Book contents
- Gospel Reading and Reception in Early Christian Literature
- Gospel Reading and Reception in Early Christian Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword: We Are All Gospel Readers
- Introduction
- Part I Reading the Gospel in Israel’s Scriptures
- Part II Gospel Writers as Gospel Readers
- Part III Gospel Reading as Ecclesial Tradition
- Bibliography
- Index of Ancient Sources
- Index of Modern Authors
- Index of Subjects
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2022
Book contents
- Gospel Reading and Reception in Early Christian Literature
- Gospel Reading and Reception in Early Christian Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword: We Are All Gospel Readers
- Introduction
- Part I Reading the Gospel in Israel’s Scriptures
- Part II Gospel Writers as Gospel Readers
- Part III Gospel Reading as Ecclesial Tradition
- Bibliography
- Index of Ancient Sources
- Index of Modern Authors
- Index of Subjects
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Gospel Reading and Reception in Early Christian Literature , pp. 244 - 268Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Allen, Pauline, and Hayward, C. T. Robert. Severus of Antioch. The Early Church Fathers. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Allen, Willoughby C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St. Matthew. 3rd ed. ICC. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1912.Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C., Jr. Constructing Jesus: Memory, Imagination, History. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2013.Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C. Studies in Matthew: Interpretation Past and Present. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2005.Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C. “The Audience of James and the Sayings of Jesus,” pp. 58–77 in James, 1 and 2 Peter, and Early Jesus Traditions. Edited by Batten, Alicia J. and Kloppenborg, John S.. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2014.Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C. The Intertextual Jesus: Scripture in Q. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2000.Google Scholar
Allison, Dale C. “The Pauline Epistles and the Synoptic Gospels: The Pattern of the Parallels.” New Testament Studies 28 (1982): 1–32.Google Scholar
Andresen, Carl. “Zur Entstehung und Geschichte des trinitarischen Personbegriffes.” Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 52 (1961): 1–39.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Super Evangelium S. Matthaei Lectura. 5th ed. Edited by Aquino, Santo Tomás de and Cai, Raphael. Turin: Marietti, 1951.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. D. “P. Egerton 2 and the Fourth Gospel,” pp. 200–7 in The Figure of Jesus in History and Theology: Essays in Honor of John Meier. Edited by Skemp, Vincent T. M. and Bautch, Kelley Coblentz. Catholic Biblical Quarterly Imprints 1. Washington, DC: Catholic Biblical Association, 2020.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. D. The Doubt of the Apostles and the Resurrection Faith of the Early Church: The Post-Resurrection Appearance Stories of the Gospels in Ancient Reception and Modern Debate. WUNT 495. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.Google Scholar
Babrius, and Phaedrus, . Fables. Translated by B. E. Perry. LCL. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Barclay, John M. G. “Early Christianity, Mission, and the Survival of the Poor in the Graeco-Roman World.” Teologisk Tidsskrift 8 (2019): 243–53.Google Scholar
Baron, Lori. The Shema in the Gospel of John Against Its Backgrounds in Second Temple Judaism. WUNT 2. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, in press.Google Scholar
Barrett, C. K. The Gospel According to St John: An Introduction with Commentary and Notes on the Greek Text. 2nd ed. London: SPCK, 1978.Google Scholar
Bates, Matthew W. The Birth of the Trinity: Jesus, God, and Spirit in New Testament and Early Christian Interpretations of the Old Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Matthew W. The Hermeneutics of the Apostolic Proclamation: The Center of Paul’s Method of Scriptural Interpretation. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. Gospel of Glory: Major Themes in Johannine Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2015.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard Jesus and the God of Israel: God Crucified and Other Studies on the New Testament’s Christology of Divine Identity. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar
Bauer, W. Rechtgläubigkeit und Ketzerei im ältesten Christentum. 2nd ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1964.Google Scholar
Bauer, W., Kraft, Robert A., and Krodel, Gerhard, eds. Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Bausi, Alessandro, Reudenbach, Bruno, and Wimmer, Hanna, eds. Canones: The Art of Harmony – The Canon Tables of the Four Gospels. Studies in Manuscript Cultures 18. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, H. Idris, and Skeat, T. C.. Fragments of an Unknown Gospel and Other Early Christian Papyri. London: British Museum, 1935.Google Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter, and Collins, Adela Yarbro. The Sermon on the Mount: A Commentary on the Sermon on the Mount, Including the Sermon on the Plain (Matthew 5:3–7:27 and Luke 6:20–49). Hermeneia.Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1995.Google Scholar
Beuken, Willem A. M. “Servant and Herald of Good Tidings: Isaiah 61 as an Interpretation of Isaiah 40–55,” pp. 411–42 in The Book of Isaiah: Le livre d’Isaïe: les oracles et leurs relectures unité et complexité de l’ouvrage. Edited by Vermeylen, Jacques and Brekelmans, C.. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum theologicarum Lovaniensium 81. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Beutler, Johannes. A Commentary on the Gospel of John. Translated by Michael Tait. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2017.Google Scholar
Blenkinsopp, Joseph. Isaiah 56–66: A New Translation and Commentary. AB 19B. New York: Doubleday, 2003.Google Scholar
Bock, Darrell. Luke. 2 vols. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 1994.Google Scholar
Boissevain, J. Friends of Friends: Networks, Manipulators, and Coalitions. Oxford: Blackwell, 1974.Google Scholar
Bond, Helen K. Caiaphas: Friend of Rome and Judge of Jesus? Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2004.Google Scholar
Borgen, Peder. Bread from Heaven: An Exegetical Study of the Concept of Manna in the Gospel of John and the Writings of Philo. NovTSup 10. Leiden: Brill, 1965.Google Scholar
Bovon, François, Koester, Helmut, and Thomas, Christine M.. Luke 1: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 1:1–9:50. Hermeneia. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2002.Google Scholar
