Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Access
  • Open access
  • Print publication year: 2018
  • Online publication date: May 2018

20 - Governing Climate Change

from Part V - Synthesis and Conclusions
  • View HTML
    • Send chapter to Kindle

      To send this chapter to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Available formats
      ×

      Send chapter to Dropbox

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Available formats
      ×

      Send chapter to Google Drive

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Available formats
      ×
Abbott, K. (2012). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 571590.
Andersson, K. and Ostrom, E. (2008). Analysing decentralised resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sciences, 41(1), 7193.
Andonova, L., Hale, T. and Roger, C. (2017) National policy and transnational governance of climate change. International Studies Quarterly, 61(2), 253268.
Averchenkova, A., Fankhauser, S. and Nachmany, M. (2017). Introduction. In Trends in Climate Change Legislation, ed. Averchenkova, A., Fankhauser, S. and Nachmany, M.. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1936.
Bäckstrand, K. and Kuyper, J. (2017) The democratic legitimacy of orchestration: the UNFCCC, non-state actors, and transnational climate governance. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 764788.
Bang, G., Hovi, J. and Skodvin, T. (2016) The Paris Agreement: short term and long term effectiveness. Politics and Governance, 4(3), 209218.
Bansard, J., Pattberg, P. and Widerberg, O. (2016). Cities to the rescue? Assessing the performance of transnational municipal networks in global climate governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(2), 229246.
Benson, D., Jordan, A. and Smith, L. (2013) Is environmental management really more collaborative? Environment & Planning A, 45, 16951712.
Betsill, M., Dubash, N. and Paterson, M. et al. (2015). Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader global climate governance landscape. Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 110.
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L. and Bäckstrand, K. et al. (2012). Governing climate change transnationally: assessing the evidence from a database of sixty initiatives. Environment & Planning C, 30(4), 591612.
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L. and Betsill, M. et al. (2014). Transnational Climate Change Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bulkeley, H. and Newell, P. (2010). Governing Climate Change. London: Routledge.
Castro, P. (2016). Common but differentiated responsibilities beyond the nation state: how is differential treatment addressed in transnational climate governance initiatives? Transnational Environmental Law, 5(2), 379400.
Chan, S., Falkner, R., Goldberg, M. and van Asselt, H. (2018). Effective and geographically balanced? An output-based assessment of non-state climate actions. Climate Policy, 18(1), 2435.
Cole, D. (2015). Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Climate Change, 5(2), 114118.
Dorsch, M. and Flachsland, C. (2017). A polycentric approach to global climate governance. Global Environmental Change, 17(2), 4564.
Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics, International Affairs, 92(5), 11071125.
Fankhauser, S., Gennaiolia, C. and Collins, M. (2015a). The political economy of passing climate change legislation: evidence from a survey. Global Environmental Change, 35, 5261.
Fankhauser, S., Gennaiolia, C. and Collins, M. (2015b). Do international factors influence the passage of climate change legislation? Climate Policy, 16(3), 318331.
Fleig, A., Schmidt, N. and Tosun, J. (2017). Legislative dynamics of mitigation and adaptation framework policies in the EU. European Policy Analysis, 3(1), 101124.
Galaz, V., Crona, B., Osterblom, H., Olsson, P. and Folke, C. (2012). Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries. Ecological Economics, 81, 2132.
Gerring, J. (2012). Mere description. British Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 721746.
Gies, E. (2017). Business leads where US falters. Nature Climate Change, 7(8), 543546.
Green, J. (2014). Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gupta, A. and van Asselt, H. (2017). Transparency in multilateral climate politics: furthering (or distracting from) accountability? Regulation & Governance, in press.
Hale, T. (2016). ‘All hands on deck’: the Paris Agreement and non-state climate action. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 1221.
Hale, T. and Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Review of International Organizations, 9(1), 5982.
Hickmann, T. (2017). The reconfiguration of authority in global climate governance. International Studies Review, 19(3), 430451.
Hoffmann, M. (2011). Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hsu, A., Whitehouse, A. and Schwarz, J. (2015). Towards a new climate diplomacy. Nature Climate Change, 5(6), 501503.
