. If we take the UK as an example of what has happened across many parts of the planet, since 1945, largely as a result of agricultural intensification, we have lost over 50% of our ancient lowland woodlands, 150 000 miles of hedgerow, 95% of traditional hay meadows, 80% of chalk downland and 80% of wetland fens and mires. This has given rise to massive losses in some, once very common, farmland birds: in the past 30 years 40% of Song Thrushes, 54% of Yellowhammers, a staggering 87% of Starlings and 90% of Corn Buntings have disappeared.

In addition to agricultural intensification, development pressure as a result of industrialisation, human population expansion and resultant increases in the ‘ecological footprint’ of our own species through, for example, house building, airports, seaports, road infrastructure, water supply, energy generation, waste management, freight distribution and extraction of raw materials, has taken its toll on biodiversity. The UK government's sustainable development commission recently announced that the country has a very long way to go before existing developments, and the way we manage environmental resources, can be deemed to be ‘sustainable’. This is without any consideration of the impending threat from climate change.

But it would be wrong to focus entirely on the negatives.

Type
Chapter
Information
Handbook of Biodiversity Methods
Survey, Evaluation and Monitoring
, pp. xi - xii
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×