Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2018
  • Online publication date: February 2018

6 - Diagnostic Laparoscopy

from Section 2 - Gynecologic Surgery

Summary

Introduction

Modern “endoscopy” is relatively young, but the concept of looking inside body cavities to diagnose ailments is an ancient concept. Its development was truly limited by entry and cavity expansion techniques, illumination of interior spaces, and technological development of instrumentation to enhance visualization. In order to understand the current status of these tremendously valuable techniques, it is important to review its origins and progress over time.

Evidence from more than 3,500 years suggests that ancient Egyptians had tried to develop techniques to look into the body to discover what was causing problems and to reveal disease processes. This curiosity never stopped. The Chinese in 1600 BC introduced catheters as a means of collecting samples and furthering diagnostic techniques. Indian medical treatises dating back to 600 BC show evidence of the development of speculum-like devices to look into the inner ear, nostrils, and other cavities. The Romans and Greeks also made contributions. Hippocrates is thought to be the father of “minimally invasive” medical application. He was also able to describe some of the earliest endoscopic procedures circa 400 BC in his publication The Art of Medicine which describes utilization of speculums and instruments to cure anal rectal hemorrhoids (1, 2).

Abdominal entry was a little more delicate issue and was not really described until much later in history. In 40–50 BC the Greeks again pushed the issue by proceeding to utilize abdominal surgical procedures to address digestive concerns. The incisions got smaller and smaller and surgeons eventually turned to the umbilicus to achieve visualization into the abdomen utilizing specially designed catheters inserted with speculums specifically designed to insert the catheters. These historic sources sound somewhat similar to current techniques (3).

While such procedures allowed for sampling of abdominal contents, direct visualization was still limited by cavity expansion and illumination. Early pioneers utilized candles and mirrors to assist in solving these issues. However, it was a surgeon from Cordoba, Spain, who changed surgery permanently. Abu-al-Qasim was one of the greatest surgeons and philosopher-scientists of the pre-modern era (936–1013 CE). His innovations served as foundational for surgical principles throughout Europe and Eurasia. Al-Qasim's contributions included his 30-volume medical encyclopedia Al-Tasrif (The Method) which clearly describes many more modern surgical techniques including endoscopic procedures and revolutionary instrumentation such as cannulas and grooved needles.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
1. Nezhat History of Endoscopy, Society for Laparoscopy Surgeons. http://sls.org/project/nezhats-history-of-endoscopy/
2. Daniilidis, A, Hatzis, P, Pratilas, G, Loufopoulos, PD Dinas, K. Laparoscopy in Gynecology; How, Why, When, ed. Darwish, A, Chapter 3 – in Advanced gynecologic endoscopy. 2011 Retrieved from www.intechopen.com/books/advanced-gynecologic-endoscopy
3. Page, BJ, Ocampo, J, Nutis, M, Luciano, AA. History of modern operative laparoscopy. In: 2008 Nezhat's Operative Gynecologic Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy, 3rd ed. Nezhat, Camran, Nezhat, Farr, and Nezhat, Ceana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Hippocrates. The Art of Medicine, Mann, JE, March 2012, 9789004224292.
5. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 439. Informed Consent, 2009; 114:401–8.
6. Childers, R, Lipsett, PA, Pawlik, TM. Informed consent and the surgeon. J Am Coll. Surg 2009; 208 ( 4 ): 627–34.
7. ACOG. You asked we answer (informed consent).
8. Making health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices, Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 211. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2013. Report No.: 13-E001-EF.
9. Joint Commission, Universal Protocol 2016 National Patient Safety Goals, www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/npsgs.aspx
10. Cabras F, Lazzara F, Ristovich L, Lever M, Pignata G. Chapter 8, Gynecology in Laparoscopic Surgery. Pignata G, Bracale U, Lazzara F, eds. 2016 Springer International Publishing, Switzerland
11. Gerges, FJ, Kanazi, GE, Khoury, SI Jabbour. Anesthesia for laparoscopy: a review. J Clin Anesth. 2006 Feb; 18(1):67–78.
12. Sukhu, T, Krupski, TL. Patient positioning and prevention of injuries in patients undergoing laparoscopic and robot-assisted urologic procedures. Curr Urol Rep. 2014 Apr;15(4):398. doi: 10.1007/s11934-014-0398-1.
13. Arnold, A, Aitchison, LP, Abbott, J. Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation for abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgery: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jul–Aug;22(5):737–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.003. Epub Apr 13, 2015.
14. Shaher, Z. Port closure techniques. Surg Endosc. 2007 Aug;21(8):1264–74. Epub Feb 7, 2007.
15. Ahmad, G, Gent, D, Henderson, D, O'Flynn, H, Phillips, K. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Watson: A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 31;8:CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub4.
16. Binda, MM. Humidification during laparoscopic surgery: overview of the clinical benefits of using humidified gas during laparoscopic surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Nov;292(5):955–71. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3717-y. Epub Apr 25, 2015.
17. Yu T, Chen Y, Wang X, et al. Gases for establishing pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(6), doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009569.pub3.
18. Speakers give sound advice. Syracuse Post Standard, p. 18. March 28, 1911.
19. Pneumoperitoneum Ott D. http://laparoscopy.blogs.com/prevention_management_3rd edition.
20. Wamsteker, K. Documentation in laparoscopic surgery. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Sep;3(3):625–47.
21. Indman, PD. Documentation in endoscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995 Sep;22(3):605–16.
22. Chapelle, CF la, Swank, HA, Wessels, ME, Mol, BW, Rubinstein, SM, Jansen, FW. Trocar types in laparoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec;16;12:CD009814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009814.pub2.
23. Chapron, C, Querleu, D, Bruhat, MA et al. Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. Hum Reprod. 1998 Apr;13(4):867–72.
24. Gandhi, TK, Sittig, DF, Franklin, M, Sussman, AJ, Fairchild, DG, Bates, DW. Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Sep;15(9): 626–631. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91119.x PMCID: PMC1495590
25. Postoperative care – WHO www.who.int/surgery/publications/Postoperativecare.pdf