Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T16:18:51.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Conclusions

options for effective climate governance beyond 2012

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Frank Biermann
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Philipp Pattberg
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Fariborz Zelli
Affiliation:
Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik
Frank Biermann
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Philipp Pattberg
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Fariborz Zelli
Affiliation:
Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The diversity of the contributions to this volume illustrates the complexity of the challenge. Climate change is a governance problem that needs to be analysed, and addressed, at multiple levels, in multiple sectors, and with a view to multiple actors. In searching for policy options that go beyond current negotiations, the contributions thus addressed issues as diverse as international carbon markets, overlaps between the climate convention and world trade law, the role of non-state actors in technological change, climate refugees, or the vulnerability of the poorest of the poor. The chapters approached these issues from a variety of methodological approaches, showing that the governance challenge of global climate change can be framed very differently.

In light of this complexity, this book did not seek to present a silver bullet for future climate governance. An all-inclusive and perfectly coherent account of policy options would be neither feasible nor would it be desirable given the diversity of interests, perspectives and issues. As Einstein reportedly advised, it is important to simplify a problem to the extent possible – but not more. Instead of applying a structural straitjacket, this book thus offers a broad array of policy options organized under the three research themes of architecture, agency and adaptation. We summarize these options now in Sections 19.2–19.4. Finally, in Section 19.5 we map the policy options according to their political dimensions and institutional settings, illustrating their differences but also the opportunities for joint negotiation and implementation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012
Architecture, Agency and Adaptation
, pp. 306 - 323
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asselt, H. van 2007. ‘From UN-ity to diversity? The UNFCCC, the Asia-Pacific Partnership and the future of international law on climate change’, Carbon and Climate Law Review 1: 17–28.Google Scholar
Asselt, H. van and Biermann, F. 2007. ‘European emissions trading and the international competitiveness of energy-intensive industries: a legal and political evaluation of possible supporting measures’, Energy Policy 35: 497–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benecke, G., Friberg, L., Lederer, M. and Schröder, M. 2008. From Public–Private Partnership to Market: The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) as a New Form of Governance in Climate Protection, SFB Governance Working Paper Series 10. Berlin: Sonderfor\schungsbereich (SFB).Google Scholar
Biermann, F. and Brohm, R. 2005. ‘Implementing the Kyoto Protocol without the United States: the strategic role of energy tax adjustments at the border’, Climate Policy 4: 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., Chan, S. and Mert, A. 2007. Partnerships for Sustainable Development: An Appraisal Framework, Global Governance Working Paper No. 31. Amsterdam: The Global Governance Project.Google Scholar
Boeters, S., den Elzen, M. G. J., Manders, T., Veenendaal, P. and Verweij, G. 2007. Post-2012 Climate Change Scenarios, MNP Report No. 51001004007. Bithoven, The Netherlands: Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP).Google Scholar
Börzel, T. A. and Risse, T. 2005. ‘Public–private partnerships: effective and legitimate tools of international governance’, in Grande, E. and Pauly, L. W. (eds.), Reconstructing Political Authority: Complex Sovereignty and the Foundations of Global Governance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 195–216.Google Scholar
de Bruin, K. C., Dellink, R. B. and Agrawala, S. 2009. Economic Aspects of Adaptation to Climate Change: Integrated Assessment Modelling of Adaptation Costs and Benefits. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckersley, R. 2004. ‘The big chill: the WTO and multilateral environmental agreements’, Global Environmental Politics 4: 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, P. M, Kanie, N. and Murphy, C. N. 2004. ‘Conclusion: institutional design and institutional reform for sustainable development’, in Kanie, N. and Haas, P. M. (eds.), Emerging Forces in Environmental Governance. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 263–281.Google Scholar
Hinkel, J., Bisaro, S., Downing, T. E., Hofmann, M. E., Lonsdale, K., Mcevoy, D. and Tàbara, J. D. 2010 (in press). ‘Learning to adapt: narratives of decision makers adapting to climate change’, in Hulme, M. and Neufeldt, H. (eds.), Making Climate Change Work for Us: European Perspectives on Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC 2007a. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC 2007b. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kanie, N. 2008. ‘Towards diffused climate change governance: a possible path to proceed after 2012’, in Grover, V. I. (ed.), Global Warming and Climate Change: Ten Years after Kyoto and Still Counting. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers, pp. 977–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, K. and Bulkeley, H. 2009. ‘Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: governing climate change through transnational municipal networks’, Journal of Common Market Studies 47: 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R. J. T. and Persson, A. 2008. Financing Adaptation to Climate Change: Issues and Priorities, ECP Report No. 8. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Kolk, A., Levy, D. and Pinske, J. 2008. ‘Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: the institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure’, European Accounting Review 17: 719–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, E. 2008. ‘Global governance and adaptation to climate change for food security’, in Zelli, F. (ed.), Integrated Analysis of Different Possible Portfolios of Policy Options for a Post-2012 Architecture, ADAM Project report No. D-P3a.2b. Norwich, UK: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, pp. 143–153.Google Scholar
Mechler, R., Aaheim, A., Hochrainer, S., Kundzewicz, Z., Linnerooth-Bayer, J. and Lugeri, N. 2010. ‘A risk management approach to assessing adaptation to extreme weather events in Europe’, in Hulme, M. and Neufeldt, H. (eds.), Making Climate Change Work for Us: European Perspectives on Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.Google Scholar
Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H. and Schroeder, H. 2009. ‘Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the international regime’, Global Environmental Politics 9: 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, K. and Victor, D. G. 2004. ‘The regime complex for plant genetic resources’, International Organization 58: 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieth, L., Zimmer, M., Hamann, R. and Hanks, J. 2007. ‘The UN Global Compact in sub-Sahara Africa: decentralization and effectiveness’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 7: 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J. G. 2004. ‘Reconstituting the global public domain: issues, actors, practices’, European Journal of International Relations 10: 499–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thynne, I. 2008. ‘Climate change, governance and environmental services: institutional perspectives, issues and challenges’, Public Administration and Development 28: 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNFCCC 2007. Climate Change: Impacts, Vulnerabilities and Adaptation in Developing Countries. Bonn: Climate Change Secretariat. .Google Scholar
World Bank 2006. Clean Energy and Development: Towards an Investment Framework. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zelli, F. 2007. ‘The World Trade Organization: free trade and its environmental impacts’, in Thai, K. V., Rahm, D. and Coggburn, J. D. (eds.), Handbook of Globalization and the Environment. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 177–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×