Brooks, E. W. A Collection of Letters of Severus of Antioch, from Numerous Syriac Manuscripts (Fasc. II). Patrologia Orientalis 14. Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1920.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. An Introduction to the Gospel of John. Edited by Moloney., Francis J. ABRL. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Bultmann, Rudolf. The Johannine EpistlesI: A Commentary on the Johannine Epistles. Translated by R. Philip O’Hara, Lane C. McGaughy, and Robert Funk. Hermeneia. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1973.Google Scholar
Burkett, Delbert. The Case for Proto-Mark: A Study in the Synoptic Problem. WUNT 399. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkitt, F. C. “Ubertino da Casale and a Variant Reading.” Journal of Theological Studies 23 (1922): 186–88.Google Scholar
Burr, David. The Spiritual Franciscans: From Protest to Persecution in the Century after Saint Francis. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Burridge, Richard A. Imitating Jesus: An Inclusive Approach to New Testament Ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007.Google Scholar
Byers, Andrew J. Ecclesiology and Theosis in the Gospel of John. SNTSMS 166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Byers, Andrew J. John and the Others: Jewish Relations, Christian Origins, and the Sectarian Hermeneutic. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Capetz, Paul E. “Friedrich Schleiermacher on the Old Testament.” Harvard Theological Review 102, no. 3 (July 2009): 297–326.Google Scholar
Carrington, Philip. The Primitive Christian Catechism: A Study in the Epistles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Cavallo, Guglielmo, Gribomont, Jean, and Loerke, William C.. Codex Purpureus Rossanensis: Museo dell’Arcivescovado, Rossano Calabro. 2 vols. Rome: Salerno, 1987.Google Scholar
Collar, Anna. Religious Networks in the Roman Empire: The Spread of New Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Conzelmann, Hans. “Was von Anfang War,” pp. 194–201 in Neutestamentliche Studien für Rudolf Bultmann: Zu seinem siebzigsten Geburtstag am 20. August 1954. Edited by Eltester, Walther. BZNW 21. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1957.Google Scholar
Coogan, Jeremiah. “Mapping the Fourfold Gospel: Textual Geography in the Eusebian Apparatus.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 25 (2017): 337–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coogan, Jeremiah “Transmission and Transformation of the Eusebian Gospel Apparatus in Greek Medieval Manuscripts,” pp. 29–46 in Canones: The Art of Harmony – The Canon Tables of the Four Gospels. Edited by Bausi, Alessandro, Reudenbach, Bruno, and Wimmer, Hanna. Studies in Manuscript Cultures 18. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2020.Google Scholar
Coombes, Malcolm. 1 John: The Epistle as a Relecture of the Gospel of John. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2013.Google Scholar
Cramer., J. A. Catenae Graecorum Patrum in Novum Testamentum. Tomus VIII: In Epistolas Catholicas et Apocalypsin. Oxford: E Typographeo Academico, 1844.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. “A New Witness to the ‘Western’ Ordering of the Gospels: GA 073+084.” Journal of Theological Studies 69 (2018): 477–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. The Eusebian Canon Tables: Ordering Textual Knowledge in Late Antiquity. OECS. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Culpepper, R. Alan. “The Relationship between the Gospel of John and 1 John,” pp. 95–119 in Communities in Dispute: Current Scholarship on the Johannine Epistles. Edited by Alan Culpepper, R. and Anderson., Paul N. ECL 13. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Davies, W. D. Paul and Rabbinic Judaism: Some Rabbinic Elements in Pauline Theology. Rev. ed. New York: Harper & Row, 1955.Google Scholar
Davies, W. D., and Allison, Dale C., Jr. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew, 3 vols. ICC.Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1988–97.Google Scholar
Denova, Rebecca I. The Things Accomplished Among Us: Prophetic Tradition in the Structural Pattern of Luke-Acts. Journal for the Study of the New TestamentSup 141. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Dettweiler, Andreas. Die Gegenwart des Erhöhten: Eine exegetische Studie zu den johanneischen Abschiedsreden (Joh 13,31–16,33) unter Berücksichtigung ihres Relecture-Charakters. FRLANT 69. Göttingen: Vanderhoek & Ruprecht, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Do, Toan. “The Epistles of John,” pp. 444–58 in The State of New Testament Studies: A Survey of Recent Research. Edited by McKnight, Scot and Gupta, Nijay K.. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2019.Google Scholar
Doble, Peter. “Luke 24:26, 44 – Songs of God’s Servant: David and His Psalms in Luke-Acts.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 28, no. 3 (2006): 267–83.Google Scholar
Dodd, C. H. “The First Epistle of John and the Fourth Gospel.” Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 21 (1937): 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doeve, Jan Willem. Jewish Hermeneutics in the Synoptic Gospels and Acts. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1954.Google Scholar
Downing, F. Gerald. “Plausibility, Probability, and Synoptic Hypotheses.” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 93 (2017): 313–37.Google Scholar
Downing, F. Gerald. “Writers’ Use or Abuse of Written Sources,” pp. 523–48 in New Studies in the Synoptic Problem. Oxford Conference, April, 2008: Essays in Honour of Christopher M. Tuckett. Edited by Tuckett, C. M., Foster, P., Gregory, A., Kloppenborg, J. S., and Verheyden., J. BETL 239. Leuven: Peeters, 2011.Google Scholar
Downs, David J. Alms: Charity, Reward, and Atonement in Early Christianity. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Dupont, Jacques. Les Béatitudes Tome I: Le Problème Littéraire: Les Deux Versions du Sermon Sur La Montagne et des Béatitudes. EB. Paris: J. Gabalda, 1969.Google Scholar
Eastman, Susan. “Israel and Divine Mercy in Galatians and Romans,” pp. 147–70 in Between Gospel and Election: Explorations in the Interpretation of Romans 9–11. Edited by Florian Wilk, J. Wagner, Ross, and Schleritt, Frank. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.Google Scholar
Edwards, James R. The Gospel According to Luke. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015.Google Scholar
Ehrman, Bart D. The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. K. The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocrypha Christian Literature in an English Translation. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. John and Philosophy: A New Reading of the Fourth Gospel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels “The Past Is a Foreign Country: On the Shape and Purposes of Comparison in New Testament Scholarship,” pp. 41–62 in The New Testament in Comparison: Validity, Method and Purpose in Comparing Traditions. LNTS 600. London: T&T Clark, 2020.Google Scholar
