Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T06:11:57.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - The intersection of global trade, social networks, and fisheries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

By
Kenneth A. Frank ,
Katrina Mueller ,
Ann Krause ,
William W. Taylor  and
Nancy J. Leonard
Edited by
William W. Taylor ,
Michael G. Schechter  and
Lois G. Wolfson
Kenneth A. Frank
Affiliation:
Measurement and Quantitative Methods Counseling Educational Psychology and Special Education and Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 460 Erickson Hall East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
Katrina Mueller
Affiliation:
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 13 Natural Resource Building East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
Ann Krause
Affiliation:
Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability Michigan State University 13 Natural Resources Building East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
William W. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 13 Natural Resource Building East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
Nancy J. Leonard
Affiliation:
Great Lakes Fishery Commission 2100 Commonwealth Boulevard Suite 100 Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
William W. Taylor
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Michael G. Schechter
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Lois G. Wolfson
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access

Summary

GLOBALIZATION AND NETWORKS

In this chapter, we explore globalization through networks. Of course, globalization can be described in terms of networks of trade between countries and as executed by multinational corporations (Breiger 1981; Chase-Dunn and Grimes 1995; Kim and Shin 2002). And fisheries ecosystems have long been characterized in terms of networks of predator and prey relationships between taxon or species (e.g., Cohen et al. 1993; Gaedke 1995; Krause et al. 2003). But here we will explore how human social networks mediate between global economic exchanges and the dynamics of aquatic ecosystems. Thus we extend critiques of the globalization literature for lack of attention to individual agency (e.g., Schechter 1999:62) by calling attention to the effects of human relationships in globalization. Ultimately, our focus allows us to integrate theories related to social networks (e.g., social capital) as well as inform policy and management of and research on fisheries and their associated ecosystems.

What is globalization?

We define globalization as an increase in the rate of exchange of resources and information across geographic regions and cultures. Though communities have been interdependent through trade as long as people have traversed the oceans, our current awareness of globalization suggests that we are increasingly globalized – that the resources and related actions in distant regions of the world have an unrivaled immediacy in the lives of most people (Harrison 1996; Kim and Shin 2002; One World 2007).

Type
Chapter
Information
Globalization: Effects on Fisheries Resources , pp. 385 - 423
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, E. and Rosenkopf, L. 1997. Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: a computer simulation. Organization Science 8: 298–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acheson, J. M. 1988. The Lobster Gangs of Maine. Hanover, CT: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Acheson, J. M. 2003. Capturing the Commons. Hanover, CT: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Acheson, J. M. and Gardner, R. 2004. The origins of territoriality: the case of the Maine lobster fishery. American Anthropologist 106: 296–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acheson, J. M., Wilson, J. A., and Steneck, R. S. 1998. Managing chaotic fisheries. In Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, eds. Berkes, F., and Folke, C.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 390–413.Google Scholar
Agresti, A. 1984. Analysis of Categorical Data. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Akerman, M. 2003. What does “natural capital” do? The role of metaphor in economic understanding of the environment. Environmental Values 12: 431–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. 1998. The Haribon netsman training program. SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin 4: 7–12.
Baerveldt, C., Duijn, M. A. J., and Hemert, D. A. 2004. Ethnic boundaries and personal choice: assessing the influence of individual inclinations to choose intraethnic relationships on pupils networks. Social Networks 26: 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, R. and Fisher, L. 1961. The perspectives of Elton Mayo. In Complex Organizations, ed. Etzioni, A.. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 113–126.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. 1998. Indigeneous knowledge and resource management systems in the Canadian sub-arctic. In Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, eds. Berkes, F. and Folke, C.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 98–128.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. and Folke, C. 1998. Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, eds. Berkes, F. and Folke, C.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Bidwell, C. and Yasumoto, J. 1999. The collegial focus: teaching fields: collegial relationships and the instructional practice in American high schools. Sociology of Education 72: 234–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. M. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, D. and Jannink, J.-L. 2000. A classification of collaborative management methods. Conservation Ecology 4(2). Available online at www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art13/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of capital. In The Handbook of Theory: Reseach for the Sociology of Education, ed. Richardson, J. G.. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–258.Google Scholar
Breiger, R. 1981. Structure of economic interdependence among nations. In Continuities in Structural Inquiry, eds. Blau, P. M. and Merton, R. K.. San Francisco, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 353–380.Google Scholar
Burger, J., Ostrom, E., Norgaard, R. B., Policansky, D. and Goldstein, B. D. 2001. Protecting the Commons: A Framework for Resource Management in the Americas. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 2000. The network structure of social capital. In Research in Organization Behavior, eds. Sutton, R. I. and Barry, M. Staw. Greenwich, CT: Elsevier Science, pp. 345–423.Google Scholar
Chase-Dunn, C. and Grimes, P. 1995. World system analysis. Annual Review of Sociology 21: 387–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, P. and White, A. T. 1997. Trends in development of coastal area management in tropical countries: from central to community orientation. Coastal Management 25: 155–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, P., White, A. T, and Buhat, D. 1994. Community-based coral reef management on San Salvador Island, the Philippines. Society and Natural Resources 7: 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. E., Beaver, R. A., and Cousins, S. H. 1993. Improving food webs. Ecology 74: 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Conway, F. D. L., Gilden, J., and Zvonkovic, A. 2002. Changing communication and roles: innovations in Oregon's fishing families, communities and management. Fisheries 27(10): 20–29.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coralfilm. 2003. Coral Reef Adventure. Available online at www.coralfilm.com/f_story.html
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., and Stern, P. C. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302: 1907–1912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doreian, P. 2000. Causality in social network analysis. Sociological Methods and Research 30: 81–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowding, K. 2004. The theory of policy communities and policy networks. Contemporary Political Studies 5: 59–78.Google Scholar
Duke, J. B. 1993. Estimation of the network effects model in a large data set. Sociological Methods and Research 21: 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1933. Division of Labor in Society. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. J. and Shepherd, A. D. 1992. Environmental implications of aquarium-fish collection in the Maldives, with proposals for regulation. Environmental Conservation 19: 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faris, J. C. 1972. Cat Harbour: A Newfoundland Fishing Settlement. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Feld, S. L. 1981. The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology 86: 1015–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., and Back, K. 1950. Social Pressures in Informal Groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Finlayson, A. C. and McCay, B. J. 1998. Crossing the threshold of ecosystem resilience: the commercial extinction of the northern cod. In Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, eds. Berkes, F. and Folke, C.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 311–338.Google Scholar
Frank, K. A. 1998. The social context of schooling: quantitative methods. Review of Research in Education 23: 171–216.Google Scholar
Frank, K. A. 2002. The Dynamics of Social Capital. New Orleans, LA: International Social Networks Association.Google Scholar
Frank, K. A. and Fahrbach, K. 1999. Organization culture as a complex system: balance and information in models of influence and selection. Organization Science 10: 253–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, K. A. and Yasumoto, J. Y. 1998. Linking action to social structure within a system: social capital within and between subgroups. American Journal of Sociology 104: 642–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y. and Borman, K. 2004. Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: application to the implementation of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education 77: 148–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, O. and Strauss, D. 1986. Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 832–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, L. 1992. Filling in the blanks: a theory of cognitive categories and the structure of social affiliation. Social Psychology Quarterly 55: 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbay, S. M. and Leenders, R. T. A. J. 1999. CSC: the structure of advantage and disadvantage. In Corporate Social Capital and Liability, eds. Leenders, R. T. A. J. and Gabbay, S.. London: Kluwer, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadgil, M., Natabar, S. H., and Mohan Reddy, B. 1998. People, refugia and resilience. In Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, eds. Berkes, F. and Folke, C.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–47.Google Scholar
