Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T00:28:46.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Permanent Female Sterilization

from Section 2 - Gynecologic Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

By
Christinne Canela  and
Eduardo Lara-Torre
Edited by
Lisa Keder  and
Martin E. Olsen
Lisa Keder
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Martin E. Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Gynecologic Care , pp. 79 - 88
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Patil, E, Jensen, JT. Update on permanent contraception options for women. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015;27:465–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finer, LB, Henshaw, SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006;38:90–6.Google Scholar
Mosher, WD, Jones, J, Abma, JC. Intended and unintended births in the United States: 1982–2010. Natl Health Stat Report 2012;55:1–27. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr055.pdf. Retrieved January 18, 2016.Google Scholar
Daniels, K, Daugherty, J, Jones, J, Mosher, W. Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women age 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. Natl Health Stat Report 2012;86:1–14. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr086.pdf. Retrieved January 18, 2016.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 133. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Benefits and risks of sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, MS, Murphy, MA, Vitonis, AF et al. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy, and epithelial ovarian cancer in the New England case-control study. Inter Cancer 2013;133:2415–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madsen, C, Baandrup, L, Dehlendorff, C, Kjaer, SK. Tubal ligation and salpingectomy and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumors: a nationwide case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015;94:86–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creinin, MD, Zite, N. Female tubal sterilization: the time has come to routinely consider removal. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:596–9.Google Scholar
Narod, SA, Sun, P, Ghadirian, P et al. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations: a case control study. Lancet 2001;357:1467–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 620. Salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:279–81.Google Scholar
Kwon, KS, McAlpine, JN, Hanley, GE, et al. Costs and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy as an ovarian cancer prevention strategy. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125;338–45.Google Scholar
Levgur, M, Duvivier, R. Pelvic inflammatory disease after tubal sterilization: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000;55:41–50.Google Scholar
Bartz, D, Greenberg, JA. Sterilization in the United States. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1:23–32.Google Scholar
Curtis, KM, Mohllajee, AP, Peterson, HB. Regret following female sterilization at a young age: a systematic review. Contraception 2006;73:205–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, EO, Diedrich, JT, Eisenberg, DL. Surgical procedures for tubal sterilization. Glob. libr. Women’s Med. 2014. DOI 10.3843/GLOWM.10400Google Scholar
Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Hughes, JM, Wilcox, LS, Taylor, LR, Trussell, J. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S collaborative review of sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1161–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bollapragada, SS, Bandyopadhyay, S, Serle, E, Baird, C. Spontaneous pregnancy after bilateral salpingectomy. Fertil Steril 2005;83:767–8.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, MI, Edelman, AB, Kapp, N. Postpartum sterilization with the titanium clip: a systemic review. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:143–7.Google Scholar
Penfield, AJ. The Filshie clip for female sterilization: a review of world experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:485–9.Google Scholar
Dominik, R, Gates, D, Sokal, D et al. Two randomized controlled trials comparing the hulka and filshie clips for tubal sterilization. Contraception 2000;62(4):169–76.Google Scholar
Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Hughes, JM et al. The risk for ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. N Engl J Med 1997;336:762–7.Google Scholar
Malacova, E, Kemp, A, Hart, R, Jama-Alol, K, Preen, DB. Long-term risk of ectopic pregnancy varies by method of tubal sterilization: a whole–population study. Fertil Steril 2014;101:728–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adelman, MR, Dassel, MW, Sharp, HT. Management of complications encountered with Essure hysteroscopic sterilization: a systematic review. J Minn Invasive Gynecol 2014;21:733–43.Google Scholar
Moss, C, Isley, M. Sterilization: a review and update. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2015;42:713–24.Google Scholar
Essure instructions for use, www.essuremd.com/App_Themes/BaseTheme/PDFs/Link%20Essure%20IFU.pdf. Retrieved June 3, 2014.Google Scholar
www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/productsandmedicalprocedures/implantsandprosthetics/essurepermanentbirthcontrol/ucm488065.pdf. Retrieved August 27, 2017.Google Scholar
Basinski, CM. A review of clinical data for currently approved hysteroscopic sterilization procedures. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2010;3:101–10.Google Scholar
Povedano, B, Arjona, JE, Velasco, E, Monserrat, JA, Lorente, J, Castelo-Branco, C. Complications of hysteroscopic Essure(®)sterilisation: report on 4306 procedures performed in a single centre. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:795–9.Google Scholar
Jamieson, DJ, Hillis, SD, Duerr, A, Marchbanks, PA, Costello, C, Peterson, HB. Complications of Interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:997–1002.Google Scholar
Rios-Castillo, Velasco E, Arjona-Berral, JE, Povedano-Canizares, B, Castelo-Branco, C. Efficacy of Essure hysteroscopy sterilization – 5 years follow up of 1200 women. Gynecol Endolcrinol 2013;29(6):580–582.Google Scholar
Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Wilcox, LS et al. US collaborative review of sterilization working group. Pregnancy after tubal sterilization with silicone rubber band and spring clip application. Obstet Gynecol 2001;94:205–10.Google Scholar
Pölcher, M, Hauptmann, S, Fotopoulou, C et al. Opportunistic salpingectomies for the prevention of a high-grade serous carcinoma: a statement by the Kommission Ovar of the AGO. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015;292:231–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, B, Levie, MD, Childers, ME. A summary of reported pregnancies after hysteroscopic sterilization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:271–4.Google Scholar
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 615. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Access to contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:250-Google Scholar
FDA Essure risks and benefits, www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/EssurePermanentBirthControl/ucm452254.html. Retrieved March 8, 2016.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×