Epiphanius of Cyprus. Ancoratus. Translated by Young Richard Kim. The Fathers of the Church 128. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Eubank, Nathan. Wages of Cross-Bearing and Debt of Sin: The Economy of Heaven in Matthew’s Gospel. BZNW 196. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Eusebius, , Ecclesiastical History. Translated by Kirsopp Lake. 5 vols. LCL. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Farrer, Austin. “On Dispensing with Q,” pp. 55–88 in Studies in the Gospels: Essays in Memory of R. H. Lightfoot. Edited by Nineham, Dennis. Oxford: Blackwell, 1955.Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke: I–IX: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. AB 28. New York: Doubleday, 1981.Google Scholar
Foster, Paul. “The Epistles of Ignatius of Antioch and the Writings That Later Formed the New Testament,” pp. 159–86 in The Reception of the New Testament in the Apostolic Fathers. Edited by Gregory, Andrew F. and Tuckett, Christopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Foster, Paul “The Reception of the Canonical Gospels in the Non-Canonical Gospels.” Early Christianity 4, no. 3 (2013): 281–309.Google Scholar
France, R. T. Jesus and the Old Testament: His Application of Old Testament Passages to Himself and His Mission. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, Paula. “How Jewish Is God? Divine Ethnicity in Paul’s Theology.” Journal of Biblical Literature 137, no. 1 (2018): 193–212.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, Paula. Paul: The Pagans’ Apostle. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Frei, Hans W. The Identity of Jesus Christ: The Hermeneutical Bases of Dogmatic Theology. Rev. ed. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2013.Google Scholar
Frey, Jörg. “Das vierte Evangelium auf dem Hintergrund der älteren Evangelientradition,” pp. 60–118 in Johannesevangelium – Mitte oder Rand des Kanons? Neue Standortbestimmungen. Edited by Söding, T. and Berger, Klaus. Quaestiones Disputatae 203. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 2003.Google Scholar
Frey, Jörg. Theology and History in the Fourth Gospel. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Gaechter, Paul. Die literarische Kunst im Matthäus-Evangelium. SBS 7. Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1965.Google Scholar
Garland, David. Luke. Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011.Google Scholar
Garrow, Alan. “An Extant Instance of ‘Q.’” New Testament Studies 62 (2016): 398–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, Alan. “Streeter’s ‘Other’ Synoptic Solution: The Matthew Conflator Hypothesis.” New Testament Studies 62 (2016): 207–26.Google Scholar
Garrow, Alan. The Gospel of Matthew’s Dependence on the Didache. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Sup. 254. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar
Gaventa, Beverly Roberts. “Interpreting the Death of Jesus Apocalyptically: Reconsidering Romans 8:32,” pp. 125–45 in Jesus and Paul Reconnected: Fresh Pathways into an Old Debate. Edited by Still., Todd D. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007.Google Scholar
Gaventa, Beverly Roberts “On the Calling-Into-Being of Israel: Romans 9:6–29,” pp. 255–69 in Between Gospel and Election: Explorations in the Interpretation of Romans 9–11. Edited by Florian Wilk, J. Wagner, Ross, and Schleritt, Frank. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.Google Scholar
Gaventa, Beverly Roberts “The Archive of Excess: John 21 and the Problem of Narrative Closure,” pp. 240–52 in Exploring the Gospel of John: In Honor of D. Moody Smith. Edited by Alan Culpepper, R. and Clifton Black, C.. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1996.Google Scholar
Gearhart, Heidi C. “From Divine Word to Human Hand: Negotiating Sacred Text in a Medieval Gospel Book.” Word & Image 32 (2016): 430–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghazaryan, Vigen H. ԽՈՐԱՆՆԵՐԻ ՄԵԿՆՈՒԹՅՈՒՆՆԵՐ = Commentaries of Canon-Tables. Yerevan: Sargis Khachents, 1995.Google Scholar
Glad, Clarence. Paul and Philodemus: Adaptability in Epicurean and Early Christian Psychagogy. NovTSupp 81. Leiden: Brill, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnilka, Joachim. Das Matthäusevangelium. 2 vols. HTKNT. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 1986–8.Google Scholar
Goodacre, Mark. Goulder and the Gospels: An Examination of a New Paradigm. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Sup. 133. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Goodacre, Mark. “Taking Our Leave of Mark-Q Overlaps: Major Agreements and the Farrer Theory,” pp. 201–22 in Gospel Interpretation and the Q Hypothesis. Edited by Müller, Mogens and Omerzu., Heike LNTS 573. London: T&T Clark, 2018.Google Scholar
Goodacre, Mark. The Case Against Q: Studies in Markan Priority and the Synoptic Problem. Philadelphia, PA: Trinity Press International, 2002.Google Scholar
Goodacre, Mark. “The Protevangelium of James and the Creative Rewriting of Matthew and Luke,” pp. 57–76 in Connecting Gospels: Beyond the Canonical / Non-Canonical Divide. Edited by Watson, Francis and Parkhouse, Sarah. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Goodacre, Mark. Thomas and the Gospels: The Making of an Apocryphal Text. London: SPCK, 2012.Google Scholar
Goodacre, Mark. “Too Good to Be Q: High Verbatim Agreement in the Double Tradition,” pp. 82–100 in Marcan Priority without Q: Explorations in the Farrer Hypothesis. Edited by Poirier, John C. and Peterson, Jeffrey. LNTS 455. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar
Goodrich, John K. “Thinking from Christ to Israel: Romans 9–11 in Apocalyptic Context,” pp. 239–56 in Paul and the Apocalyptic Imagination. Edited by Blackwell, Ben C., Goodrich, John, and Maston, Jason. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2016.Google Scholar
Goulder, Michael D. Luke: A New Paradigm. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Sup. 20. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Goulder, Michael D. Midrash and Lection in Matthew: The Speaker’s Lectures in Biblical Studies, 1969–71. London: SPCK, 1974.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony, and Williams, Megan Hale. Christianity and the Transformation of the Book: Origen, Eusebius, and the Library of Caesarea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (1973): 1360–80.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.” Sociological Theory 1 (1983): 201–33.Google Scholar
Green, Joel B. “The Death of Jesus, God’s Servant,” pp. 1–29 in Reimaging the Death of the Lukan Jesus. Edited by Sylva, Dennis D.. Frankfurt am Main: Hain, 1990.Google Scholar
Gregory, Andrew F. “1 Clement and the Writings That Later Formed the New Testament,” pp. 129–58 in The Reception of the New Testament in the Apostolic Fathers. Edited by Gregory, Andrew F. and Tuckett, Christopher M. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Gronewald, M. Kölner Papyri Band 6 (P. Köln VI) (Abhandlungen der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften). PapyCol CII. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
Gundry, Robert H. “Hermeneutic Liberty, Theological Diversity, and Historical Occasionalism,” pp. 1–17 in The Old Is Better: New Testament Essays in Support of Traditional Interpretations. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005.Google Scholar
