Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T18:09:39.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Biodiversity: Communities and Landscapes

from Part V - Biodiversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Chadwick Dearing Oliver
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

A now outdated concept assumed these communities were stable and co-evolved. Plant communities were assumed to “partition” areas between forests, grasslands, and other vegetation types. And, plants within a community interacted mutualistically to help the community remain intact (relay floristics). We now know that plants compete, and the ones that gain initial advantage after a disturbance can dominate a community—and make the same area into different vegetation types. This changes complicate vegetation mapping. Following a disturbance, plant communities undergo times of rapid plant invasion, followed by exclusion of new stems when the growing space is becomes occupied. Later, other structures appear. Species diversity is generally highest during initial plant invasion (“stem exclusion stage”), lowest in the “stem exclusion stage”, and increases with different species in the later stages. All stages are needed in a landscape to protect biodiversity. Recent declines in forest species may be because stages have been excluded and because communities have been fragmented with roads and cities. All structures will be important for maintaining all species with climate changes.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Tansley, A. G.. The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms. Ecology. 1935;16(3):284307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmins, J.. Forest Ecology. (Macmillan Publishing Company, 1987).Google Scholar
Crawley, M. J.. The Structure of Plant Communities. Plant Ecology. 2009:475531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornduff, R., Faber, P. M., Keeler-Wolf, T.. Introduction to California Plant Life. (University of California Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Boyce, S. G., Oliver, C. D.. The History of Research in Forest Ecology and Silviculture. Forest and Wildlife Science in America: A History. (Forest History Society, 1999), pp. 414–53.Google Scholar
Huston, M. A.. Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species. (Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Stevens, W. K.. New Eye on Nature: The Real Constant Is Eternal Turmoil. New York Times. 1990 July 31, 1990;Sect. B.Google Scholar
Levin, S. A.. Self-Organization and the Emergence of Complexity in Ecological Systems. BioScience. 2005;55(12):1075–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddart, D., Stott, T.. Earth Environments: Present, Past, and Future. (Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).Google Scholar
Urban, M. C., Tewksbury, J. J., Sheldon, K. S.. On a Collision Course: Competition and Dispersal Differences Create No-Analogue Communities and Cause Extinctions During Climate Change. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2012;279(1735):2072–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Spinage, C. A.. Too Many Elephants: A Continent-Wide Problem: Part I. African Ecology. (Springer, 2012), pp. 675713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lortie, C. J., Brooker, R. W., Choler, P., et al. Rethinking Plant Community Theory. Oikos. 2004;107(2):433–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Báez, S., Donoso, D. A., Queenborough, S. A., et al. Ant Mutualism Increases Long-Term Growth and Survival of a Common Amazonian Tree. The American Naturalist. 2016;188(5):567–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egler, F. E.. Vegetation Science Concepts I. Initial Floristic Composition, a Factor in Old-Field Vegetation Development with 2 Figs. Vegetatio. 1954;4(6):412–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J. L.. Population Biology of Plants. (Academic Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Niering, W. A.. Vegetation Dynamics (Succession and Climax) in Relation to Plant Community Management. Conservation Biology. 1987;1(4):287–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C. D.. Forest Development in North America Following Major Disturbances. Forest Ecology and Management. 1980;3:153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E. P.. Fundamentals of Ecology. (Saunders, 1971).Google Scholar
Clements, F. E.. Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. (Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1916).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, F. E.. Nature and Structure of the Climax. Ecology. 1936;24(1):252–84.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. D., Larson, B. C.. Forest Stand Dynamics, update edition. (John Wiley, 1996).Google Scholar
