Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T14:54:32.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wallensteins Tod as a “Play of Mourning”: Death and Mourning in the Aesthetics of Schiller's Classicism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Simon Richter
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Daniel Purdy
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

Jill A.Kowalik

(1949-2003)

in memoriam

Numerous critics have pointed out that with the exception of Schiller's Wilhelm Tell, the protagonists of his classical dramas die at the end: Wallenstein, Maria Stuart, Joan of Arc, and Don Manuel and Don Cesar, the two enemy brothers in Die Braut von Messina. If we associate Schiller with Romanticism, as Anglo-American criticism has done, this emphasis can be interpreted as part of the Romantic longing for death that we find in the works of his contemporaries from Novalis to Hölderlin. But if we classify Schiller as a representative of German Classicism, it is difficult to find an explanation for this preoccupation, because the affirmative aesthetics of German Classicism does not tolerate death and destruction. There is only one reference to the representation of death in Kant's Kritik der Urteilskraft of 1790. This reference is typical for the aesthetics of classicism, as it pleads for the indirect representation of the unpleasant. Kant claimed that sculpture excluded the representation of unpleasant or odious subjects by substituting allegory for the reality of nature, as for example, a beautiful genius figure for the representation of death:

Auch hat die Bildhauerkunst,weil an ihren Produkten die Kunst mit der Natur beinahe verwechselt wird, die unmittelbare Vorstellung häßlicher Gegenstände von ihren Bildungen ausgeschlossen und dafür den Tod (in einem schönen Genius) … durch eine Allegorie oder Attribute, die sich gefällig ausnehmen, mithin nur indirekt vermitteltst einer Auslegung der Vernunft, und nicht bloß für ästhetische Urteilskraft, vorzustellen erlaubt.

(Kritik der Urteilskraft § 48)
Type
Chapter
Information
Goethe Yearbook 15 , pp. 171 - 186
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×