Gundry, Robert H. Matthew: A Commentary on His Literary and Theological Art. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1982.Google Scholar
Gurtner, Daniel M. “Water and Blood and Matthew 27:49: A Johannine Reading in the Matthean Passion Narrative?,” pp. 134–50 in Studies on the Text of the New Testament and Early Christianity: Essays in Honor of Michael W. Holmes. Edited by Grutner, Daniel M., Hernándex, Juan, Jr., and Foster, Paul. NTTSD 50. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Gwilliam, George H. “The Ammonian Sections, Eusebian Canons, and the Harmonizing Tables in the Syriac Tetraevangelium, with Notices of Peshitto and Other MSS. Which Exhibit These Accessories in the Text.” Studia Biblica et Ecclesiastica 2 (1890): 241–72.Google Scholar
Haenchen, Ernst. “Neuere Literatur zu den Johannesbriefen.” TRu 26 (1960): 1–43, 267–91.Google Scholar
Hagerland, Tobias. “Editorial Fatigue and the Existence of Q.” New Testament Studies 65, no. 2 (2019): 190–206.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Catherine Sider. “Introduction: Francis Watson’s Gospel Writing and the Fourfold Gospel: Engaging a ‘New Paradigm,’” pp. 1–14 in Writing the Gospels: A Dialogue with Francis Watson. Edited by Hamilton, Catherine Sider and Willits., Joel LNTS 606. London: T&T Clark, 2019.Google Scholar
Hare, Douglas R. A. The Theme of Jewish Persecution of Christians in the Gospel According to St. Matthew. SNTSMS 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hartin, Patrick J. “James and the Q Sermon on the Mount/Plain,” pp. 440–57 in Society of Biblical Literature 1989 Seminar Papers. Edited by Lull, David J.. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hay, David M. Glory at the Right Hand: Psalm 110 in Early Christianity. SBLMS 18. Nashville, TN: Routledge, 1973.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. Echoes of Scripture in the Gospels. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. Reading Backwards: Figural Christology and the Fourfold Gospel Witness. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Heckel, Theo K. “Die Historisierung der johanneischen Theologie im ersten Johannesbrief.” New Testament Studies 50, no. 3 (2004): 425–43.Google Scholar
Hengel, Martin. The Four Gospels and the One Gospel of Jesus Christ. London: SCM, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heppe, Heinrich. Reformed Dogmatics. Edited by Bizer, Ernst. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1950.Google Scholar
Heskett, Randall. Messianism within the Scriptural Scroll of Isaiah. LHBOTS 456. New York: T&T Clark, 2007.Google Scholar
Holl, K., ed. Epiphanius, Band 1: Ancoratus und Panarion. Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller 25. Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1915.Google Scholar
Hooker, Morna. Jesus and the Servant: The Influence of the Servant Concept of Deutero-Isaiah in the New Testament. London: SPCK, 1959. Repr., Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2010.Google Scholar
Hooker, Morna “Response to Mikeal Parsons,” pp. 120–4 in Jesus and the Suffering Servant: Isaiah 53 and Christian Origins. Edited by Bellinger, William H. Jr. and Farmer, William R.. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 1998.Google Scholar
Howard, W. F. “The Common Authorship of the Johannine Gospel and Epistles.” Journal of Theological Studies 48 (1947): 12–25.Google Scholar
Huggins, Ronald V. “Matthean Posteriority: A Preliminary Proposal.” NovT 34 (1992): 1–21.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. The Earliest Christian Artifacts: Manuscripts and Christian Origins. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert. “Scripture’s Authority in the Church,” pp. 27–37 in The Art of Reading Scripture. Edited by Davis, Ellen F. and Hays, Richard B.. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar
Jeremias, Joachim. Die Sprache des Lukasevangeliums: Redaktion und Tradition im Nicht-Markusstoff des dritten Evangeliums. MeyerK Sonderband. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1980.Google Scholar
Jerome, Saint, Fischer, Bonifatius, Weber, Robert, Gryson, Roger, et al. Biblia Sacra iuxta Vulgatam Versionem. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1983.Google Scholar
Jipp, Joshua W. “Luke’s Scriptural Suffering Messiah: A Search for Precedent, a Search for Identity.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 72, no. 2 (2010): 255–74.Google Scholar
Johnson, Luke Timothy. The Gospel of Luke. SP 3. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Johnson, Luke Timothy. “The Use of Leviticus 19 in the Letter of James.” Journal of Biblical Literature 101 (1982): 391–401.Google Scholar
Jonge, M. De, and Van Der Woude, A. S.. “11Q Melchizedek and the New Testament.” New Testament Studies 12, no. 4 (1966): 301–26.Google Scholar
Juel, Donald. Messianic Exegesis: Christological Interpretation of the Old Testament in Early Christianity. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1988.Google Scholar
Julian of Norwich. The Showings of Julian of Norwich. Edited by Baker, Denise N.. New York: Norton, 2005.Google Scholar
Kadushin, C. Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and Findings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kahl, Werner. “Inclusive and Exclusive Agreements – Towards a Neutral Comparison of the Synoptic Gospels, or: Minor Agreements as Misleading Category,” pp. 44–78 in Luke’s Literary Creativity. Edited by Nielsen, Jesper Tang and Mogens Müller., LNTS 550. London: T&T Clark, 2016.Google Scholar
Keener, Craig S. Acts: An Exegetical Commentary. 2 vols. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2012.Google Scholar
Keener, Craig S. The Gospel of John: A Commentary. 2 vols. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2003.Google Scholar
Keith, Chris. The Gospel as Manuscript: An Early History of the Jesus Tradition as Material Artifact. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, Charles A. Jesus’ Exposition of the Old Testament in Luke’s Gospel. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Sup. 94. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1994.Google Scholar
Kirk, Alan. “‘Love Your Enemies,’ the Golden Rule, and Ancient Reciprocity (Luke 6:27–35).” Journal of Biblical Literature 122 (2003): 667–86.Google Scholar
Kirk, Alan Q in Matthew: Ancient Media, Memory, and Early Scribal Transmission of the Jesus Tradition. LNTS 564. New York: Bloomsbury, 2016.Google Scholar
Klemm, E. “Die Kanontafeln der armenischen Handschriften Cod. 697 im Wiener Mechitaristenkloster,” ZKunstG 35 (1972): 69–99.Google Scholar
Klink, Edward W., III, and Lockett, Darian R.. Understanding Biblical Theology: A Comparison of Theory and Practice. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. “On Dispensing with Q? Goodacre on the Relation of Luke to Matthew.” New Testament Studies 49 (2003): 210–36.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. “The Use of the Synoptics or Q in Did 1.3b–2.1,” pp. 105–29 in Matthew and the Didache: Two Documents from the Same Jewish-Christian Milieu? Edited by van der Sandt, H.. Assen: Van Gorcum, 2005.Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John S. “Variation in the Reproduction of the Double Tradition and an Oral Q?” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 83 (2007): 53–80.Google Scholar