Drury, W. H., Nisbet, I. C.. Succession. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum. 1973;54(3):331–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niering, W., Dreyer, G., Egler, F., Anderson, J. Jr. Stability of Viburnum Lentago Shrub Community after 30 Years. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 1986:23–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niering, W. A., Egler, F. E.. A Shrub Community of Viburnum Lentago, Stable for Twenty‐Five Years. Ecology. 1955;36(2):356–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C. D., Burkhardt, E. C., Skojac, D. A.. The Increasing Scarcity of Red Oaks in Mississippi River Floodplain Forests: Influence of the Residual Overstory. Forest Ecology and Management. 2005;210(1):393414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C. D.. Development of Northern Red Oak in Mixed Species Stands in Central New England. Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Bulletin. 1978;91:63.Google Scholar
Covey, K. R., Barrett, A. L., Ashton, M. S.. Ice Storms as a Successional Pathway for Fagus Grandifolia Advancement in Quercus Rubra Dominated Forests of Southern New England. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2015;45(11):1628–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C. D., Stephens, E. P.. Reconstruction of a Mixed‐Species Forest in Central New England. Ecology. 1977;58(3):562–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, K. L.. Multiaged Silviculture: Managing for Complex Forest Stand Structures. (Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, E., Granzow-de la Cerda, I., Oliver, C., Kulakowski, D.. Wind Effects and Regeneration in Broadleaf and Pine Stands after Hurricane Felix (2007) in Northern Nicaragua. Forest Ecology and Management. 2017;400:199207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, U. M., Berlyn, G. P., Gregoire, T. G., Tennakoon, K. U., Ashton, M. S.. Differences in Survival and Growth among Tropical Rain Forest Pioneer Tree Seedlings in Relation to Canopy Openness and Herbivory. Biotropica. 2014;46(2):183–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snook., L. K. Catastrophic Disturbance, Logging and the Ecology of Mahogany (Swietenia Macrophylla King): Grounds for Listing a Major Tropical Timber Species in CITES. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 1996;122(1):3546.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Vega, J., Covey, K. R., Ashton, M. S.. Tamm Review: Large-Scale Infrequent Disturbances and Their Role in Regenerating Shade-Intolerant Tree Species in Mesoamerican Rainforests: Implications for Sustainable Forest Management. Forest Ecology and Management. 2017;395:4868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins., S. L. Fire Frequency and Community Heterogeneity in Tallgrass Prairie Vegetation. Ecology. 1992;73(6):2001–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Maarel, E.. Pattern and Process in the Plant Community: Fifty Years after as Watt. Journal of Vegetation Science. 1996;7(1):1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, A. S.. Pattern and Process in the Plant Community. Journal of Ecology. 1947;35(1/2):122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, S. L., Glenn, S. M., Gibson, D. J.. Experimental Analysis of Intermediate Disturbance and Initial Floristic Composition: Decoupling Cause and Effect. Ecology. 1995;76(2):486–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhlendorf, S., Engle, D.. Application of the Fire–Grazing Interaction to Restore a Shifting Mosaic on Tallgrass Prairie. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2004;41(4):604–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhlendorf, S. D., Engle, D. M.. Restoring Heterogeneity on Rangelands: Ecosystem Management Based on Evolutionary Grazing Patterns. BioScience. 2001;51(8):625–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, S. P., Foster, R. B.. Biology, Chance, and History and the Structure of Tropical Rain Forest Tree Communities. Community Ecology. 1986;19:314–29.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. D., O’Hara, K. L.. Effects of Restoration at the Stand Level, in Stanturf, J. A., Madsen, P., editors, Restoration of Boreal and Temperate Forests. (CRC Press, 2004): pp. 3159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, J. F., Spies, T. A., Van Pelt, R., et al. Disturbances and Structural Development of Natural Forest Ecosystems with Silvicultural Implications, Using Douglas-Fir Forests as an Example. Forest Ecology and Management. 2002;155(1):399423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, P. S., Oliver, C. D.. Variability of Stand Structures and Development in Old-Growth Forests in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Forests. 2015;6(9):3177–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GifeX. South America Vegetation, 2017 (Accessed July 1, 2017). Available from: www.gifex.com/detail-en/2009–11-19–11222/South-America-vegetation.html.Google Scholar