Gaedke, U. 1995. A comparison of whole-community and ecosystem approaches (biomass, size distributions, food web analysis, network analysis, simulation models) to study the structure, function and regulation of pelagic food webs. Journal of Plankton Research 17: 1273–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilden, J. 1999. Oregon's Changing Coastal Fishing Communities. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Gittell, R. J. and Vidal, A. 1998. Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties: network theory revisited. American Journal of Sociology 18: 279–288.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannon, B. 1973. The structure of ecosystems. Journal of Theoretical Biology 41: 535–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.Google ScholarPubMed
Hargreaves, A. 1993. Individualism and individuality: reinterpreting the teacher culture. In Teachers' Work: Individuals, Colleagues, and Contexts, eds. Little, J. W. and McLauglin, M. W.. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 51–76.Google Scholar
Harrison, A. 1996. Globalization, trade and income. Canadian Journal of Economics 48: 417–447.Google Scholar
Heemskerk, M., Wilson, K., and Pavao-Zuckerman, M. 2003. Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines. Conservation Ecology 7(3). Available online at www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art8/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh, P. M. and Levin, D. Z. 1999. Umbrella advocates versus alidity police: a life-cycle model. Organization Science 10: 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, P. D. 2005. Bilinear mixed-effects models for dyadic data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100: 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1995. What barriers? What bridges? In Barriers and Bridges to Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, eds. Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., and Light, S.. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 14–16.Google Scholar
Hollingshead, A. B. 1940. Human ecology and human society. Ecological Monographs 10: 354–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holthus, P. 1999. The Marine Aquarium Council, certifying quality and sustainability in the marine aquarium industry. SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin 5: 34–35.Google Scholar
Homans, G. C. 1950. The Human Group. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. P., Baird, A. H., Bellwood, D. R., et al. 2003. Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science 301: 929–933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Idoine, J. 2004. American Lobster. Woodshole, MA: National Marine Fisheries service. Available online at www.nefsc.noaa.gov/sos/spsyn/iv/lobster.htmlGoogle Scholar
Jordan, F. and Molnar, I. 1999. Reliable flows and preferred patterns in food webs. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1: 591–609.Google Scholar
Kapferer, B. 1973. Social network and conjugal role in urban Zambia: towards a reformulation of the Bott hypothesis. In Network Analysis: Studies in Human Interaction, eds. Boissevain, J. and Mitchell, J. C.. New York Mouton, pp. 67–82.Google Scholar
Kim, S. and Shin, E.-H. 2002. A longitudinal analysis of globalization and regionalization in international trade: a social network approach. Social Forces 81: 445–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, A., Frank, K. A., Mason, D. M., Ulanowicz, R. E., and Taylor, W. W. 2003. Compartments exposed in food-web structure. Nature 426: 282–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, A. E., Taylor, W. W., and Mason, D. M. 2004. Potential overfishing impact on the southeastern Lake Michigan food-web, poster presented at the Quantitative Ecosystem Indicators for Fisheries Management International Symposium. March 31–April 3, 2004, Paris, France.
Krempel, L. and Plumper, T. 2002. Exploring the dynamics of international trade by combining the comparative advantages of multivariate statistics and network visualizations. Journal of Social Structure 4(1). Available online at www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume4/KrempelPlumper.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lal, P., Lim-Applegate, H., and Scoccimarro, M.. 2001. The adaptive decision-making process as a tool for integrated natural resource management: focus, attitudes and approach. Conservation Ecology 5(2). Available online at www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art11/Google Scholar
Lawler, E. J. and Yoon, J. 1998. Network structure and emotion in exchange relations. American Sociological Review 63: 871–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazega, E. and Duijn, M. 1997. Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: a logistic regression model for dyadic network data. Social Networks 19: 375–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K. N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the New Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Lee, K. N. 1999. Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology 3(2) Available online at www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art3/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, N. 1999. Sunbelt keynote address. Connections 22: 28–51.Google Scholar
Lin, N. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Los Angeles Times. 2002. Swimming against the tide of overfishing. Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles, December 29, 2002.