Koet, Bart J. “Isaiah in Luke-Acts,” pp. 79–100 in Isaiah in the New Testament. Edited by Moyise, Steve and Menken., M. J. J. New Testament and the Scriptures of Israel. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Kok, Michael. The Gospel on the Margins: The Reception of Mark in the Second Century. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köster, Hermut. Synoptische Überlieferung bei den apostolischen Vätern. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar
Kouymjian, Dickran. “Armenian Manuscript Illumination in the Formative Period: Text Groups, Eusebian Apparatus, Evangelists’ Portraits,” pp. 1015–51 in Il Caucaso: Cerniera fra Culture dal Mediterraneo alla Persia (secoli IV–XI), Settimane di studio del Centro italiano di studi sull’alto Medioevo 43. Spoleto: Centro italiano di studi sull’alto Medioevo, 1996.Google Scholar
Kugel, James L. “On Hidden Hatred and Open Reproach: Early Exegesis of Leviticus 19:17.” Harvard Theological Review 80 (1987): 43–61.Google Scholar
Labahn, Michael. “Peter’s Rehabilitation (John 21:15–19) and the Adoption of Sinners: Remembering Jesus and Relecturing John,” pp. 335–48 in John, Jesus, and History. Vol. 2 of the Aspects of Historicity in the Fourth Gospel. Edited by Anderson, Paul N., Just, Felix, and Thatcher, Tom. SBL Early Christianity and Its Literature. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Landry, David. “Reconsidering the Date of Luke in Light of the Farrer Hypothesis,” pp. 160–90 in Marcan Priority without Q: Explorations in the Farrer Hypothesis. Edited by Poirier, John C. and Peterson, Jeffrey. LNTS 455. London: T&T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar
Lieu, Judith M. I, II, and III John. NTL. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lieu, Judith M. “The Johannine Literature and the Canon,” pp. 396–415 in The Oxford Handbook of Johannine Studies. Edited by Judith, M. Lieu and de Boer, Martinus C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Lieu, Judith M. “What Was from the Beginning: Scripture and Tradition in the Johannine Epistles.” New Testament Studies 39 (1993): 458–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Andrew T. The Gospel According to St John. Black’s New Testament Commentaries. London: Hendrickson, 2005.Google Scholar
Longenecker, Bruce W. “The Unbroken Messiah: A Johannine Feature and Its Social Functions.” New Testament Studies 41 (1995): 428–41.Google Scholar
Lührmann, Dieter. “Liebet eure Feinde (Lk 6,27–36/Mt 5,39–48).” Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 69 (1972): 412–38.Google Scholar
Luz, Ulrich. “Looking at Q through the Eyes of Matthew,” pp. 571–89 in New Studies in the Synoptic Problem. Oxford Conference, April, 2008: Essays in Honour of Christopher M. Tuckett. Edited by Foster, P., Gregory, A., Kloppenborg, J. S., and Verheyden., J. BETL 239. Leuven: Peeters, 2011.Google Scholar
Luz, Ulrich Matthew 21–28. Translated by James E. Crouch. Hermeneia. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2005.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Nathan. Deuteronomy and the Meaning of “Monotheism.” FAT 2/1. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003.Google Scholar
MacEwen, Robert K. Matthean Posteriority: An Exploration of Matthew’s Use of Mark and Luke as a Solution to the Synoptic Problem. LNTS 501. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar
MacLean, Douglas. “Scribe as Artist, Not Monk: The Canon Tables of Ailerán ‘the Wise’ and the Book of Kells.” Peritia 17–18 (2003): 433–70.Google Scholar
Magnus, Albertus. Enarrationes in primam partem Evangelium Lucae (I–IX) ad loc. Vol 22. of Opera Omnia. Edited by Borgnet, A.. Paris: Apud Ludovicum Vivès, 1894.Google Scholar
Mallen, Peter. The Reading and Transformation of Isaiah in Luke-Acts. LNTS 367. London: T & T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce. “Do Christians Worship the God of Israel?,” pp. 231–64 in Knowing the Triune God: The Work of the Spirit in the Practices of the Church. Edited by Buckley, James J. and Yeago, David S.. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar
Marshall, I. Howard. “Acts,” pp. 513–606 in Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament. Edited by Beale, G. K. and Carson, D. A.. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007.Google Scholar
Martyn, J. Louis. Theological Issues in the Letters of Paul. Nashville, TN: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Massaux, Édouard. The Influence of the Gospel of Saint Matthew on Christian Literature before Saint Irenaeus, Book I: The First Ecclesiastical Writers. Translated by Norman J. Belval and Suzanne Hecht. New Gospel Studies 5/1. Leuven: Peeters; Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Mathews, Thomas F., and Sanjian., Avedis K. Armenian Gospel Iconography: The Tradition of the Glajor Gospel. Dumbarton Oaks Studies 29. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 1991.Google Scholar
Matson, David Lertis. “Double-Edged: The Meaning of the Two Swords in Luke 22:35–38.” Journal of Biblical Literature 137, no. 2 (2018): 463–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matson, Mark A. “Luke’s Rewriting of the Sermon on the Mount,” pp. 43–70 in Questioning Q. Edited by Goodacre, Mark and Perrin, Nicholas. London: SPCK, 2004.Google Scholar
McArthur, Harvey K. “Eusebian Sections and Canons.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 27 (1965): 250–6.Google Scholar
McCabe, Herbert, OP. “Aquinas on the Trinity,” pp. 76–93 in Silence and the Word: Negative Theology and Incarnation. Edited by Davies, Oliver and Turner, Denys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
McGurk, Patrick. “The Canon Tables in the Book of Kells,” pp. 40–60 in New Offerings, Ancient Treasures: Studies in Medieval Art for George Henderson. Edited by Binski, Paul and Noel, William. Stroud: Sutton, 2001.Google Scholar
McGurk, Patrick “The Canon Tables in the Book of Lindisfarne and in the Codex Fuldensis of St. Victor of Capua.” Journal of Theological Studies 6 (1955): 192–98.Google Scholar
McGurk, Patrick “The Disposition of the Numbers in Latin Eusebian Canon Tables,” pp. 242–58 in Philologia Sacra: Biblische und patristische Studien für Hermann J. Frede und Walter Thiele zu ihrem siebzigsten Geburstag. Edited by Gryson, Roger. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 1993.Google Scholar
McKnight, Scot. Jesus and His Death: Historiography, the Historical Jesus, and Atonement Theory. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Menken, Maarten J. J. Old Testament Quotations in the Fourth Gospel: Studies in Textual Form (Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology). CBET 15. Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1996.Google Scholar
