Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T00:43:56.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Writing Systems and Global Literacy Development

from Part II - Neurobiological and Ecological Markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2023

By
Charles Perfetti  and
Ludo Verhoeven
Edited by
Ludo Verhoeven ,
Sonali Nag ,
Charles Perfetti  and
Kenneth Pugh
Ludo Verhoeven
Affiliation:
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Sonali Nag
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Charles Perfetti
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Kenneth Pugh
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

This chapter deals with global literacy development in relation to writing systems. A global perspective on literacy compels attention to global variation in languages and writing systems. The history of writing involves processes of discovery, borrowing, and modification, which language communities go through when they move toward a literate society. These processes require choices to be made regarding the graphic forms and how they connect to the spoken language and to broader cultural and educational considerations, including how new generations can learn this writing to understand their language. Across the globe, writing systems have developed varying solutions as to how to represent their spoken language, that is, its phonological, morphological, and semantic properties. In this chapter, some of the solutions to this mapping problem through invention and variation will be examined , and cognitive principles aiding the process of learning to read across languages and writing systems are proposed. The chapter concludes that writing systems follow the same set of operating principles in learning to read but that the they differences between them do matter for in terms of understanding the weighting of reading procedures and different educational challenges. It is also emphasized that all writing systems are learnable, and instruction effectively geared toward their specific properties may be successful for most children.