Lynch, K. D. 2001. Formation and implications of interorganizational networks among fisheries stakeholder organizations in Michigans's Pere Marquette River watershed. Ph.D. thesis Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Maiolo, J. R. and Johnson, J. 1992. Determining and utilizing communication networks in marine fisheries: a management tool. Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 1992: 274–296.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. V. and Friedkin, N. E. 1994. Network studies of social influence. Sociological Methods and Research 22: 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M. 1973. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Mayo, R. and O' Brien, L. 2000. Atlantic Cod. Woodshole, MA: National Marine Fisheries Service. Available online at www.nefsc.noaa.gov/sos/spsyn/pg/cod/Google Scholar
McCann, K., Hastings, A., and Huxel, G. R. 1998. Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395: 794–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCay, B. J. 2001. Community-based and cooperative fisheries: solutions to fisher's problems. In Protecting the Commons: A Framework for Resource Management in the Americas, eds. Burger, J., Ostrom, E., Norgaard, R. B., Policansky, D., and Goldstein, B. D. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 175–194.Google Scholar
McClanahan, T., Polunin, N. and Done, T. 2002. Ecological states and the resilience of coral reefs. Ecology and Society 6(2): 18.Google Scholar
McDonough, M. H., Cobb, M., and Holecek, D. F. 1987. Role of communication science in social valuation of fisheries. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116: 519–524.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, K. B. 2004. The role of a social network in the functioning of the Grand Haven Charter Boat Fishery, Lake Michigan. M.S. thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Nadel, S. F. 1957. The Theory of Social Structure. London: Cohen & West.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. 1977. Establishing a 200-Mile Fisheries Zone, NTIS Order #PB-273578. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Office of Technology Assessment.
One World 2007. The OneWorld Network. Available online at http://us.oneworld.net/
Palsson, G. 1998. Learning by fishing: practical engagement and environmental concerns. In Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, eds. Berkes, F. and Folke, C.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–66.Google Scholar
Pattison, P. and Robbins, G. 2002. Neighborhood-based models for social networks. Sociological Methodology 32: 301–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R., and Torres, F. 1998. Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279: 860–863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickett, S. T. A., Burch, W. R., and Grove, J. M. 1999. Interdisciplinary research: maintaining the constructive impulses in a culture of criticism. Ecosystems 2: 302–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, A. 1998. Social capital. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, A. 2000. The hidden abode: sociology as analysis of the unexpected. American Sociological Review 65: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, A. and Sensenbrenner, J. 1993. Embeddedness and immigration: notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology 98: 1320–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretty, J. 2003. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302: 1912–1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raub, W. and Weesie, J. 1990. Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: an example of network effects. American Journal of Sociology 96: 626–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricciardi, A. and Rasmussen, J. B. 1998. Predicting the identity and impact of future biological invaders: a priority for aquatic resource management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 55: 1759–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. 2003. With record catches, why are prices so high? Portland Press Herald, Portland, OR, July 6, 2003.
Roethlisberger, F. J. and Dickson, W. J. 1941. Management and the Worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rubec, P. J., Cruz, F., Pratt, V., Oellers, R., and Lallo, F. 2000. Cyanide-free, net-caught fish for the marine aquarium trade. SPC Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin 7: 28–34.Google Scholar
Safina, C.. 1998. Song for the Blue Ocean: Encounters along the World's Coasts and Beneath the Seas. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Schechter, M. G. 1999. Globalization and civil society. In The Revival of Civil Society: Global and Comparative Perspectives, ed. Schechter, M. G.. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, G. 1955. Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations, trans. K. H. Wolff and R. Bendix. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sporrong, U. 1998. Delecarlia in central Sweden before 1800: a society of social stability and ecological resilience. In Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, eds. Berkes, F. and Folke, C.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 67–92.Google Scholar
Steins, N. 2001. New directions in natural resource management: the offer of actor-network theory. IDS Bulletin 32(4): 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepp, J. R., Jones, E. C., Pavao-Zuckerman, M., Casagrande, D., and Zarger, R. 2003. Remarkable properties of human ecosystems. Conservation Ecology 7(3). Available online at www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art11/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stovel, K., Savage, M., and Bearman, P. 1996. Ascription into achievement: models of career systems at Lloyds Bank. American Journal of Sociology 102: 358–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, D. and Ikeda, M. 1990. Pseudolikelihood estimation for social networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 204–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations, 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available online at http://unfccc.int/cop4/ftconv.html
United Nations, 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available online at http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/07a01.pdf