Menken, Maarten J. J. Studies in John’s Gospel and Epistles: Collected Essays. CBET 77. Leuven: Peeters, 2015.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1994.Google Scholar
Michelini, Giulio. “The Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of John: Intertextual Connections in Three Case Studies (Matt 27:49 // John 19:34; Matt 27:55–56 // John 19:25–27; Matt 5:32 // John 7:53–8:11),” pp. 247–67 in Texts, Practices, and Groups: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the History of Jesus’ Followers in the First Two Centuries: First Annual Meeting of Bertinoro (2–5 October 2014). Edited by Destro, Adriana and Pesce, Mauro. Turnhout: Brepols, 2017.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Jacob. Leviticus: A Book of Ritual Ethics: A Continental Commentary. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2004.Google Scholar
Miller, Merrill P. “Function of Isa 61:1–2 in 11Q Melchizedek.” Journal of Biblical Literature 88, no. 4 (1969): 467–69.Google Scholar
Minns, Denis, and Parvis, Paul, eds. Justin, Philosopher and Martyr: Apologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Moloney, Francis J. The Gospel of John. Sacra Pagina 4. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Morgan, Teresa. Popular Morality in the Early Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Mullins, Elizabeth. “The Eusebian Canon Tables and Hiberno-Latin Exegesis: The Case of Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, lat. 940.” SacEr 53 (2014): 323–43.Google Scholar
Mullins, Elizabeth “The Insular Reception of the Eusebian Canon Tables: Exegesis and Iconography.” PhD diss., University College Cork, 2001.Google Scholar
Nanos, Mark D., and Zetterholm, Magnus, eds. Paul within Judaism: Restoring the First Century Context to the Apostle. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2015.Google Scholar
Nestle, Eberhard, Nestle, Erwin, Aland, B., Aland, K., et al. Novum Testamentum Graece. 28th ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2012.Google Scholar
Netzer, Nancy. “The Origin of the Beast Canon Tables Reconsidered,” pp. 322–32 in The Book of Kells: Proceedings of a Conference at Trinity College Dublin 6–9 September 1992. Edited by O’Mahony, Felicity. Aldershot: Scholar Press for Trinity College Library, 1994.Google Scholar
Nicklas, Tobias, Thomas, J. K. Kraus, , and Kruger, Michael J., eds. Gospel Fragments. Oxford Early Christian Gospel Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Karl-Wilhelm. Gesetz und Paränese: Katechismusartige Weisungsreihen in der frühjüdischen Literatur. WUNT 2/28. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1987.Google Scholar
Niederwimmer, Kurt. The Didache: A Commentary. Hermeneia.Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Nihan, Christophe. From Priestly Torah to Pentateuch: A Study in the Composition of the Book of Leviticus. FAT 2/25. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.Google Scholar
Nolland, John. The Gospel of Matthew: A Commentary on the Greek Text. NIGTC. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans; Bletchley: Paternoster, 2005.Google Scholar
Norden, Von Eduard. Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte religiöser Rede. Leipzig: Teubner, 1913.Google Scholar
Nordenfalk, Carl Die spätantiken Kanontafeln: Kunstgeschichtliche Studien über die Eusebianische Evangelien-Konkordanz in den vier ersten Jahrhunderten ihrer Geschichte. 2 vols. Göteborg: O. Isacsons boktryckeri a-b, 1938.Google Scholar
Nordenfalk, Carl “The Apostolic Canon Tables.” Gazette des Beaux-Arts 105 (1963): 17–34.Google Scholar
Nordenfalk, Carl “The Eusebian Canon-Tables: Some Textual Problems.” Journal of Theological Studies 35 (1984): 96–104.Google Scholar
North, Wendy E. S. A Journey Round John: Tradition, Interpretation and Context in the Fourth Gospel. LNTS 534. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar
North, Wendy E. S. The Lazarus Story within the Johannine Tradition. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Sup. 212. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001.Google Scholar
North, Wendy E. S. What John Knew and What John Wrote: A Study in John and the Synoptics. Interpreting Johannine Literature. Lanham, MD; Boulder, CO; New York; London: Lexington Books/Fortress Academic, 2020.Google Scholar
Novenson, Matthew V. “Whither the Paul within Judaism Schule?” Journal of the Jesus Movement in Its Jewish Setting 5 (2018): 79–88.Google Scholar
Oegema, Gerbern S. “The Historical Jesus and Judaism: A Methodological Inquiry,” pp. 449–69 in Jüdische Schriften in ihrem antik-jüdischen und urchristlichen Kontext. Edited by Lichtenberger, Hermann and Oegema., Gerbern S. SJSHRZ 1. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlaghaus, 2002.Google Scholar
Olmstead, Wesley G. Matthew’s Trilogy of Parables: The Nation, the Nations and the Reader in Matthew 21:28–22:14. SNTSMS 127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
O’Loughlin, Thomas. “Harmonizing the Truth: Eusebius and the Problem of the Four Gospels.” Traditio 65 (2010): 1–29.Google Scholar
O’Loughlin, Thomas “The Eusebian Apparatus in Some Vulgate Gospel Books.” Peritia 13 (1999): 1–92.Google Scholar
O’Loughlin, Thomas “The Eusebian Apparatus in the Lindisfarne Gospels: Ailerán’s Kanon Euangeliorum as a Lens for Its Appreciation,” pp. 96–111 in The Lindisfarne Gospels: New Perspectives. Edited by Gameson, Richard. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Oswalt, John N. The Book of Isaiah, Chapters 40–66. NICOT. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar
O’Toole, Robert F. “Does Luke Also Portray Jesus as the Christ in Luke 4,16–30?” Biblica 76, no. 4 (1995): 498–522.Google Scholar
O’Toole, Robert F. “The Parallels between Jesus and Moses.” Biblical Theology Bulletin 20 (1990): 22–29.Google Scholar
Pannenberg, Wolfhart, Rendtorff, Rolf, Rendtorff, Trutz, and Wickens, Ulrich. Revelation as History. New York: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar
Pao, David W. Acts and the Isaianic New Exodus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000. Repr., Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2016.Google Scholar
Pao, David W., and Schnabel, Eckhard J.. “Luke,” pp. 251–414 in Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament. Edited by Beale, G. K. and Carson, D. A.. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007.Google Scholar
Pardee, Cambry G. Scribal Harmonization in the Synoptic Gospels. NTTSD 60. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Parsenios, George L. First, Second, and Third John. Paideia. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2014.Google Scholar
Parsons, Mikeal C. “A Neglected ΕΓΩ ΕΙΜΙ Saying in the Fourth Gospel? Another Look at John 9:9,” pp. 145–80 in Perspectives on John: Method and Interpretation in the Fourth Gospel. Edited by Sloan, Robert B. and Parsons, Mikeal C.. NABPR Special Studies Series 11. Lewiston, NY: Mellen, 1993.Google Scholar
Parsons, Mikeal C. “Isaiah 53 in Acts 8: A Reply to Professor Morna Hooker,” pp. 104–19 in Jesus and the Suffering Servant: Isaiah 53 and Christian Origins. Edited by Bellinger, William H. Jr. and Farmer, William R.. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 1998.Google Scholar
