Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T17:23:34.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Marx, Keynes, and social change: is post-Keynesian theory neo-Marxist?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Get access

Summary

Introduction

The recent criticism of the neoclassical approach to economic analysis has come from a number of diversified areas. There has been a tendency to view these competing theories as a homogeneous group. This is correct in the sense that all present negative criticism of orthodox theory as represented either by Arrow-Debreu or the aggregate production function simplifications of the “neo-neoclassics.” From this “negative” homogeneity it has been suggested that all can be grouped with the name of Marx or considered as neo-Marxist (Harcourt and Nell, 1970).

Strict Marxists, however distinguish their own positions, first on the grounds of theoretical differences, but more importantly, on prescriptions for social change. Thus the anomaly that while all the non-neoclassical theories are said to be neo-Marxian, only “true” Marxist theory is supposed to possess the basic requirements necessary for valid political assessments of economic reality and to yield meaningful implications for social change. This chapter considers the post-Keynesian and Marxist approaches, and attempts to show that while the two lines have a surprisingly large number of theoretical similarities, they are only superficial. There is, however a strong common ground to be found between them and it is precisely in the implications of the two approaches for social change.

For some Keynesians this should not be surprising since Joan Robinson showed long ago that Keynes's theory could have what she jokingly called a distinctly “pinkish” hue. The implicit contention is that the affinity between Keynes and Marx, surprisingly, turns out to lie in the implications for social change rather than in the theoretical underpinning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Growth, Profits and Property
Essays in the Revival of Political Economy
, pp. 267 - 275
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×