Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Access
  • Open access
  • Print publication year: 2020
  • Online publication date: June 2020

6 - Carbon Pricing

from Part II - Coherence and Management in the Climate-Energy Nexus
  • View HTML
    • Send chapter to Kindle

      To send this chapter to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Available formats
      ×

      Send chapter to Dropbox

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Available formats
      ×

      Send chapter to Google Drive

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Available formats
      ×

Summary

International institutions established to promote carbon pricing and carbon markets (including carbon taxation, emissions trading and offsets) constitute a rapidly growing alphabet soup of acronyms straddling the boundaries between public and private organisations. All institutions within the carbon pricing sub-field subscribe to the norm that climate change should be addressed through placing a price on emissions. The various institutions perform different roles. While several of the private institutions set standards and commitments regulating how private actors should trade emission allowances and offset emissions, public and hybrid institutions tend to play information dissemination and networking roles focused on supporting political decisions to implement carbon pricing and to link carbon markets. The carbon pricing sub-field is characterised by coordination or co-existence, with significant attempts to establish a division of labour, and only little outright competition or conflict. Focusing on the interlinkages between the UNFCCC and the World Bank institutions that address carbon pricing, we found that also the relationships between these two particular sides are characterised by close coordination. This coordination is informed by cognitive and normative interaction mechanisms, while differences between both sides are managed in a bottom-up, incremental manner.