Peels, H. G. L. The Vengeance of God: The Meaning of the Root NQM and the Function of the NQM-Texts in the Context of Divine Revelation in the Old Testament. OTS 31. Leiden: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Penna, Angelo. “Il ‘De Consensu Evangelistarum’ ed i ‘Canoni Eusebiani.’” Bib 36 (1955): 1–19.Google Scholar
Pennells, Stephen. “The Spear Thrust (Mt. 27:49b, v.l. / John 19.34).” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 19 (1983): 99–115.Google Scholar
Pierce, Madison N. Divine Discourse in the Epistle to the Hebrews: The Recontextualization of Spoken Quotations of Scripture. SNTSMS 178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Piper, John. “Love Your Enemies”: Jesus’ Love Command in the Synoptic Gospels and in the Early Christian Paraenesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. Sacred Tradition in the New Testament: Tracing Old Testament Themes in the Gospels and Epistles. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2016.Google Scholar
Poulsen, Frederik. “A Light to the Gentiles: The Reception of Isaiah in Luke-Acts,” pp. 163–80 in Rewriting and Reception in and of the Bible. Edited by Høgenhaven, Jesper, Nielsen, Jesper Tang, and Heike Omerzu., WUNT 396. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.Google Scholar
Pulliam, Heather. “Painting by Numbers: The Art of the Canon Tables,” pp. 112–33 in The Lindisfarne Gospels: New Perspectives. Edited by Gameson, Richard. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Pusey, Philip Edward, and Gwilliam, George Henry. Tetraeuangelium Sanctum: Simplex Syrorum Versio. Oxford: Clarendon, 1901.Google Scholar
Radner, Ephraim. Time and the Word: Figural Reading of the Christian Scriptures. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2016.Google Scholar
Rasimus, Tuomas, ed. The Legacy of John: Second-Century Reception of the Fourth Gospel. NovTSup 132. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Reudenbach, Bruno. “Der Codex als heiliger Raum: Überlegungen zur Bildausstattung früher Evangelienbücher,” pp. 59–84 in Codex und Raum. Edited by Müller, Stephan, Saurma-Jeltsch, Lieselotte E., and Strohschneider, Peter. Wolfenbüttel: Herzog August Bibliothek, 2009.Google Scholar
Reuss, Joseph. “Matthäus-Kommentare aus der griechischen Kirche.” Texte und Untersuchungen 61. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar
Richardson, Cyril C., ed. Early Christian Fathers. Vol 1. of The Library of Christian Classics. New York: Macmillan, 1970.Google Scholar
Riggsby, Andrew M. Mosaics of Knowledge: Representing Information in the Roman World. Classical Culture and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Roberts, Alexander, James Donaldson, and A. Coxe, Cleverland, eds. The Ante-Nicene Fathers: The Writings of the Fathers down to A.D. 325. 10 vols. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1956–62.Google Scholar
Robinson, James M., Hoffmann, Paul, Kloppenborg, John S., and Moreland, Milton C., eds. The Critical Edition of Q: A Synopsis Including the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, Mark and Thomas, with English, German and French Translations of Q and Thomas. Hermeneia. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 2000.Google Scholar
Rondeau, Marie-Josèphe. Exégèse prosopologique et théologie. Vol. 2 of Les commentaires patristiques du Psautier (IIIe–Ve siècles). Rome: Institutum Studiorum Orientalium, 1985.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. Kavin. Early Narrative Christology: The Lord in the Gospel of Luke. BNZW 139. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2006.Google Scholar
Sanders, Fred R. The Triune God. New Studies in Dogmatics. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2016.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Aus Schleiermachers Leben in Briefen. Edited by Jonas, Ludwig and Dilthey, Wilhelm. 4 vols. Berlin: Reimer, 1860–3.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hansjörg. Gegner im 1. Johannesbrief? Zu Konstruktion und Selbsreferenz im johanneischen Sinnsystem. BWANT 159. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2002.Google Scholar
Schmid, Heinrich. Doctrinal Theology of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. 3rd ed. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg, 1899.Google Scholar
Schmid, Ulrich. “Scribes and Variants: Sociology and Typology,” pp. 1–23 in Textual Variation: Theological and Social Tendencies? Papers from the Fifth Birmingham Colloquium on the Textual Criticism of the New Testament. Edited by Parker, D. C. and Houghton, H. A. G.. TS 3:6. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias, 2008.Google Scholar
Schnabel, Eckhard J. Acts. Expanded Digital Edition. Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012.Google Scholar
Schneider, Gerhard. Jesusüberlieferung und Christologie: Neutestamentliche Aufsätze 1970–1990. Leiden: Brill, 1992.Google Scholar
Schottroff, Luise. “Non-Violence and the Love of One’s Enemies,” pp. 9–39 in Essays on the Love Command. Edited by Fuller, Reginald H.. Translated by R. H. Fuller and I. Fuller. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1978.Google Scholar
Schröter, Jens, Nicklas, Tobias, and Verheyden, Joseph, eds. Gospels and Gospel Tradition in the Second Century: Experiments in Reception. BZNW 235. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar
Shepherd of Hermas, Mandate(s).Google Scholar
Sim, David C. The Gospel of Matthew and Christian Judaism: The History and Social Setting of the Matthean Community. SNTW. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1998.Google Scholar
Smit, Joop. “The Function of the Two Quotations from Isaiah in Luke 3–4,” pp. 41–55 in The Scriptures of Israel in Jewish and Christian Tradition: Essays in Honour of Maarten J. J. Menken. Edited by Koet, B. J., Moyise, Steve, and Verheyden, Joseph. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Smith, D. Moody. “The Epistles of John: What’s New since Brooke’s ICC in 1912?” ExpTim 120 (2009): 373–84.Google Scholar
Soulen, R. Kendall. Distinguishing the Voices, vol. 1 of The Divine Name(s) and the Holy Trinity. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2011.Google Scholar
Stahl, Michael J. “The ‘God of Israel’ in Judah’s Bible: Problems and Prospects.” Journal of Biblical Literature 139, no. 4 (2020): 721–45.Google Scholar
Strelan, Rick. Luke as Priest: The Authority of the Author of the Third Gospel. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Strom-Olsen, Rolf. “The Propylaic Function of the Eusebian Canon Tables in Late Antiquity.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 26 (2018): 403–31.Google Scholar
Stromberg, Jacob. “An Inner-Isaianic Reading of Isaiah 61:1–3,” pp. 261–72 in Interpreting Isaiah: Issues and Approaches. Edited by Firth, David G. and Williamson., H. G. M. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2009.Google Scholar