Keywords

writing systemsliteracylearninglanguage propertiesglobaloperating principlesuniversals
Type
Chapter
Information
Global Variation in Literacy Development , pp. 241 - 264
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berman, R. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2002). Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy, 5(1), 1–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.5.1.02ber.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolger, D. J., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2005). A cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: Universal structures plus writing system variation. Journal of Human Brain Mapping, 25(1), 92–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bright, B. (2000). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas. Studies in the Linguistics Sciences, 30(1), 63–71.Google Scholar
Cao, F., Bitan, T., Chou, T. L., Burman, D. D., & Booth, J. R. (2006). Deficient orthographic and phonological representations in children with dyslexia revealed by brain activation patterns. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 1041–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, F., & Perfetti, C. A. (2017). Neural signatures of the reading-writing connection: Greater involvement of writing in Chinese reading. PlosOne 11(12), e0168414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, L.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Perfetti, C. A. (2017). GraphCom: A multidimensional measure of graphic complexity applied to 131 written languages. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, P. T. (1990). Fundamentals of grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 119(4), 727–731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/602899, JSTOR 602899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, P. T. (1992). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In Downing, P., Lima, S. D., & Noonan, M. (eds.), The Linguistics of Literacy (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, P. T. (1996). The invention of writing. In Daniels, P. T. & Bright, W. (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Daniels, P. T., & Bright, W. (1996). The World’s Writing System. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Daniels, P. T., & Share, D. L. (2018). Writing system variation and its consequences for reading and dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(1), 101–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1379082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. B. (1930). The Life and Work of Sequoyah: Chronicles of Oklahoma, vol. 8, no. 2. https://web.archive.org/web/20171028175529/http://digital.library.okstate.edu/chronicles/v008/v008p149.html.Google Scholar
DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Hooper, A. M. (2001). Why learning to read is easier in Welsh than in English: Orthographic transparency effects evinced with frequency-matched tests. Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 571–599.Google Scholar
Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 263–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11001841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelb, I. J. (1952). A Study of Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Rev. ed., 1963.)Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & de Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(10), 19–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U., Porpodas, C., & Wheelwright, S. (1997). Children’s orthographic representations in English and Greek. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Ideas about language. In Aims and Perspectives in Linguistics. Occasional Papers, No. 1 (pp. 32–55). Applied Linguistics Association of Australia. (Reprinted in On Language and Linguistics: Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, vol. 3, ed. Jonathan Webster, pp. 92–115. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.)Google Scholar
Kelly, P. (2019). The invention, transmission and evolution of writing: Insights from the new scripts of West Africa. In Ferrara, S. & Valerio, M. (eds.), Paths Into Script Formation in the Ancient Mediterranean (pp. 189–209). New England: Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici.Google Scholar
Kim, S. Y., Qi, T., Feng, X., Ding, G., Liu, L., & Cao, F. (2016). How does language distance between L1 and L2 brain network? An fMRI study of Korean-Chinese-English trilinguals. Neuroimage, 129(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim-Renaud, Y.-K. (2000). Sejong’s theory of literacy and writing. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 30(1), 13–45.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A. et al. (1997). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science, 277, 684–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, I. Y. (1973). Segmentation of the spoken word and reading acquisition. Bulletin of the Orton Society 23, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, B., Wang, X., & Li, D. (2016). The processing of visual and phonological configurations of Chinese one- and two-character words in a priming task of semantic categorization. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In Metsala, J. L. & Ehri, L. C. (eds.), Word Recognition in Beginning Literacy (pp. 89–120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nag, S. (2007). Early reading in Kannada: The pace of acquisition of orthographic knowledge and phonemic awareness. Journal of Reading in Research, 30, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, K., Kuo, W.-J., Pegado, F. et al. (2012). Universal brain systems for recognizing word shapes and handwriting gestures during reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 109(50), 20762–20767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, T. K., Snowling, M. J., & de Jong, P. F. (2004). A cross-linguistic comparison of children learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 785–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46(28), 4646–4674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C., & Treiman, R. (eds.), Reading Acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Cao, F., & Booth, J. (2013). Specialization and universals in the development of reading skill: How Chinese research informs a universal science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perfetti, C. A., & Harris, L. N. (2013). Universal reading processes are modulated by language and writing system. Language Learning and Development, 9(4), 296–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., Fiez, J. et al. (2007). Reading in two writing systems: Accommodation and assimilation in the brain’s reading network. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(2), 131–146. Special issue on “Neurocognitive approaches to bilingualism: Asian languages,” P. Li (Ed.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Epilogue: Universals and particulars in learning to read across seventeen orthographies. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. A. (eds.), Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems (pp. 455–480). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (eds.), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richlan, F., Kronbichler, M., & Wimmer, H. (2009). Functional abnormalities in the dyslexic brain: A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 30(10), 3299–3308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. (2011). Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In McCardle, P., Ren, J., Tzeng, O., & Miller, B. (eds.), Dyslexia across Languages: Orthography and the Brain-Gene-Behavior Link (pp. 146–168). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. in collaboration with COST Action A8 network (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L., & Daniels, P. T. (2015). Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets, and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz, and Fowler (2014). Writing Systems Research, 8(1), 17–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2015.1016395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74(1), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shu, H., Peng, H., & McBride-Chang, C. (2008).Phonological awareness in young Chinese children. Developmental Science, 11, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shuai, L., Frost, S. J., Landi, M., Mencl, W. E., & Pugh, K. R. (2019). Neurocognitive models of skilled and impaired reading from a cross-language perspective. In Verhoeven, L., Perfetti, C. A., & Pugh, K. (eds.), Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, F. (1979). Reading without Nonsense. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in Understanding Reading: Scientific Foundations and New Frontiers. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. A., Eden, G., Perfetti, C. A., & Siok, W. T. (2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 102, 8781–8785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unseth, P. (2011). Invention of scripts in West Africa for ethnic revitalization. In Fishman, J. A. & Garcia, O. (eds.), Handbook of Language and Ethnic Identity: The Success-Failure Continuum in Language and Ethnic Identity Efforts, Volume 2 (pp. 23–32). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2017b). Operating principles in learning to read. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. A. (eds.), Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (eds.). (2017a). Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L., Perfetti, C. A., & Pugh, K. (eds.) (2019). Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 407–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, J., & Rayner, K. (2000). Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. Memory and Cognition, 28(6), 1011–1021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yaden, D., Rowe, D., & MacGillivray, L. (2000). Emergent literacy: A matter (polyphony) of perspectives. In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, vol. 3 (pp. 425–454). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Kaup, B., Stanfield, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2001). Language comprehension as guided experience. http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×