Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:14:07.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Healthcare ethics committees and the law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

D. Micah Hester
Affiliation:
Division of Medical Humanities, University of Arkansas
Toby Schonfeld
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Objectives

  1. To become familiar with laws that mandate the creation and use of some ethics committees.

  2. To become familiar with the areas of law that afect ethics committees’ deliberations.

  3. To understand the importance of becoming familiar with your own state’s law.

Case

Tina is an 11-year-old HIV+ girl. She acquired her HIV at birth, from her infected mother, Barbara. (Barbara had not sought medical care during her pregnancy.) Barbara and Tina moved into the community shortly after Tina’s birth, and since then Barbara has been bringing Tina to the hospital’s outpatient pediatrics clinic for HIV treatment and drugs. (Barbara sees a different physician.)

Tina’s viral load is well controlled. Because Tina has been visiting the clinic since before she can remember, she regards her trips there as a normal part of life, and has never questioned them. The clinical team has asked for an ethics consult because Barbara has never told Tina the nature of her illness, and has forbidden the team from informing her, either. Tina’s physicians are concerned that Tina may soon become sexually active; they want her to understand about her HIV status and the risks of transmission. They also point out that Tina is approaching the age at which she could consent on her own to simple medical treatments; they argue that she ought to know her HIV status in order to be able to communicate it to caregivers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pope, TM 2008 Involuntary passive euthanasia in US courts: reassessing the judicial treatment of medical futility casesMarquette Elder's Advisor 9 229Google Scholar
Pope, TM 2011 Legal Briefing: Healthcare Ethics CommitteesJ Clin Ethics 22 74Google ScholarPubMed
http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/coveredentities/provider_ffg.pdf

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×