Herrmann, S. M., Anyamba, A., Tucker, C. J.. Recent Trends in Vegetation Dynamics in the African Sahel and Their Relationship to Climate. Global Environmental Change. 2005;15(4):394404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiernaux, P., Bielders, C. L., Valentin, C., Bationo, A., Fernandez-Rivera, S.. Effects of Livestock Grazing on Physical and Chemical Properties of Sandy Soils in Sahelian Rangelands. Journal of Arid Environments. 1999;41(3):231–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimore, M., Turner, B.. Does the Sahelian Smallholder’s Management of Woodland, Farm Trees, Rangeland Support the Hypothesis of Human-Induced Desertification? Journal of Arid Environments. 2005;63(3):567–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. L. Jr. Wildlife, Forests, and Forestry. Principles of Managing Forests for Biological Diversity. (Prentice Hall, 1990).Google Scholar
Simberloff, D., Dayan., T. The Guild Concept and the Structure of Ecological Communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1991;22:115–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C., Adams, D., Bonnicksen, T., et al. Report on Forest Health of the United States by the Forest Health Science Panel. (Center for International Trade in Forest Products, University of Washington, 1997).Google Scholar
Duguid, M. C., Morrell, E. H., Goodale, E., Ashton, M. S.. Changes in Breeding Bird Abundance and Species Composition over a 20 year Chronosequence Following Shelterwood Harvests in Oak-Hardwood Forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 2016;376:221–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, O. J.. Resolving Ecosystem Complexity (Mpb-47). (Princeton University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. L.. Wildlife, Forests and Forestry. (Prentice Hall, 1998).Google Scholar
Shaw, J. H.. Introduction to Wildlife Management. (McGraw-Hill, 1985).Google Scholar
Gauthreauz, S. A. Jr. Animal Migration, Orientation and Navigation. (Academic Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Han, X., Oliver, C. D., Ge, J., Guo, Q., Kou, X.. Managing Forest Stand Structures to Enhance Conservation of the Amur Tiger (Panthera Tigris Altaica). in A Goal-Oriented Approach to Forest Landscape Restoration. (Springer, 2012): pp. 93128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumpter, D. J.. Collective Animal Behavior. (Princeton University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boitani, L., Fuller, T., editors. Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Questions. (Columbia University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Canby, P.. The Cat Came Back: Alpha Predators and the New Wilderness. Harper’s Magazine. 2005:95102.Google Scholar
Low, T.. The New Nature: Winners and Losers in Wild Australia. (Penguin Australia Ltd, 2002).Google Scholar
Krishnadas, M., Kumar, A., Comita, L. S.. Environmental Gradients Structure Tropical Tree Assemblages at the Regional Scale. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2016;27(6):1117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audino, L. D., Murphy, S. J., Zambaldi, L., Louzada, J., Comita, L. S.. Drivers of Community Assembly in Tropical Forest Restoration Sites: Role of Local Environment, Landscape and Space. Ecological Applications. 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Horn, M. A., Gentry, R. M., Faaborg, J.. Patterns of Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapillus) Pairing Success in Missouri Forest Tracts. The Auk. 1995:98106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, C.. Deep-Forest Birds and Hostile Edges. In Restoring North America’s Birds: Lessons from Landscape Ecology. (Yale University Press, 2002): p. 99.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. H.. Evolution and Measurement of Species Diversity. Taxon. 1972:213–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, S. A.. Methodology for Assessing Biodiversity. (Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, 2006).Google Scholar
Voleti, R., Winter, S. L., Leis, S.. Patch Burn-Grazing: An Annotated Bibliography. Papers in Natural Resources. 2014 (Paper 462):12.Google Scholar
Henning, J., Lacefield, G., Rasnake, M., et al. Rotational Grazing. (University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture, 2000).Google Scholar
Camp, A. C., Oliver, C. D., Hessburg, P., Everett, R.. Predicting Late-Successional Fire Refugia Pre-Dating European Settlement in the Wenatchee Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management 95: 63–77. Forest Ecology and Management. 1997;95:6377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C. D., Osawa, A., Camp, A.. Forest Dynamics and Resulting Animal and Plant Population Changes at the Stand and Landscape Levels. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 1997;6(3–4):281312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallis, J. H.. Plant Community History: Long-Term Changes in Plant Distribution and Diversity. (Chapman and Hall, 1991).Google Scholar
UN FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000: Main Report. (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, 2001).Google Scholar
Morgan, P., Aplet, G. H., Haufler, J. B., et al. Historical Range of Variability: A Useful Tool for Evaluating Ecosystem Change. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 1994;2(1–2):87111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piotto, D., Montagnini, F., Thomas, W., Ashton, M., Oliver, C.. Forest Recovery after Swidden Cultivation across a 40-Year Chronosequence in the Atlantic Forest of Southern Bahia, Brazil. Plant Ecology. 2009;205(2):261–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, J. J., Ackerly, D. D., Albano, C. M., et al. The Theory Behind, and the Challenges of, Conserving Nature’s Stage in a Time of Rapid Change. Conservation Biology. 2015;29(3):618–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjort, J., Gordon, J., Gray, M., Hunter, M. Jr. Valuing the Stage: Why Geodiversity Matters. Conservation Biology DOI. 2015;10.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. D., O’Hara, K. L., Baker, P. J.. Effects of Restoration at the Stand Level, in Stanturf, J. A., Madsen, P., editors, Restoration of Boreal and Temperate Forests. (Taylor and Francis, 2015).Google Scholar
Fahrig, L.. Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity. Annual Review Of Ecological Evolutionary Systems. 2003(34):487515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, T.. The Eternal Frontier: An Ecological History of North America and Its Peoples. (Atlantic Monthly Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C.. After the Ice Age: The Return of Life to Glaciated North America. (University of Chicago Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Braun, E. L.. Deciduous Forests of Eastern United States. (Blakiston Company, 1950).Google Scholar
Davis, M. B.. Late-Glacial Climate in Northern United States: A Comparison of New England and the Great Lakes Region, in Cushing, E. J., Wright, H. E., editors, Proceedings of the Vii Congress of the International Association for Quaternary Research. 7. (Yale University Press, 1967): pp. 1143.Google Scholar
Gastaldo, R., DiMichele, W., Pfefferkorn, H.. Out of the Icehouse into the Greenhouse: A Late Paleozoic Analog for Modern Global Vegetational Change. GSA TODAY. 1996;6(10).Google Scholar
Maslin, M.. The Climatic Rollercoaster, in: Fagan, B., editor, The Complete Ice Age. (Thames and Hudson, 2009): pp. 6291.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. D., Adams, A., Zasoski, R. J.. Disturbance Patterns and Forest Development in a Recently Deglaciated Valley in the Northwestern Cascade Range of Washington, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 1985;15(1):221–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C. D.. Mitigating Anthropocene Influences in Forests in the United States, in Sample, V. A., Bixler, R. P., Miller, C., editors, Forest Conservation in the Anthropocene. (University Press of Colorado, 2016): pp. 99111.Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., Abell, R., et al. The Biodiversity of Species and Their Rates of Extinction, Distribution, and Protection. Science. 2014;344(6187):1246752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sample, V. A., Bixler, R. P., Miller, C.. Forest Conservation in the Anthropocene. (University Press of Colorado, 2016).Google Scholar
Carroll, A. L., Taylor, S. W., Régnière, J., Safranyik, L., editors. Effect of Climate Change on Range Expansion by the Mountain Pine Beetle in British Columbia. In Mountain Pine Beetle Symposium: Challenges and Solutions, October 3031, 2003; (Natural Resources Canada, 2003).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×