Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: September 2011

10 - The WTO as a ‘living instrument’: the contribution of consensus decision-making and informality to institutional norms and practices

Summary

Introduction

The Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the WTO (the WTO Agreement) and the annexed multilateral trade agreements, while firmly rooted in treaty law and representative of a set of binding obligations between the members, are nevertheless evolutionary in character. By this I mean that they are capable of adaptation and further development. They therefore constitute a ‘living instrument’. Characteristic of this are the various practices and customs that exist in the WTO, which are generated, or supplemented, by the practice of members in the institutional sphere. Normatively speaking, they form part of the ‘established practice of the organization’ and are considered as ‘rules of the organization’ in the sense of Article 2:1(j) VCLTIO. The two ‘aides-de-camp’ in this development are consensus decision-making and informality, both of which act as agents of incremental change and contribute to keeping the WTO alive.

This chapter begins with a brief explanation of what is meant by describing the WTO as a living instrument, where institutional practices and institutional norms contribute to the organisation's further development. It then focuses on the role of consensus decision-making and the way in which informality has operated in the process of collective decision-making under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization (GATT/WTO) and its effects on that process. First, during the GATT era, informal processes gradually gave way to more formal ones.

References
Blackhurst, Richard 2001. ‘Reforming WTO decision-making: lessons from Singapore and Seattle’, in Deutsch, Klaus Günter and Speyer, Bernhard (eds.), The World Trade Organization Millennium Round: Freer Trade in the Twenty-First Century. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 295–310.
Blackhurst, Richard and Hartridge, David 2004. ‘Improving the capacity of WTO institutions to fulfil their mandate’, Journal of International Economic Law 7(3): 705–16.
Brölmann, Catherine 2007. The Institutional Veil in Public International Law: International Organisations and the Law of Treaties. Oxford: Hart.
Brunnée, Jutta 2005. ‘Reweaving the fabric of international law? Patterns of consent in environmental framework agreements’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Röben, Volker (eds.), Developments of International Law in Treaty-Making. Berlin: Springer, pp. 101–26.
Buzan, Barry 1980.‘“United we stand …”: informal negotiating groups at UNCLOS III’, Marine Policy 4(3): 183–204.
Buzan, Barry 1981. ‘Negotiating by consensus: developments in technique at the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea’, American Journal of International Law 75(2): 324–48.
Churchill, Robin R. and Ulfstein, Geir 2000. ‘Autonomous institutional arrangements in multilateral environmental agreements: a little-noticed phenomenon in international law’, American Journal of International Law 94(4): 623–59.
Cottier, Thomas 2006. ‘Preparing for structural reform in the WTO’, Journal of International Economic Law 10(3): 497–508.
Dymond, William A. and Hart, Michael M. 2000. ‘Post-modern trade policy: reflections on the challenges to multilateral trade negotiations after Seattle’, Journal of World Trade 34(3): 21–38.
Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter and Ehring, Lothar 2005. ‘Decision-making in the World Trade Organization: is the consensus practice of the World Trade Organization adequate for making, revising and implementing rules of international trade?’, Journal of International Economic Law 8(1): 51–76.
Elsig, Manfred 2006. ‘Different facets of power in decision-making in the WTO’, NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper No. 23.
Engel, Salo 1967. ‘“Living” international constitutions and the world court (the subsequent practice of international organs under their constituent instruments)’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 16(4): 865–910.
Feuerle, Loie 1985/1986. ‘Informal consultation: a mechanism in Security Council decision-making’, NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 18: 267–308.
Finlayson, Jock A. and Zacher, Mark W. 1983. ‘The GATT and the regulation of trade barriers: regime dynamics and functions’, in Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.), International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 273–314.
Footer, Mary E. 1997. ‘The role of consensus in GATT/WTO decision-making’, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 17(2/3): 653–80.