Syreeni, Kari. The Making of the Sermon on the Mount: A Procedural Analysis of Matthew’s Redactoral Activity. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Disssertationes Humanarum Litterarum 44. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, 1987.Google Scholar
Theissen, G. Social Reality and the Early Christians: Theology, Ethics, and the Word of the New Testament. Translated by M. Kohl. Edinburgh. T&T Clark, 1993.Google Scholar
Thomas, Johannes. Der jüdische Phokylides: Formgeschichtliche Zugänge zu Pseudo-Phokylides und Vergleich mit der neutestamentlichen Paränese. NTOA 23. Freiburg, CH: Universitätsverlag; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1992.Google Scholar
Thorsteinsson, R. M. Roman Christianity and Roman Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Tischendorf, Constantinus. Novum Testamentum Graece. Volumen I. 8th ed. Leipzig: Giesecke & Devrient, 1869.Google Scholar
Trebilco, Paul. The Early Christians in Ephesus from Paul to Ignatius. WUNT 166. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.Google Scholar
Tuckett, Christopher M. 2 Clement: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Tuckett, Christopher M. “Synoptic Tradition in the Didache,” pp. 197–230 in The New Testament in Early Christianity. Edited by Sevrin, Jean-Marie. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Van Unnik, W. C. “Die Motivierung der Feindesliebe in Lukas VI 32–35.” NovT 8 (1966): 284–300.Google Scholar
Von Waldhe, Urban C. “Raymond Brown’s View of the Crisis of 1 John: In the Light of Some Peculiar Features of the Johannine Gospel,” pp. 19–45 in Communities in Dispute: Current Scholarship on the Johannine Epistles. Edited by Alan Culpepper, R. and Anderson., Paul N. ECL 13. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Von Waldhe, Urban C. The Gospel and Letters of John, 3 vols. ECC. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Wallace, Daniel B. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996.Google Scholar
Wallraff, Martin. Kodex und Kanon: Das Buch im frühen Christentum. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Walls, Andrew F. The Missionary Movement in Christian History: Studies in the Transmission of Faith. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1996.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis. “A Gospel of the Eleven: The Epistula Apostolorum and the Johannine Tradition,” pp. 189–215 in Connecting Gospels: Beyond the Canonical/Non-Canonical Divide. Edited by Watson, Francis and Parkhouse, Sarah. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis An Apostolic Gospel: The “Epistula Apostolorum” in Literary Context. SNTSMS 179. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis “Are There Still Four Gospels? A Study in Theological Hermeneutics,” pp. 95–116 in Reading Scripture with the Church: Toward a Hermeneutic for Theological Interpretation. Edited by Adam, A. K. M., Fowl, Stephen E., Vanhoozer, Kevin J., and Watson, Francis. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis “Barth, Ephesians, and the Practice of Theological Exegesis,” pp. 13–30, 150–57 in Karl Barth: The Epistle to the Ephesians. Edited by David Nelson, R.. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2017.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis “Barth’s Philippians as Theological Exegesis,” pp. xxvi–li in Barth, Karl, Epistle to the Philippians: 40th Anniversary Edition. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2002.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis Gospel Writing: A Canonical Perspective. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis “Hermeneutics and the Doctrine of Scripture: Why They Need Each Other.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 12 (2010): 118–43.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis “On the Miracle Catena in Epistula Apostolorum 4–5,” pp. 107–28 in Gospels and Gospel Traditions in the Second Century: Experiments in Reception. Edited by Schröter, Jens, Niklas, Tobias, and Verheyden., Joseph BZNW 235. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2018.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis Paul and the Hermeneutics of Faith. 2nd ed. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis Text and Truth: Redefining Biblical Theology. London: T & T Clark, 1997.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis “The Bible,” pp. 57–71 in Cambridge Companion to Karl Barth. Edited by Webster, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis The Fourfold Gospel: A Theological Reading of the New Testament Portraits of Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2016.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis “The Triune Divine Identity: Reflections on Pauline God-Language, in Disagreement with J. D. G. Dunn.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 80 (2000): 99–124.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis, ed. The Open Text: New Directions for Biblical Studies? London: SCM Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis, and Parkhouse, Sarah, eds. Connecting Gospels: Beyond the Canonical/Non-Canonical Divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Works, Carla. The Church in the Wilderness: Paul’s Use of Exodus Traditions in 1 Corinthians. WUNT 2.379. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Vol. 4 of Christian Origins and the Question of God. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2013.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. “The Letter to the Romans: Introduction, Commentary, and Reflections,” pp. 393–770 in vol. 10 of The New Interpreter’s Bible: General Articles and Introduction, Commentary, and Reflections for Each Book of the Bible, Including the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books. Edited by Keck, Leander E. et al. Nashville, TN: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Young, Stephen E. Jesus Tradition in the Apostolic Fathers: Their Explicit Appeals to the Words of Jesus in Light of Orality Studies. WUNT 2/311. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar
Zeller, Dieter. Die weisheitlichen Mahnsprüche bei den Synoptikern. FB 17. Würzburg: Echter, 1977.Google Scholar
Zelyck, Lorne R. John among the Other Gospels: The Reception of the Fourth Gospel in the Extra-Canonical Gospels. WUNT 2/347. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.Google Scholar
Zumstein, Jean. “Der Prozess der Relecture in der johanneischen Literatur.” New Testament Studies 42 (1996): 394–411.Google Scholar
Zumstein, Jean “Intratextuality and Intertextuality in the Gospel of John,” pp. 121–35 in Anatomies of Narrative Criticism: The Past, Present, and Futures of the Fourth Gospel as Literature. Edited by Thatcher, Tom and Moore., Stephen D. SBLRBS 55. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Zumstein, Jean “Story, Plot, and History in the Johannine Passion Narrative,” pp. 109–18 in John, Jesus, and History, Volume 3: Glimpses of Jesus through the Johannine Lens. Edited by Anderson, Paul N., Just, Felix, and Thatcher, Tom. Early Christianity and Its Literature 18. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2016.Google Scholar