Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:25:57.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

42 - The Shavian tradition

from PART VI - RECEPTION AND AFTERLIFE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

John A. Bertolini
Affiliation:
Middlebury College, Vermont
Brad Kent
Affiliation:
Université Laval, Québec
Get access

Summary

The idea of a Shaw tradition only works if conceived of in large terms: seeing Shaw in a continuum with Ibsen as restoring seriousness to dramatic literature, engaging the issues people confront when they come into conflict with organised society or with their own needs and desires. In that sense, all plays subsequent to Ibsen and Shaw that enact the conflicts between the individual and system belong in a continuum with the founders. But there is no school of Shaw: he has no direct descendants; no playwright has been able to reproduce the exact mixture of nineteenth-century theatrical modes and character types, a musical rhetoric of monologue and dialogue that astonishes the audience through its energy and stylisation, the continual subversion of the audience's assumptions and expectations, the playing with ideas that range from provocative to outlandish, and the capacity to make debate dramatically compelling – all under the umbrella of the structures and habits of classic comedy and an unmatched geniality of humour. Rather, Shaw has produced heirs to the riches of his dramatic model. He writes plays too idiosyncratically to be imitable.

When someone tries to imitate Shaw, as Noel Coward tried to imitate You Never Can Tell with The Young Idea, he fails to become Shaw's adopted child. Shaw reacted by urging – actually by ordering – Coward never to read or see another Shaw play but to become himself. It was Neil Simon who pinpointed the true inheritance Shaw offered to his heirs. In recounting the process of writing his play of mixed success, The Star Spangled Girl, Simon attributed the play's failings to his not having heeded what he had learned about playwriting from Shaw: ‘Make your protagonist and antagonist equal adversaries, so that the audience was always in doubt as to who was right and who was wrong’.

Shaw had enunciated the principle that he adhered to in the Epistle Dedicatory to Man and Superman, where he wrote about his characters’ opinions: ‘They are all right from their several points of view; and their points of view are, for the dramatic moment, mine also’ (CPP II: 517). Shaw goes on to assert that a playwright must not assume that he views life from ‘an absolutely right point of view’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertolini, John A., ed. Shaw and Other Playwrights: SHAW 13 (1993).
Hodgson, Terry. Modern Drama From Ibsen to Fugard. London: B. T. Batsford, 1992.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Andrew. Six Dramatists in Search of a Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Weintraub, Stanley. ‘Eugene O'Neill: The Shavian Dimension’, SHAW 18 (2008): 45–62.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The Shavian tradition
  • Edited by Brad Kent, Université Laval, Québec
  • Book: George Bernard Shaw in Context
  • Online publication: 05 October 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107239081.044
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The Shavian tradition
  • Edited by Brad Kent, Université Laval, Québec
  • Book: George Bernard Shaw in Context
  • Online publication: 05 October 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107239081.044
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The Shavian tradition
  • Edited by Brad Kent, Université Laval, Québec
  • Book: George Bernard Shaw in Context
  • Online publication: 05 October 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107239081.044
Available formats
×