Footer, Mary E. 2006. An Institutional and Normative Analysis of the World Trade Organization. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
,GATT. 1994. Analytical Index Guide to GATT Law and Practice, GATT/LEG/2, 6th edition. Geneva: GATT.
Georgiev, Dencho 2003. ‘The decision-making process in the World Trade Organization’, in Borght, Kim (ed.) with Remacle, Eric and Wiener, Jarrod (ass. eds.), Essays on the Future of the WTO: Finding a New Balance. London: Cameron May, pp. 25–46.
Jackson, John H. 1969. World Trade and the Law of GATT. Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Company (The Bobbs-Merill Company, Inc.).
Jennings, Robert and Watts, Arthur 1992. Oppenheim's International Law, 9th edn. London: Longman.
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S.. 2001. ‘The club model of multilateral co-operation and problems of democratic legitimacy’, in Porter, Roger B.et al. (eds.), Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 264–94
Krajewski, Markus 2000. ‘From “green room” to “glass room”: participation of developing countries and internal transparency in the WTO decision making process’, A Trade Watch Paper, Bonn: Germanwatch.
Lal Das, Bhagirath 2010. ‘Why the WTO decision-making system of “consensus” works against the South’, extract from Bhagirath Lal Das, Strengthening Developing Countries in the WTO (Penang: Third World Network), available at www.twnside.org.sg/title/td8.htm.
McNair, Arnold 1930. ‘The functions and differing legal character of treaties’, British Year Book of International Law 11: 100–18
Narlikar, Amrita 2001. ‘WTO decision-making and developing countries’, Trade-Related Agenda, Development and Equity' (TRADE) Working Paper No. 11, Geneva: South Centre.
Odell, John S. 2006. ‘Introduction’, in Odell, John S. (ed.), Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–40.
Patel, Mayur 2007. ‘New faces in the green room: developing country coalitions and decision-making in the WTO’, Global Economic Governance Project, GEG Working Paper No. 33.
Pauwelyn, Joost 2002. ‘The nature of WTO obligations’, New York University School of Law, Jean Monnet Working Papers No. 1.
Pauwelyn, Joost 2005. ‘The transformation of world trade’, Michigan Law Review 104(1): 1–70.
Schott, Jeffrey J. 2004. ‘The WTO after Cancún’, Paper presented at the Conference on ‘Sustainable Development in the WTO: Trade, Investment and Environment after Cancún’, London, RIIA, 23 February.
Sharma, Shefali 2003. ‘The decision-making process and the single undertaking’, Paper presented at the WTO Public Symposium, Geneva, in a Panel on ‘Investment in the WTO? Myth and realities’ (http://iatp.org/phplist/genevaupdate.php?id-4077).
Skubiszweski, Krzysztof 1965. ‘The elaboration of general multilateral conventions and of non-contractual instruments having a normative function or objective, resolutions of the General Assembly of the United Nations: provisional report’, Annuaire de l'Institut de Droit International 61: 154–8.
Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. ‘In the shadow of law or power? Consensus-based bargaining and outcomes in the GATT/WTO’, International Organization 56(2): 339–74.
Sutherland, Peter, Bhagwat, Jagdish, Botchwey, Kwesi, Fitzgerald, Niall, Hamada, Koichi and Jackson, John H. 2004. The Future of the WTO – Addressing Institutional Challenges in the New Millennium. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
Szasz, Paul 1979. ‘Improving the international legislative process’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 9: 519–33.
Tijmes-Lhl, Jaime 2009. ‘Consensus and majority voting in the WTO’, World Trade Review 8(3): 417–38.
,Warwick Commission 2007. The Multilateral Trade Regime: Which Way Forward? The Report of the First Warwick Commission, University of Warwick.
Weiss, Friedl 2003. ‘WTO decision-making: is it reformable?’ in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec. Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–80.
Wolfe, Robert 2008. ‘Canada's adventures in clubland: trade clubs and political influence’, in Daudelin, Jean and Schwanen, Daniel (eds.), Canada among Nations 2007: Room for Manoeuvre. Montreal and Kingston: McGill–Queen's University Press, pp. 181–97.
Wolfrum, Rüdiger 2005, ‘Introduction’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Röben, Volker (eds.), Developments of International Law in Treaty Making. Berlin: Springer, pp. 1–13.
,WTO Secretariat 1997. OMC/WTO Rules of Procedure for Meetings of WTO Bodies. Geneva: WTO Secretariat.
Zemanek, Karl 1993. ‘Majority rule and consensus technique in law-making diplomacy’, in Macdonald, R. St. J. and Johnston, Douglas M. (eds.), The Structure and Process of International Law. Dordrecht, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 857–87.