Jordan, A. and Huitema, D. (2014a). Innovations in climate policy: conclusions and new directions. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 906925.
Jordan, A. and Huitema, D. (2014b). Policy innovation in a changing climate: sources, patterns and effects. Global Environmental Change, 29, 387394.
Jordan, A., Huitema, D. and Hildén, M. et al. (2015). The emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change, 5(11), 977982.
Keohane, R. and Victor, D. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 723.
Kim, R. (2013). The emergent network structure of the multilateral environmental agreement system. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 980991.
Kivimaa, P., Hildén, M., Huitema, D., Jordan, A. and Newig, J. (2017). Experiments in climate governance – A systematic review of research on energy and built environment transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 1729.
Mansbridge, J. (2014). The role of the state in governing the commons. Environmental Science and Policy, 36, 810.
McFadgen, B. and Huitema, D. (2017a). Stimulating learning through policy experimentation: a multi-case analysis of how design influences policy learning outcomes in experiments for climate adaptation. Water, 9(9), 648.
McFadgen, B. and Huitema, D. (forthcoming 2017b). Experimentation at the interface of science and policy: a multi-case analysis of how policy experiments influence political decision-makers. Policy Sciences, in press.
McGinnis, M. (2016). Polycentric Governance in Theory and Practice. Paper presented at the Polycentricity Workshop, Indiana University Bloomington, 1417 December 2015.
Millar, R., Fugelsvedt, J., Friedlingstein, P. and Rogelj, J. et al. (2017). Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 degrees. Nature Geoscience, 10, 741747.
Oberthür, S. and Gehring, T. (eds.). (2006). Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Oberthür, S. and Stokke, O. (eds.). (2011). Managing Institutional Complexity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ostrom, E. (1999) Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278282.
Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(39), 1518115187.
Ostrom, E. (2009). A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, 5095.
Ostrom, E. (2010a). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550557.
Ostrom, E. (2010b). A long polycentric journey. Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 123.
Ostrom, E. (2014). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Annals of Economics and Finance, 15(1), 97134.
Paterson, M., Hoffmann, M., Betsill, M. and Bernstein, S. (2014) The micro-foundations of policy diffusion toward complex global governance. Comparative Political Studies, 47(3), 420449.
Putnam, R. (1988). The logic of two level games. International Organisation, 42(3), 427460.
Rockman, B. A. (2017). The melting down of government: a multi-decade perspective. Governance, 30(1), 2935.
Roger, C., Hale, T. and Andonova, L. (2017). The comparative politics of transnational climate governance. International Interactions, 43(1), 125.
Saerbeck, B., Jörgensen, K. and Jänicke, M. (2017). Multi-level climate governance: the global system and selected subsystems. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27( 2), 105107.
Schmidt, V. (2012). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union. In The Oxford Handbook of the European Union, ed. Jones, E., Menon, A. and Weatherill, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 661765.
Schoenefeld, J. and Jordan, A. (2017a). Governing policy evaluation? Towards a new typology. Evaluation, 23(3), 274293.
Schoenefeld, J., Hildén, M. and Jordan, A. (2018). The challenges of monitoring national climate policy: learning lessons from the EU. Climate Policy, 18(1), 118128.
Tarko, V. (2017). Elinor Ostrom: An Intellectual Journey. London and New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
van Asselt, H. (2016). The role of non-state actors in reviewing ambition, implementation, and compliance under the Paris Agreement. Climate Law, 6(1), 91108.
van der Ven, H., Bernstein, S. and Hoffmann, M. (2017). Valuing the contributions of nonstate and subnational actors to climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17(1), 120.
Watts, M. (2017) Cities spearhead climate action. Nature Climate Change, 7(8), 537538.
Widerberg, O. and Pattberg, P. (2015). International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance: raising the ambition level or delegitimizing the UNFCCC? Global Policy, 6(1), 4556.
Widerberg, O. and Pattberg, P. (2017). Accountability challenges in the transnational regime complex for climate change. Review of Policy Research, 34(1), 6887.
Widerberg, O. and Stripple, J. (2016). The expanding field of cooperative initiatives for decarbonization: a review of five databases. WIREs Climate Change, 7(4), 486500.