Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T21:35:05.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Comparing copulations of chimpanzees and bonobos: do females exhibit proceptivity or receptivity?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Linda F. Marchant
Affiliation:
Miami University
Toshisada Nishida
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (P. paniscus) have a similar social structure (patrilineal multi-male and multi-female social unit; Itani, 1985). However, bonobos exhibit quite different copulatory activities from other non-human primates, including chimpanzees: (1) bonobos copulate more often than other anthropoid apes (Kano, 1989); (2) bonobos copulate in varied postures (Savage-Rumbaugh & Wilkerson, 1978); (3) copulationlike behavior often occurs in other social contexts (Kano, 1980; de Waal, 1989); (4) female bonobos exhibit lengthy estrus (Dahl, 1986); (5) suckling mothers resume sexual cycling within a year after giving birth (Kano, 1992). Some authors (e.g. Blount, 1990) have discussed these features in connection with the evolution of the sexuality of human females.

However, how different is the sexual behavior of bonobos from that of chimpanzees in the wild? Here, we compare the copulatory behavior of these two species, based on previous reports and on our field studies.

BACKGROUND

In the Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania, the chimpanzees of M group have been observed since 1965. The group contained about 100 individuals in 1981 (see table 3 in Nishida et al., 1990). The adult sex ratio (10 : 39) was significantly skewed toward females compared with the expected ratio of 1 : 1 (Chi-squared = 17.2, df = 1, p < 0.001; for discussion of this tendency, see Hiraiwa-Hasegawa et al., 1984; Nishida et al., 1990).

Type
Chapter
Information
Great Ape Societies , pp. 146 - 156
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×