6.7
Abbott, K. W. 2012. The Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change. Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy 30(4), 571590.
Aldy, J. and Stavins, R. 2012. The Promise and Problems of Pricing Carbon. Journal of Environment & Development 21(2), 152180.
Alter, K. J. and Meunier, S. 2009. The Politics of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7(1), 1324.
Andersen, M. S. and Ekins, P. 2009. Carbon-Energy Taxation: Lessons from Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ATAG (Air Transport Action Group). 2016. Aviation Industry Views on CORSIA. Available at aviationbenefits.org/media/165859/Industry-position-paper_A39.pdf.
Ball, J. 2018. Why Carbon Pricing Isn’t Working; Good Idea in Theory, Failing in Practice. Foreign Affairs, July/August 2018.
Benwell, R. 2009. Voluntary Aspects of Carbon Emissions Trading. International Journal of Environmental Studies 66(5), 605618.
Bernstein, S. F. 2001. The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Betsill, M. and Hoffmann, M. J. 2011. The Contours of ‘Cap and Trade’: The Evolution of Emissions Trading Systems for Greenhouse Gases. Review of Policy Research 28(1), 83106.
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., et al. 2009. The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis. Global Environmental Politics 9(4), 1440.
Busch, P.-O. 2009. The Climate Secretariat: Making a Living in a Straitjacket. In Managers of Global Change, edited by Biermann, F. and Siebenhüner, B.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Choi, A. S. 2015. An Experimental Study to Explore WTP for Aviation Carbon Offsets: The Impact of a Carbon Tax on the Voluntary Action. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management 58(9), 16171634.
Coase, R. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3(1), 144.
Felli, R. 2015. Environment, not Planning: The Neoliberal Depoliticisation of Environmental Policy by Means of Emissions Trading. Environmental Politics 24(5), 641660.
Gallagher, K. P. and Yuan, F. 2017. Standardizing Sustainable Development: A Comparison of Development Banks in the Americas. Journal of Environment and Development 26(3), 243271.
Harrison, K. 2010. The Comparative Politics of Carbon Taxation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6, 507529.
Harrison, K. 2012. A Tale of Two Taxes: The Fate of Environmental Tax Reform in Canada. Review of Policy Research 29(3), 383407.
IATA (International Air Transport Association). 2009. IATA Press Release: First industry-wide program offers transparency and credible projects. Available at www.iata.org/pressroom/pr/Pages/2009-06-05-01.aspx.
ICAP (International Carbon Action Partnership). 2016. Emissions Trading in Practice: A Handbook on Design and Implementation. Available at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/23874/ETP.pdf?sequence=11&isAllowed=y.
IETA (International Emissions Trading Association). 2015. IETA’s Views on the European Commission’s Revision of the EU ETS Directive for the Post-2020 Period. Available at www.ieta.org/resources/EU/EU_2016/ETS%20revision%20Ph%204/IETA_position_paper_ETS_Revision_Final.pdf.
Jacobs, M. 1997. Sustainability and Markets: On the Neoclassical Model of Environmental Economics. New Political Economy 2(3), 365385.
Jinnah, S. 2014. Post-Treaty Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kansy, T. 2016. Making the Links between Carbon Markets in a Post-Paris world. Available at blogs.worldbank.org/climatechange/print/making-links-between-carbon-markets-in-a-post-paris-world.
Keohane, R. O. and Victor, D. G. 2011. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1) 723.
Lane, R. and Newell, P. 2016. The Political Economy of Carbon Markets. In The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy, edited by Van de Graaf, T., Sovacool, B. K., Ghosh, A., Kern, F., and Klare, M. T.. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lazarowicz, M. 2009. Global Carbon Trading – A Framework for Reducing Emissions. London: UK Government.
Lederer, M. 2012. Market Making via Regulation: The Role of the State in Carbon Markets. Regulation and Governance 6(4), 524544.
Lyon, T. P. and Maxwell, J. W. 2003. Self-Regulation, Taxation and Public Voluntary Environmental Agreements. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 14531486.
Lyon, T. P. and Maxwell, J. W. 2007. Environmental Public Voluntary Programs Reconsidered. Policy Studies Journal 35(4), 723750.
Marcu, A. 2016. Carbon Market Provisions in the Paris Agreement (Article 6). CEPS Special Report: No 128. Brussells: Centre for European Policy Studies.
Meckling, J. 2011a. Carbon Coalitions: Business, Climate Politics, and the Rise of Emissions Trading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Meckling, J. 2011b. The Globalization of Carbon Trading: Transnational Business Coalitions in Climate Politics. Global Environmental Politics 11(2), 2650.
Meckling, J. and Jenner, S. 2016. Varieties of Market-Based Policy: Instrument Choice in Climate Policy. Environmental Politics 25(5), 853874.
NCM (Networked Carbon Markets). 2017. Networked Carbon Markets. Available at www.worldbank.org/en/topic/climatechange/brief/globally-networked-carbon-markets.
Newell, P. and Paterson, M. 2010. Climate Capitalism: Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nielson, D. L. and Tierney, M. J. 2005. Theory, Data, and Hypothesis Testing: World Bank Environmental Reform Redux. International Organization 59(3), 785800.
Nordhaus, W. D. 2008. A Question of Balance – Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1974. Recommendation of the Council on the Implementation of the Polluter-Pays Principle. OECD/Legal/0132. Available at https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/11.
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons – The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Park, S. 2005. Norm Diffusion within International Organizations: A Case Study of the World Bank. Journal of International Relations and Development 8(2), 111141.
Park, S. 2010. World Bank Group interactions with Environmentalists: Changing International Organisation Identities. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
Paterson, M. 2012. Who and What are Carbon Markets for? Politics and the Development of Climate Policy. Climate Policy (Earthscan) 12(1), 8297.
Paterson, M., Hoffmann, M., et al. 2014. The Micro Foundations of Policy Diffusion Toward Complex Global Governance: An Analysis of the Transnational Carbon Emission Trading Network. Comparative Political Studies 47(3), 420449.
PMR (Partnership for Market Readiness). 2017. Supporting Action for Climate Change Mitigation, Available at www.thepmr.org/system/files/documents/PMRbooklet_1-2017.pdf.
Pigou, A. C. 1932. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.
Rabe, B. G. and Borick, C. P. 2012. Carbon Taxation and Policy Labeling: Experience from American States and Canadian Provinces. Review of Policy Research 29(3), 358382.
Sanderink, L., Pattberg, P., et al. 2016. Mapping the Institutional Architecture of the Climate-Energy Nexus. Amsterdam: IVM Institute for Environmental Studies.
Segerson, K. 2013. Voluntary Approaches to Environmental Protection and Resource Management. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 5(1), 161180.
Skjærseth, J. B. and Wettestad, J. 2008. EU Emissions Trading – Initiation, Decision-making and Implementation. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Skovgaard, J., Sacks Ferrari, S., and Knaggård, Å. 2019. Mapping and Clustering the Adoption of Carbon Pricing Policies – What Polities Price Carbon and Why? Climate Policy 19(9), 11731185.
Stephan, B. and Paterson, M. 2012. The Politics of Carbon Markets. Environmental Politics 21(4), 545562.
Sterner, T. and Coria, J. 2012. Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management. Washington, DC: RFF Press.
Stokke, O. S. 2001. The Interplay of International Regimes: Putting Effectiveness Theory to Work. FNI Report. Oslo: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
Tol, R. S. J. 2011. The Social Cost of Carbon. Annual Review of Resource Economics 3, 419443.
UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). 2015. Decision 1/CP.21 Paris Agreement.
VCS (Verified Carbon Standard). 2018. The VCS Program. Available at www.v-c-s.org/project/vcs-program.
World Bank. 2012. The State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2012. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. 2014. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2014. Washington, DC: The World Bank, Ecofys and Vivideconomics.
World Bank. 2018a. Pricing Carbon. Available at: www.worldbank.org/en/programs/pricing-carbon.
World Bank. 2018b. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2018. Washington, DC: The World Bank, Ecofys and Vivideconomics.