Book contents
- Global Resources and the Environment
- Reviews
- Global Resources and the Environment
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Figure Credits
- Part I Introduction, Dynamic Systems, and Change
- 1 Introduction
- 2 A Perspective on Dynamic Systems
- 3 Change, Sustainability, and Related Concepts
- Part II People
- Part III Climates
- Part IV Landforms
- Part V Biodiversity
- Part VI Water
- Part VII Agriculture
- Part VIII Energy
- Part IX Minerals
- Part X Forests
- Part XI Perspective
- Book part
- Index
- Plate Section
- References
2 - A Perspective on Dynamic Systems
from Part I - Introduction, Dynamic Systems, and Change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2018
Book contents
- Global Resources and the Environment
- Reviews
- Global Resources and the Environment
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Figure Credits
- Part I Introduction, Dynamic Systems, and Change
- 1 Introduction
- 2 A Perspective on Dynamic Systems
- 3 Change, Sustainability, and Related Concepts
- Part II People
- Part III Climates
- Part IV Landforms
- Part V Biodiversity
- Part VI Water
- Part VII Agriculture
- Part VIII Energy
- Part IX Minerals
- Part X Forests
- Part XI Perspective
- Book part
- Index
- Plate Section
- References
Summary
Socio-environmental systems and their subsystems will be viewed as “complex systems” lying between “organized complexity” and “disorganized complexity.” Studies of these systems in recent decades have developed under the label “complexity science.” Complex systems involve a large number of variables with complicated interactions and feedback loops. They typically display some degree of self-organization—pattern formation without central control. They exhibit behaviors that cannot be explained through studying the subcomponents. A conceptual scheme describing the dynamics and the evolution of such systems is presented. Order and some degree of disorder can conflict and keep a system vibrant. At times, a system can decline or disappear. Building blocks can then form a new system that can be quite different from the former one. Models are simplified depictions of reality as perceived by the people constructing them. They allow one to understand and somewhat predict the behaviors of the modeled system. Two structural organizations are hierarchies and networks.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Global Resources and the Environment , pp. 12 - 21Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Wiener, N.. Cybernetics: Control and Communication in the Animal and Machine. (MIT Press, 1948).Google Scholar
Boulding, K. E.. General Systems Theory – The Skeleton of Science. Management Science. 1956;2(3):197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrester, J. W.. System Dynamics, Systems Thinking, and Soft OR. System Dynamics Review. 1994;10(2–3):245–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldrop, M. M.. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Chaos. (Simon & Schuster, 1992).Google Scholar
Levin, S. A.. Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems. Ecosystems. 1998;1(5):431–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodder, R., Dare, R.. Complex Adaptive Systems and Complexity Theory: Inter-related Knowledge Domains. ESD 83: Research Seminar in Engineering Systems, October 31, 2000. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000): 14 pp.Google Scholar
Heylighen, F.. Complexity and Self-Organization. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. 2008;3:1215–24.Google Scholar
Phelan., S. E. A Note on the Correspondence between Complexity and Systems Theory. Systemic Practice and Action Research. 1999;12(3):237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, W.. Principles of the Self-Organizing Systems. Facets of System Science. 1991;6(1/2):102.Google Scholar
De Wolf, T., Holvoet, T., editors. Emergence Versus Self-Organisation: Different Concepts but Promising When Combined. In International Workshop on Engineering Self-Organising Applications. (Springer, 2004).Google Scholar
Tainter, J.. Complexity, Problem Solving, and Sustainable Societies. In Getting Down to Earth: Practical Applications of Ecological Economics. (Island Press, 1996): pp. 61–76.Google Scholar
Kirchner, J. W., Weil, A.. Delayed Biological Recovery from Extinctions Throughout the Fossil Record. Nature. 2000;404(6774):177–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botkin, D. B., Sobel, M. J.. Stability in Time-Varying Ecosystems. The American Naturalist. 1975;109(970):625–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, A.. Catastrophes and Lesser Calamities: The Causes of Mass Extinctions. (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Huddart, D., Stott, T.. Earth Environments: Past, Present, and Future. (Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).Google Scholar
Dove, M. R., Sajise, P. E., Doolittle, A. A.. Beyond the Sacred Forest: Complicating Conservation in Southeast Asia. (Duke University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterman, J. D.. All Models Are Wrong: Reflections on Becoming a Systems Scientist. System Dynamics Review. 2002;18(4):501–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., Kinzig., A. Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society. 2004;9(2):5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahmandad, H., Sterman, J. D.. Reporting Guidelines for Simulation‐Based Research in Social Sciences. System Dynamics Review. 2012;28(4):396–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahmandad, H., Sterman, J.. Heterogeneity and Network Structure in the Dynamics of Diffusion: Comparing Agent-Based and Differential Equation Models. Management Science. 2008;54(5):998–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borshchev, A., editor. From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modeling: Reasons, Techniques, Tools. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, July 25–29. (Citeseer, 2004).Google Scholar
Lane, D. C.. The Power of the Bond between Cause and Effect: Jay Wright Forrester and the Field of System Dynamics. System Dynamics Review. 2007;23(2/3):95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albin, S.. Building a System Dynamics Model (MIT System Dynamics in Education Project, 1997 [Accessed August 16, 2017]). Available from: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/sloan-school-of-management/15-988-system-dynamics-self-study-fall-1998-spring-1999/readings/building.pdf.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A.. The Architecture of Complexity. In The Science of the Artificial. (MIT Press; 1969): pp. 192–229.Google Scholar
Salthe, S. N.. Summary of the Principles of Hierarchy Theory. General Systems Bulletin. 2002; 31: 13–17.Google Scholar
Pattee, H. H.. Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems. (George Brasiller, 1973).Google Scholar
Oliver, C. D.. Functional Restoration of Social-Forestry Systems across Spatial and Temporal Scales. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 2014;33 (Supplement 1):S123–S48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Yam, Y.. General Features of Complex Systems. Isn Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), UNESCO (EOLSS Publishers, 2002).Google Scholar
Newman, M. E.. Modularity and Community Structure in Networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103(23):8577–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strogatz, S. H.. Exploring Complex Networks. Nature. 2001;410(6825):268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cilliers, P.. Boundaries, Hierarchies and Networks in Complex Systems. International Journal of Innovation Management. 2001;5(02):135–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar