Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Access
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: March 2011

26 - Values in global health governance

    • Send chapter to Kindle

      To send this chapter to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Available formats
      ×

      Send chapter to Dropbox

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Available formats
      ×

      Send chapter to Google Drive

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Available formats
      ×

Summary

Introduction

Over the past several decades, political conflicts, economic volatility and large-scale cultural and social changes have strongly influenced not only global health problem and solution frameworks, but the very way we conceive of global health as a public good. As politicians, business people and cultural elites employ the language of global health to shape discourse and policies focused on displaced and migratory peoples, they have perhaps unwittingly broadened the classic public health agenda. As a consequence, that agenda now includes violence and its traumatic consequences, the health (and mental health) impact of natural and social catastrophes, other health-related problems from obesity to substance abuse, and the effect of pharmaceutical and digital technology innovations not previously considered to be core public health issues. They expand and reformulate the traditional spheres of public health, and challenge classic public health values.

As a result, debates shaping global health research, ethics, policy and programs have developed along two parallel tracks. One can be characterized as a neo-liberal approach combining economics (liberalization of trade and financing; new mechanisms for product development for diseases of poverty involving public–private partnerships; cost-effectiveness analysis), disease-specific and biotechnology programs and security concerns. The other has focused on human rights, social justice and equity frameworks with a broader, more inclusive model of the determinants of health. This perspective calls for a transformation of the current fractured system of global health governance into a transparent and accountable system, better equipped to address the world's global health agendas.

References
,American Public Health Association (APHA) (2002). Principles of the Ethical Practice of Public Health, Version 2.2. Washington, DC: Public Health Leadership Society, APHA.
Angell, M. (1997). The ethics of clinical research in the Third World. New England Journal of Medicine 337, 847–849.
Benatar, S. R. (2002). Some reflections and recommendations on research ethics in developing countries. Social Science and Medicine 54(7), 1131–1141.
Benatar, S. R., Lister, G. & Thacker, S. C. (2010). Values in global health governance. Global Public Health 5(2), 143–153.
Feierman, S., Kleinman, A., Stewart, K. A., Farmer, P. E. & Das, V. (2010). Anthropology, knowledge-flows, and global health. Global Public Health 5(2), 122–128.
,Global Forum for Health Research (GFHR)www.globalforumhealth.org/About/10–90-gap (Accessed January 21, 2010).
IJsselmuiden, C. B., Kass, N. E., Sewankambo, N. & Lavery, J. V. (2010). Evolving values in ethics and global health research. Global Public Health 5(2), 154–163.
Kim, J., Rhatigan, J., Jain, S. & Porter, M. E. (2010). From a declaration of values to the creation of value in global health: a report from Harvard University's Global Health Delivery Project. Global Public Health 5(2), 181–188.
McGahan, A. & Keusch, G. T. (2010). Economic valuations in global health. Global Public Health 5(2), 136–142.
Palamountain, K., Stewart, K. A., Krauss, A., Diermeier, D. & Kelso, D. (2010). University leadership in global health and HIV/AIDS diagnostics. Global Public Health 5(2), 189–196.
Renne, E. (2006). Perspectives on polio and immunuization in northern Nigeria. Social Science and Medicine 63(7), 1857–1869.
Shapiro, K. & Benatar, S. R. (2005). HIV prevention research and global inequality: towards improved standards of care. Journal of Medical Ethics 31, 39–47.
Stewart, K. A. & Sewankambo, N. (2010). Okukkera Ng'omuzungu (lost in translation): understanding the social value of global health research for HIV/AIDS research participants in Uganda. Global Public Health 5(2), 164–180.
Stewart, K. A., Kleinman, A. & Keusch, G. T. (2010). Introduction: values and moral experiences in global health: bridging the local and the global. Global Public Health 5(2), 115–121.
,World Bank (1993). The World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health. Washington, DC: World Bank.
,World Trade Organization (WTO)www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_01_e.htm (Accessed January 21, 2010).
Yang, A. T., Farmer, P. E. & McGahan, A. M. (2010) “Sustainability” in global health. Global Public Health 5(2), 129–135.