USAID Philippines. 2006. Transforming the Marine Aquarium Trade in the Philippines. Manila: Marine Aquarium Council. Available online at http://philippines.usaid.gov/oee_envgov_marine_tmat.php
Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review 61: 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzzi, B. 1999. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review 64: 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderploeg, H. A., Nalepa, T. F., Jude, D. J., et al. 2002. Dispersal of emerging ecological impacts of Ponto-Caspian species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 59: 1209–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wali, A., Darlow, G., Fialkowski, C., et al. 2003. New methodologies for interdisciplinary research and action in an urban ecosystem in Chicago. Conservation Ecology 7(3). Available online at www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art2/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B. and Steffen, W. 1997. An overview of the implications of global change for natural and managed terrestrial ecosystems. Conservation Ecology 1(2). Available online at www.consecol.org/vol1/iss2/art2/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, S. and Pattison, P. 1996. Logit models and logistic regressions for univariate and bivariate social networks. I. An introduction to Markov graphs. Psychometrika 61: 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, eds. Henderson, A. M. and Parsons, T.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1958. Essays in Sociology, eds. Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wellman, B. and Wortley, S. 1990. Different strokes from different folks: community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology 96: 558–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, E. M. 2001. Collection of Coral Reef Fish for Aquaria: Global Trade, Conservation Issues, and Management Strategies. Ross-on-Wye, UK: Marine Conservation Society.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 1965. Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woolcock, M. 1998. Social capital and economic development. Theory and Society 27: 151–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y. and Frank, K. A. 2003. An ecological analysis of factors affecting technology use in schools. American Educational Research Journal 40: 807–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zezima, K. 2003. Tracking the route of your lobster dinner. New York Times July 24, 2003.
Zimmerman, C. R., Fukami, T., and Drake, J. A. 2003. An experimentally derived map of community assembly space. In Unifying Themes in Complex System II: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Complex Systems, eds. Bar-Yam, Y. and Minai, A.. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing, pp. 427–436.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The intersection of global trade, social networks, and fisheries
    • By Kenneth A. Frank, Measurement and Quantitative Methods Counseling Educational Psychology and Special Education and Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 460 Erickson Hall East Lansing, MI 48824 USA, Katrina Mueller, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 13 Natural Resource Building East Lansing, MI 48824 USA, Ann Krause, Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability Michigan State University 13 Natural Resources Building East Lansing, MI 48824 USA, William W. Taylor, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 13 Natural Resource Building East Lansing, MI 48824 USA, Nancy J. Leonard, Great Lakes Fishery Commission 2100 Commonwealth Boulevard Suite 100 Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
  • Edited by William W. Taylor, Michigan State University, Michael G. Schechter, Michigan State University, Lois G. Wolfson, Michigan State University
  • Book: Globalization: Effects on Fisheries Resources
  • Online publication: 10 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542183.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The intersection of global trade, social networks, and fisheries
    • By Kenneth A. Frank, Measurement and Quantitative Methods Counseling Educational Psychology and Special Education and Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 460 Erickson Hall East Lansing, MI 48824 USA, Katrina Mueller, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 13 Natural Resource Building East Lansing, MI 48824 USA, Ann Krause, Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability Michigan State University 13 Natural Resources Building East Lansing, MI 48824 USA, William W. Taylor, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 13 Natural Resource Building East Lansing, MI 48824 USA, Nancy J. Leonard, Great Lakes Fishery Commission 2100 Commonwealth Boulevard Suite 100 Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
  • Edited by William W. Taylor, Michigan State University, Michael G. Schechter, Michigan State University, Lois G. Wolfson, Michigan State University
  • Book: Globalization: Effects on Fisheries Resources
  • Online publication: 10 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542183.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The intersection of global trade, social networks, and fisheries
    • By Kenneth A. Frank, Measurement and Quantitative Methods Counseling Educational Psychology and Special Education and Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 460 Erickson Hall East Lansing, MI 48824 USA, Katrina Mueller, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 13 Natural Resource Building East Lansing, MI 48824 USA, Ann Krause, Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability Michigan State University 13 Natural Resources Building East Lansing, MI 48824 USA, William W. Taylor, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 13 Natural Resource Building East Lansing, MI 48824 USA, Nancy J. Leonard, Great Lakes Fishery Commission 2100 Commonwealth Boulevard Suite 100 Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
  • Edited by William W. Taylor, Michigan State University, Michael G. Schechter, Michigan State University, Lois G. Wolfson, Michigan State University
  • Book: Globalization: Effects on Fisheries Resources
  • Online publication: 10 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542183.020
Available formats
×