Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:46:18.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Evaluating the benefits of abolishing the MFA in the Uruguay Round package

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Yongzheng Yang
Affiliation:
Australian National University
Will Martin
Affiliation:
Washington, DC USA
Koji Yanagishima
Affiliation:
Washington, DC USA
Thomas W. Hertel
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

Introduction and overview

The use of quantitative restrictions on textile imports from developing countries dates back to the 1930s (Keesing and Wolf 1980). At that time, the restrictions were mainly directed against the increasingly competitive Japanese cotton textile industry. After the Second World War, Japan's textile exports to the industrial countries spearheaded its export-led industrialization. However, the pressure for protection in industrial countries came not only from competition overseas, but perhaps more important, from the stagnant or even declining output and employment as a result of sluggish domestic demand (Keesing and Wolf 1980). Despite Japan's “voluntary” export restraints, a Short-Term Arrangement (STA) in cotton textile trade was reached in 1961 at the initiative of the US and under the auspices of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The conclusion of a Long-Term Arrangement (LTA) in 1962 established a system of quantitative protection against textile exports from developing countries (GATT 1984).

Despite the LTA, developing countries were able to expand their exports of textiles to industrial countries in the 1960s. Technological change strengthened the competitiveness of developing countries in textiles throughout this period. The emergence of synthetic fibers also enabled developing countries to find holes in industrial country restrictions, thereby increasing their market penetration. In addition, restrictions on Japanese products led to rapid growth of exports from other Asian countries, namely, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Korea (Keesing and Wolf 1980).

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Trade Analysis
Modeling and Applications
, pp. 253 - 279
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×